How Things Start

They start with an empty space.

'Empty beach, empty streets, sun goes down alone...' Don Henley: The Boys of Summer.

Om Na-Ma Shi-Va-Ya Om (That's seven sounds there; and that's the note system, and the color system, and the...).

'Shi' - no; 'Va' - thing.

Thing.

Meanwhile...

...A couple of silly little kids. That's us down here.

Actually I think the lyrics say 'nobody on the beach, etc.' 

The Book of Daniel begins with a most unusual set of ideas, for the 'Hebrew' Bible.

A dark horse...

Daniel is just a little kid, see - a child, literally, and taken by the officers of Nebuchadnezzar and trained to speak Chaldean Babylonian (whatever that was, some kind of thing not 'modern' Aramaic but also called 'Aramaic' by scholars). He is among some children taken who had the confidence to 'stand before the king' and who 'had an understanding of science.'

Now I'm not sure what the original manuscripts say, that is I don't know what the original word they were using there was, but the KJV uses the modern word 'science.'

Which is interesting.

So Daniel becomes extremely learned in not just Hebrew matters but also in Chaldean magic and astronomy and astrology as the Babylonians back then had their form of it.

He is not regarded by Jews as an actual Jewish prophet.

He is, on the other hand, regarded by Christians as almost, the prophet for our times.

The Book of Daniel says that Daniel was explicitly taught personally by God Himself.

Now just what does that mean?

Why should it be that Daniel should be taught by God Himself?

Should not the Hebrew people be cared for by God Himself - instead, at that time, they were taken into captivity by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar.

Daniel, in fact, continues in the court of the Babylonians right through the life of Nebuchadnezzar and then on into the reign of Cyrus the Great. He doesn't ever go back to the Hebrew people.

Manning Laneway Festival
yesterday.

Hmn.

And God, not Moses, or the Laws of Moses, taught Daniel.

Daniel does however, show faithfulness to his earliest traditions, and refuses the food of the Chaldeans and convinces them that they should permit him to eat what he had been raised on.

Essentially this does appear to be grains and water, rather than the meat and the wine that Nebuchadnezzar had ordered his officers to give the kids in order to make them as strong as the Babylonian (or Chaldean, in the account) youth.

But Daniel has an understanding of science. Chaldean meat was 'heavily spiced' and that, my friends, is principally because unlike us today, they did not have fridges.

So Daniel 'has an understanding of scientific things.'

He even gives the Chaldean officers an experiment to run to see whether he and his friends would be healthy on their normal food compared to what the Chaldean kids were being fed.

It does not say explicitly in the standard modern Bible anywhere, the specific techniques to use to get into direct touch with advanced beings such as the kind that Enoch clearly was engaging with and going on trips with, and using their technology to travel around in.

Or does it?

Well, it does but only using the faintest of touches to do so.

I think the most important thing is the first foundation of faithfulness. Do you have that to begin with? Daniel did.

And then, God taught him stuff.

God knew what he was like to begin with.

At the Manning Laneway Festival...
For the Autism Employment Project:
'Safe Drone Flying Awareness and
Bush-Fire Safety.' 

'Knowing stuff' that includes or involves very advanced high-level tools and techniques is a learned process - if you are going to be able to implement things entirely by yourself.

The Hebrews must have been fairly smart, and the Chaldeans were not only smart but powerful and militaristic as well. God-knowledge level however, was way more advanced still than both of those two. Both of.

And Jews don't like it.

...I definitely have a bunch of little Earth-technology drones.

And that is all I am saying for right now. 

 

PRESS RELEASE

Manning Laneway Festival

So, we just got back from participating in the Manning Laneway Festival.

Manning is a super-wealthy local suburb here, mostly of older residents but they are all still highly active in different things.

A section of the Manning Laneway behind the
local public library - 
looks a bit different when there are
a thousand people in there and stalls and 
music and kids and things.
 

I have to say I was not expecting quite as large a turn-out as actually eventuated - which was at least four/five thousand people over a few hours.

As soon as I have a chance to organize the pics I took I'll post something up here of it.

Basically we had a stand to do with the Autism employment project and bush-fire safety and the potential for kids with Autism gaining meaningful roles as wildlife and bush wardens. 

'Bush' here in Australia means the outback terrain with all of its flora and fauna and ancient land formations and even the very ancient rock and cave art. There is an enormous amount of traditional culture from the most ancient times, right through the the relatively modern era of Australian poets and bushmen and their artistry with horses and livestock - and in all of that not leaving out the Afghan camel drivers who opened up the inland to the Western people.

