This is going to be difficult and I cannot post everything there is about it.
In fact I will only outline one node of the three that pertain to this face of a hypothetical 'dynamic pyramidion.'
Let's say your have a triangle, at whose points there are 'nodes' which are active principles that are polarities: this v that.
The one we are going to consider is the polarity of 'Position versus Opposition.'
Now we have to take this in context of an ancient myth about three - or even four in some respects - fundamental 'rulers' of particular planes of existence: Hades has the Underworld, Ogenos and/or Poseidon (Leviathan/Taninim Gedol) the 'Ocean' (which really means the turbulent Chaos), and the Celestial realm which is ruled by Zeus, and the Earth is 'common to all.'
There's your problem - 'common to all.'
Well see, but we're here.
Shouldn't this be our place?
So... 'Common to all,' or - contested space, indeed contested people?
I am going to have to go a little bit into one of the other node concepts, which is, that, as David R. Hawkins says, there is a 'field effect' going on... Everywhere.
We are in a field. ...Means electro-magnetic field containing lots and lots of field fluxes and information (data).
The process of taking - drawing - people up or down to this place or that, in the intellectual mindset sense, is by the process of opposition.
Say you are living in a calm, peaceful and pleasant kingdom, and then I come along and destabilize the place, turning things upside down, instigating all kinds of chaos and after a while you might get the mistaken idea that the 'science' of riding turbulent waves and being able to accept constant 'change' (where have you heard that before?) is the way to handle life as a basic principal of life itself...
All quiet at Thunderbird HQ tonight... |
You have been drawn away from one template - one of stability and quietness - to another one of chaos, turbulence and strife.
And then after a very short while, you lose all agency(lol!), and sense of personal power in your own place, forgetting in what your power lay - and start to concern yourself with the demands and the edicts of the lords of turbulence and chaos.
But you have a source of real power, and if you just stuck your hand onto it, you could exert that power against the interloper in your place and throw him/them out and do so quite easily.
Now when you yourself actually turn water into wine, you will stop this nonsense of asking, perpetually asking the same damn question. Because I can guess what many here are thinking next.
Anyhew...
Hollywood are completely implicated in this, and it is occult, and sinister. These guys are not 'imaging' stuff, making things up and 'being creative!' They are driven by the intentions of minds behind the forces of rule and control in the world, and for some of the time, the objective is to mischievously divert your attention away from something super important, and direct your attention to a false fabrication of that thing, a simulacrum.
But it is not only Hollywood that does it. If I stick a sword at your throat and say 'cube cube cube - here here here,' after a while everyone thinks this is the cube, then no one will think to look anywhere else for any other cube.
So today, the China people are going up to the Moon to 'see' some cube that seems to be there (there is no cube there as you know).
But still - your mind turns to there.
Muslims go - 'kaaba.'
Hollywood's 'Independence Day Resurgence' has a substantial plot element of some 'cube' or 'box' on the Moon inside of which there is some kind of glowing AI thing that wants to, intended to, 'rescue some humans' and take them to a safe place away from these violent deadly 'Harvester' Aliens who come here around whom the whole bang swoosh CGI 'action' rubbish scenes of the film then revolve.
The movie says 'AI...'
The ET Aliens want it too. The 'Queen' Harvester wants it and she is prepared to battle to the death for it.
In the end (of the movie) a handful of humans prevail and they take and keep the AI glowing thing-y.
So... That thing-y never took anyone away, actually; you will notice.
The essential wrap-up, though, if you go by 'pop culture' (and I include all of Islam in that statement) - is that the intelligent thing inside some box is only AI, and that the box is either 'on the Moon' or in Mecca (and any other of a number of permutations of the same deceptions).
There is absolutely no one you know, that has ever stuck their hand (I'm just being metaphorical here) in the Yemeni Corner of the Black Cube -, who suddenly had gold appearing in their pockets! The process by which MBS and his predecessors have been receiving their wealth is via the good offices of the UK government and the US Saudi-Aramco partnership agreement backed by an American gun at the Saudis' heads.
