The People-Tree Branches

So okay, you know the human brain has dendrites and dendritic activity.

This is a systemic process in which tiny little appendages of a nerve cell (or 'neural cell' body called a 'soma') engage in some electrical activity and then establish 'long-term potentiation' of particular favored conductivity pathways of certain dendrites - which theoretically or just about certainly - accounts for memory formation in the brain.

Dendrite is simply a word taken from the Greek word for tree, but really, it more means the branches of trees.

...Meanwhile though, here is the link to the free off-commercial platform pdf of the 'Drinkable Inks' full text: Writer's Block Drinkable Inks Free Full Text PDF

Now back to the normal broadcast (lol). Said Orson Welles.

What you don't know, and the reason you have very limited personal friendships that are truly fulfilling of the propositional definition of the name 'friendship,' including those relationships that are said to be within once's actual close genetic 'family' - is that the same system applies to humans; that is, between one human and other humans.

You are not unintelligent.

Caddyshack - the original movie.
Best ever film on professional
investing. Yes. Yes it was.
Wall Street was the second best, being
a fictionalized account of investing
drawn from the experience of Oliver Stone's
recollection of his Wall Street trader dad.
Caddyshack was factual. 100% factual.

Danny being a 'good boy' was about his
being corruptible.

Although David Icke says that evil Reptilian demonic Satanic (aw, so cool; yes David - more more! Get more lurid please!) 'forces' (notice that recently he's swapped from actual 'Reptilian beings' to just 'forces') run the world and dominate everyone and control everything that you do or are allowed to do - he doesn't know really how this happens or what the real benefit might be to such non-human 'entities.'

Sometimes he does get close though, I'll grant.

Bit of an accident of him just being in the subject territory, I think.

In order to keep themselves alive as a discrete species, and a ruling one, they need to separate you from developing and establishing those long-term potentiated pathways between other actual human beings of an advanced kind (which is what you are).

Although you cannot see it right now, the reason behind all of these massive floods around the world, mostly in either Third World places or places very far away from the central political power hubs - is so that the mechanisms of control, by the evil enemy Empire of Reptilians of David Icke, are degraded catastrophically.

And that's what you will see happening from now on in.

Pakistan will shift around in its global geopolitical position as the de facto and behind-the-scenes religious-political ruler of Saudi Arabia (and hence all of Sunni Islam around the whole world), the concentration of economic value of the viable still-functioning coffee plantations and primary processing plants of Minas Gerais, will limited the ability of Brussels to financially dictate to German and Dutch industry (which together control the Brazilian coffee economy), and the Afro-Arab-Indian rice monopoly of Ahmed Bin Kanoo Group will also enhance its position against China and the USA who are part of the Reptilian Empire (lol - why not? Let's leave it where Icke sets things).

And what this means in the social-political scheme of things, is that human people unit dendrites will be laid in all of these regions, at first expressed as seemingly just a shifting away from Western capitalism - although, this means simply the Brussels/Globalist orbit - but eventually as cultural movement probably of ecology futurism. But this will not be the one that the Globalists wanted to install.

Highest quality hand-made
Italian-American 'carrozzeria'
thing ever made - the original Bizzarrini.

 

They wanted to install Sing 2.0 - a set-up in which 6G data systems monitored your every move and controlled you with 'social credit scores' and all the rest of that dystopian insanity.

And that's just not going to happen now. Even just today, the Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands literally told the government of Australia to * off and stop interfering with its internal politics.

But this is all stuff happening on a huge geo-political scale.

You want to know about things 'closer to home' for you.

You are very likely living inside the globalists' pitch and this means you will be isolated from people of your own higher levels of intelligence and sensibilities, and isolated from any activities involving cooperating groups at your level.

I'm not pampering your egos here. There is no way anyone comes here and stays here if they are not of well above average intellect and education and possessed of a very advanced capability of understanding highly sophisticated concepts, especially human relationship and human psychology concepts.

So what we will be doing over coming days and weeks, is exploring the advanced tools and techniques of attaining, maintaining and managing, human dendritic propagation.

