Of Spiders And Spins

We're going to talk about an amazing thing at the end, so hang in there.

Luca Turin is a biophysicist, and not just any old kind - he is a current research manager at Imperial College, which is the leading independent research grant funded academic institution in the world. Ahead of Harvard, ahead of Oxford, ahead of everyone.

I think we've already hinted - at least one or two of you already have pointed to the fact - that he received research funding from you-know-who; yes, the alphabet people.

He's into mind-control; naturally. Via bio-electronics.

Aaaah, we start so simple.
Spiders absolutely hate
this stuff - Proraso. Menthol and
Eucalyptus.
Not synthetic though. Real
Menthol and real
Eucalyptus.

 

But he was the guy who, in his outstanding collab book(s - because I think there's more than one even though some came out with just Turin's name as the author) with Tania Sanchez, came up with the metaphor of birds on a beach, and someone running at them:

First the small birds took off rapidly, 

followed by the medium-sized birds,

and finally the large and heavy-weight Pelicans flew off unhurriedly.

This was all to describe the action of olfactory molecules in the air.

Luca Turin is also widely misrepresented in supposedly authoritative literature as having 'predicted a certain human olfactory experiment outcome incorrectly based on the vibration model of olfaction (olfactory action).'

In fact he simply mentioned publicly that there were other scientists who had proposed hypotheses about various theories of molecular dynamics, inclusive of a vibratory aspect.

People from academia who need to necessarily debunk whatever does not fit into their standard narrative, loudly declaim both Turin and his supposed theoretical model.

It is a scientific fact however, that all scent molecules have electron spin polarity, and that all of them also have inertial states of energy (vibration).

To what extent which particular animal's noses are able to discriminate precisely between what minute molecules is for anyone to say...

This is the same problem I mentioned earlier, about the imperative definitions modern 'sci-entists' don't give a damn about clarifying, ever. 'Creativity.' What does that mean - to a sci-entist!! 'Can you tell the difference between menthol and camphor...?' (Some random human subject being asked). 'Yes - I know because I am Ukrainian.' 

I've seen the studies in question. They're BS.

...And then,
we move into more
interesting
spaces -.

You've got no chance of getting sense from today's breed of scientists. They're all desperates with agendas.

That's just the reality.

Some animals have much larger ranges of sensitivity when it comes to olfactory molecules than humans, and that has never been contested by anyone ever.

The size and complexity of the cellular structures of insects simply does not allow for the Buck & Axel 'lock and key' model of olfaction. The sensitivity and size of the 'equipment' tends towards the vibratory model. So the debunkers are way wrong. But like the academic theory of the Pyramids, the whole of academia is pre-committed to some primitive stupid nonsense that it cannot any longer justify but of course, will not give up on easily, if at all...

'Electron spin' is data not 'vibration.' And no one in physics speaks of the vibration of molecules when they mean the orbital positions/attitudes and pulses of the electrons. 

'Vibration' is a loose terminology although it can be used in a casual way for just normal street-level conversation about the matter.

When you spray a scent into the air, you are spraying data by way of the electron spin of the molecules.

A spider or a mosquito has no way of feeling that a particular molecule is shaped a certain way, with a certain mass different to just plain water raindrops, for example - yet they will avoid camphor and eucalyptus and menthol and capsaicin like the plague.

Hey! Did someone slip
something into the tea?!

And, you can tune a frequency generating device and get the same results.

I don't know what the specific relevant <meters are so don't anyone ask!

Now I want to touch on something completely different.

It's not different in that it also has to do with neurology and micro-scale matters.

There is this thing called the Capgras Syndrome or also, Capgras Delusion.

What it is is that a few people, especially when they are suffering late-stage Alzheimers for one case of it, can hold this unshakable belief that a certain person they know or knew, has been substituted by another different individual but made to look the same and act similarly.

Islam has this delusion to do with how God substituted some random innocent guy and had him crucified in the place of Jesus...

LOL

The practical mechanics of how it would be possible to just suddenly substitute some amazingly similar physical human form, is never explained by those suffering from such delusions - and by the way, it is not the only delusion of the sort that people have: sometimes they think a person is dead and no longer exists who is still alive (I had that one for some years about Marvin Gaye -, when I was telling people that the singer had intervened in a family fight between an uncle and his - Gaye's - father, and was shot by one of them; and people used to smile at me and laugh that he was still alive and where did I get that insane story. And then of course, it exactly did happen like that. Even I am amazed...)

And there are a number of other ones with similar aspects - the same person is going around in different guises is one such.

Things are 
startin' ta 
look a bit funny!

However because some of you have gone a little more than casually into the spintronics concepts to do with acquiring a 'second sight' as it were, it is probably worth mentioning that there are two kinds of 'normal human' situations on this planet, where there are such 'unusual' kinds of affairs.

One is that there are elf-like people, human people but rather diminutive, who are (mis-)taken for ordinary human beings (and I'm not talking about anyone here, in case one of you at least was thinking that!). But just like all the rest of you 'normal' human beings, they are here in a normal human physical body - where the structural data about that body reflects who they really are.

And that means that unless the mind data is also transferred, they are quite in a state of internal turmoil.

And then there are one or two or several in fact, people who have been substituted. And usually this happens, typically, when a plane trip encountered some kind of electronic trouble at high altitude.

The person that is 'back' is almost just an automaton, following a kind of organic systematic reactive 'intelligence' rather than that the real person with their own dynamic active Monad mind is actually inside there.

: )

You will not find today, any Ancient Greek literature truly explaining Pythagoras's or Heraclitus ideas about the Monad - but I will tell them to you: the Monad is your Personal Self which has an inward as well as outward-looking mirror, and that reacts with perfect sensitivity to geometrical shapes and to the forces of moving geometries.

I think it is a bad idea to widely disseminate complex ideas about internal electron spintronics and data patterns and discrete vibration formations that are innate to a particular individual. (Which is what we have been doing here and will continue to, because no one comes here!) LOL

The reason there is Death among the living beings of the planet, is that any single human person will be unable to live with the trouble they have caused all by themselves, if they had to live let's say, beyond a normal human lifespan with a totally sensational physical body structure.

With Death, the memory cells are destroyed.

Yes it is a cave, and I have my head
chained to look only at the
projection of reality...
But it is a nice cave, you have to admit.

All the good, all the bad -, everything, goes.

The electron spin data could be retrieved, if it ever had been stored somewhere viable.

All you need to acquire that kind of development, is unwavering faith in -.

Enoch 'disappeared' because he had unwavering faith... ...in -.

Well, he had a consistent practice of sensitivity to an Ultimate Intelligence Who was Benevolent.

I noticed just this week some Rabbi pose the question 'why is God invisible?'

Well who said He was invisible??

Every single Contact Experiencer that you have ever come across, always says ET's act like as though they are automated, or somewhat automated. That is of course, not the case, but they are smarter than to think they can make just any old spontaneous decision out of a personal whim - which is how humans mostly all behave. So indeed they look automated.

There are many 'Enochs' around the place, that is to say, many who have 'been taken.'

As the US Navy continues its slow leak about what it has been encountering off San Diego, let me just say, that never will there be a time when the US Government will or will be able, to discuss everything that is going on, that is to say, everything that they have some files about but are unable to explain.

Your job, and you have really no choice about it, is to be able to stabilize those characters if you ever should encounter one of them, who feel a little destabilized by life on this planet.

It's hard to 'have faith' of course if you cannot see properly. 

...Don't forget, when I upload videos here, there is a backstory, sometimes. Wonder what Jackson -...

Definitely no substitute; you can tell from the eyes.