Why Not

It isn't that you cannot, but that you should not... ....because,

you will simply be feeding a monster.

There are whole industries - not just an industry, but many of them - that go into long and complicated ideas about human personality. Some talk about 'colors reflecting personality types,' others deal with 'data graphics' in order to design branding schemes, others are heavily tied up with academic studies such as Myers-Briggs and Holland Codes (which is a theory about career choice).

Miriam Lancewood - a young
Dutch woman who with her English
husband live 'wild' in New Zealand,
I believe.

There are 'communication styles,' and there are 'personality tests' - and most of it now has academic approval.

And this is of course, due to big business paying money out to try and grab the holy grail, as it were, of customer and consumer access and capture.

Like I said - I can easily, and I mean easily - force someone to do something they might not have thought they were going to do, or were even likely to do, especially when it comes to money, for one good example.

But when you do that kind of thing what you are effectively doing is throwing that person under a bus they are themselves errant in driving at all in the first place, to say nothing of when they drive it too fast.

If you just apply cold objective common sense to the 'labels' that are attached to ideas like 'color wheels and personality' what you could as easily conclude as you might 'conclude' that the words do apply appropriately - is that they apply anyway because they would do so at various intervals no matter what. The most self-involved, introvert person could in particular given circumstances, be a lion! ...As always happens in hot wars; it's a maxim. The loudest, noisiest, most self-aggrandizing bully is always the biggest coward when confronted with an obviously more serious and real threat than they themselves are at the given moment of challenge.

'Red' is aggressive - but why isn't 'pink' aggressive? Well, it actually is!

It's all about how you think about something.

Miriam is 'cute' but she is also potentially deadly
dangerous and obsessional.

So, if I go back to the 'white room,' scanning is looking at what someone is generally, or most automatically 'defaulting' to, when they are looking at anything.

Now I'm not going any further, or more deeply into this here because it becomes stupendously significant, beyond this point; as soon as you 'see' what the system or structure is, it changes a lot of things - none of which I want to be responsible for changing. I am not a prophet to Mankind - I am the undertaker to it.

I'm not saving anyone.

If you're smart enough you'll be quite able to save yourself anyway.

But I will tell you about a problem that is already here, not just 'coming up soon.'

The Plague of Sheroe (627 AD - 628 AD) killed off fifty per cent of the population of the Western Sassanid Empire. But... ...or maybe and - it killed the ruler.

The Sassanids self-destructed virtually immediately thereafter and the mercenary or 'client' armies they had been previously arming with expensive weaponry, jumped into the power vacuum, rampaging everywhere and looting and vandalizing everything from which the developed world never recovered not for a thousand years.

How to be wild and deadly dangerous
in the city...

The whole of Egypt was plundered and wrecked, Ctesiphon and Baghdad too, and the need for further, in fact continuous plunder to feed this hungry and not self-sufficient monster saw the expansion of it all the way to Spain.

On-line, there are hundreds, no, thousands and thousands, of pages of details about 'strategy' and 'battles' and even named individuals and places - none of whom or which ever existed in history.

All of these on-line reference sources will have a little phrase tucked in there somewhere, that says: 'these details are principally from Islamic tradition.' 

In fact, that 'Islamic tradition' comes from only one man, ibn Hisham, who wrote a recension (supposedly of an earlier text, not one single copy of which exists at all, nor even any fragments therefrom...) more than two hundred years after the various 'historical' episodes themselves, for which there is in fact, no history at all; as in 'absolutely zero.'

The 'Pact of Umar' (copy document) is an obvious forgery made hundreds of years after it was meant to have been made/signed, and there are no indications by anyone at the time that such a thing occurred.

Plagues - real ones - have the uniform habit of killing off the leaders, and altering the political and economic prevailing structures and doing so with effects felt for hundreds of years.

Conspiracy theorists could say, oh this one we're having is not a real plague - but yes it is and I'll tell you why: it has already altered the economic and social/political structures that had been in force.

Animal in the wild...

Superficially, it would seem that because of modern medicine and technology, leaderships are capable of protecting themselves relatively successfully, in the face of a global viral pandemic.

Scenario modelers however, using sophisticated 'data-graphics' will tell you a different story. 

They will say, that some critical structural girders underpinning why those leaders even existed in the first place have already been removed - weakening the whole system.

Buildings exhibit lots of problems over some time before they just completely collapse altogether under their own weight, if they are no longer structurally sound.

Isn't that right?

Eric Weinstein, who raised the basic alarm about the media's treatment of the Epstein business, shone a light onto a basic fact regarding the whole 'Epstein model' - which is that little did we the ordinary public know or realize, that arms of government, the powers of the state, were being used to compromise people, and especially public figures, for a long time.

Well what you also don't know is that right now, there are small groups of people who are going to take politicians, judges, lawyers, 'activists,' bankers, police, 'secret police' out under the cover of darkness - and skin them alive and present the hides to you. (I should say 'in ways that you might not expect could happen' - you know, so that the cops don't come knocking on my door).

You think not?

Are you betting? And do you have enough money to lose?

POSTSCRIPT. I just had this video come through my YT feed for no reason that I can think of - it was just in with a bunch of other general TV interviews, but this one was one of Caitlyn Jenner, in which Jenner mentions that there was one single idea going through the head for forty years, every single day, all the time. So, that's a good example of what I'm talking about. Stick such a person into a totally somnolent state, shutting down their incessant verbal explaining about things they are actually lying to you about - and you can use EMF scanning technology and 'read' the neural network pathways that are heavily used. ...I can explain to Jenner what was going on - and what still is going on - but I don't need to do that; no one has asked me to, and I might not anyway. The fact that a human being is mys-organized inside is no crime of that person's. Super advanced cultures and species are so far above what the human paradigm is though, that 'agency' on behalf of the flawed human being is nonsensical as an absolute principal. Humans are mediocre things at best as an 'average' of the whole group (of 'humans'). Jenner's conclusions appears to be something along the lines of 'being true to oneself...' What does that even mean though? 'Oneself?' Oneself who? He wasn't 'himself' the whole of his life but even in this interview he openly claims to have been 'successful' in having raised his kids and in acquitting a range of other... ...social expectations. ...It's totally possible to make someone happy, though, just by reading what their inward neural inclinations are all the time - and the mistake people make is in thinking this is from something outside of themselves, something put upon them; in fact it's who they are. The only choice you get when you die, is - do you want to be who you claimed to have been? LOL 

Davin R, Hawkins says that; I'm just repeating it. I don't know anything.