LOL
No contest.
Besides I'm cheating.
So. ...I have to post this now because things are moving very fast.
The Ukrainian government, army, whatever - are constantly laying claim to every bit of stupid nonsense that they can but suddenly, they DAK on the helicopter strike on that fuel storage facility in Belgorod.
Darjeeling. Where Joanna Lumley hails from. |
Russian analysts themselves are leaning towards the idea that since the Ukraine army has virtually zero capacity to communicate between its various placements of troops because of the kinzhal missile attacks which took out the entire military communications installations all across the Ukraine - some senior officers isolated in the north eastern zone near Kharkiv made the mission decision on their own and their helicopters carried out the successful attack.
Except there are no helicopters out there and anyone watching the attack itself will realize this was some pretty outstanding flying even given there are good flyers in the Ukrainian air force.
Nowadays, the Russians will go back through continuous satellite vision of the whole area and work out where actually, the helicopters came from.
There has always been a third hand at play here...
You will recall that in 2014 when the head of the French oil company Total Oil, Christophe de Margerie, was killed, I suggested that he had been murdered in a clandestine operation. At the time, Total was the single biggest foreign investor in the Russian energy sector, with significant two-way trade going on and much closer partnerships being planned.
You will note now, that 2014, was also the so-called 'Maidan uprising' - which was of course a coup d'etat.
And you will further note the pathetic attempts by the Borg to pretend they can stop Europe from buying Russian oil and gas.
Anyway, not to avoid talking about the ways of aristocrat 'glowies,' I will address that now: (and please don't listen to Gonzalo Lira's idea of what 'glowie' means - he is wrong. He is slightly right in that of course there are such things as CIA 'glow-in-the-darks,' but his idea that this means he is able to tell who is a CIA operative because they 'glow' is rubbish. He's just observing what anyone can do, when it comes to people such as 'James Vasquez' and Stanford's Ryan Perkins).
King Solomon was not tricked or confused by the Queen of Sheba turning up at his court in bare feet and wearing the dress of a servant. Now was he.
If you recall the story.
So then. Back to the helicopters.
My friends, when you look at the world's richest bankers today - the Safras and the Rothschilds - one must consider the antecedents.
Those guys started the Crimean War.
Sean Penn is not a glowie in the sense that he is neither in the dark nor is he particularly in-obvious to those without UV lenses. He is pretty obvious to all and sundry or at least he should be. And as Adnan Khashoggi once observed - 'war is good marketing (for me).' And Penn is part of the marketing world generally.
Penn said this week that 'a couple of billionaires could easily end the war.' Well, no; they cannot.
You can buy these new again today, you know. |
But they can have started it and they can do quite a lot to keep it going.
And then afterwards, they can sell money to governments for reconstruction and all kinds of things. Maybe they think they can even steal gas and oil and everything that isn't tied down.
And you think you want to go eat with these people in London Town or New York City?
I wouldn't. I'd go there in bare feet and bohemian floral cotton quite deliberately in order just to be observably directed away from them.
I'd love to see a BMW e30 with a modern power train and maybe some slight interior mods. Japanese/German late 80's/early 90s automotive design was peak automobile. Then the govt and the lawyers fucked everything up with stupid crash safety standards that turned automobiles into toasters.
ReplyDeleteWould not surprise me if the russians bombed themselves. And any of the three scenarios would be relevant.
'Toasters.' LOL. Worst thing is they are that now. Electric toasters.
DeleteWhen Harry and that woman drove off to their honeymoon in a vintage Jaguar XKE, I wondered if it was safe? But maybe it was "new."
ReplyDeleteLOL Photo-op. No one was wearing helmets and it did look a bit dubious. Great-looking car, no brakes, weird handling, floats around a bit. I would have one in a heartbeat.
Delete