I think I've already told the story of the finding of the world's richest gold ore deposit (Boddington Mine) by a geologist who listened to a local Aboriginal prospector who told him that the gold was where the tiny red-flowered plants were.... Turned out to be totally true. That geologist lives here in Salter Point (Manning). I know him quite well. 

One of the most interesting, exciting, atmospheric and truly historically redolent things you will ever do, if you have the chance to - is go for a journey on the first class Ghan, the Australian overland express train.

Best 'high end' food, best service, highest quality and best travelling environment of anywhere on the planet. Absolutely no question at all. Beats the pants off the European Orient Express.

That's how good, because Orient Ex is stunning.

...If you were really paying attention to the last music track (and the last Blog article and all of the comments!), this will hit you (watch the video... chuckle; what's it saying? What did you ask - how to slip laterally across time? I dunno. How?):

Philip's Orthogonal Time Slip

Philip K. Dick was one of the most influential science fiction writers of the last hundred years -, and every summary of his life in any journal or media resource always uses the phrase 'had a troubled life.'

Well whether he really did or not I cannot say.

I know that a number of historical figures of great note - for instance the celebrated Italian sculptor of the 16th Century, Benvenuto Cellini - have lives peppered with 'incidents' involving essentially, violence... In the case of Cellini he was in the habit of carrying a dagger around with him and stabbing, although usually not to death so that their suffering would persist, anyone who sued him or in some way 'went against him' in society.

The Cellini salt cellar. It's a small thing -
worth an estimated 60 million
US dollars today. 
Was stolen from the Vienna Museum 
a few years ago but recovered in 2006.

I am bringing these figures into our pages here because they are examples of some individuals who were very much verging onto, or at least, into, the coming future world.

Philip Dick described what he had somehow discovered, which was that our human world and its society, is not a chronologically linear one at all -, where a certain trajectory merely continues to its natural decline and conclusion. Like George Soros, Philip Dick realized that it was possible to bend and manipulate the obtaining trajectory of history that you were in, and send it off into some completely other direction.

Dick held that in fact it wasn't exactly a matter of world leaders simply bending anything by their own actions and will, but that there were multiple time lines all going on at the same real 'channel' - and he even initiated the phrase 'the Matrix' to describe it 

He explained that he personally had had certain actual 'experiences' through which he was now 'recalling' things from his own future existence - and which was how he accounted for his creation of such works as what later became the movie 'Blade Runner' and also 'The Man In The High Castle.'

Rolex Cellini. Named in dedication to
the sculptor Benvenuto Cellini.

He said that he himself was not going to be among the actual first people who would be able to do these things with any real facility (because he was only doing it in a fragmentary way), and that there would be others, at a certain moment in the 'channel future,' who would be able to move with more facility in and out of a positive 'future' and by which process they would be able to 'jump' our erstwhile trajectory away from its extremely negative direction and onto the positive time line.

But he said that not everyone would be able to 'follow' or be positively affected, and that by and large, most people would fall back into a terminally degenerative time groove. And -, that there were active intelligent and highly negative, malicious people and forces intent on dragging as many people back into that nightmarish 'hole' as possible.

Interestingly, he literally quoted Saint Paul about 'going into future time' and 'stepping out of the present time and its baleful path.'

Philip Dick is interesting because he actually sets out what it is (or was) that allows people, certain people, to have better and easier lives...

Not linking to anything here yet. Because I don't want anyone here rushing off and buying this. It isn't necessary for you. But this thing has a free Crypto AI program in it which just goes off and makes money all by itself with zero risk and zero capital. Yes it does. Yes it does.

Sorry, but yes it does!

Sorry naysayers, but it actually does. And I have it. And that's the end of the matter. Don't argue - I too, like Cellini, have a dagger and more than just any old dagger.

And I'm not the only one around here that does.

We whip our daggers out and many people die. Or live on.

If you think I am joking in any way at all, you'd better go find that forty-odd minute speech by Philip K. Dick which is right now at least, still available on-line everywhere.

I know some of you might be thinking this place has turned a bit sinister, but not really. 

We were hidden before, that's all. I told you all before - two slaughtered 185,000 Assyrian soldiers overnight; I told you that right here up front.

You keep going and we can keep going too. Right up to your front yard if necessary. Stop being an idiot. We are here.

Where...

Now we are about to look at only some of the most austere, elevated, and advanced thinking any humans have ever proceeded into.

The greatest modern expositor of these philosophical ideas - and they are philosophical ideas - is Lee Strasberg, the acting coach of Marilyn Monroe. 

