Later today, in about 12 hours, a bunch of girls will be travelling on the Jeff Bezos Express to just under 62 miles above the Earth's notional surface.
I will be watching the event online of course, rather than from any of these little white oval objects.
...On the other hand -.
 |
| Interesting things come in small packages... Sometimes. |
Stranger things can happen than what people read about in the media.
Anyway, later on, at least the pod will not make a Splash! down somewhere and thus one could theoretically count on all the members being the same ones as who went up. Ain't that right, Jackson?
Meanwhile, elsewhere Brooke Eden will not be having a concert anywhere and none is scheduled until next month but it will also happen to be in Austin TX not far from where this 'Blue Origin' thing-y is going up.
LOL
If I went to a psychotherapist this week myself, they would doubtless confirm a strong case of Capgras Syndrome.
And that's because I would be quite liberal with the verbiage.
I don't mind telling people stuff. I mean, hey, what are they gonna do?
Why even Britney Spears is carrying on about 'clones' and has even I think written or part-way written a book on it called 'the Rose Project' - which is making the rounds of the Conspiracy Theory world.
Clones is not what is going on; at least not any clones coming from any lab in Planet Earth.
Me I just say - would say, to the therapist - I notice Britney Spears is banging on about clones...
 |
| Piastri wins again. How 'bout that. Who wudda guessed. |
In the very very old days - and Bill Smith, you know about this from some recent experiences - there were these 'mystery places,' which meant not what it means now, but the actual physical experiencing of what is not natural, and taken by the common people to be supernatural.
Today some of the richest people can go into space or pretty near to it, and that is very supernatural for most of the rest of us.
Yet in the past, the richest people might own, a 'mystery place' - a place for the experience of the supernatural - for example, like the son of the lunatic Roman Emperor Sulla, Faustus, owned, in the the highest of the hilly lands of what is now the Carinola de Casanova.
At this place, which is a 100 miles away from where the surviving 'villa dei misteri' is in Pompeii (also in the region of Campania, same as Falernus), there most definitely was a villa dei misteri, which was likewise with the one surviving now albeit as a renovated ruins, a place where one could experience the inconceivable.
Of course today, in the place of rocket-ships, the ancient mural paintings will mostly all tend to show beautiful-looking people with wings.
But all of you, because you know about it, will certainly note the presence of the purple cloth almost everywhere in the depicted scenes.
This is the phlox porphurios from ancient Tyre and Sidon -, from ancient 'Atlantis' effectively.
This is the burning purple.
 |
| Actual mural on the wall of the Villa Dei Misteri at Pompeii. |
This is the thing the rich woman, Lydia of Thyatira, was selling to Paul the Apostle and his entourage.
This is the thing that was used in the original 'talit' shawls of the Hebrew priests who carried the 'Ark of the Covenant.'
Faustus also owned, of course, the world's most coveted wine of all time, the doubly eponymous 'Faustian Falernian;' the first part of the double-barreled name being for Faustus, and the second name for the pauper Falernus, who was visited one time by the God of Wine, and who showed the God hospitality even though he had little.
I have no idea what modern religions are about.
They seem to be separated from reality and there is no material supernatural experience in them to be had at all.
Reality is like this - it's okay to be a pauper.
If you were to encounter a Divinity, it's probably better that you were one (a poor person) instead of a celebrity and very rich in the worldly sense - because then they would have many excuses to mess with you and not only with your mind.
I don't know any really rich people who are humble when push comes to shove.
Many of them fake humility quite decently but it doesn't last when challenged.
Humility.
ReplyDeleteThe boys down below are not seeing the color of your purple, but you are making the point/s that count!
DeleteI fink, I got the point
DeleteAre there "purple photons?"
Delete'Are there Ferrari bees? Mercedes bees? No, only bees bees, and bees' honey is good for horses.' The great race horse trainer Bart Cummings about his views on feeding his horses 'Manuka' honey.
DeleteI don't have a horse. Anyway, conversely, are there resonators that respond only when 2 different frequencies are present together, but not to either one individually?
DeleteI didn't know that "purple" color is constructed by our brains: https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a64393667/purple-is-fake/
ReplyDeleteMy dear fellow, ALL color is a phenomenon going on inside our heads. Our brains receive an electromagnetic wave through the portal of the eyes and interpret it as a color. People who are color blind may interpret that electromagnetic wave differently, but that doesn't mean it's "wrong," as there is no color in the universe - only EM frequencies. All color is an interpretation of EM frequencies that occurs INSIDE our heads.
