Simple And Obvious, But Huge

Prior to around 320-something BC, there are literally no as in zero at all, references in any writings, documents, stones, monuments, coins, in Hebrew or in Greek or any other language, of any of the figures of the Old Testament - anywhere; not in Jerusalem or that broader area generally.

'Abraham' simply does not exist as a figure. And there are no names associated with the Torah identities in Hebrew or Judaic records - no 'Isaac,' no 'Benjamin,' no nothing. Maybe if you take Sanskrit words, you can force in 'Abram' and 'Sarah.' 

The poor man Falernus,
made this kind of thing to give
to the God of Wine, when He
visited.

The standard religious beliefs say that Abraham was around maybe at 2000 BC.

Now this actually does not mean none of the stories have some true basis, what it means is that the things passed down are unreliable.

And that does not make Islam and the modern interpretations of that involving this idea of 'corrupted Jewish literature' correct at all - far from it in fact, because the Quranic literature is literally the worst for borrowing other earlier stories and frikking around with them.

I will explain some very obvious and key elements and then attempt to ensure that no one is suddenly left thereby in a vacuum of religious beliefs and ideas!

The infamous Book or Books of Enoch, is a perfect example to look at:

There is only maybe eight-odd pages of sacred verse form writing in those texts that can be authentic.

And that is also, not an explanation of why it was not forcefully included in Canon because it is definitely somewhat in there... Jesus quotes Enoch directly and so do plenty of other places of the Gospel Writers and of the Letters.

The verse form sections are Enoch. But that is all that is actually from Enoch. Surprisingly, people seem not to notice that all the other parts are written in the third person in 'profane prose' (as Ammon Hillman would say) with some quotations claiming to be of what Enoch said, presumably to some other recorder! 

Everything else, whilst in some places making reference to things that were culturally known and/or folkloric incident knowledge (was based on incidents that happened and were passed down or were part of group memory) - were made up in order to justify the use of force and violence by dictators and leaders and rulers and have nothing whatsoever to do with Godly things; the same is true of the whole of the Bible and also the Quran in particular.

It is well-known for instance, that drinking alcohol is forbidden (aka 'haram') in Islam, but what is never talked about is the reason specified in the Quran (Surah al Maidah) - which is that when you are killing people, it adversely affects your capacity to kill efficiently if you are drunk...

None of these books have anything to do with 'God.'

And the God of Wine
rewarded him.

Steven M. Greer is getting better and better by the day, and it is because he is firmly underscoring that an individual's attitude is critical to interaction with advanced intelligent beings located just off the planet.

Greer recently made mention of the fact that he had been offered some items of technology, some devices, by the Russell Targ group and the military intel 'remote viewing' people, which mechanistically placed a person in that 'communication mode' with ETs. But he declined to use it because it circumvented the reality about a person's necessary intention in making contact at all. And he is completely right.

When we talk about 'electron spintronics' I could put together such devices but they are entirely unnecessary. [Which is not to say that I am not putting something together for you, because I am but it is an extremely cut-down version].

Greer is now providing quite a lot of video of the 'lights' responding to whatever his Ce5 groups are doing out in Joshua Tree and other places - and unless those of you who have already got some basic techniques via here are either not implementing them because of insufficient time or other reasons, or really not 'doing it right' - by now you yourself won't absolutely need to see videos of stuff like that because you have already personally seen the responses and could be a lot of other things besides.

It is completely obvious - when you know about Greek sacred oracular verse - that the Book of Enoch contains only a tiny section which is really 'Enoch.' And that section or those relatively few short sections never talk about anything violent or any sort of retribution by God except in the most generalistic ways: 'sin and the spirits created by wicked mortal flesh are destroyed...' He doesn't say people are destroyed and he never says in any of the verse form sections that the so-called 'Fallen Angels' are done anything with in particular. These are all utterly ridiculous stories added in later. 