The greatest ancient classical propounders of these philosophical ideas, were Parmenides and Pythagoras, and we must include Democritus too, because he sets out the essential primary atomic number basis.

Magenta is the Pantone
Color-of-the-Year for 2023.
 

Strasberg makes the point that everything in human life (and really, it is everything in life itself) essentially involves a process of communication - and there has to be some medium via which one thing is conveyed to some other thing.

If a human stands before a real god, in a place where a real god is, they must stand in a position of needfulness, and ambition - to have... ...something.

In human history, there are two great and entirely separate and different, and competing propositions about 'God' or Divinity:

The first one is a system of rules and laws, the breaking of which have negative consequences, usually violent ones, and the outcome of whose accepting (of those rules and laws), is a relationship of master and servant between God and/or its intermediary (Al Syouti transmitting the narration of Ali ibn Abi Talib; classed as a 'mawquf' hadith aka authoritative and primary and morally and factually unquestionable), the same as the way the Hebrews under Moses had to do (obey) whatever Yahweh commanded or else they would suffer or die.

This first system has dominated the entire history of the common people and all Western societies.

A corollary of this system is atheism, whose simple proposition is just the apophatic contradistinction from positive 'Overlord Deism.'

There is a version of this system which is what all political dictators proclaim, namely, the concept that there is such a thing as a benevolent dictatorship; but this is still based on the positive overlord proposition.

Turin bicerin coffee,
is what you will need plenty of for 
all of this.

The second system is a theorem existentialism about God. 

This is the idea of a statement that can be proved by a chain of reasoning.

Of course, the validity of the statement depends on the reliability and substantiation of each link in the chain.

In the story of Solomon and Sheba, Sheba enters upon a scene in which the purported throne of the king is at the end of some shiny, glass-like or watery floor or stage.

Sheba at first thinks this is water, and lifts her skirts. And then she discovers that it is some kind of polished crystal or stone.

Behind this idea is another idea, a more important one than just the initial awe inspired by such an unexpected, streamlined, almost futuristic scene of such highly-polished stone or crystal...

This same element - a description of a floor of shining glass-like crystal - occurs in every single account of some Biblical figure going to the throne area of God: it is there in Daniel, it is there in Enoch, in Elijah, and in the Apocalyptic vision.

As soon as you have a thing with properties, though, you are talking about a material; about matter.

As soon as you have 'properties' as ideas, then you are talking about the realm of ideas themselves and not matter.

Parmenides proposed the monad, a single unitary thing, the primary unit of matter, which somehow yet reflected all other things literally within itself, and yet being also able to project them out from what was immediately around it as well.

Where are there real temples,
where the gods really are present, in the 
forms that they really have?

The idea of a reflective floor upon which someone stands, before a Deity, is the proposition of self-reflection.

The problem that modern atheists have, is that the consistency of matter and its behavior through the Cosmos guarantees the existential reality of a field principle - and this means the existence of some supra-material factor coming from some elsewhere other than only in the units of matter themselves: for the fact they all behave equally means even just the existence of physics verisimilitude from quanta to separate items of quanta means there is such a physic 'law.'  And the law is different to the material object. Has to be; it is the equivalency aspect, the unified field aspect, which is different from the elements. It is an idea. It is the idea behind the things behaving all the same. 

The ultra atheists will want to say well this is just an objective (human brain's construct) idea but drawn from the existential fact. But that does not explain relationship and connection.

What is the medium - in the vacuum of space - that ties the behaviors of elements?

Because in the very first place we are not talking only about one simple function - say, like 'dot-ness.' We are talking about all real principles of mathematics and kinetic geometry. Each one is able to be treated as a theorem on their own, and the panoply of them all is a group of many different geometric propositions: triangle, sphere, circle, square - and on and on.

These 'exist' outside of matter but have power over all matter.

The reason they placed girls
in pics of Seventies and Eighties
Italian cars was because the
designs were that good. ...Of the girls.

So - when you stand on the self-reflecting 'floor' of a large number of monads, your own reflection is in the first place a relationship between things. And on the putative throne (which we have not seen yet, in our description) ahead of us must be - must, be - the highest examples all joined together in a perfect arrangement, of all of the non-matter geometries and dynamics and balanced equations, of which we individually are simply a monad example of...

But because reflection, then relationship. There is no 'master/servant' relationship - there is only relationship. Reflects means harmonic, therefore cannot be master/servant.

Means harmonic - harmonizes.

This does not mean you are god, sitting on the throne of all power.