One of our members here, just recently mentioned to me about a particular piece of music, and it was a great suggestion, because, what I tend to do, is go with those things I know from the producers themselves, have a pretty 'hammer over the head' kind of BPM rating, and bass lines and those cross-pattern melodic 'stabs' which - well, what they technically do in your neurology is exploit this thing call the wave edge drop-off.

See we get habituated to our own brain wave stimulations, and then the brain stops being acutely on alert for that particular thing then. So this is what happens when people become used to a certain drug or medication, for instance; it's exactly the same thing although most doctors assume (wrongly) that the physiology itself is being materially shaped and altered and that this is causing the chemical 'toleration.' Well that is a different thing though. That's when something is actually harming the internal structure.

The higher the brain wave edge drop-off, the greater the neural signalling effect and clarity.

But this is all still just about signal strength and clarity, it's not saying anything about why. Icke just says 'coherence/coherent thought.' He's wrong when it comes to providing an explanation of why. We'll get into that in future pieces here.

Anyway today we have fairly accessible somewhat sophisticated little devices that can 'read' the brain wave force 'spill-over' into the skin's nerves using transducers and some algorithms - you can easily 'see' that in fact your brain is switching over to a certain state, when, for example, you have used some of the compounds we have been discussing.

So whereas in the past many malicious and deliberately destructive mind-set people will quickly say 'Oh such-and-such didn't work on me,' well today, you can stick a headset onto them and see that they are straight out lying!

Having said that, you will be able to observe though, that with the piece of music below, which is very different to the stuff I normally post here, yet at the same time, it has all of the key components that will 'give you a feeling;' what they call a 'vibe.'

The substances in the compositions talked about off-line here, produce these 3-D mind acuity conditions and the result is very pleasurable.

And it doesn't have to be just from those tracks that we are posting here normally. In fact, in many people's personal 'pre-set' edge-detection neural connections, they will already have some patterns that produce repeatable 'feelings' which they like and find pleasurable.

David Icke - The Right/The Wrong

Maybe it would be better termed 'the missing parts' or even 'the deficiency.'

Meanwhile, just as an aside, here - extracted recipes from Yuhanna ibn Masawaiyh's writings in Venice: 'Writer's Block Drinkable Inks'

The FULL Drinkable Inks narrative text 

(If this is not free to read in your location, well just read one of the other free titles under my titles at Kindle, and let me know and I will get you a link to the 'off-platform' free pdfs).

NB. Commercially-available dried ingredients may not in every instance be as potent as the fresh ingredients.

Hey I kinda like David Icke. Any time someone goes 'out there' and says 'lower astral plane demonic Satanic Reptilian evil conspiracy' well, give me more.

He even says that people like Bill Gates and Fauxi and Soros are just demonically-possessed zombies.

Cool!

It's all very nice and it's making me go and find a beer from some stockpile my cousin sent over to me...

But we can't all just sit pushing our backs deeper into the sofa from the cinematic thrill of it all, and drink beer and eat nuts and then fall asleep knowing that Icke has 'outed' the evil Satanic global conspiracy for us, because and then so what...? Okay it's nice to be nodding and have someone else on the big media platforms (he is on them, don't you worry about that) nodding back for us so that it feels like we have company in our cherished stupidity, but where does it leave us? We're still all stuck in the same place, in the same predicament of having to comply with moronic zombies who are not even vampires. 

Vampires at least, wear swish clothes.

Lake Lefroy in Western Australia.
This is just a tiny fraction of it. It is so large
it's bigger than some countries.
I've been there. Those islands in the
distance literally look
when you are standing there, like they are
floating in the sky.
It's quite amazing.

 

And in the mornings after, we still find that our blood has been sucked again overnight anyway and will be sucked all through the day as well.

David is doing what the whole nine yards of the 'system' has always done, has continuously done, for thousands of years - he is committing some pretty basic fallacies in front of our eyes and getting away with it because part of what he says is true enough.

He is not a sinister figure though as far as I'm concerned, and I don't think he's doing anything 'adverse' on purpose. He sees his role as that of alerting 'the common mind' to a fundamental problem.

But you - you who read here - do not represent 'the common mind.'

You want the solution. You already know about the problems.