And listen hey, if the Russians and the Americans and the China people really thought that 'cube' on the Moon could do the same thing...
No cube there. Especially no 'magic cube.'
Thunderbird drinking coffee. Well, holding it at least. |
Let's say though, you could find the magic cube.
Oh man, would they try and stop you.
If your position, is drawn up to the safe, the perfect, and the powerful - then your life as a simple human is over. You are no longer contested space.
'Cubes' are like distributed nodes of access to something, and they are all over the material Universe. Stanley Kubrick says, remember. LOL
We'll get five, ten, people here eventually, to stick their hands on 'the cube,' the real one (or obelisk whatever). Will be a lot of opposition about it too. But we'll prevail and then that'll be that, as they say.
Not a hugely catchy melody but still -, good lyrics and she has a great voice in its own 'elfish' way.
(I'm real pleased with this post btw, just sayin').
Okay. so you conspiracy folks, and I don't really know who I'm speaking to so whatever, but you can frame up the question of agency as relating to "an interloper."
ReplyDeleteBachelard speaks of the "casting out" of the child from the home into the world, at which point one starts to form all sorts of ideas about what one should do, and who one should be, which are fed to us through experience with the broader world. Agency is constrained.
You can't just choose to be whoever you like, well you can try, but the journey from where you are to where you might like to be is difficult. "Imagine you are a character in a movie" is advice I've heard someone tell me worked well for them. She was incidentally a member of the class of people you might call "privileged" and yet she struggled with this issue constantly.
To LEARN a thing, a new thing, is to change your self. You could imagine moving a satellite through various orbits, with constraints on its motion defined by gravitational fields of nearby planets and moons. The journey is not easy.
You've said here "I know of a thing, you place your hands on it and you can move around now with ease." At least that's what I'm reading.
You've also talked about "Against the Pollution of the I" and in it Lusseyran insists that "immediate cognition" is a thing that is real.
Of course this is all very fictional because everyone knows you can't "see" with your eyes shut.
So yeah, you can talk about a source of power one could "touch" and be like a satellite that can move about without consideration for the gravitational constraints of the large objects scattered around him. Unless I'm not understanding you and then you should threaten to ban me or accuse me of twisting your words in service to some evil beast like the great google.
I'm noticing some of these words get pushed around in "mainstream media" a bit more lately. Myabe just me. But last night's episode of Star Trek Discovery had the new captain saying "I must respect your agency" to a person who had been confined to a prison for decades. Also there is a cute one on amazon now called "alienated" which uses the word "synchronicity" about a gazillion times.
DeleteOh no no. You are very VERY far from being banned here right now. You'e been making not only a lot of sense but adding considerable to the overall knowledge set. We don't make enough money here yet to ask for contributing PAID writers! But it could happen.
ReplyDeleteWhat you are saying here now has to be addressed - you are spot on anyway: I was 'begging the question,' as it were!
Can you actually 'see' with your eyes shut... Hmn. Well, let me see, sorry 'think.' Someone here was commenting is the vegvisir symbol tainted? No, I don't believe it is. And so, we'll adopt it; why not.
Now listen, let's make some money right?
Which means let's just be a touch careful know about what we say too openly about this from here on in. But you are 100% spot on. I made 'claims;' these must be proven.
And by 'proven' I mean not 'demonstrated' a la oh hey unusual floods and storms and other things, but actual logical meaningfully connected steps in some process that gets somewhere.
DeleteMarvel's "Cosmic Cube" - predictive programming, or merely a literary exploitation of an archetype?
ReplyDelete"The Cosmic Cube is a fictional object appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics. There are multiple Cubes in the Marvel Universe, all of which are depicted as containment devices that can empower whoever wields them. Although the first version, introduced in Tales of Suspense #79 (July 1966) and created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, originated on Earth as a weapon built by Advanced Idea Mechanics, most are of alien origins." - Wikipedia
We are going to have to consider all of these things, next article...
ReplyDelete