It means you have a direct harmonic relativity between the perfect example of all geometries, and your existential reality - if you cannot harmonize, you disappear from existence eventually.

You have to relate.

You do not have to worship.

Although you can, because that is a feeling, a real existential part of who you are - it is an internal impulse pertinent to you. 

...If the perfect arrangement of all geometries and communications (Strasberg), then the perfect agency of complete power throughout the material Universe. 

'Toil and mediocrity.' You have been artificially disconnected from the monad, and from the prime arrangement of all monads and perfect geometries and the communication media of the actual existential material Universe.

Pages of relativity physics notation will seem like very advanced stuff, but it is just a load of gibberish made from an artificial language designed to convince you that others are smarter than they actually are.

You can reach out and touch and feel the complex and elevated harmonics of the Universe at any time:

Real Names Versus Titles Only

You see, so many of the figures of myth and cultural tradition, are known to ordinary people only by their titles and not their actual names.

'Hermes' is a title, which means he who brings a beautiful message. And yes, it does have some punning characteristics to do with rocks and stones but most of these titles all do as well (have dual meanings).

In the Russian this name - well, title - is Uri, which is Evri in ancient Greek.

You are well-versed in the modern pop myth of Atlantis. This city-state was established by the sons and daughters of the Titan, Atlas.

The 'lost' city of Prometheus, God who brought
fire from Heaven to Men in burning embers
hidden inside a fennel stalk.

Now Atlas, in theory a Titan, had a brother who was somehow not a Titan but some other thing, only vaguely explained in any early writings. And this brother was called 'Prometheus;' but that is a title...

Prometheus created, with something called the Eudaemon Spirit, Man, and then, on command of Zeus, a troublesome counter-entity, aka Pandora. There is no implication in ancient classical Greek myth, that Man and Woman were created either equal or good. In fact, Mankind on the whole is wicked and Woman was made to destroy Him. 

But then you've got to understand that in these accounts there is a huge difference between 'Male' and 'Female' and Man and Woman.

Man means humankind. 

Up until the destruction by the Muslims, of the Great Library of Alexandria, there was a compilation of all the actual names of the Titans and the gods. This book has been sealed up until the time of the end - of humankind. Humankind cannot survive what has befallen the world.

There are claims that some pages from one of the compilations of a dictionary of ancient Greek words, by Hesychius of Alexandria, does contain the actual name of Prometheus, but it only contains possibilities for what it might have be written down as, based on what cult groups sounded it out as being.

'Enterprise system personal transport.'

While there was a vast and powerful kingdom and city-state founded by his brother, Atlas, there is no such known place founded by Prometheus and he has no temples that are clearly evident to anyone, even in antiquity - although he regularly shared a place with one of the Gods.

Prometheus carried out the role of courier between the gods and the Titans in the Titanomachy - and it is from this role, that people say he was not ever a Titan as such, having on the one hand been the grandson of the first God Ouranos and his consort Gaia, and literally therefore being the nephew of Zeus, the then king of the gods.

'God' and 'god' have two distinct implied meanings in the ancient Greek tradition - one means the sentient and Supreme, Eternal 'Spirit'-like (was more than some invisible thing, but literally was the discrete force and the power over something particular) existential being at the head of a category of thing; whereas the other meant the existential absolute ruler over some boundary-defined place or people or things.

What makes all of this important for you, is that whereas the gods can have an interest in some humans at various times, only the actual creator of humans cares about them for all time.

Which is why when you pray to 'god,' your prayers are not answered.

The temples where the real Gods really are,
and to know them by their actual
names, and see them in their real forms.

Unless you know what the name and the characteristics are, of the sentient being/s you are trying to interact with - who have the kind of power you seek - then you will be addressing an 'unknown god.'

Nevertheless, even that is good enough in the sense of that the Turkey ruling elite just discovered that if you offend even the 'unknown god' formally, you will find out just what consequences will necessarily ensue.

All the greater then, if you consort with that being as known.

...Moving then, to Prometheus, the Creator of Man:

Never will the Creator of Man destroy you. Never will He destroy His messengers.

'Jibreel' is not a messenger of Prometheus, because Prometheus, being Himself a messenger and a deliverer of, and one who manifests, things from the abode of the Eternal Heavens, will not be so Un-Just as to betray the Divine Aspect Himself by killing His own messenger.

You do not know the name of Prometheus.

And therein lies your quandary, and the source of all your struggles and your problems - for you are, as it were, an orphan in the Universe of the Eternal Beings.

Were you to go to the real temple of the Gods, and see them as they really are, and know them by their true names -, you will find Life, and all good things.