The two big ways the truly sinister people try to fool - well, succeed in fooling - people is the 'confusion of the inverse' fallacy, and the 'elicit conversion' fallacy.

Muslim apologists do it all the time: 'Christians say God is Jesus.' Well but they don't though; they say Jesus is God. The issue is that the definition of one word is about the meaning of it as a descriptive (and thus all of the characteristics and qualities that describe 'it') and a title; while the meaning of the other word is just someone's name and identity for a particular given space of Earthly time in context that this is to do with 'God' manifesting or projecting as a human person for humans to 'see' using their human senses and intelligence.

The woke and social thought police do it all the time - and that's because they are part of the sinister conspiracy of the demonic.

Back to a bit of reality, okay?

If you listen to an interview of Rose McGowan, the words and the phrasing she uses, although okay it is highly critical of males, still doesn't sound particularly as if she is criticizing 'the male' as such. For instance, she says the Academy of Motion Picture Directors is made up of over 90% males, and mostly white males.

So that is not the same thing as saying that all males throughout the world are wicked, cunning, conniving, or sinister, and white(!) - because logically 'the Academy (of MPDs)' is just a small restrictive group 'of males.'

But the woke crowd will use almost the exact same words and phrasing that McGowan does but it will mean an entirely different thing in their mouths.

Let me give a better example:

The Greek philosopher Speusippus is claimed by modern academia (although how they would know I am not quite sure) to have taken over or 'inherited' Plato's Academy after he disappeared - although they will never ever say disappeared, just as they will outright lie and say 'Oh Lycurgus (the Law-Giver of Sparta) was a made-up mythical person who never really lived' (on account that he too 'disappeared').

And they will quickly add that Speusippus disputed with Plato's Theory of Forms.

Well but did he though?

No he didn't.

He simply pointed out (what is also missing in the Icke view of everything) that Plato never taught that the Forms, separate though they were from material reality, did not contain all of material reality. And that is a hugely significant point about what Speusippus was saying. But no one in modern academia has seriously read either Plato fully, or Speusippus and so they don't even have that much depth of the required and necessary knowledge to distinguish the real point of what Speusippus said. But by repeating it without explaining it, it is made to seem that somehow the person who took Plato's Academy forward was both contradicting Plato and thereby exposing some kind of mistake or defect in the teachings of Plato and of course, therewith you can undermine all of Plato because he is made to seem 'just another, any old other, ancient thinker.'

Get away from there, Bill.
I know you want to go there.
LOL

What Plato himself actually said, was that it was going to be difficult or impossible to teach ordinary people, or to say to them, on account of which too was the actual reason Pythagoras never taught those exact same higher level things except to his disciples who had been with him over fourteen years - that one and the same seemingly contradictory things were able to exist simultaneously!

Well that is not the way modern academia wants to have you believe what Speusippus said about the Forms.

Icke says there are possessed - as in demonically-possessed - people who are organized as a conspiracy against the average human; and who then exploit people and make vast amounts of wealth and rule in perfect luxury and dominion.

And presumably, there is nothing you can do about it. Well he doesn't say what you can genuinely practically do about it.

Of course it's all true. What he says. Well, partly true to sufficient of an extent that it hits home to the intrinsic sensibilities of people who know darn well that the media and governments and certain corporate entities and institutions are total malevolent liars.

With us, it is 'jam today.'
Because we are the real deal,
and that makes all the difference.

But you see, if it were really true that the Forms were separate and entirely distinct from material reality as such, and that 'they were incorrect' or incorrectly conceived by Plato - as they claim Speusippus said - then for sure you would have no means to counterbalance the wicked evil 'demonically-possessed' conspirators. And those people would have you believe it too, since then, you would not bother to reach forth your hand, and take of the fruit of the Forms, and use, and benefit thereby.

Would you?

'For in that day you shall surely die.'

But who though, who 'shall surely die?'

It is insane to want to believe or even to think and suppose from the logical perspective, that let's say we do have really amazing advanced civilizations out there elsewhere in the Galaxy and out even further than - but somehow we 'need' it to be the case that 'heaven' is where then, exactly? And why would it necessarily be 'better' than or even different to, what 'ordinary' massively advanced cultures of real physical people were able to achieve and attain to...

