Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E
Showing posts with label # Bilderbergers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label # Bilderbergers. Show all posts

Monday 15 June 2020

Play Cards Against This, And...

You will lose.

Of course, many governments, many of these so-called 'elites' are playing cards; that's exactly what they are doing.

Anyway, humans are humans, right? They'll just all go on doing what they always ever have done.
Oh, what is this?

The thing that occupies the discussions among astro-physicists and cosmologists when it comes to 'the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life' - apart from clever things that the Kepler Space Telescope (a craft) could do like record the periodic diminishing levels of light from nearby stars which indicated that 'Earth-like' planets were crossing the visual field in front of the particular star... ...the thing they talk about is the fact that super advanced Extraterrestrial civilizations would need to have found a way to send data back in time. And this is because that is the only mechanism our scientists can see - or maybe the best mechanism they can see - that provides some kind of bridge to faster-than-light travel. Information - or 'data' - if you look at it in terms of the pulse function ('wave function') of light, may be able to recruit energy and subsequently mass and also organize it. I mean, we are talking seriously huge numbers and quanta here, it's beyond my state-of-mind even to bother trying to actually 'think' about. Jesus, if you want to look at gravity as having some kind of Doppler properties then you are talking about a medium that goes right through and all the way round and round and round the whole entire Universe all at once.

Ouch, my head hurts.

Anyway, we don't need to think about that stuff!
Dunno... Double Delta?
Two heat sources
coming together?

Of course, almost all of the genius-level physicists' discussions all end with the 'we haven't found any indication of anyone having sent any data back in time...'

So. You only need to have found one of those...

Because if you find one, as in really do find one that is not able to be dismissed in any way at all, and is in fact able to be tested positively, then it's not a 'singularity,' it's the breach that alters the 'skeptic hypothesis' for everything (which is our present 'genius-level' human approach) - and starts to afford itself the opportunity to take the 'political hypothesis' approach instead.

If all of us here just all admit that we are maybe not that important in the vast scheme of things - that we, us, are maybe not entitled to engage anyone from some hugely advanced futuristic alien civilization and get them to expend however much huge sums of whatever they need to recruit to the task, to 'make space-ships appear' or send two or three interplanetary visitors over materially just to hold our hands and go 'there, there...'

Nevertheless, the easiest, cheapest (in terms of whatever protocols and energy spend is involved - which must be simply huge) way to get things to us, is to send data.

Now I'm only 'taking a step back' from absolute disclosure because I don't know what plans people have that have plans, and also who have the power; I don't know what they want to do. What I do know, is - going back to the - exo-biologists/cosmologists - that they have a 'parallel stepping' hypothesis. This says that as we, we humans, progress with our own technology and science understandings by ourselves, then equivalently, other civilizations may engage at the equivalent technology level and not much beyond it.

It really is only the 'back sending' of data that is our big hurdle at the moment and it may be that CERN has gone at least enough of the way, that 'help' could be rendered more meaningfully in that 'parallel stepping' protocol. Except, let's at least be somewhat modest and say, not to us individually particularly. Right?

Right?! Because that's the 'stance' we take. 

If anybody asks you, you just say 'no no no, not me, IDK. I'm just guessing and I just heard rumors.'

On the other hand, if someone comes to you with a 'sign' then you know - well, at least you'll know how to read the sign.

There's all kind of 'static' - all kinds of nonsense and socially irresponsible stuff that goes on with any large social groupings and the instigators of things inside there. For instance, green colored shawls 'could' be an indication of someone who takes, trades, or wants marijuana. That's pretty straightforward.

And I guess those guys would not realize that the Office of National Drug Control Policy has had people inside of festivals and concerts at least for the last seven months now - so let's not alert them either, okay.

A big tip for those of you here who haven't already decided to stick their fingers in their ears now, is to 'right click' on any pic and 'Google search for image' and then just see what is associated with those pics.

Naturally, because you have been raised and effectively completely brainwashed in the 'skeptical hypothesis' approach and not the political hypothesis approach, you won't - you still won't believe what you are seeing.

However there are, at this moment a good half a dozen people who emailed privately and by now if any of them wanted to dispute what they were shown, I'm sure they would have comment-posted by now.

I love this phrase, that seems to be something from our modern era of 'phoneglish' and post-Millennial speak:

It is what it is.

It is what it is. 

Here's that song 'Arrowhead' again.





