And Then, It's Too Late

Science is when someone has a process that they do, and then it results in a direct material effect, and they pass this process on to someone else, who also does the process and the same effect occurs - and they can all pass the process on and on to any others they like.

'Faith' is to do with some idea or other, which does not have any immediate obvious material effect. And this does not preclude there being material consequences though, at some time thereupon after the intellectual process is implemented. For example, civilized societies have concepts of justice, which they intend will have material consequences - but these are subtle and intellectual in the first instance. So it is not as though these things relate to completely non-material matters - except they relate more particularly to the underlying thoughts rather than material procedures that have to do with arrangements of actual things. 'Rituals' might have metaphorical or even metaphysical purposes, but they are not intended to be exactly like chemistry processes or 'engineering.' Still this is arguable too, on a level, because there have been dubious practices like 'alchemy' and magical incantations in so-called 'black masses' or in witchcraft and all of this... 

German engineering - complex, and will
get you an immediate material effect!

Yet even so, no one has reliable experience that is widely accepted that says that any of these sorts of things procure material effects in any immediate way like the connected relationships observed in, as I said, chemistry and electronics and so on.

Broadly, very broadly speaking, we could say that the intellectualizing of certain complex things - be it even say, the Big Bang Theory, or the Theory of Evolution, or even just any design plan, circuit design/diagram, all of that kind of thing - is propagated, rather than actually 'experimented' in every single instance of it being transferred from one mind to another. 'Science' though, is just the thing where we do expect there to be a more - a much more direct - set of results and effects that may be observed right away, or in the sense of 'right away' being the chain linking all the actual things within the specified process itself. ...Whatever that process is.

So then there are big systems of organised 'ideas' that are not actually expected to produce immediate material effects, but which human societies all use: the modern education system, for instance, is one such thing -, so are religious faiths examples of this, and written and intellectual 'law' in societies.These things are both propagated (you can go to a Law School to study 'the Law') but they are also 'culturally enacted daily' or virtually daily anyway in normal life within any society. We can try to put metrics on them.

Anglo-French design - the Baccarat Bar
at Harrods.

To some extent, science is actually quite crass, because it wants to make a big fuss of anything that is immediately obvious! Explode a big BIG bomb - wow. Nuclear Bomb; science, yeah man. Wow. Science.

Music, the playing of it can also procure an immediate effect in the emotions of people hearing it but scientists do not call this thing actual 'science.' And that is because artists will tell them to fuck off! And produce Beethoven's 9th if they can which they can never do.

Can, never do. And there is a reason why not. This vain notion that 'scientists' all secretly maintain that someday they will 'create' a scientifically-designed, mechanistically (meaning, a process able to be passed on to anyone who can repeat it to specification very reliably) 'new' 'Beethoven's 9th' (IE a creative masterpiece) is fundamentally amiss because they do not perceive that there is a geometry and hence also a dynamics, a 'celestial motion' law, of intangible form, force, number and shape. And that they don't know it.

One problem is that although one can make a statement that intangible dynamics of the arts are like dynamics of material physics (IE 'as above so below') - in fact they are not exactly like it though... And that's the problem.

Art is choice, science has no choice.

A thing is held to be 'good' in art often as a matter of taste, not mechanistic rule.

You can, if you choose, bow to an unknowable, non-materially present, invisible deity as someone doing 'noble servitude' (Islam, certain Chinese beliefs as well) to that deity, or you can choose to have a transactional relationship with a 'Demonic' Supreme Nature such as you might do in Satanism or in black witchcraft or sorcery or 'Voodoo,' or you can try to have a transactional relationship also with a deity which demands your worship and your 'sacrifice' of something (whatever, I don't know), or you can choose none of those, or you can choose even some other thing entirely different too. But 'religion' and 'faith' too, are questions ultimately of volition (deliberate choice), even though they are almost never that according to the outward forms of organized religion: that is, you will go to Hell if you don't 'choose' such-and-such! Not much of a real act of volition there...

American industrial constructing
techniques (J. Edwards Deming-style),
has its charms, too...

Religion has choice, but art is choice.

And there is a difference.

When you are attracted to something it is because you are something, even though you are also pretending to yourself that it is entirely a matter of choice - although, addiction is a compulsion, and not exactly a fully independent choice. So, art is a relationship of equivalency between the object, and the subject which is also part of the intangible ellipse of the object itself.

Let's get back to the stupid bizarre unrealistic subject of 'grey' ET aliens.

And, by now you all have read all of those free reads I linked and you remember everything in there, right. And so, you will pick up all the ideas, the muscle groups, the actual people referred to, what they do, who they are, where they are. Right?

Grey aliens are not 'grey.' And they are certainly not 'giants' as the recent FBI declassified files (the supposed 'Memorandum 6751' or some 'new-release' of related files) say, because that is to protect their actual really quite diminutive and almost fragile nature until they get 'adapted' to the Earth conditions.

Now remember - you are in the loop here - I have already told you beforehand, about this era, and the archives and files, I even named one of those in charge: Munro Leaf.