The Forms are real. Reality is real, but it's also complete. And there's your missing link.

The Knights Who Say 'Ni'

So... ...You are about to learn a secret here, that sent many a knave to their untimely and horrible death.

You are also about to find out why someone like myself has no time for fools masquerading as 'scientists.'

...But just as an aside for a second, however: McCanard, McTrudueau, McKULTRA. And, 20 people killed, many more injured. Canada. Amazing.

Twenty people! Goodness me...

Anyway.

Well it is pretty dark
where we're going...

You're all very familiar with the Monty Python gag, now an internet meme, in which some crusader knights think they heard about an order of monks and nuns, who belonged to the Order of Saint Denis. Even Wikipedia, GD it(!) gets even this wrong now, and explains the story from half-way in: namely, that (by this time), the leader of the knights thinks they are the keepers of some sacred words including 'Ni.'

The peasants have already worked out that it must have been the Knights of Denis (pronounced 'Denise' in French) although some think the horsemen may have been intoning that they were the Knights of Saint De-nise.

And then though, the knights themselves - who have actually no idea what they are talking about - start to say that they are the Knights who say 'Ni.' 'We are the Knights-oo-say-'Ni.'

Anyway it's a complete mess. And that's the point.

One of our associates here had cause to speak with some of their more distant family members - who were about to travel to Malta where they had business, and would be starting some more companies there.

Lot's of money, lot's of tax issues. That kind of thing that none of us here have exposure to.

And this associate relayed first to me, because I hadn't heard yet, that the 'Pope' (fake Pope), was altering the organizational structure of the Knights of Malta.

Hmn.

Knights of Malta have three ranks - the top ones who swear an oath of poverty (in some sense, at least), the middle rank which swears allegiance to the Order, and the base rank, which doesn't swear anything at all but is nonetheless 'inducted' somehow.

The modern Knights of Malta have assumed a particular 'Order of Chivalry and Merit' established by a Grand Master of a secret Order, namely the King of Prussia, in 1811 - this being the Royal Order of Saint John.

I like the wooden thing. All you
vegetarians can look away.

Now it's hard to know which 'Saint John' this is meant to really refer to, but this is another place now, where you are going to see references to this word 'pseudo,' and in this case here, we are talking about the Spanish friar (Juan de la Cruz 1542 - 1591) who took his ideas, as far as academics go, from someone 'Pseudo-Dionysius' a Neo-Platonic philosopher of the 5th century.

A couple of hundred years before this 'Juan,' Philip IV King of France, got rid of the Knights Templar and tortured and executed their Grand Master. Every book you will ever read says that the King 1. owed a lot of money (to the Templars and to the Spanish Jews), 2. He wanted to find out the source of the Templars' wealth, and 3. He thought they were heretics.

And then all of the history (fairy tales) say that this Grand Master uttered the name of the demon they worshiped, who gave them all their money, and he drew an image of this demon which we all know today as 'Baphomet.'

Back to the 16th century and another one of these 'Templar'-style militaristic priests - Juan de la Cruz (aka the 'Juan' I was referring to earlier; who is also 'Saint John,' ostensibly 'of the Cross') - is also tortured, for what reason it is best left up to ignoramuses like Richard Dawkins to dictate to you what that really was.

Because he knows, right.

Woven into the modern mythology about 'Baphomet' is the legend that Alexander the Great went inside the Temple of Memphis where he saw the Goat-Headed God - same as the one depicted in the Templar's figure.

As you know, being the liguists that you all are, 'B' is pronounced 'P' by the Egyptian Arabic speakers, and 'P' is often also pronounced as 'B' by them. (Think wall scenes at Dendera).

I know, having conversed with a couple of you off these pages, that some of you are already 'onto it' or at least so close to the nub of what I am about to say that well, you'll more or less be able to put two and two together.

That's pretty tame, right?
Is not. Is dripping in cognac.

Certainly, you already know there is an Egyptian connection, there is an 'Alexander the Great' connection (this bit I will spell out here in a moment), and since they spoke 'Graeco-Egyptian' back then, you already are taking a close look at the 'met' component of the compound word.

