Not Teasing

I was not ever trying to tease anyone here - or just be 'teasing.'

Obviously that is not how things are necessarily going to come across because I have never posted pics of anything that goes on down here!

Well, that's not exactly true - I posted some of JES and also the Lux Partum German affair. Whether you can tell that there are any 'people' in the audience who should not be there according to 'sci-ence...' Well, I cannot say.

Let's go down the rabbit-hole.
This is the Lafite-Rothschild
cellars for some of their
best wines.

But given that there are one or two people reading along with us who have voiced some sense of 'tease,' it might be appropriate to swing away from the money side of things just for a short while and go back to covering the 'other subject' for just a minute or two.

The main thing about not saying too much all that openly is that we are dealing with extraordinarily dangerous matters. We are dealing with the fact that governments themselves do want to know that there really are 'other people' here. To some extent they do know it, except it has been bottled up into the Intel fraternities where it has managed to exist as a secret to do with nuclear weapons - and there has never really been so much 'activity' that things needed to be extricated from that shadowy crevice.

To say that anyone here has regularly actual meetings with suspicious characters, is only inviting trouble.

It would already be possible to know where to look if someone made a systemic examination of all of the posts here across several years.

I'm going to try and explain this - or at least, my own attitude and sense of where and when or even if, it will be appropriate to openly say anything very detailed...

I am going to explain it by talking about something right off what you would think is even vaguely connected. Someone.

But to at least find a kind of a bridging point I can say that I have always said we are misusing our own communication tools - those of our own normal senses - in the way we assume 'talking' is actual intelligent communicating. It is not.

'Talking' or speaking intelligent sensible connected meaning words - is in fact a way of mischievously presenting insufficient real information about what we think and feel.

Some people blush when they tell lies or say something embarrassing to them, and that is a minimalist parallel communications tool that should go along with the spoken word; the fact we have very little range of skin flush signalling is a negative aspect of human evolution.

Only because the pic is
cute.
To me it is, anyway.

Certain well-known identities in fields of communicating - film directors, drama producers, maybe some stage people, opera and ballet artists and creators - do have a set of tools they all use and know about, but which they mostly never discuss with others.

Roger Vadim is a guy who is one of these and to the extent that I know that he really is, then, look, hey - I have to deal with him...

And you might not know I mean there.

Vadim was not necessarily demeaning of the women actors he directed and produced, but I would say he dismissed them utterly as worthy of his deepest honesty and highest intellectual thoughts. I think Bardot was on to him to some extent. But I don't think Fonda ever was. I think Pickett had some idea and thankfully was subject to much criticism from the professional media tribes of vandals and Vadim passed away from this Earth quickly after his work with her so she avoided the biggest problem that is entailed with going too deeply into the truth.

For one thing, the people of the human race generally crucify Truth all day long. Do not fancy for one second you are a 'good' people, a 'good' species - nor that you are even all that particularly intelligent.

You cannot be intelligent if you are using such a limited range of what your possible, or potential communications tools actually are.

Roger Vadim never explained what his method was with any of his female stars. Most people like him leave such 'explanations' to the end stages of their lives - and many expected Kubrick to do it, but he never did either.

Kubrick never had the same technique or skills that Vadim had, with his female actors, but he certainly did with the all the male ones: he completely did it with Peter Sellers, for example.

I have always considered that there may come a time much later on in my life, at which I might or maybe should explain a few things clearly. I certainly have possession of certain facts and 'things' that would completely challenge everything you ever thought you knew that human science 'knew.'

Human science is not even close.

At the same time there is a tremendous militancy of stupidity among most of the prominent public figures - and we have seen it recently with Sam Harris, where he literally said that 'if, Covid was more deadly, and the vaccines more obviously effective, then, maybe people would not have had such foolish conspiracy theory tendencies about how the scientists all lied about the problem and the dangers.' Canadian public philosopher Gad Saad has said this is like saying our table cloth would make a beautiful setting for our roast dinner if we had a table to lay it out it on... ...if we had a beautiful table-cloth.

...If we had a roast dinner.

What this means is that confronted with absolute cold hard evidence people would just simply deny it in favor of their previous commitments to some viewpoint, which was now obviously wrong though.

'A' truth, is that right here, there is already a place where people are building on pretty important philosophical understandings about logic and human psychology too.