Sunday 24 May 2020

All The Caveats

It has been thus for centuries, not just the last few years - that people claiming to be 'Satanists' form either secret groups, or less secret ones though still inclined to be secretive.

Now their clear-cut direction is to counter often hide-bound institutionalized doctrine and dogma in a society, basically by deliberate transgression of all the taboos of those hide-bound doctrinal systems. If such groups have written manifestos, they usually even outright announce this is what they are doing: 'God doesn't exist,' 'let's have a black mass and do everything backwards and upside down,' 'let's have a lot of sex...' 'Let's break the rules...' Whatever...
Alex Jones outside of the Bilderberger's one time. He's
a big strong man. Some people say he's 'controlled opposition.'
He's not. He's one big strong tough guy.

In modern popular conspiracy theory therefore, you have the symbolism of the 'all-seeing eye,' '666,' and various other presumed or proclaimed 'Lucifer/Satan' symbolism - and regardless of what actual real technical definitions learned people can find for the words and the terms themselves, we all have a rough enough idea of what people generally intend to mean - and these symbols are seen everywhere especially anywhere that someone is being marketed as 'successful.' 

I know - as do you - a number of self-identifying atheists, and those I know for the most part are among the least underhanded people I know!

When you get up into the circles of the big money successful people, the whole scene is littered with fairy tales of one side accusing the other of 'being in league with the Devil,' or maybe even being the Devil himself - as in the case for example, of the LA music producer Dr Luke. Of course, these identities do nothing to dissuade people from thinking along these lines anyway; it's good for the profile, good for business, and serves to scare enough of the credulous away so that they can indeed dominate the scene like a demon!

There were FBI uncovered cases of fraud and blackmail and drugging, going on many years ago, by the family of the late Baby Doc Duvalier extorting money from the wives of prominent New York people. So you have different types of 'sinister' themes in upper levels of society - there is the manipulative that is more to do with marketing, and then there is the extortionate much more actively aggressive type of thing too.

Neither of them are activities necessarily pursued by people who actually believe in anything 'unseen but yet preternaturally powerful.'
James Sherwood bespoke tailoring

There are atheists who have rational skepticism and thus 'don't believe things they cannot self-demonstrate adequately.'

With our modern scientific knowledge we can consider things like Palinopsia (lingering optical after-image), and certain disorders of the fusiform gyrus some of which provoke dysfunctional perceptions about people and objects, others of which make the sufferer actually feel what the other person they are looking at appears to be feeling. There are studies clearly demonstrating placebo and nocebo effects.

Scientifically one is able to make many discriminating assessments about observed cause and effect.

We don't need to ascribe all that many unusual things to 'Jinns' or 'demons!' Anymore...

Well, though alas I suppose, because this has severely cut our opportunities to find employment as 'exorcists.' lol 

But while I am going to tell you that Katy Perry is not 'in the Illuminati' - at least not any kind of Illuminati you need to be all that worried about - there are nonetheless people who self-declare one thing on the surface (for instance, that they are atheists; don't believe in god), and behind a veil they absolutely do believe in unseen powers, powers that they intend to exploit for their own benefit and advantage over you. The FBI has such things on file, and so do many other agencies that gather quiet intelligence on what people do behind closed doors.

Just recently the senior judges in the UK raised a lot of objection when it was proposed that their robes and regalia should be updated. If you want to find a real 'Illuminati' secret cadre doing weird bizarre things, you need look not much further than say Ede & Ravenscroft in London, where they make judges' robes and regalia. It's all a bit like Milich's shop in EWS, really.
New designs for UK judges' robes

Do any of those people actually believe they can engage with hidden, unseen, and quite sinister forces and powers by doing strange peculiar rituals, using special magical words, and chanting? I mean they actually do those things, but do they seriously believe in some kind of unseen realm that genuinely exists?

Now.... If I had been listening to and transcribing - because you know, machines can't do it, especially not things like interpreting English idiom and accent - endless 'tapes' of intercepted behind-closed-doors talk for hours and hours on end, well I would tell you things you simply would not believe. And even we have to sit back and consult top line psychologists who, despite all their advice about how ritual, especially religious ritual, engages exactly those parts of the fusiform gyrus where neural disorders and dysfunctions are to be located that involve hallucinatory experiences - well we have to consult these guys just to check ourselves that we haven't all run away with the plate into the forest ourselves sometimes! 'Taking a run in the forest' is a phrase in some Eastern European places which means you have taken leave of your senses.

Later tonight, here, something more fun, and less dour and dismal in outlook.