So, it's 'meta' of course. Not just 'met.' But same thing anyway.

Pseudo-Aristotle.

Well he wrote his 'Mirror for Princes' expressly for Alexander the Great.

Did you see what I just did there?

In one foul swoop, I just tossed idiots like Richard Dawkins and all of that lot of fools and morons, into the intellectual bin. And forever - if you're smart enough to realize what just happened there.

Because they have clearly, zero knowledge in this direction, whilst loudly and rancidly decrying anyone who doesn't adopt their foolish nonsense about Aristotle's 'Nature of Living Things' (where Dawkins thinks he got his 'inspiration' as a biologist and evolution-scientist)

Look, if 'Pseudo-Aristotle' is so 'fabricated,' and 'Pseudo-Dionysius' so, well, don't-know-what -, then how come y'all have to torture their exponents all the time to extract some 'secret' or other concerning wealth? As in, actual literal material wealth?

Back to the 'structure' of the Knights of Malta.

No. Back to the structure of the Lyceum of Aristotle.

Ah, there you go.
That's pretty safe.
Isn't it?

You see, only one or just a small few people were designated to have the role of getting material wealth for all the others in the Academy or the 'Garden' as it was also called. So these guys (and women too) had to swear an oath to Apollo or Minerva or someone of those kinds of Gods, to not be swayed by a desire for personal wealth, and to distribute fairly what they got to the other members of the School. 

And then the main body of members swore an oath as well - because they were going to be given secrets to protect. And then maybe other associates did not have to swear any kind of oath at all.

The 'Pope' has no idea, Dawkins has no idea, Cartesians have no idea, modern academia has no idea, most Freemasons no matter how high in degree or rank have no idea. The only thing they know about is how steal from you, and torture you to get what they want if they are given even an inch to do it in.

These things like 'the Knights of Saint John of the Cross (Malta)' are vestiges of something deep in the past. 'They've' heard about something and have tried to pull it to themselves by force, which includes by force of propaganda against ordinary people.

But I've tied what those things relate to by telling you outright: Alexander the Great/Pseudo-Aristotle and the 'Mirror for Princes;' The Knights Templar and the 'demon of Memphis' aka the Goat of Mendes where Alexander went and saw this 'entity,' and the supposed/mythological source power of the wealth of the Order of the Templars; Saint John of the Cross of Spain, and his writings taken from 'Pseudo-Dionysius.'

The thing that ties them all together is that every single one of them had access to one specific item of knowledge or learning, preserved in specific books or texts which deal with very very important things to do with money and power and life.

You yourself have actually read that text.

Except you don't know it. You've never been shown how to interpret what you were reading. 

In external practical life and reality, people take something they see has power and at some stage provided someone - now long gone from the place though - wealth; and then they assume it for themselves and tell the naive around them 'follow me.' Sure they find out bits and pieces of things. But nothing that is the actual real thing.

This is no joke.
This is Malta - Church of Saint John.
And yes, gold leaf, but the stuff
made in Venice...
How 'bout that.

You put your idiot friend Richard Dawkins in a locked room and after ten days see what happens (to him). He'll be dead as a doorstop when you open the door. That's what'll happen to him.

It's important for you to have read this first, before you get to see the Drinkable Ink stuff.

Because at some point you will want to go into the ideas about money and wealth, from 'Pseudo-Whoever.' And you can, because you've already had the stern warnings and lectures.

And just always remember - 'they' will torture you and they will kill you too. Because they are jealous and cannot have what you can have. Not because they are rational 'sci-entists' and you are not. After a while you will see and understand how come they can never have what you can have.

...And, there's no point extending that line of thought further than that here, in case, well -, Christopher Wray. Which way are the canards flying now?

'Canard' - that's French for duck, isn't it? French. That would be 'French' Canada - where the 20 got murdered. 'Every key word counts.' Remember that here? When was that said here?

What I continually said was I was not going to be extremely explicit because it involved death and I 'might' draw the attention of the FBI. LOLOLOL. I'm not laughing at the people who got killed. I'm laughing at the FBI and all the smart alecs who think they know what's going on.