And so I would like for us to accept that there are a number of fine minds already here, who ought to be looking at new problems, or even just other ideas not exactly problems as such, and applying their mind tools onto those matters. ...On a dynamic, 'each and every day' basis.

We don't need to go back and go over the same old ground all the time all the time.

We already are the beneficiaries of Jesus, Enoch, Elijah, Plato, Pythagoras, Freud, Jung and so on.

We did not 'go up to heaven' either with Elijah or Enoch or Jesus - and as for the last dude, He literally said some would be down here and having to 'wait' for something.

There's plenty of YouTube people claiming He is coming back next Tuesday or thereabouts though, as you know.

For me, I would hope you could consider the possibility that you might just apply some tools and techniques from all of these people without having to 'go up' anywhere (and likely not return!) - and have effects on situations right here and right now.

Oh of course, I know, a laser canon or something would certainly have an effect - but then that is not the thing Vadim used on his actors. Now was it?

So but if Vadim could twist Fonda's mind without blasting it with a laser weapon (although who knows what he had on the set of Barbarella), then why do you feel you need to come visit with some ET Aliens in space ships and maybe acquire some light sabers or whatever?

If Vadim was able to twist Jane Fonda's mind...

Good enough though?

Are there ET Alien space ships and do they have weapons in there? 

What would be the point though, of anyone going up there if they were permanently prey to a Vadim-style set of techniques because they did not want to change their own minds?

And what makes you think you are at all entitled to 'go there' when you adamantly resist looking at first principles in the matter?

Rather than worry about, or ask to see the space craft and the occupants, why not bring some Earth problems to here and let's all of us work on them.

You're all smart enough in a combined way.

You don't need anybody else's brain-power. Okay you might need some fun nights with Fonda but then, that was already in the toolkit of Vadim; he ain't here on the planet right now, but so what?

Are you able to work out what he was doing all by yourself?

  

What We Have That Others Haven't

Some of you who have been reading here for a long while now, and maybe even reading some of the 'off-site' books on Amazon/Kindle, already will have formed the view that either whoever is really behind this place is in league with some kind of functionally active Intel organization somewhere, or else maybe in league with 'demons' (lol) or actual ET Aliens - or all three!

So now we will take things up a notch for you guys (which is a term that includes 'gals' of course), because you will be able to link what you are about to read with what you already have read. Whereas those new to this will simply see only this one moment and see it very likely as simply an ordinary potential advanced perspective on a well-known subject: namely 'AI.'

I like retro sci-fi, don't you?

But the fact is, most of you will appreciate, that there is no such thing as 'AI' in this world today.

It is not 'artificial' (because it is real, mechanistic...) and it is not 'intelligence' because it is so far away from what constitutes human intelligence that one cannot legitimately employ the same term to describe the two different things.

Human intelligence is composed of conscious decision-making - including analysis and drives to action - coming through personal emotional sensations of pleasure and displeasure.

No machines anywhere have any systems which can truly equivalently appreciate the meaning of what humans experience when they (humans) make value decisions from feelings.

The world of science contains a grooved-in view about what neuroscience says that 'emotions' and 'feelings' are - and this view is completely erroneous.

Science has not even discovered anywhere close to the range of neurotransmitters that it would need to in order to be able to say anything meaningfully conclusive about how the human feels pleasure and displeasure. Right now it focuses on Dopamine and Serotonin, largely.

Nevertheless, we all know that there is a swelling tide to throw the term 'AI' into everything new coming across the technology threshold - and so we must expect to see it ('AI') everywhere soon.

Unless you've had the real thing,
in the right environment - 
you don't know what 'transcendence' is.

But virtually none of it will really be 'Artificial Intelligence.'

A better way of labeling a decent example of something like what is being talked about so casually, is 'human fabricated machine learning systems with response protocols for human interactions.'

And then of course, maybe somewhere way out in space... ...lol - there will be civilizations who have enabled some kind of emulative human emotion system for a fabricated machine being.

Now here is something that is a long way away from Malthus and all of the present human psychology studies that you have ever read:

There is a seeming vagary about human emotions - which comes from the fact that they move across a map-able set of 'meaning' nodes, or foci - and these movements are stochastic.

