Sinister And Occult And Deeply Dangerous

I've had to think very carefully about this article... I've had to think a lot about choosing words carefully.

Firstly because I certainly do not believe making sweeping generalizations are appropriate to expressing my own thoughts on the matter. Of course, I could, like anyone casually expressing a gut reaction or 'feeling' or superficial impression - make sweeping generalizations!

This is a 'two pipe problem,'
this one!

But I'm not going to.

But then I'm also a bit stuck too, because we are positioned in a world in which 'standard definitions' for words, and common beliefs about what some old writings say - are not the same as my own understandings concerning them. So I don't know, and I'm not sure whether readers here really share similar understandings.

For example... Every church in the whole entire world is convinced there is a word 'fornication' in the Bible, Old and New Testaments. I mean, yes, there is in most translations into English, however after all the thing was not originally composed in English and Hebrew was not a written language at the proposed or presumed time of Moses and indeed there were no modern grammatical forms of written Hebrew even at the time the original Septuagint was actually written down.

So... So... Where does that leave me...

Well... The original Greek word, and the proto-god-only-knows-what - Sumerian? Sanskrit? - or the primitive Aramaic word... ...is 'ekporneuo.' 'Ekporneuo' does not mean 'fornication' - in fact so much so were early translators aware that it does not, that they notated their simplistic truncated (though final textual) translations with the phrase: 'give themselves over to fornication...' So what we have is the translators really saying this tautology - 'fornication (being the word we settled on) means 'give oneself over to er, er... ...fornication.'

A meaningless exposition, frankly.

No. It does not mean 'fornication.'

Thus, according to me and pretty much no one else, even if there were 'Watchers' or 'Fallen Angels,' who 'fell' (there were not any of those things; not in the original texts, not in reality, not at any time in history ancient, deep past, or now, or ever) their problem was not that they 'committed fornication.' Their 'sin' (and again, there is no word 'sin' originally, and certainly not as is commonly understood today as a word cast about in every church).

If you want to see someone go into a supernatural trance,
have a look at Kristian Nairn's 'trance DJ set' on YouTube.
Nairn is the actor who plays 'Hodor' in GOT, and he's also a
very good DJ.  

No. They 'exceeded all satisfactions of greed and lust even to the point past barbaric vandalism (of course, 'vandalism' not a word at that time).' Ekporneuo. And that has a 'subtle' (not!) meaning beyond simple unlicensed sex.

There is no passage in the Bible in which Sodom and Gomorrah were obliterated because of gay sex or homosexuality. No indeed, for once again, it is for 'ekporneuo' - and in fact worse; they were about to violently rape certain unusual-looking strangers under the protection of Lot.

There are many words used by Jesus Christ which have all been translated as a bulk job lot as 'sin,' but they have very very complex and subtle nuances of meaning with very important implications: the words are 'be defeated,' 'not be ideal,' 'not perfectly beautiful,' 'sinister with cunning,' 'not in the divinely perfect way...'

But no single word 'sin.' Nowhere. Not ever. Ever. Period.

So which 'Jesus' are any of you listening to? The guy that fell down in the last shower of rain at a local church on your television? Or the guy who may have lived, might have lived, and according to some did not even live, albeit at least we can all agree - the actual chronologically original 'Jesus Christ?!' ...of the texts from more or less around that time in question?

So what then is the problem, if any, with transgender anything, or perhaps, with the present political agenda that I have termed it deep and dark and occult and utterly dangerous?

Well, I can tell you my own thoughts let's say, as pitched to maybe an actual transgender person - what does going too far mean to your mind, to your sensitivities about other human beings, about your friends and neighbors...? For all I know you might be some alien hybrid, or just plain alien (ET) who is legitimately needful of gender re-assignment surgical intervention. I don't know. And I don't care, since for one thing I am neither a medical doctor, nor a surgeon, nor any kind of professional psychologist; those guys form part of the fabric of ordinary society - I do not - and that's all of you guys' business, not mine. If they have some factual basis of reason to do something well, that's that as far as I'm concerned, and if they do not - then they go too far pretending to a knowledge and powers they do not have.

So here's another thing you will not read or hear anywhere else... I'm sure you have heard it said that somewhere in the Bible, someone said that 'the Seat of Satan is in Pergamon (Turkey).'

You've heard me say this before - the gods love puns and plays on words.

Okay so the people referred to in the infamous passages in the Book of Enoch and also in the mainstream canonical Bible were never called 'Watchers;' maybe they did do 'watching' but they were not specifically named 'Watchers.' They were described as, and named 'Gegenes.' You see there's 'homogenes,' and there's 'heterogenes,' and there's 'gegenes.'

A big tall individual - well over six foot tall.
I think by name 'Gena...?'

And the Gegenes were so terribly excessive in their strength, and in lusts and in their lack of compassion (mostly, not all of them) that they were able to do whatever they wanted, and they were eventually cannibals, and highly destructive of animals and men and even forests and trees (so the story goes). And when they died out (don't worry for what reason) some occultists were able to invoke their deceased spirits and have them in-dwell living people bred to accommodate their power (nephesh-philim: 'Nephilim') and so they were great warriors, great athletes, great 'beings' and did all kinds of extravagant things.

If you mess around using certain highly toxic drugs (and of course the US Military research units are already a long way up this road), you can fiddle with the Sella Turcica (Turkish Seat) which ensconces and usually circumscribes how much endocrine activity and flow can come from the pituitary, and you can 'create' gigantism or acromegaly and those subjects will start to have extended ranges of vision ('see' things which do not appear there to the rest of us), off-the-scale rage and anger potential, and immense strength and stamina and the ability to withstand pain.

There are plenty of 'gentle giants' around and there always have been. And there are even these 'gegenes' who will do you no harm.

Those are not the guys we are worried about. The guys I'm worried about are the 'poniria' - the ones who are sinisterly cunning. And the ones that are incredibly organised.