'I might draw the attention of the FBI...' Hah! That would be the day though, right. Right now it's just 'ordinary nobodies' who got murdered. Nobody at the FBI or anywhere else cares about them. Still, it pays to be a little bit cautious. And I care about the 'nobodies' because they are all somebody to some one. Did anyone cry when Nero died though? I dunno. Could have. We shall see. We shall see, in modern times, what happens. And we shall see what 'subtlety' is in store.

 

Roger Bacon, Doctor Of Wonders

Wikipedia, being the echo chamber of arrant nonsense that it is, states very boldly that Roger Bacon (1120 - 1292) is credited as one of the earliest advocates of the modern scientific method. 

And what is that thing 'modern scientific method?'

By the time of Descartes, in the 16th and 17th centuries - which is only around 400 years ago - suddenly science departs very radically from the methodology and directions of anything that Bacon ever did!

Why is that?

How can he have, on the one hand, been an advocate of the modern scientific method, yet at the same time have been literally an occult practitioner, a 'wizard,' an alchemist, and a spiritual religious philosopher??

If we get one of these, Bill, we'll
have to solve detective mysteries!

Well, my friends, by the time you have finished reading the 'add-on' text to the Drinkable Inks article, you will quickly realize that the works referred to in there, have never ever been read by Richard Dawkins or Neil deGrasse Tyson, and on account of which very obvious fact, they simply have absolutely no idea of what they are talking about.

You see, none of them speak or reads Arabic, or ancient high Greek, or Persian, and all that they know of the works translated and used by identities such as Roger Bacon, are things they have been told by others, who also, have never read the works either.

Descartes knew that the Vatican held certain important texts, but he did not have access to them! 'Modern scientists' have never had access to them!

So how could they possibly know what is in them?

Well of course they can't know and they don't know.

But they howl long and hard enough though, don't they?

There is of course, what one can only say is a deeply 'conspiracy theory' kind of reason for why there is such animus against particular kinds of understandings about what it is certain ancient books were saying - and we will go into this soon in here. It's a truly terrible and astonishing thing, and without seeking to draw the attention of Christopher Wray and the FBI generally(!), we must however, at least note that the reason the Borgias had the reputation of killing people - was because that is what they did do afterall. No doubt about it.

Then we'd have to eat some of 
these....

All those who read these ancient classic works in their original forms and understand their meanings having been given the keys to the understanding of them - will necessarily also fall more into the category of the Borgias, than in the category of saints Joe Biden and saint The Pope and saint Everyone-else-and-his-dog-wokey-wokey-wonder-pronoun.

I will not explain explicitly what that means 'fall into the category of the Borgias.'

There is a huge antipathy towards anyone who breaks out from the cookie-cutter 'modern scientific method' mentality - yet that mentality is flawed and based on a false understanding of Aristotle's original arguments and writings. But, and here is where something quite sinister starts to enter into the picture, albeit Richard Dawkins, for example, has never read the 'Mirror For Princes' by al-Kindi, he may say that he 'knows' that its original source was the same book or text also titled the same way, by 'Pseudo-Aristotle.' And here is where the very deliberate 'switch' is being played. See, it's the other way around. Those works that are commonly attributed to 'Aristotle' are false, and virtually fraudulent items of propaganda spawned by those who were at the time very much against the Academy (of real Aristotle). 

Further, unless you are a student of the actual Academy (I mean that ancient one) you will not understand that the reason all the masters of the Academy towards the ends of their lifetimes have what 'seem' like unfinished, or half-completed works, is something to do intrinsically with the teaching method itself, that they were using...

Thus, for example, Plato's Letter to Dion, is intended to be completed by Dion himself (although he was assassinated before that could happen) or another one or more of the Garden School (Academy) - but how they are to be completed is something completely outside of modern science's insistence about anything, because... ...well? Are you able to guess?

...Wear things like those.

You all have been reading here enough already (those of you who have been into the pages for a few years now).

The fact that there are a number of books which appear under the name of 'Aristotle' around the time of his older age and eventual death, are exactly what was supposed to happen, officially. Are you getting what is being said here?

Star Trek had it quite neatly, when they produced an episode called 'Plato's Stepchildren.'

I hope you're getting it now.