What is ridiculous about them is simply that either God is this incompetent power-mad over-reactive entity with absolutely no foreknowledge of anything at all (especially with not even a slight suspicion of what is an obvious likely consequence of having good-looking females enter the scene where there are powerful 'Watchers!' lol), or well -, the stories are lies.

Yes it is true technology is such a thing that as it advances, it is capable of producing ever more powerful weaponry; that is an obvious fact about it.

In our day, a poor man
might not even have that much
to offer (the vegetables).
And there are already plenty
of rich people that surely
the God of Wine would 
better like to visit - yes?

So I would say make sure you don't so obviously show an ego that simply needs to have prime billing all the time, and that you can work with others and as part of a team where such a team is lead by the consensus formed around the best logical argument.

And that does not mean you cannot strongly argue a particular point or the merits of a case. It just means that a stage is reached where the winning logical case is uplifted by all, not just by some; that is not by only those who argued it in the first place where the others did not.

Here is how Enoch puts it:

'These words are for a remote generation, at a time far in the future when people have learned a great many things, and those who are not evil are selectively supported...'

What I Have Been Doing

Well, I'm stuck, aren't I?

I'm out here, on my own, it's getting dark -, and...

Nah.

Is nothing like that. Too much. LOL

Was in the Perth Mint on Monday - the queue was pretty long and it took me almost five hours to get to one of the bullion dealing cubicles. There were people both buying and selling, now that the price is seeing new highs. I mean to be sure, there's sellers around at any time, but right now they all want to advertise that they are obviously 'taking profits' or that they had been smart or something, I dunno. Or their grandmothers left them a heap.

Artwork; obsolescent 
technology.

The real reason for the lengthy process these days is that last year, the government here went into a flap because of the appearance of money laundering going on or being let through the systems, and so the systems have been tightened up almost to an extreme.

One consequence has been that it is making buying gold look like waiting in the artificial lines outside of Louis Vuitton!

But the point is not whether to buy gold or to sell it right now, the point is what the heck is happening in the financial markets, and in economies generally.

I've been sitting in late night coffee places last few days (as you do) and jotting down notes about capital and flows-of-funds in the economy - and this scenario applies right around the whole world these days, because of the alignment of global politics and banking.

So I've posted a pic of one of the sheets from my note-pad, and here you will see that I have described what I have termed 'bank lending stock' - this means mortgage-able land and buildings (and nothing else anymore), with the wholesale rate of money being the ten-year government bond rate and then a line for bank costs and a theoretical margin. This gives you the effective nominal average borrowing rate for real estate mortgages.

Where I have a problem understanding what went on, is how they ever got to the valuations (which is the modeling sample that you see in the oblong-ish box denoting '$100 billion').

This is nowhere near the size of any actual national property market that I had in mind, it's just a notional figure for ease of looking at the model itself as a dynamic interaction.

My scribbling.

Whatever the actual figure, say, for the Australian national market is, for real estate, it all started in its current form after the Stock Market Crash of 1989 - and where anyone got the moneys to float that property market after that Equities Crash I have simply no idea: there was massive unemployment everywhere in the world, then there was the Gulf Crisis, there was also 9/11, there was the so-called 'Sub-Prime Mortgages Crisis' (a fraud, in my view, when you look back in hindsight and the 'infinity liquidity' proposition of central bankers since that time).

There is no transparency at all as to how any figure for the market valuations of viable real estate was arrived at by bank lending and policies of central banks after the Stock Market Crash of 1989.

In fact, to highlight that, the Basel Agreement (which is two things, the Accords on banking regulation, and the Conventions, on hard core asset backing of debt and national currencies for transboundary movements of funds) has no meaning anymore and had none after the Crash of '89 when none of its items were adhered to by anyone; so they simply altered the key elements and watered them down to nothing and to meaninglessness.

What really happened was that governments and banks appropriated land and buildings, and/or also 'created' them, and re-valued them at absurdly high prices and then sold them to themselves for ever-decreasing interest prices on the basis of no securities and no ability to pay, and then on-sold them at a margin to the idiots who are called the citizens and also to foreign investors, who are just as much idiots possibly even more so.