DeleteThey say some insects can "see" into the ultraviolet spectrum. Only Odin knows what "color" they're "seeing"...
Well you're both right though, aren't you. The magazine particle will attract lots of arguments from physicists even though it is also, basically correct. I guess the most tendentious part is that anything really 'bends' so that discrete 'red' and discrete 'blue' meet - as the article suggest BECAUSE they are opposites. Well they're not really opposites because what Van Horn (happens to be right near where the girls were blasted off to space... ...and let's not get into whether INTO space or just near enough TO it. Fer gawdsakes) says is also correct in that the brain designates bounded-state categories to the spectrum of colors and labels each one according to what it has 'decided.' Next comment now, I might go into some easier-to-get terminologies about this... Not that I am any kind of physicist, really. Or, as Sabine Hossenfelder says 'fuzoos'ssst.'
DeleteThis is a great example of boundary state conditions. Or, BOUNDED state conditions, governing names of things, labels of things. Discrete spectral colors (ROYGBIV) are a matter of 'this, not that.' This set span of frequencies is 'this, not that:' for example, it might be RED, not ORANGE. And orange is orange not yellow; et cetera. When we get to 'purple' or 'cyan' for the printing industry, or even magenta - the thing is (that is to say the name or label being given/assigned by the brain) is: a bit of THIS AND a bit of THAT. The mind DOES actually see both colors and designates the mix 'purple.' Where there is really obvious weird stuff going on is when light blue and pink are placed side-by-side, then a dithering effect of the actual light waves (or beams!) and the brain is unable to 'see' the actual clear line that separates the two and there is a blurring effect that goes on. And then, we have several times talked about the energetic profile of ascending power up the spectrum and when it comes to Indigo and Ultra-Violet, there is an apparent loss of the strength of the curve trajectory - does 'energy' actually disappear from space, or manifest space-time and net present dimension? IDK!! This is something fuzoos'sssts actually cannot even conceive and falls into the territory of 'radical science.' LOL This is Graham Hancock stuff.
DeleteOh stop dancing around. Are there purple PHOTONS or not? You did say "particle" not "article."
DeleteA photon is a "quanta of energy" with a single wavelength, and as such can not "be purple." According to the standard definition. I think. I suppose as a carrier of energy we could ask whether an electron perfectly at rest could ever be put into some kind of anharmonic motion by interacting with a single photon. This would amount to "two wavelengths simultaneously."
DeleteHowever the theory says electrons are never "perfectly at rest" because of the uncertainty principle, zero point energy, etc.
Delete"Perfectly at rest."
DeleteHeh. Sounds like absolute zero.
Nothingness.
No-thing-ness...
The dream-less sleep...
I meant 'particle' the first time and 'article' the second time: the first time was for the thing as a beam, and the second time, as a wave. (Chuckle, gets outta here).
Delete'Magazine particle?' I mean magazine article. Prolly the fuziks got to my brain and fingers.
ReplyDeleteSo... It's very tempting to go along with the article's statement about 'bending' the spectrum or the light - and not just bending it but turning the spectrum (which is an arced lateral strip of course) in twist into a Mobius Strip. That way, you can suggest a mechanical reason for cancer - the 'purple' energy, the violent energetic precision spectral action of Ultra-Violet, is cutting at the precise helix connection of the DNA that connects also like a Mobius Strip itself. Which means that unless you propose a way of reconnecting the strip ends back as twists, you will never fix the broken DNA segments which is why cancer is so intractable: it still multiplies but as a dysfunctional structure. Jeezus Christ I think we've gone a bit too far here. None of us have the instrumentation that Imperial College has to be able to look down into these small structures and energy patterns, and nowhere near the research funding that would be necessary to go down these lines of thought usefully. Well, I mean, we 'could' but -. LOL Back to Graham Hancock again!! People would say you're crazy. No one can cure cancer and if SCI-ENTISTS ever came up with a cure, it would involve vaccines and lock-downs so that people were forced to stay out of the sunlight (UV) - also, they would have to be lock-in for life and be vaccinated every five minutes on taxpayer money.
ReplyDeleteKaty is kinda my idea of a Pleiadian - except, her hair should be a shimmering silver.
ReplyDeleteShe is something, that's for sure.
DeleteI shouldn't mess around - she's a hybrid but I have never gone into it with much care for that kind of detail as to which specific kind; the Universe is really such a huge place. I have an idea though - the Chinese call these kinds from 'Xuanu, or 'Jeuni' depending which dialect group but they are referring to the same people.
Delete