Believe me, you are going to be reading some things (in this latest 'add-on' text) which are so astonishing, that you will wonder how it was possible to keep those matters from the wider public for thousands of years.

I will be showing you, for instance, where in the Christian New Testament, the writers expressly detail the Vedic chakra system.

And this, you will grant, is knowledge that the whole entire world of the New Age-y people would give their eye-teeth to know about.

But I will also be showing you how such knowledge is used to kill (as is also detailed in the Rig Veda), and also how it is used to control which people find their way to you and remain there.

And you will clearly see though, how the system itself instantly precludes those who do not accept one simple condition, or let's say it better, set of conditions.

Luckily, all of this is complete nonsense.

And open jars of jam.
Jam today. For us.
Giggle.

LOL

Because if it were not, and I were silly like, say the reporter, journalist, and writer Tracy Twyman, who started off softly enough writing 'Mind Controlled Sex Slaves and the CIA,' but who ventured into problematic territory when she threatened to divulge who actually were the pedophiles who frequented Epstein Island - I could end up getting myself killed like she did a year or so ago.

I mean I wouldn't though, get myself killed, because I have some 'facilities' and 'access' that she did not have.

Certainly I don't have any kind of pressing need to 'expose' anyone. When there are real crocodiles in the muddy water, believe me, the ducks just disappear from the surface and no one knows anything beyond that simple fact. I know this must sound like a canard.

And every particular word chosen counts.

We shall see though, what we shall see.

Meanwhile, for you and me, our immediate mission is simply to draw those to ourselves that we want, lock out those whom we will, and mess around with those that we must before the end of the whole tale is completely through and the fat lady has stopped singing.

We - you and I - are not the big league leaders; we might be some of the big league players though, that's fair enough to say. 

So let's play. Because with us the fun never ends:

The Inks Extension Text/s

Ah so, it's basically completed. And I'm really happy because I was able to extract the really crucial aspects of how and why these preparations really work. See that - really really really.

I'm not sure whether we should go even one step beyond where we're at right now (not that you have seen these latest pieces) - and I probably will, now that I think about it.

See there's two very interesting aspects of the strands of thinking that have been (luckily) not lost to us, and brought to us by Al Kindi and then later by Ibn al-Haytham and then on through Roger Bacon.

It's fake, it's modern,
but it is atmosphere, you
have to grant that.

Bacon was a stupendously brilliant scientist, but he also had the reputation of literally being a wizard - whatever that means. In his day he was referred to as 'Doctor Wonderful' or more like, if I translated and interpreted what they meant:  'Doctor of Wonders.'

He made a translation of the major Arabic occult work 'Sirr al-'asrar' (Mirror of Princes) and there is no way people then or now, in the general run of things, never mind if they were from academia or not - would ever be able to understand what is being said in those works.

There is just far too much overhang now, from 'sci-entists' who are really intent on keeping the value of the highest ground of knowledge to themselves for mercantile reasons - to gain any intelligent discussion from open public sources about either Roger Bacon or his best written works.

Whether you actually believe a person, for instance, like Immanuel Velikovksy, or not, it is more profitable to examine why he was coming to the conclusions that he did come to, but then advanced as his propositions about religious myths, really.

All the modern-day scientists who would even be prepared to render an opinion on Velikovksy always default to the standard 'he made things up' as their fundamental criticism. And that indeed he did, too!

But it was not why he was being moved towards that kind of 'sci-fi/fantasy/myth explanation' direction in his thinking. He wasn't 'making things up' because he was pathologically creative.

He knew - as in actually literally did know for a fact of language and etymological science - that for example, the Book of Revelation explicitly contains the Vedic chakra system, fully intact and exactly as the Vedas themselves say.

You didn't know that, did ya?

So in the same way, it's more profitable to look into what sources Roger Bacon had, and acknowledge that he, rather than say Richard Dawkins today, actually knows, reads, and understands the ancient languages in which texts by Aristotle and Parmenides and then Al Kindi and so on - were composed originally.

Not fake at all.
Also modern.
Pretty atmospheric, 
you also have to admit.

Dawkins has no such language knowledge or background. And neither did Descartes for that matter. So why are you believing their stupid nonsense??