The elimination of the hard-core asset ratio for lending and debt allowed for the accounting opacity to what has become the media-led and thus overtly political pressure to lower interest rates - against a backdrop of incredibly high risks and zero effective real liquidity, let's put it this way, in hard money terms - which is always expressed by the price of gold.

If I could really scribble, 
I'd pen designs like this!

You cannot actually lower interest rates unless the through-put on capital (so, over at least ten years worth of trade banking) has been providing an excess over the wholesale rate of money after bank costs and profits repatriated to shareholders - none of which has happened.

The real money comes from the tax receipts that governments have attained over the ten-year term of the domestic circulation of money (aka 'the economy/commercial sector profits'), otherwise you are denuding the currency and it must fall - Saudi Arabia, for instance, will charge you more for energy if they think you are making lots of money and can afford to pay; they do that by either literally increasing your gas prices, or forcing your currency down, or both.

This is what is happening in many countries around the world recently, and Australia has been one of the finest instances of it, with the local currency dropping like a stone every time the central bank (the RBA) claims loudly that it 'has lowered interest rates' and everyone claps their hands and thinks they are better off and can 'pay their mortgages.'

If you look again at the sheet of paper, you will realize that by up-valuing the figure in the oblong box (say to double; which is easily what has happened over the last five years), in fact the quanta of money increases dramatically where you see the '2%' and the 'plus 3%+' (total 5%+).

That's what people don't see and they don't understand and they don't want to understand.

The amounts of money are dramatically escalating and where is it all coming from?

Well I'll tell you where 'it' is coming from...

And then we'd be able to have nice
things like this.

It is coming from your lifestyle, your quality of life, your health and well-being, the standard and quality of available products and services - in short everything is going to meet the mortgage debt of the citizenry.

And so because like rocket-ships, it looks impressive and it is real up to a point, it also means that it sucks all the attention and everyone, especially businesses, commercial enterprises, departments stores, leading brands, are stealing from their own past normal cost lines to feed an ever-more voracious mouth.

Advertising and marketing is shoddy or non-existent, service standards decline or even disappear -, and so on.

There is no room for anything other than the feeding of a fantasy, which is the magical increase in the 'in the oblong box number.'

It is no longer a case of an economic scenario - this is an event sociologique. 

People are wasting their time looking at economic modeling and economic scenarios from this point on.

The outcome to this will take place on the social front, not the economic or the banking one.

When you look at the amount of hate everywhere for these women that went up on that dangerous damn rocket of Jeff Bezos's, you are looking at the overflow of deep negativity which springs from the mass subconscious knowledge that there is something drastically amiss in the society and in the economy at large.

The biggest argument against celebrating what these celebrities did was that they are all rich entitled brats wasting money when everyone else is suffering...

Suffering?

Nice things for females.

How? People's properties are going through the roof. There is virtually full employment. People are working lots (giggle). Money is free. Why are they complaining? 

But it was a fraud. The rocket didn't really go into space. It was probably done with smoke and mirrors on a sound stage in LA.

Yeah. So what. Your mortgage is a fraud its apparent rise (in value) to the moon is done using smoke and mirrors and filmed on a sound stage in the back rooms at CNN and Fox...

Now none of this means property prices and values are going down any time soon.

What it means is there is a lot of anger in the hearts of the public.

The women of the world today, despite that they can go into space on tragically old-tech rockets, are not brave enough to send donkeys to the senate in place of their men (like the women did in Roman times)...

And that is what I mean by dumbed-down and stupid.

The end of this is going to be tragic. Although probably not for any of you because you have the inside run on things.

And like I say often enough around here - there are more animals in the forest than just bulls and bears.

...Never make the mistake of thinking that what you saw the other day was so fantastic and somehow genuine because it was using real rocket-ships and real material motion and travel from this planet up to high high up there. It was genuine in the same sense that some ancient Chinese emperor one time strapped himself to a large kite in order to fly 'to the clouds' and again another time had bamboo firecracker rockets tied to his chair in order to get that to take off when lit.

