Where...

Now we are about to look at only some of the most austere, elevated, and advanced thinking any humans have ever proceeded into.

The greatest modern expositor of these philosophical ideas - and they are philosophical ideas - is Lee Strasberg, the acting coach of Marilyn Monroe. 

The greatest ancient classical propounders of these philosophical ideas, were Parmenides and Pythagoras, and we must include Democritus too, because he sets out the essential primary atomic number basis.

Magenta is the Pantone
Color-of-the-Year for 2023.
 

Strasberg makes the point that everything in human life (and really, it is everything in life itself) essentially involves a process of communication - and there has to be some medium via which one thing is conveyed to some other thing.

If a human stands before a real god, in a place where a real god is, they must stand in a position of needfulness, and ambition - to have... ...something.

In human history, there are two great and entirely separate and different, and competing propositions about 'God' or Divinity:

The first one is a system of rules and laws, the breaking of which have negative consequences, usually violent ones, and the outcome of whose accepting (of those rules and laws), is a relationship of master and servant between God and/or its intermediary (Al Syouti transmitting the narration of Ali ibn Abi Talib; classed as a 'mawquf' hadith aka authoritative and primary and morally and factually unquestionable), the same as the way the Hebrews under Moses had to do (obey) whatever Yahweh commanded or else they would suffer or die.

This first system has dominated the entire history of the common people and all Western societies.

A corollary of this system is atheism, whose simple proposition is just the apophatic contradistinction from positive 'Overlord Deism.'

There is a version of this system which is what all political dictators proclaim, namely, the concept that there is such a thing as a benevolent dictatorship; but this is still based on the positive overlord proposition.

Turin bicerin coffee,
is what you will need plenty of for 
all of this.

The second system is a theorem existentialism about God. 

This is the idea of a statement that can be proved by a chain of reasoning.

Of course, the validity of the statement depends on the reliability and substantiation of each link in the chain.

In the story of Solomon and Sheba, Sheba enters upon a scene in which the purported throne of the king is at the end of some shiny, glass-like or watery floor or stage.

Sheba at first thinks this is water, and lifts her skirts. And then she discovers that it is some kind of polished crystal or stone.

Behind this idea is another idea, a more important one than just the initial awe inspired by such an unexpected, streamlined, almost futuristic scene of such highly-polished stone or crystal...

This same element - a description of a floor of shining glass-like crystal - occurs in every single account of some Biblical figure going to the throne area of God: it is there in Daniel, it is there in Enoch, in Elijah, and in the Apocalyptic vision.

As soon as you have a thing with properties, though, you are talking about a material; about matter.

As soon as you have 'properties' as ideas, then you are talking about the realm of ideas themselves and not matter.

Parmenides proposed the monad, a single unitary thing, the primary unit of matter, which somehow yet reflected all other things literally within itself, and yet being also able to project them out from what was immediately around it as well.

Where are there real temples,
where the gods really are present, in the 
forms that they really have?

The idea of a reflective floor upon which someone stands, before a Deity, is the proposition of self-reflection.

The problem that modern atheists have, is that the consistency of matter and its behavior through the Cosmos guarantees the existential reality of a field principle - and this means the existence of some supra-material factor coming from some elsewhere other than only in the units of matter themselves: for the fact they all behave equally means even just the existence of physics verisimilitude from quanta to separate items of quanta means there is such a physic 'law.'  And the law is different to the material object. Has to be; it is the equivalency aspect, the unified field aspect, which is different from the elements. It is an idea. It is the idea behind the things behaving all the same. 

The ultra atheists will want to say well this is just an objective (human brain's construct) idea but drawn from the existential fact. But that does not explain relationship and connection.

What is the medium - in the vacuum of space - that ties the behaviors of elements?

Because in the very first place we are not talking only about one simple function - say, like 'dot-ness.' We are talking about all real principles of mathematics and kinetic geometry. Each one is able to be treated as a theorem on their own, and the panoply of them all is a group of many different geometric propositions: triangle, sphere, circle, square - and on and on.

These 'exist' outside of matter but have power over all matter.

The reason they placed girls
in pics of Seventies and Eighties
Italian cars was because the
designs were that good. ...Of the girls.

So - when you stand on the self-reflecting 'floor' of a large number of monads, your own reflection is in the first place a relationship between things. And on the putative throne (which we have not seen yet, in our description) ahead of us must be - must, be - the highest examples all joined together in a perfect arrangement, of all of the non-matter geometries and dynamics and balanced equations, of which we individually are simply a monad example of...

But because reflection, then relationship. There is no 'master/servant' relationship - there is only relationship. Reflects means harmonic, therefore cannot be master/servant.

Means harmonic - harmonizes.

This does not mean you are god, sitting on the throne of all power.

It means you have a direct harmonic relativity between the perfect example of all geometries, and your existential reality - if you cannot harmonize, you disappear from existence eventually.

You have to relate.

You do not have to worship.

Although you can, because that is a feeling, a real existential part of who you are - it is an internal impulse pertinent to you. 

...If the perfect arrangement of all geometries and communications (Strasberg), then the perfect agency of complete power throughout the material Universe. 

'Toil and mediocrity.' You have been artificially disconnected from the monad, and from the prime arrangement of all monads and perfect geometries and the communication media of the actual existential material Universe.

Pages of relativity physics notation will seem like very advanced stuff, but it is just a load of gibberish made from an artificial language designed to convince you that others are smarter than they actually are.

You can reach out and touch and feel the complex and elevated harmonics of the Universe at any time: