Complicated, But We'll Try

This is another one of these situations where as soon as you mention it, then people will all go 'yeah we knew.'

(I try to make these short - but hell, this is into the intense stuff now!).

And, the knowledge will alter the course and direction of something, at least, substantially different to the present direction of things.

Where AI research and even development will get it all wrong, is in this idea they are all on right now (and you're not going to see them shift themselves off the path) - that is depicting 'the brain' and 'consciousness' and 'intelligence' as oriented towards 'body-object interaction.' (They mean body to object...). It's termed, in the scientific communities that are involved: 'body-object interaction.'

The gestures of Nature...

How they came to this conclusion is that the present status of actual hard research can factually show that the blood flows in the human brain, go to discrete regions and specific areas, for specific word-ideas (EG 'old man,' 'throws,' 'stone' 'lake). Studies have been conducted using FMRI, in which there is a greater than 85% accuracy of the interpreting by a computer, of such blood flows, across a large, a really large, selection of languages (IE different actual words) but using the same meanings, obviously. 

So because it appears (and likely is to a great extent, the case) that a computer can 'read' what someone is 'saying' or thinking in their brain, regardless of which language they are using - this has steered the thinking on AI down the path of semantics and that the 'human being' is located in their brain, and in the neural networks up there, as a direct reflection of motor action, and object interaction, plus desires and aversions.

So...

If we were to say 'oh okay so-and-so is really the case' and then describe and show how and why, then all of a sudden, if this works its way out into the general discussion and debate, sooner or later the current pathway will change.

And I don't want that to happen. I am a strong advocate of AI. And I am at the same time a strong advocate of the fact that humans are bound to FIU and FUBAR, too.

The white room has a subject individual in a state where there is only 'white' as the sensory input baseline. What this does is high-light the 'grooved in' neural network pathways - especially, as long as you know what you are looking for, those to do with more or less obsessional thinking and thinking that is flawed, but nonetheless, obsessive.

They say 'color-personality' but
I don't believe it.

'Flawed' here, will be those brain neural patterns, that have cut off 1. affective/effective pathways, and 2. cut off or diverted sensory signals.

The Wikipedia does not have any entry for 'mys-osmia.' It has 'anosmia,' 'hyposmia,' 'hyperosmia,' and 'parosmia.' Parosmia is the closest to mysosmia. Parosmia is a persistent false belief about certain things giving off a bad odor.

Medical science today too, does not have a standard concept (or really, any conception at all) that there is a condition that should be termed 'mysosmia.' 'Misos' means hatred in Greek, so we are not really talking about that; we are talking about 'mysos' which means mixed up, heterogeneous, and with incompatible parts attempted to be mixed in. Now don't try and go look it up and come back with what the broad modern version of 'mysos' is - that is wrong.

'Mysos' means incorrectly mixed.

Plainly though, people suffering even from what is called 'parosmia' are getting incorrect - IE false - signals via their neurology.

This condition is a well-known attendant to certain pathological states like schizophrenia (or the current terminology for the same thing), or bi-polar disorders, or amphetamine and heroin addiction materially/organically very adverse conditions.

Consequently, you should be able to guess, that 'consciousness' and the human individual persona is actually not just located entirely in the brain (in fact it is not 'located' there at all, but we won't go into it here) - but has a diffused arrangement through actual organic features and cellular and organic interactions.

Two spoiled brats. I met one of them.

Humans have two major signalling infrastructures: the hormonal ones, and the neural (nerve) network system.

Hormones are molecular signalling things that give the active dynamic functioning body, signals between the organs and the cells there and around there, related to the 'optimum function' directive in (also 'of') the whole organism.

Nerves convey affective and effective signals to and from muscles, and to a certain extent from the joints as well.

Nerves also convey information to and from the largest organ of the body - the skin - as well as to the sustentacular cells. Also the auditory canals and eyes and so on.

But the question is raised now, if an individual's brain flow habituation, is for always cutting across or cutting off the optimum performance and function of the whole being -, IE its living body - is that something in fact, that the inner person intends?

So where is this 'inner person' and how did they come to be 'there' and what, actually, are they even - at all?

If we go to Veda knowledge, we see the apparent hypothesis there that there is a totally objective 'knower' which is Universal Cosmic Krsna, or Vishnu, or Shiva. In the Vedas, according to the modern interpretations of the religious Hindus/Vaishnavas, there is the ultimate proposition that everyone merely 'goes back' to Krsna and that 'we' were only being lent to us anyway, in our lifetimes! At the same time, this is actually not what the Vedas actually say at all. 

This 'Vaishnavism' is in fact atheistic - it is the same mish-mash nonsense that obtains in the Western religions, but it is here in the Eastern one.

However, what is able to be drawn from this Veda teaching, is that there is a neutral, objective knower; and that is all, in fact, that the Vedas say.

The 'persona' though, is neither objective nor neutral.

Now I am able to stick something down in front of an individual, having observed them a little, and working out various things about them - and have them pick that thing up 100% of the time without saying anything at all. It is also possible, to have a bank manager give you a grossly illegal 'non-recourse loan' of a lot of money, and not say anything at all to them, not hold a gun to their face or anything like that, and have them obsess all day long as to how to give it to you.

This is all very interesting of course and you don't believe me. Because, how come I don't do that then? Right?

However let's look at a large commercial organization that is about to market a new product.

Karl Popper, as I have mentioned here before, produced this 'falsifiability template' for science - and in so doing, he altered actual 'science' as it is found around today.

If that 'large commercial organization' employed a Popper-grounded modern science graduate, they would fail eventually, or at some certain point - essentially because they are not using actual science, but Karl Popper-science; which is not only wrong, but maliciously so.

Popper 'science' uses the commodity value of authority, not the commoditized value of function.

The notion that '21 black crows' is a basis for 'falsifiability' since it retains the open possibility of the next crow being white - is a false piece of logic. But it is what all of current science is built upon.

A 'white crow...' is not a crow.

Crows pecking each other's eyes out...

If you were to ask a European in the old old days - what color are swans? They should answer you that 'swans are white.' And then, if you were to ask an Australian Aboriginal the same question they should answer you: 'swans are black.'

Well they are neither black nor white; swans are both black and white. Even John McAfee 'bequeathed' that item of Boolean programming 'gold' to the kids just before he apparently, died.

There is no such thing as ' a black swan event.' Such a thing is just another 'swan event;' just another 'event.'

Boeing built planes on the 'authority' of Popper science - and people paid the price with their lives.

You keep on betting that it cannot be done what I just said can be done, with your customer, and you will keep losing your shirt. So - keep doing that.

As far as making money is concerned, I would simply pick one person or a few of the same kind, and take their money off them. Simple as that. I don't need to talk to a committee, or a board of idiots trying to build the 'camel.'

Next post, we will take a case example, and employ Alien tactics and strategies, and see where it leads us.