Which means they can be analyzed statistically, but they cannot be predicted accurately.

Now.

Yes they cannot be predicted by your earth scientists.

But they can be determined (that is, forced) by ours.

This is the real dude that makes these
things - 'Argos.'
Dunno. Is he good or bad?
We'll let the AI decide.
lol

If human emotional prioritization is stochastic only, then it cannot ever be emulated in a machine learning tool (software/program).

Malthus wants to say that 'transcendence' is on top of his pyramid or hierarchy of value that (all standard/normal) humans have - but then he does not say whether this feeling of transcendence is the same for the guy who is eating beef burgundy jaffles with french onion sauce on the side, as for the one who is praying in a church or temple.

...And the assigning of value and meaning, to both of those two might be very different in an economic system.

And thus Malthus's AI program which is expecting to give you some brilliant insight into making money in a global economic framework, for example - is bound to fail.

But Malthus is the guy they will teach at your local Universities, and he will indeed necessarily be the pathway that all of those graduates go, when they are fabricating their fake 'AI' thingies for you. 

We, on the other hand, will yes, use a 'sample sizes and values' model - pretty much the same pattern discerning system that US military war-planners use today in their war-games; except we will know what goes into the seemingly stochastic data arising from human decision sample sets.

And this, is what you will get each time that you 'activate' one of the utility tokens you have from here...

Ah yeah.
We have it all.

In other words we do have an AI system.

But what motivates the otherwise stochastic human emotion-based outcomes?

My friends, some of you should be having the hairs standing up behind your neck right now.

What makes our AI system valuable is that it works - because it is so far in advance of anything on this planet right now.

I mean, hey, for example, it's all very well a few runners-after telling you now in the media that 'scientists' can maneuver lightning with laser beams - but 'scientists' can't do that... They can only repeat what they were told to look for - and found.

So. Guide-star lasers and volcanic lightning. Somebody can move lightning about but not earth scientists.

...Accountants have pushed people into thinking that economic systems are devoid of human emotion when it comes to profit-seeking.

But if I suggested to you that even the word 'liquidity' in practice is not just the fact, that something can be turned into cash in 24 hours, but the other fact that attends it always, that if the asset is in some human being's hands, then a lot depends on whether they want to release it for cash at all!

Yes it might be liquid, which doesn't mean to say that it should be liquidated.

What makes this place you're reading at valuable is its understanding of stochastic systems in human emotional decision-trees.

Every activated unit, nominally @ $100 each, obtains one time-decaying stochastic analysis of a 'sample sizes and values model' instance of something in the world of humans -, possibly something in the economic world.

And each and every one of them will be incredibly exciting.

What People Don't Know...

 ...won't hurt them.

I have replaced any reference to money in the current list of owners of 'utility tokens' with 'units.'

It's probably not a good idea to say anything about money until we have actually detailed the ledger and publicized actual re-sales and buyers.

Coffee at midnight all by yourself...

Anyway, it's too soon.

Nevertheless, here is a link to the present list and it has been redacted in terms of actual full names and addresses but you will be able to see yourself in there - if anyone believes they should be on the list and are not please let me know ASAP. Also, if people want to update their addresses - especially since there will be some things being mailed out, and some already have been.

Digital Dirhams/Utility Tokens Owners List

These packages will still just be 'mini packs' because I want to see what the real mailing times and costs turn out to be in RL.

At the next 'drop' though, of information about this, it will be um... ...interesting.

As you know, the quality of the data in determines what the results out are going to be.

...Except that we have a way of getting 'living, dynamic information' from a distributed network of contributors; and this is really quite unique in today's world of people claiming to be using AI systems.

Real secrets are valuable because no one else has them and they actually do something. 

It doesn't matter that there are only two or ten or fifty people who are using the sling bag system, or who even know how to. 

It matters that what is in the sling bag is a simply mind-boggling AI program.

And then you people on the outside can scream all you like. Who cares.

You can even be Elon Musk or whoever else, it doesn't matter.

Believe me guys - if you knew what was already in the sling bags right now, and which part thereof of is in fact yours, your head would hurt.

Better that you feel broke and are maybe even starving for the present moment.

Look up at the sky, especially the stars at night - if you can see them.

For your salvation is at hand.