LOL

Marshmallow flower tea
is different to marshmallow root
tea - but they will both
give you a nice sensation.

I mean yeah it was real.

And it was genuinely courageous of those people to do it all.

To fly in the air you need aeronautics. Not Chinese skyrockets and firecrackers under upturned garbage bins from LA alleyways. This is antiquated, it is obsolescent technology.

To travel into space you need seriously advanced astrophysics and key new understandings about electron matrix fields and light and how gravity even works, which the human race is nowhere even close to near working out on its own.

 - Regardless of what Steven Greer and Bob Lazar say the government has behind closed doors. It doesn't have any such thing.

Today At The Karman Line

Later today, in about 12 hours, a bunch of girls will be travelling on the Jeff Bezos Express to just under 62 miles above the Earth's notional surface.

I will be watching the event online of course, rather than from any of these little white oval objects.

...On the other hand -.

Interesting things come in 
small packages...
Sometimes.

Stranger things can happen than what people read about in the media.

Anyway, later on, at least the pod will not make a Splash! down somewhere and thus one could theoretically count on all the members being the same ones as who went up. Ain't that right, Jackson?

Meanwhile, elsewhere Brooke Eden will not be having a concert anywhere and none is scheduled until next month but it will also happen to be in Austin TX not far from where this 'Blue Origin' thing-y is going up.

LOL

If I went to a psychotherapist this week myself, they would doubtless confirm a strong case of Capgras Syndrome.

And that's because I would be quite liberal with the verbiage.

I don't mind telling people stuff. I mean, hey, what are they gonna do?

Why even Britney Spears is carrying on about 'clones' and has even I think written or part-way written a book on it called 'the Rose Project' - which is making the rounds of the Conspiracy Theory world.

Clones is not what is going on; at least not any clones coming from any lab in Planet Earth.

Me I just say - would say, to the therapist - I notice Britney Spears is banging on about clones...

Piastri wins again.
How 'bout that.
Who wudda guessed.

In the very very old days - and Bill Smith, you know about this from some recent experiences - there were these 'mystery places,' which meant not what it means now, but the actual physical experiencing of what is not natural, and taken by the common people to be supernatural.

Today some of the richest people can go into space or pretty near to it, and that is very supernatural for most of the rest of us.

Yet in the past, the richest people might own, a 'mystery place' - a place for the experience of the supernatural - for example, like the son of the lunatic Roman Emperor Sulla, Faustus, owned, in the the highest of the hilly lands of what is now the Carinola de Casanova.

At this place, which is a 100 miles away from where the surviving 'villa dei misteri' is in Pompeii (also in the region of Campania, same as Falernus), there most definitely was a villa dei misteri, which was likewise with the one surviving now albeit as a renovated ruins, a place where one could experience the inconceivable.

Of course today, in the place of rocket-ships, the ancient mural paintings will mostly all tend to show beautiful-looking people with wings.

But all of you, because you know about it, will certainly note the presence of the purple cloth almost everywhere in the depicted scenes.

This is the phlox porphurios from ancient Tyre and Sidon -, from ancient 'Atlantis' effectively.

This is the burning purple.

Actual mural on the wall
of the Villa Dei Misteri
at Pompeii.

This is the thing the rich woman, Lydia of Thyatira, was selling to Paul the Apostle and his entourage.

This is the thing that was used in the original 'talit' shawls of the Hebrew priests who carried the 'Ark of the Covenant.'

Faustus also owned, of course, the world's most coveted wine of all time, the doubly eponymous 'Faustian Falernian;' the first part of the double-barreled name being for Faustus, and the second name for the pauper Falernus, who was visited one time by the God of Wine, and who showed the God hospitality even though he had little.

I have no idea what modern religions are about.

They seem to be separated from reality and there is no material supernatural experience in them to be had at all.

Reality is like this - it's okay to be a pauper.

