Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Thursday, 2 July 2020

Why 72 Virgins...

So, Lesbian Jesus, right? That's the latest new 'amazing' stunt from Hollywood - although it is coming via the pretense of being an 'Indie' production. Starring Paris Jackson. Definitely not, Indie.

Well look, you cannot have it 'both ways' (LOL) - either God is All-Powerful, or God is not and has limited capabilities. As an exercise in exploring the themes of human moral agency, it is okay to consider the possibilities of a 'lesbian Jesus.' Albeit I would like to warn women of that inclination of gender political mind, that the world will still crucify you all the same, woman or not.
'Lesbian Jesus' is the Cosine of Radius 1,
if 'X.0' is the Axis origin. LOL
Why not? People say anything these days.

At this point I would like to alert those who have been reading here over recent times, that it is getting to the stage where it is necessary to distract, obscure, and maybe even deceive the mischievous and malevolent... And you know the funny thing is that those kinds of people will easily be led down the wrong paths, because they are seeking power and control themselves, and the means they always think this is to be had, is via 'data, facts and knowledge.'

You may recall a while back that I posted a GIF of a rolling axis, whose twin circles of differing radius nonetheless traced the exact same linear distance when 'rolled out' along the exact same straight track - intuitively, you would think the bigger circle would trace a different distance to the inner circle.

As we look at trigonometry, we see that in fact, wave amplitudes along frequency curves are really, the same thing as the radial distances of the circles we looked at previously in that other (the GIF) example. And so trigonometry simply calculates triangle side lengths and thus the ratios of related inner angles to side lengths. And in 3-D motion (well, that's I suppose 4-D because of the time component), this is all about wavelengths and frequencies, isn't it?

Christianity is not the only traditional religious system under fire from those interested in messing with the 'template' of social constructs we have been using for a long time. 

In Iraq today there is a noted Islamic scholar - Syed Sheikh Ahmed Al-Gubbanchi - who has utterly crashed through the modern Sunni dogma and previously accepted 'facts' about Islam and the Quran, and he has openly said both that the text used today is provably false, basically a forgery and a concoction made by political interests in successive iterations, and that there was something known as 'the Quran' and that it is not this thing around today.
Simple trigonometry - rotational vectors, linear forward.

But he will hit the same wall as indeed Christian scholars will too, when they point to various key passages of text -, which consists of people not really wanting to actually know the truth, even if it is of greater actual, real, even miraculous, benefit to them.

Let's just for 'thought experiment' purposes, take one seemingly completely absurd element - this thing about '72 virgins.' Another one of the current blazing riots going on in Islamic apologetics right now, is the qira'at translation of a word 'al barea' in the Quran. In one version of the written Quran, the word is 'al barea,' (the creation/creatures) and in another one, it is 'al bare/ah' (the innocent). Well look, I am going to say something no one else does say - this word is like the Latin-esque 'prima vera...' Vera. 'B' is often 'V' in many languages. It means the new, the new-born, the first of, and so on; also the purest of.

In geometry and in trigonometry, you can reverse an image, turn a shape around, and see it from a different angle.
EDM festival pashmina shawl

The standard thing in the old days of Christian churches, was that women were supposed to wear veils because they could distract 'angels' that were possibly in attendance there...

A normal human female, someone born and raised on this planet, is affected by a lot of 'life cycle' things, effects that are pertinent to this actual place, this location in Galactic space. Whereas someone from some distant place, even let's just say hypothetically, living on a 'Death Star' satellite somewhere relatively hidden in this solar system, will have no such habitual experience.

And by contrast we all know that men are often aggressive and transgressing, and this is due to the effects of various biochemical effects inside their normal biology - the concept of moral agency among humans is often just a question of how we mediate or modify natural predispositions of biochemistry.

Categorically, the Bible itself depicts 'otherwordly' beings as having the appearance of a rather feminine kind of beauty - but this contradicts, or stands in contradistinction to the idea that 'angels' are distracted and affected by female beauty, per se.

So if we turn the geometry of the narrative construct around, and look at its obverse - what if there are numerically more 'females' in Jannah, than 'males' on account of biochemistry and biochemical predisposition.
EDM festival gear

Every single commentator from out of the military research fields, who 'went mad and went rogue' and started to produce books and do seminars about the 'aliens' in Roswell, all say - all of them - that these aliens claim to be afraid or at least wary, of the aggressiveness of humans.

The other thing you may discover if you venture into any of the weird and whacky literature, is that the places that any human person are taken to interface with any of these alien groups parked not far off the planet - and there is plenty of written, virtual nonsense, really, about there ever having been some formal US military detachment of selected people 'sent' off-world to learn about technology or whatever - is that these places are virtually completely empty, and they also have a uniform 'white' or glaring, glowing, white color-scheme wherever they take the human personnel.

The reason there are '72' females to every '1' human male, is because this is a superficial effect of biochemistry and 'not-Earth' usual location for someone to be 'living.'

Now I certainly don't expect anyone to 'believe' any of what I am saying here. That would be silly of me. But I would just simply say, that all of the major 'books' of ancient history, especially religious or 'supernatural' narrative 'history,' consist of ideas of those who were trying to convey something, even where they were given extremely accurate explanations of what they were supposed to be looking at, and understanding - and what we tend to do today, what people have tended to do down through centuries, is re-interpret things according to our own immediate levels of science and cultural and social knowledge.
No comment, right?

You cannot break past the pure BS on-line, on places such as Wikipedia typically, and every other place that 'follows suit,' on subjects like the ideas, the language, writing, sounds of words, and their meanings too, and of course the mythology and religion, of ancient Sumeria - you will never get past or be permitted to go beyond Jordan Maxwell's magnetic (and wrong) interpretation about all of this, and the manifesto of popular entertainments like the movie 'Zeitgeist.'

The words 'Inanna,' 'Anunnaki,' and 'Ishtar' are actually in the New Testament... But they are nothing at all, like what people such as Jordan Maxwell, say they are or are meant to describe. And you will not be told what they mean in there, that is, in the Gospels and New Testament, in any modern-day exegesis either. They simply don't know, because - and you will appreciate this, logically - they are coming off the levels of social advancement and awareness, of the past; of past eras. You need to take things from a future perspective, not a past one.

Some of these words are actually in 'the Lord's Prayer.' I have one Russian language translator friend, who does work for the Kremlin now and then, and he has told me: 'You are utterly shameless, aren't you?' And then he described the distance apart in 'word meaning' as being like the valleys made by one's knuckles, and then the side of the wall in the living room, away!
Empty white rooms, Stanley? Yes?

He is wrong.

What I am showing you and telling you are things as best I can locate in generic pics off the internet, that are the exactly closest things to what you will see, if you were literally 'there' yourself. It is what it is.

And if you 'mark your course' according to the course beacons set by the kinds of things implicit in what I have been saying, you will suddenly discover every other thing rapidly falls into place.








No comments:

Post a Comment

Your considered comments are welcome