• Seek The Challenge
• Be Ready On Time
• Everything Working Together
• Quick Reflexivity
• No Limitations
• Equilibrium
• Winner Takes All

For just right now it will serve everyone to think modestly and understand that it is all about the future... It is not really about what is 'in the box' now. Even though there is something in there right now.

The Base

Did you ever meet a guy who was wearing this swish, high tech sling bag around him at your local favorite coffee place...?

And he had some BitCoin in that?

'The Base' is this, maybe, mythical idea that there is a network of terrorists who are funded from some place that is provisioned by these super wealthy Saudis.

Or someone.

Black Ember sling-bag.

Maybe Elon. Actually let's say Elon.

The Base is not an actual location.

It exists as an idea rather than as any particular physical location.

But then again it's also quite real.

Nobody who ever used it in the past, believed that Osama bin Laden was the ultimate financier - because in fact he wasn't.

The story circulated back at the time that this was the mechanism bin Laden was using to arrange payment to those carrying out one or other of his terrorist schemes.

To some extent there was indeed something like it but bin Laden was not in control of the thing.

Right now in the city where I mostly reside, there is this media flap about these kids known as 'eshays' (I have no idea what that means) - and they wear red Nike shoes and are supposedly liable to do bad things. So a friend of mine - Michael Pages - who owns the Bar1 nightclub I told you about where my other occasional meet-up guy Toni-Ville Virtanen, DJ-ays -, banned anyone from entry who was wearing these 'sports' shoes. 

Recently a couple of them stole the Maserati of the CEO of a really huge energy producing company called 'Woodside.'

Something red for you, Bill...?

And if you believe that - that they 'stole' her car- well, there is nothing I can do for you.

They stole it from her front driveway, apparently.

According to the press reports.

The first thing I thought of doing for a few minutes, was rush out and buy me some-a them red Nikes.

But then I hate Nikes...

Michael Pages made it clear that he wasn't necessarily going to ban everyone who was wearing those shoes - just the ones for whom it was the particular 'signal attire.'

For you to get some money from the guys with the sling bags you will also be required to know and understand about the signals involved there are.

So what could they be.

Who cares?!

LOL

Only once every twelve years.

You make some up.

None of this is real is it, KP?

As all of you well know, the terminology 'AI' is somewhat misleading, in that the casual observer will often tend to think this refers to some kind of, well, human-esque form of actual conscious thinking.

Meanwhile, there are some advances being talked about to do with so-called 'Xenobots' - organic self-replicating, god, I don't know - things - which can perform various organised tasks if on the nano-scale level right now.

So at least in the Hollywood movies we will have Xenobots with AI.

But all of that is movie-land stuff.

See the problem for the mainstream typical super-negative-about-everything-except-what-
Uncle-Joe-and-Step-Dad-Fauci-told-him thinkers, is that we have been operating for a while here, and all of you have been very patient, and what that really means is that 'things have been building up.'

And they are not going away.

So, if your kids and grand-kids were bequeathed a million bucks each, so what, right?

Some of you are already on the inside. You haven't been told anything much yet but that will happen.

Human beings consciously feel bad things, they feel discomfort, and they can also feel euphoria and everything in between. Machines are as yet unable to have this kind of dynamic structure for deciding when to use energy to retire, retreat, or advance.

Energy is accessible to machines designed to have and to use it.

Which one, the painting, or the car?
Which one, AI program?
Tell me.

But conscious feelings are not accessible to them. Not in the human world yet, not at any kind of complex human-style level of emotional processing.

For AI programs to be able to deliver to you, accurate statements about what human economic systems are doing -, and liable to do next and next and next, then they would have to have the means to understand human emotions; and they do not.

Even a Xenobot thing with AI would not necessarily have the range or complexity of human empathetic emotional access.

And that does not mean people around the would will not be completely sucked-in to the idea that there are AI programs with emulative human emotion and which can make accurate predictions about economics and finance for them.

In fact it's guaranteed that they will. Those people around the place everywhere you well know and you have seen them and heard from them and read their 'ideas' (or what passes for intelligent ideas, at any rate) -  those people will immediately believe everything that the designated lie sources they are already fully beholden to, tell them.

And of course they will scream loud and long about how they are 'critical thinkers' and seek 'proof' all the time - which is why they believe only what is true. And they know what is true, and they 'seek proof.'