If you were to encounter a Divinity, it's probably better that you were one (a poor person) instead of a celebrity and very rich in the worldly sense - because then they would have many excuses to mess with you and not only with your mind.

I don't know any really rich people who are humble when push comes to shove.

Many of them fake humility quite decently but it doesn't last when challenged.

Of Spiders And Spins

We're going to talk about an amazing thing at the end, so hang in there.

Luca Turin is a biophysicist, and not just any old kind - he is a current research manager at Imperial College, which is the leading independent research grant funded academic institution in the world. Ahead of Harvard, ahead of Oxford, ahead of everyone.

I think we've already hinted - at least one or two of you already have pointed to the fact - that he received research funding from you-know-who; yes, the alphabet people.

He's into mind-control; naturally. Via bio-electronics.

Aaaah, we start so simple.
Spiders absolutely hate
this stuff - Proraso. Menthol and
Eucalyptus.
Not synthetic though. Real
Menthol and real
Eucalyptus.

 

But he was the guy who, in his outstanding collab book(s - because I think there's more than one even though some came out with just Turin's name as the author) with Tania Sanchez, came up with the metaphor of birds on a beach, and someone running at them:

First the small birds took off rapidly, 

followed by the medium-sized birds,

and finally the large and heavy-weight Pelicans flew off unhurriedly.

This was all to describe the action of olfactory molecules in the air.

Luca Turin is also widely misrepresented in supposedly authoritative literature as having 'predicted a certain human olfactory experiment outcome incorrectly based on the vibration model of olfaction (olfactory action).'

In fact he simply mentioned publicly that there were other scientists who had proposed hypotheses about various theories of molecular dynamics, inclusive of a vibratory aspect.

People from academia who need to necessarily debunk whatever does not fit into their standard narrative, loudly declaim both Turin and his supposed theoretical model.

It is a scientific fact however, that all scent molecules have electron spin polarity, and that all of them also have inertial states of energy (vibration).

To what extent which particular animal's noses are able to discriminate precisely between what minute molecules is for anyone to say...

This is the same problem I mentioned earlier, about the imperative definitions modern 'sci-entists' don't give a damn about clarifying, ever. 'Creativity.' What does that mean - to a sci-entist!! 'Can you tell the difference between menthol and camphor...?' (Some random human subject being asked). 'Yes - I know because I am Ukrainian.' 

I've seen the studies in question. They're BS.

...And then,
we move into more
interesting
spaces -.

You've got no chance of getting sense from today's breed of scientists. They're all desperates with agendas.

That's just the reality.

Some animals have much larger ranges of sensitivity when it comes to olfactory molecules than humans, and that has never been contested by anyone ever.

The size and complexity of the cellular structures of insects simply does not allow for the Buck & Axel 'lock and key' model of olfaction. The sensitivity and size of the 'equipment' tends towards the vibratory model. So the debunkers are way wrong. But like the academic theory of the Pyramids, the whole of academia is pre-committed to some primitive stupid nonsense that it cannot any longer justify but of course, will not give up on easily, if at all...

'Electron spin' is data not 'vibration.' And no one in physics speaks of the vibration of molecules when they mean the orbital positions/attitudes and pulses of the electrons. 

'Vibration' is a loose terminology although it can be used in a casual way for just normal street-level conversation about the matter.

When you spray a scent into the air, you are spraying data by way of the electron spin of the molecules.

A spider or a mosquito has no way of feeling that a particular molecule is shaped a certain way, with a certain mass different to just plain water raindrops, for example - yet they will avoid camphor and eucalyptus and menthol and capsaicin like the plague.

Hey! Did someone slip
something into the tea?!

And, you can tune a frequency generating device and get the same results.

I don't know what the specific relevant <meters are so don't anyone ask!

Now I want to touch on something completely different.

It's not different in that it also has to do with neurology and micro-scale matters.

There is this thing called the Capgras Syndrome or also, Capgras Delusion.

What it is is that a few people, especially when they are suffering late-stage Alzheimers for one case of it, can hold this unshakable belief that a certain person they know or knew, has been substituted by another different individual but made to look the same and act similarly.

Islam has this delusion to do with how God substituted some random innocent guy and had him crucified in the place of Jesus...

LOL

The practical mechanics of how it would be possible to just suddenly substitute some amazingly similar physical human form, is never explained by those suffering from such delusions - and by the way, it is not the only delusion of the sort that people have: sometimes they think a person is dead and no longer exists who is still alive (I had that one for some years about Marvin Gaye -, when I was telling people that the singer had intervened in a family fight between an uncle and his - Gaye's - father, and was shot by one of them; and people used to smile at me and laugh that he was still alive and where did I get that insane story. And then of course, it exactly did happen like that. Even I am amazed...)

And there are a number of other ones with similar aspects - the same person is going around in different guises is one such.

Things are 
startin' ta 
look a bit funny!

However because some of you have gone a little more than casually into the spintronics concepts to do with acquiring a 'second sight' as it were, it is probably worth mentioning that there are two kinds of 'normal human' situations on this planet, where there are such 'unusual' kinds of affairs.

One is that there are elf-like people, human people but rather diminutive, who are (mis-)taken for ordinary human beings (and I'm not talking about anyone here, in case one of you at least was thinking that!). But just like all the rest of you 'normal' human beings, they are here in a normal human physical body - where the structural data about that body reflects who they really are.

And that means that unless the mind data is also transferred, they are quite in a state of internal turmoil.

And then there are one or two or several in fact, people who have been substituted. And usually this happens, typically, when a plane trip encountered some kind of electronic trouble at high altitude.

The person that is 'back' is almost just an automaton, following a kind of organic systematic reactive 'intelligence' rather than that the real person with their own dynamic active Monad mind is actually inside there.

: )

You will not find today, any Ancient Greek literature truly explaining Pythagoras's or Heraclitus ideas about the Monad - but I will tell them to you: the Monad is your Personal Self which has an inward as well as outward-looking mirror, and that reacts with perfect sensitivity to geometrical shapes and to the forces of moving geometries.

I think it is a bad idea to widely disseminate complex ideas about internal electron spintronics and data patterns and discrete vibration formations that are innate to a particular individual. (Which is what we have been doing here and will continue to, because no one comes here!) LOL

The reason there is Death among the living beings of the planet, is that any single human person will be unable to live with the trouble they have caused all by themselves, if they had to live let's say, beyond a normal human lifespan with a totally sensational physical body structure.

With Death, the memory cells are destroyed.

Yes it is a cave, and I have my head
chained to look only at the
projection of reality...
But it is a nice cave, you have to admit.

All the good, all the bad -, everything, goes.

The electron spin data could be retrieved, if it ever had been stored somewhere viable.

All you need to acquire that kind of development, is unwavering faith in -.

Enoch 'disappeared' because he had unwavering faith... ...in -.

Well, he had a consistent practice of sensitivity to an Ultimate Intelligence Who was Benevolent.

I noticed just this week some Rabbi pose the question 'why is God invisible?'

Well who said He was invisible??

Every single Contact Experiencer that you have ever come across, always says ET's act like as though they are automated, or somewhat automated. That is of course, not the case, but they are smarter than to think they can make just any old spontaneous decision out of a personal whim - which is how humans mostly all behave. So indeed they look automated.

There are many 'Enochs' around the place, that is to say, many who have 'been taken.'

As the US Navy continues its slow leak about what it has been encountering off San Diego, let me just say, that never will there be a time when the US Government will or will be able, to discuss everything that is going on, that is to say, everything that they have some files about but are unable to explain.

Your job, and you have really no choice about it, is to be able to stabilize those characters if you ever should encounter one of them, who feel a little destabilized by life on this planet.

It's hard to 'have faith' of course if you cannot see properly. 

...Don't forget, when I upload videos here, there is a backstory, sometimes. Wonder what Jackson -...

Definitely no substitute; you can tell from the eyes.