...As opposed to anyone else's stupid nonsense?

Dawkins doesn't know what he's talking about. He acts as if he does, and he can sound convincing to the ignorant, but he's an egocentric charlatan with a big platform in a modern era of 'platform-ism.'

Look. Let me give it to you with both barrels here.

The reason it is called 'The Secret of Secrets' and 'The Mirror of Princes' is because it is the complete methodology and actual practical guide and steps to doing those things for which 'Pharaoh' was accused by the JOOOZ of Moses, and earlier Nimrod in Babylon when he tried to 'ascend the tower to the Throne of God in Heaven...'

And what were those guys accused of being able to do?

See the thing you have to get around just in terms of logic, is this - Jews all agree there was a Moses (of the exact type of identity they all claim; I don't agree with them but I would only be splitting hairs about it with them anyway); archaeologists all agree there were Pharaohs and they were politically powerful and hugely wealthy and they all agree there are 'pyramids' (which were built by ignorant primitive Egyptians idiots with no machines or instruments and just slaves, right? LOL).

But then so what of it anyway?

The Jews' story is that Pharoah was no more than three feet tall and had magical powers. Go ask them. Go and ask any actually learned Jew in their own traditions, in the Talmud and the commentaries of the Torah, and see what they tell you.

He had funny grey skin, big black eyes that transfixed people. And this is simply according to actual Jewish writings.

And he was a 'wizard.'

This was made using 
a recipe of Al Kindi.

Logically you have to get around the fact that he was so bad, that the JOOOZ all wished to escape his clutches. Nimrod was so bad, that Abraham or the proto-JOOOZ wanted to escape him and 'God' actually smashed up his 'tower.'

So why are you believing the other end of the fairy tale but not the seminal causative part?

You want to 'demarcate' between 'sci-ence' and 'wizardry' why...? Because now you tell us 'wizardry doesn't work...'

B**ers! You are a liar.

You 'sci-entist.'

You are scared that people will do to you what Pharaoh was able to do. What Nimrod was able to do. What Aristotle said (if you presume he wrote the 'Secret of Secrets' - the real book of that) that the actual knowledge of Hermes was able to do.

If 'wizardry' as it is being called by the malefic 'sci-entists' is so pathetic and non-functional why not just let people try it, see that it doesn't work and is nonsense, and it will die its predictable natural demise?

Oh oh, but but, you will waste so much time and energy er, er, er, wasting your time, chasing all of these crazy ideas and notions. So, jury in, Roger Bacon is wrong. Never mind we've stolen every single one of his practical ideas. But he's just, just wrong. Now stop going there. Don't look in there.

Sorry that's not good enough.

But but, people will exploit the naive, and use propaganda and lies and the media to, to, er, to get their way even though it will not be based on sci-ence.

And, as Fauxi told you 'we are science.'

Listen. What these fools know about science is nothing at all.They know about lying and politics.

The flames are slowly starting to burn
the crepes...

The minute one 'Bacon' somewhere just whimsically 'takes out' some prominent identity, then you will find the headless chooks all running around the chook-pen, squawking.

Me personally I'm trying to focus and concentrate on making you guys some money here.

That's what I'm focused on.

It's very difficult too, because I don't even know what 'money' even is right now!

LOL

Look if the modern 'sci-entist's' dichotomy of subject matters - the so-called 'issue of demarcation' were genuinely and honestly being rendered by those 'sci-entists,' then you would not be left with the same problem of the reality of the opposition to Moses; the reality of the anti-public stance of Nimrod; the reality of the psychology of what those 'sci-entists' fear.

Because they fear something. And that fear comes from its reality, not its fantasy, because after all, the 'sci-entists' are the last to 'believe' in phantasms and unreality anyway.

The opposition is both real and its power is real. There's ya problem right there.

So what's real about what I am telling you?

How about everything.

My friends in the Islamic community always ask me to produce a Djinn for them.

Well, just make sure you read the up-coming new text:

(Do I ever let you down with the music? Nope. Never do. ...You got to get to about 2 minutes in, using the tools given by this new text. Meanwhile, however... ...you just listen).