Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Tuesday 26 April 2022

The Imperfect Machine

So, I'm going to try and deal with two points raised by people much earlier, that somehow turned up in my emails late, but I never saw them as comments here first... Hmn. Elon, what are you doing? LOL

Or whoever. Prolly not Elon. Eric Schmidt and friends, maybe.

Will look at those two points while also finishing the 'Part Two' of this current segment here.

Actually the questions are linked with this whole matter anyway.

Vanilla souffle.

1.There is no 'UFO religion' as such (although, well that's arguable too), because there is a concerted scheme to stop people from realizing who and what ET Aliens are, with the added 'trick' of insisting Aliens are weird or ugly. They are not. And you know who you can listen to to comprehend why (not)? Ye olde Jordan Maxwell. He was straight onto it. He outright said that not only is it improbable that ugly beings can just seduce Earth women and thereby have offspring with them (as in the so-called 'Watchers' doing that), but that not only are they good-looking to women, but so are they to male homosexuals (ref, Sodom!). He has a crystal clear point of logic.

2. 'Hathor.' Hathor is an ancient Egyptian word for something, we say it is a 'goddess' but I say it is the term they were using to describe 'punnett square' breeding with other beings. It's very clear from the sequences of squares showing different colored cows, that this was all about breeding.

These matters, these things, be they the nature of 'Watchers' or just exactly who are the 'Sons of God' (B'nai Elohim), can only sit well with someone after a long time of just accepting the 'possibility' and then, as life unfolds and the conclusion is more and ever more logical and reliable in terms of what really does happen, then the realization becomes an existential truth rather than something that one can convey to a younger person. The trouble being with science, that it is not maths, but rapidly-witnessed causative and linear (including multi-linear) observation; and this does not accommodate reality at all! ...Whose existential time-arcs (reality's) are sometimes impossible to actually link together materially, even though scientists want to have it that they always do; they do not 'always do.' (You cannot determine what happens with that arced laser light whose proceeding front end out in space is traveling faster than light, right? Remember that thought experiment?).

Then again though, the Western Judaeo-Christian religions say not to 'worship' these foreign flesh beings - although the Vedas say you can if you penetrate into the 'god within.'

Beef short ribs. Yes. I know.
Sorry.

I always get into trouble with my expert linguists who chide me whenever I do this kind of thing, what I'm about to here again, but I do think that Plato was being quite literal when he talked about 'following most closely in their chariots in the train of the gods, and then at a point of rest, attending to temples in which the gods really were, in the form that they really are...' He meant it literally. He meant there is an ascending hierarchy of intelligent beings in the whole (material) Universe 'up there.'

Now there's only about a hundred or so people who come here and read consistently, so, I'm not going to get into too much trouble with what I am about to say here next. But I am going to tell you all now what the famous (infamous) 'Third Secret' is.

We cannot completely avert what is about to happen, although you can personally, more or less side-step the worst things. But you will never be able to help the rest of your families, your friends or anyone other than maybe, your own self. It's 'every man for himself.' It really is that now.

Worldwide plague, yeah we got that. Wars and weapons industries taking control of politics and the state, yeah we have that too. 

But I am going to divulge the 'Third Secret.' Right here, right now.

Can you tell what it is?

Go back to the very immediate last post here. Go to the very final verse of that poem...

What do you think about it? Sounds 'nice,' doesn't it? Anything deep in your gut though?

Was written in 2011, as I said before.

Or maybe like this...

Well this was written in 2004...

Re-read the last post and then come back and pose the question back to yourself - do you know what the 'Third Secret' is? Well, you are going to live to see it happen. Make sure you re-listen to the first track and then back-to-back this one. 

Worked it out yet?

Have a stab, go on. 

Anyone who is at all familiar with the surrounding guesses and also the various renditions of all of the 'Secrets' be they La Salette, or later, will already know about the 'and the Earth acts as if in revulsion...'

In revulsion about what...





 

  


 




8 comments:

  1. Well I liked your last post a lot, naturally. But regarding this "third secret" stuff, I read about that, and it's all Fatima and the stuff written on the paper, was it one piece or four? And as far as I'm concerned this always resembles some version of Elena Danaan and her "Thor Han asked me to tell you all that he does not have secret lovers among the women of earth."

    So yeah, maybe there's some cosmic geneticist out there who's about to cull the current generation of his experiment and redistribute the new material among the remaining populations like a kind of blessing.

    But who the hell knows, right? Oh yeah Malachi Martin. Eech.

    Elon, though. Now there's a guy who believes in hierarchies! He thinks the universe is a computer simulation and wonders about the "prior existing base reality." What a fool! Hierarchies! And it's gotta be all lions and bears at the top, naturally.

    Hey, ETs show up at my door spewing this bullshit and I'm going to tell them to vaporize me immediately.

    This is not "scientific arrogance." This is the simple perception that our fascination with hierarchies stems from a misconception about what agency is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Time for you to tell us - and Elon - what 'agency' is.

      Delete
    2. Yeah Right! Like I have something to teach that guy about agency and hierarchies. He runs three enormous companies at least.

      Delete
    3. I'm still keen to understand what you mean by 'agency.' Is it the idea that you have the power to do something on your own?

      Delete
    4. It's deeper than that, it has to do with "what is a particle?" In the situation where two people are in a room speaking to each other they each seem to know who is who, things "factor" nicely in that moment. But power is something else. There are situations where it isn't as clear who is who, ("Who beat Lee Sedol?") and yet power is still there moving through the situation.

      The ability to see yourself as being "on your own" is good, but it is a choice that is made. The power to do something for yourself, the power to have someone do something for you which you can't do alone, the power to do something by using a thing which others have made to do something. Machines.

      For me it is this "factoring out" of situations into neatly defined persons that feels "off" in terms of how power moves through and affects things as I see them.

      Delete
  2. Malachi Martin never told you the 'Third Secret.' I just did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is to say, I did say it, but in such a way that people could really work it out for themselves 'possibly.' I will actually specify it clearly soon.

      Delete

Your considered comments are welcome