 

Campari - Chinotto

The Book of Zechariah sets forth what Paradise is like when it is available to certain people on the Earth.

It is truly remarkable to me, how that even scientists seem unable to consider the actual profile of a human life, and observe that prior to that phase after conception probably at the eight-week plus stage - prior to then, there is clearly no evidence of material brain cells adequate to contain sensory memory.

The Prophet Zechariah.
Yeah! 
Waddya mean 'no.'

This is obviously why a person has only the conscious memories of themselves that are stored from that stage on. 

You can go into the Jungian Subconsciousness and the Collective Unconscious and so on, and they are ideas worth considering for different reasons - but as far as an immediate specific life material conscious memory, well these can only be in the grown memory cells; if we say we have identified where immediate personal memories are.

Now there is always a huge problem anyway, when it comes to scientists in particular, which is namely that none of them speak English. They speak kind of - gibberish.

I came across a recent release of some studies, or, someone from the world of modern scientists commenting on it at any rate -, which study said that creativity came from the right frontal pole of the brain.

Trouble is, if you asked any scientists what they defined 'creativity' as being, you will go round and round in circles like following the trail of Islamic hadiths and 'scholarship' into why no one has an original legitimate Injeel or Taurat...!

It will sound great to those who are already committed to some kind of nonsensical argument, but it cannot stand the light of common sense and the daylight of logic in the open.

The name you have today in this lifetime of yours, applies to who you are from the moment of your birth or at least true formation as a more or less complete human physical body, however tiny it was prior to being born.

You might have been Julius Caesar for all your current brain memory cells know - that is, if you had an existential being before - but none of that sensory memory from that life will be held in your present material brain cells because they only have input or sense feed from the experiences of your present life. In other words you current brain will have no memory of having ever lived as one 'Julius Caesar.' 

Campari is made from myrtle-leaved
orange.

Scientists are confusing memory with consciousness, especially personal consciousness - and that is so because of the superficial 'clarity' about brain cells and memory.

Today we live in a world of digital data, and we know and can easily understand that electrons create data and transmit data, and systems which contain electron traffic and mathematically-locked Boolean states are information and process and process-control systems.

Your living brain memory cells develop electron signals.

Anyway, back to 'Paradise on Earth.'

While you are living here, you are using material processes and systems largely, to gain sensory signal input and hence to create experiences and memories.

There are seven trees, according to the Book of Zechariah, which are evident, where there is Paradise here on Earth: the Cedar, the Acacia, the Myrtle (bay and bay orange), the Olive, the Fir, the Pine, and the Box tree. These woods plus the oils from the oranges and the olives, were what made up the 'Ark of the Covenant.'

...Inside of which the 'Glory of God' dwelt (for however long the Ark remained intact and maintained).

The Rider on the Red Horse...

And the Rider on the Red Horse, is among the trees of the grove of Myrtles.

The meaning is that no matter how the world is, in whatever state that it is however dismal, the power of a particular Sovereign rules absolutely albeit it stands still - as the Tao Te Ching by the way, also states - at the base of a vast ravine; in a peaceful place, well-watered, like a well-kept grove of fragrant trees. 

People always seem to be looking backwards, instead of observing the present, and searching out the future.

Religious people in particular, but so do scientists and atheists with no reasoning powers beyond the childishness of aggression and a foot-stamping hubris from their self-involved demanding egos - all forever take stories of the past and turn them over and over to find absolutely nothing...

You cannot find the 'Ark of the Covenant' because it does not exist anymore. Not that one!

The Rider on the Red Horse in the
Ark of the Covenant.
It is, what it is.

The reason they put myrtle orange in Campari and Chinotto is because it is not orange orange -and it is not pepper or salt or honey or molasses or anything else (if you know what I mean; I mean it is quite specific, a specific thing).

The electron spin polarity model of olfaction is the correct one. Each specific scent molecule is unique. Therefore it is digital; it is data, it is information.

If you want to dream the future you place bay leaves under your pillow.

Because it is high science and not BS like most of modern fake 'sci-ence' is.