Walking the Dystopian streets at night,
looking for the guy with the right 
sling bag.

Except they never do that because they never can envisage the basic problems at stake around which the specific proofs should center.

Do we have an AI program that can swim under human systems, and 'see' what people are doing in economic and sociological spaces?

Yes we do.

See it would be different if this thing were just now starting up and everything was at 'zero-line/line-ball.'

But it isn't. Some of you gave me money a while back.

And as you know, when BitCoin first started, it already was in the open public space at over $2,000. But then it went up, and then some more 'up.'

If you take a hundred human beings, most of them have seriously flawed psychologies. And they cannot be 'fixed.' And yes I am being judgmental. 

But they are stuck being who they are, although it is more correct to say 'what' they are.

The demons who were sent into the herd of swine and jumped off a cliff, never learnt anything about themselves.

But if you notice in the narrative, at all times they were loud, aggressive, confident, sure of what they wanted to do, sure of who they were, who they were 'going to be...'

They never said 'we do not want to be demons or pigs.'

The ultimate justice of the Universe is that you can be what you want to be.

You can be the guy who stepped into a coffee bar, and found someone with a sling bag, who gave you a few thousand dollars.

Every time.

Oh yes you can.

What do you have to do?

You don't have to do anything. As Robert Pante says, 'it's not about what you do, it's about who you be.'

 

Everyone please, REALLY calm down now...

What am I saying?

Well I'll tell you.

I watched another one of these post evening news documentary segments about these old guys who lost a hundred thousand dollars or more, each, 'trading' in cryptos.

I mean talk about nuts in the first place. But still...

See the thing is, you will find that after you read what I am going to link here, you will start to lose sleep at night thinking about stuff.

Eo voglio una red Ferrari, per favori.

Difficult to control this aspect of one's mind -, the 'expectations' that are built on some vague potential that is or seems at least, realistic.

The worst part about what is coming up the turnpike - for you - is that if you keep your head, keep a strong hold of your wild impulses, well you will actually realize (as in, make) the high side results.

And there will be some of you who will go round and round in circles trying to work out ways to say that what you are reading is somehow 'not correct' or cannot be correct or whatever.

Smirk.

Don't waste your time. Literally, just don't.

What your mind will briefly and initially tell you is the person you are reading about, well, that is what it is.

But listen I really want to stress this and I know many of you will know this is true too: if, you and me and thee and thou and us, just STFU in a sense, and play it all out, slowly, methodically, mindfully, then for sure it will turn out as all the indications are that it at least logically should.

And what is that?

Just calm down and drink the coffee.

Well, let's just leave the silly guys to their fate - if they want to risk stupid sums in stupid things, well let them. No one could have stopped them anyway, persuaded them away from the craziness.

The thing that pushes these guys is the mythic belief that there is always someone else but not them, who has the inside run, and that therefore all it takes is for them to be with those 'special ones...' There is no one they know who actually is a 'special one.' And never never but never can they themselves be a special one.

But we are making the rules and the running here.

As you will now see.

Apart from everything your thinking mind will 'piece together' from what you are about to read, I will be posting up somewhere, a partially blacked out ledger of who holds what with the Silver Dirhams.

And then next after that a few letters will be sent out containing stuff.

That is just a test run to see how much the mail really costs and how fast it all gets to different places. And then there will be more mail going out after that.

And then after that we should all go 'dark.' Oh there will be 'ways and means' but not anything any outsiders will be able to see.

This is all going to take months and years, not five minutes. 

So rather than preempt what your own mind will be able to calculate for you, let's just cut to the chase. This is something that I haven't edited at all and it is just 'as is' so that it can get to you as fast as possible. (You know to place your cursor over this next thing here, right?):

What Lies Beyond Crypto

Meanwhile, let's talk the Flanders Red Ale!

The taste is not sour like actual fruit lambics, but sweet like ripe cherries and very ripe plums, with just a hint of tart that makes it have a slight acidic edge there.

But then there's this really 'out there' soft, esoteric(!) mallow taste... Marshmallow.

There's no fruit it in at all. The whole flavor profile comes from red malt and the kind of fermentation used.

...Anyway the link is to something that contains everything but the actual coding. Which I have.