Right, so that was Fab Morvan from Milli Vanilli, doing the music and total production of that last music vid. Brilliant genuine musician.
Who can doubt the authenticity of The Monkees? Mike Nesmith wrote and produced songs for Michael Jackson, Lionel Ritchie, and others and is still active in the business now at 78. The Monkees were almost the exact reverse of the Milli Vanilli situation, because they were designed as no more than a television program group of actors play-acting a pop group. And then a large market actually gravitated to them knowingly anyway - and it turned out they really could sing and play very well which made them a huge commercial success as an actual live performing act. Their drummer was not originally trained as a drummer, but that didn't stop him becoming way good enough either, along the journey.
...So, the point was raised 'but why should any truly advanced ET Alien group coming here, and possessing so much more advanced technology than we have right now, require a contract, or need to have any kind of contract with us?'
Well okay, let me say this from my best best anddirect 'understanding' let's call it - they don't really have a contract that they intend or need to abide by from their side of things. But yes there is an actual agreement, and some circles including in the military who have very great power and a wide brief well know about it and align many things they are doing up with their side of that particular specific bargain.
Laura Eisenhower is not completely wrong...
But she hasn't answered the basic question either. Okay maybe you're telling us 'the truth' Laura, as you know it, but still - why? That is, why the agreement/contract at all? We could not possibly deter them anyway. We could not prevent them doing whatever they wanted to do.
There are two parts to the full answer, one part I will submit to you all now:
Close up of the stage set design from the pic earlier above.
Let's say for some reason, the whole world just took a poll, about who to give the 'red button' to the most powerful weapon, to. Literally was only one person given that 'button.'
And the officials had placed everyone's name into a large hat -, and pulled out KP's name.
Now I am not saying this intending to animate the lyrics from ABBA: '...the gods rolled the dice, their minds as cold as ice.' I don't say we are dealing with a random type of gambling. Advanced beings are not indulging in some kind of gratuitous 'throwing of the dice' here or anywhere.
So anyway, now we have KP with his hand on the button. Is that okay with you, KP? Everyone else okay with this? Yes? No problems there? Everyone happy?
All those who have been reading here for some time, will already be distinguished apart from other people by certain important characteristics.
In any given situation, anyone of those at all, you will access all available data that you can, and you will make strategic analyses, and arrive at the optimum key decision better than anyone else on the planet.
Serge Mansau design
Without noticing it, all of you have had exposure to Democritus, and to Atomic Number Theory, Plane Geometry, Mechanics, numbers in motion, shapes and sizes in motion, and especially exposure to how these things works together aka to the highest form of mathematics, which is known as 'music' at Oxford and Cambridge.
You know which things fit into what spaces. Maybe by now it is instinctive, intuitive, but you know.
And you do know, that if I mislabel something critical, then poor results eventuate in the usual 'cause and effect' structure of our world.
If someone deliberately mislabels something and has you continually using that incorrect label, then they are acting with some kind of mal-intent. They can get people to the point that everyone becomes totally convinced this thing is to be called 'so-and-so' when really, it should be 'such-and-such.'
With this strategic mislabeling, whenever someone goes to pick up that tool for something really important, they pick up the wrong thing.
Fabrica - Engineering research center, Treviso.
And nothing works in that context where that specific tool was needed.
Now once that has become a blanket social 'rule,' then you begin to deal with an additional phenomenon, which is different to the first problem - that is, you have to deal with human emotions themselves, with human feelings, human psychology OVER AND ABOVE the facts and the truth.
We - that is we here (only) - should be able to think of the human existential situation as 'Gaussian:' it consists of a bell-curve of all times, all people, all places, all duration... And, it consists of a large number of items inside those curves.
You should readily be able to perceive that without asking like Mr. Permanently-Seeking-Evidence, 'whether' it is so or not.
Scientists know, that if you tried to 'reason out' a deadly situation such as a tiger leaping out of the bushes at you, and perceive it consciously and 'reason through' a response, you'll be dead.
And so, Mr.Permanently-Seeking-Evidence - this is you. This is your mindset and where you are at.
Tomorrowland - Belgium
'ET Aliens' spring out at you from behind the metaphorical starry shrubbery - and you have to 'reason out' whether they are benign or dangerous. Alternatively, the government is planning a big scam in which 'ET Aliens' are going to spring out at you from behind the Hollywood thicket.
You're dead.
You're already dead meat.
'Jehovah -' well that was simple, he just demanded a few hundred virgins as 'heave offering.'
His obvious power was so superior that of course, it was impossible for Moses to argue too much about it.
But hang on a minute - those 'Tic Tacs' are also vastly superior in their exhibited technology. So what now? More 'heave offering' virgins? We're in big trouble now - we are, afterall, the Mocconna planet: 'we had virgins, but er, we run out.'
So, moving on... (LOL Pivot warning).
Milli Vanilli. Remember them? Were very successful and then ran into a brick wall over the allegations that they were lip-synching their pop songs.
Must be true, right? Everyone said so - the music industry media, the general news media, everyone.
Frank Farian's music was so successful that he became the single biggest producer/artist above and beyond the major studios and he was totally independent. He was so far out in front, they had 'gold albums' - he had diamond ones as well. Frank sang the main male lead of the radio track version of Milli Vanilli's hit songs, but it was a different act where he sang tracks himself unstated and then also used an actual 'stated' singer - who was Bobby Farrell - and that act was Boney M.
All the bad publicity was aimed at two young bunnies with no management - Fabrice Morvan and Rob Pilatus. There is nothing at all in the Wiki entry about Boney M regarding any kind of fraud. Boney M were selling 100, 120 million records per hit - which in those days, still means a billion dollars per hit, when you factor in actual shows and merchandise. Actual billion, those days, actual money.
The substitution 'fraud' was to do with Frank Farian's belief that the market did not want to see his white German face singing that kind of music.
Fabrice Morvan
Only a division of Sony - Arista records - and Morvan and Pilatus, were ever sued.
So far, in this story, the narrative is that the kids in Milli Vanilli are frauds, and not really singers or musicians, and that Arista Records too, for instance, are hiring, contracting the kids not knowing that they are not musical...
Right?
So, Clive Davis, who produced Aretha Franklin, Dionne Warwick, Janis Joplin, Whitney Houston, and on and on and on - Carly Simon, the Kinks, Lou Reed, and on and on; well, he couldn't tell these kids were not musicians, right?
I mean really, how stupid are human beings?
Or just how twisted and deceptive is the social-political-economic structure that all humans are stuck inside of, really?
So seriously, some of you - one in particular - actually knows what 'evidence' is when you see it in front of your eyes, right? You sure about that, right?
Once you see the light, it is downhill to there.
When you go out into your local city, or your fav hang-outs, you are seeing through a veil. You are looking at the legs of a really swish, naturally tall, lean, ridiculously well-dressed girl, fishnets, designer short pants, very high heels though not thin stiletto heels, more like mules, flowing hair. A few meters up the shopping street, she is not wearing fishnets but opaque nylons... And, she's never been inside any store in your eyesight and recollection, nor ducked into an alley or anything.
No more than fifteen minutes, max. But you never observed the stocking change. And neither did anyone else.
Same as no one here noticed the 'tower of Babylon' in the sci fi art pic in a previous Blog post here, and matched it to the design of Serge Mansau. Or did someone?
And on the Gaussian curve, where does the fifteen minutes of the long-legged woman lie? Meaningless, right? Tiny tiny fraction of the curve.
We use 'cause and effect' to establish what we are calling 'logic' in our human mindsets.
Religions are reflections of the prevailing political situations. And that is all that they are.
The religious texts in tyrannies are characterized by threats versus propositions.
Let's go into the future now.
The religious texts of democracies are limitless: there is a 'constitution' around that will suit someone, but not one in particular that must suit all. There are never-ending constitutions, never-ending amounts of religious ideas and beliefs and it's all like a bazaar in which people can just wander around, picking and choosing whichever one suits them for that afternoon.
(I mean none of these things are sayings that are mine, at least not in this lifetime for sure! Other people wrote them a long time ago).
The religious texts of monarchies are high mythologies of the 'Golden Age' from which, out of the dim mists of antiquity, lineages proceed/have proceeded, and which are to be preserved.
Unfortunately, human beings, being what they are, well they adapt to bad situations so much so that at a point, it becomes impossible to prevent them from feeling emotionally displaced, and worried and troubled, when you 'free them' from some, let's say previous condition of enslavement.
To just look at possible narratives from the past about 'encounters' we need look no further than the story of the so-called 'Tower of Babel.'
Islam is not quite certain about exactly why Allah, in that case, decided to destroy the place and confound/confuse the people. Possibly 'Nimrod' (Arabic 'Namrud'/'Numrud') built this structure, possibly with the intent of 'climbing to Heaven to confront and even to overthrow God...'
Or possibly, either the tower was built so that two angels - Harut and Marut - could descend there, and from whence they then taught Mankind various 'magical arts:' which included cosmetics for women, chemistry and poisons, and how to make various weapons of war.
This narrative also exists in the Judaeo-Christian system, via the Book of Enoch certainly, though also in various places of the canonical Bible.
'Tower of Babel' bottle design by Serge Mansau.
We are left, however, with a significant contradictory set of narratives: either God destroyed Babylon and the Tower of Babel because Nimrod wanted to 'ascend to Heaven,' or because angels came down there and taught Mankind advanced forms of mischief.
Now frankly, let's assume you or I are actual 'God' in Heaven, and we are sitting there and someone on Earth decides to construct a very tall tower in order to 'get up to us...'
What we do? Logically, we would most certainly go: 'Okay, off you go then. Keep going. No problem.'
Doesn't make sense, right - that any real God would be even in the slightest bit concerned that anyone was going to get to Him any time soon by that means.
Meanwhile, later on in the Bible, this 'God' who meets and greets Moses -, has protruding nostrils ('apayim') on his face, breathes smoke and fire from out of them, spits burning coals down to Earth from out of his mouth, flies in smoke and clouds, lives on a mountain, possesses and hides a treasure, demands a percentage of virgins as 'his sacrificial share,' consumes heifers and goats and sheep and even people, gets angry a lot and destroys stuff.
??
And, even - he has a squadron of winged flying brass-like vipers that he liberally sends out to bite people, including his own 'followers/worshipers.'
This whole thing is not as simple (as many people want to think) as 'oh well, that's because God doesn't exist...'
No. What we can take from all of the accounts may be something along these lines: somebody built a very tall tower. We don't really know why.
Dome angel in Madrid, sculpted by Federico Coullaut-Valera. It is called 'Winged Victory' (Victoria Alada) and was completed on the 'Day of Athena' which is 11 October.
Something 'weird' happened but we really cannot say what, but something did.
And subsequent textual narratives reflect the politics - Jews are essentially enshrining a monarchical form of politics (KING David); Muhammadans are enshrining a Caliph-style tyrannical system (ONE ruler, reflection on Earth OF God, many many threats of extreme violence, plus propositions about what you will get in the future after you are dead, so long as you agree to become a slave).
And now we have Campbell's Tomato Soup Xtians all going along with the standard Jewish narrative - whereas this, is actually what their putative leader (Jesus) actually said about the Jews and their 'Moses:' "Moses gave you the Law, BUT..."
Huh?? But? But what?!
This is real God talking now, right - according to 'Christians' (so they want to claim they are, and from where they are deriving their form of the equivalent nonsense) - and He has just then whole-ly disavowed 'the Law of Moses!'
Christians make it all the worse, when they insist on calling the individual concerned: 'Jesus' and 'Yeshua' (which is supposedly, the Hebrew form of it). Well, but that is not His name... Is it? This 'Christ' guy is an 'El' figure, not a 'Yeh' figure... (Isra-EL, EL-ijah, Dan-i-EL). So what's His actual birth name and why don't people use it?
The Quran (hopping over to there in my recent type of 'hopping and skipping' that has become all too noticeable, even to me!) - Allah says 'you must call someone and know them if you are to give respect acceptable to me BY THE NAME OF HIS FATHER.'
So - what Muslim can tell me what is this 'name of Muhammad's father' by which you are supposed to call him, to address him, and to refer to him?
Anyone? Anyone?
Dawn... (Refer music below)
...The point of all this, is for me to ask you to please consider, what would happen two minutes after some really good-looking hot ET Alien arrived on your doorstep, with a bottle of 'Big Red' telling you, that she (or he for that matter) was lost and needed to find the house of her (his) grandma's before evening - while batting their eyelids, all lengthened through their advanced arts of cosmetics.
You would annoy them no end, by having far far far too much difficulty, adjusting to a new reality, in which the morals (KP mentioned this) and the ethics and the 'rules' of what is understood to be a Universal Deity to truly advanced sentient beings - was nothing at all like what you (whether right now you care to admit it or not) had become so used to, that every five seconds around these people you would be questioning inside your mind (which they can easily read) whether something was 'right or wrong.' To say nothing of the fact that you would be assigning all kinds of consequences - that canon on through your emotional psychological being as 'perceptual realities.' 'I feel such-and-such.' That is a reality. It is known by psychology as 'perceptual reality.'
How much energy, do you think it is taking, on the part of advanced beings, to underwrite the nonsense going on in your head? 'Underwrite' meaning -, tolerate, and then spend time and energy on, un-doing. All the damn bloody time.
People who are moving fluidly through space-time, understand that 'cause and effect' in time-line frames of reference, is only a small part of logic and reality.
You want to have an advance intelligent being meet with you 'now' and so they can 'give' you some helpful things, maybe even 'hook up' (I believe, is what they say, the kids these days?).
How about you just keep your mind still, and observe...
Plenty of tall towers there!
But note, as you do, that the political situation of 'angels' (a la Harut & Marut) or of whoever is in touch/in tune, with actual Universal 'Deity,' is not tyrannical, certainly not democratic, not monarchical, and not technocratic. So what is it? And how will you 'get into it,' without dragging along all of the baggage of the human race that has built up inside of you, whether you like to acknowledge it all that readily or not, just yet.
'Republic' does NOT, mean, as the current definition maintains 'a type of system in which a state is ruled by representatives of the citizen body.'
It means equality between its members. You need to be equal. To meet any advanced ET Alien overtly, and for them to acknowledge who they are to you and to stay - you have to be their equal.
And you can do that. Yes you can. You can get there.
I watch a lot of arguments and discussion between people. When you're at Law School (which I was personally in, in the mainstream system though, only for a short while because I rapidly went into a government role that had its own 'in house' system of legal training...) at some point you will participate in 'moot court.' By standard definition this is a 'mock court at which law students argue imaginary cases for practice').
Depending on what your motivations are, you might always throughout the whole of your life, observe these situations - but you might do it with 'an edge,' so to speak, and not simply because you like watching politicians speak.
Supercar Blondie - not 'Barbie' although... lol Can drive though. Damn yeah!
At a certain stage of your build-up of knowledge or what must pass for it in this world - you will observe that many good people, even those with very sound basic 'positions' on some crucial matter, will, when they are 'flying freely' in the subject, start to parrot off things that have been around for a long time, and that others have said as part of the 'dogma' if you will, of the 'position.' They are not really thinking about what they are saying.
When we are considering the peculiar subject of, say, ET Aliens being here, many people look back into the past and make suggestions a la 'Ancient Astronaut Theorists.' LOL
The fact is, it is wrong to say that anything we can see as 'artifact' from the past - at least in the form of any created object - was ever made by advanced ET Aliens.
Even the pyramids are clearly the work of human beings. There is nothing in respect of 'materials' or construction tools that evidence the advanced technology even of ourselves here today.
Sure it is advanced, and clever and industrious work, - but human, and human from a nascent time of Man's development albeit Mankind possessed great skills and intelligence.
So a great problem with human thought as we see it today, embodied in ideologies,
regardless even of whether they are scientific ones, and not simply religious or belief system ones - is that they are all heavily subject to open blind ignorance as soon as people feel free to speak gratuitously. Which is all the time. It is such a trap too, that in most cases it becomes impossible to explain to that person espousing the position, exactly how off-the-trail they really are. People get things right, and from there, they quickly throw in loads of rubbish that is completely. They never seem to be satisfied just 'sitting pat' on clear-cut truth at all. And staying there.
If you are not already capable of doing it on your own, certainly I could take you, over just a few weeks, stick you in a darkened room most of the time, and at the end, you won't have any difficulty at all knowing the difference between imaginary friends, or hallucinations - and actual encounters with actual people who are not at all from this planet!
There is a widespread modern pop cultural - although, it has more than just the dimension of being a teen thing and is supported by the older generation (on account of the strong Confucianism social environment there) - idea in Korea, that 'K-Pop' groups must not have boyfriends or girlfriends and only 'fans,' and that they cannot even marry anyone. If they do, they must leave the group.
Rabindranath Tagore - great poet of modern Korean culture. Huh? Oh, but you knew, right?
The story is 'they have the pure morals/moral purity of angels...'
So - would it be possible to point out to Xtian ideologues, for instance, that in the standard New Testament text, 'angels' are really really sexed-up creatures??
No, you could not say that to anyone; no one would believe it. But it is there starring everyone right in the face and no one appears to 'get' the words they are reading.
Alternatively, the Quran makes a fuss of Jesus coming back to 'break crosses' because the competing ruling Abd' ul Malik wanted to envision the destruction of the Byzantines. He even caused Islamic eschatology to say that the rise of an apostate regime would stop at 'Rum.' He meant - Constantinople; which he wanted to take complete control of and which he believed would remain an ideological battleground into the future, even after he took it by force.
Why couldn't Jesus come back to um, I dunno - say, Lhasa and 'break Buddhas?' (At least that would have shown whoever wrote the Quran really did know the future and things that hadn't happened yet at the time of the first exposure of the Quran) Or how about Sri Lanka and break 'idols?' Because none of those places had any relevance to Abd' ul Malik!
...So.
Where does this leave us?
The big three religious/philosophical/morality systems in the world: pop Xtianity, Islam, and Vedic (which includes Buddhism) though possibly with some exceptions with the Vedas because they are so diverse and wide-apart morally in places - all have this concept of 'judgment' because you have or are 'breaking' someone else's law; it's not your personal internal individual law code -, it is from outside of you/outside of your life.
And all of them force you to this notion that there is someone or something outside of you, that has so much greater power than you, that you must accept their/its enforcing, delivery downwards onto you, of its rules. And you have to fit into it, because you are essentially not 'it' inside.
However, there is an entirely different notion that is quite unfamiliar to most of the world, and it is around in places, one of those being the texts which speak of 'Guardians' that are subtly here and extremely powerful but whose aggression and aggressive is hidden because they don't even want to be known of as forceful and overpowering. They have no money, no wealth, no position, no social entitlement, but they are really, the actual gatekeepers to you. To what becomes of you.
And, they are hidden, in disguise, but actually present under your nose. All the time.
There's documents about them. People don't talk about those. If they have even encountered them, they think it's just a speculation. Virtually a pointless speculation. Taoism has some similar ideas. And even there, in that ethnic context, it is Confucianism that rules on the surface.
You see, it is utterly cruel to expose to everyone else, that you got out, and that they didn't and nor could they ever at this stage of their um 'development.' So there is a gulf between 'you' (if you 'get' the idea, the key - the golden key, which isn't 'gold' at all, of course), and the values that everyone else has, and what they all hold is important and valuable...
So...
This track is a ballad, not really the style that we have been posting recently, but it is from Sue McLaren and Suzanne Chesterton.
So I'm characterizing this with the phrase 'Intellectual' but that's basically only because someone 'out in the field' still, mentioned that there was not enough intellectual conversation available where he was, in his stake-out. ...He's been managing to attract 'black Toyota Kluger' tails though, so, all is not in vain with his current sacrifice. ; ) Just hang in there.
This is about a guy I knew well a while back - I'm not going to mention his name here right now, in case 'Kluger men' put ten and five together and get zero. We can totally work even with the 'Wokey-Woke' new mini pasta soup people, but not with these lunatics in the 'black Toyota Klugers' down here. They are going to find out the meaning of 'long log fire in the Taiga winter' one day very soon. And heaven knows, they seem to know enough about 'wheelie bin fires' in lonely plantations.
Much more beautiful in RL than it looks in the pics - and has a kick in the back that I have only twice before ever felt from cars.
Anyway. Back to the business: for years and years I knew this fellow, I loved having lunches and dinners with him just to wait for the moment (it would always come) where his brain would go right off the rails. He was the absolute ultimate 'apparent' liar. Some of his stories were so ludicrous, that even I had difficulty working out exactly how mad he was, not if/whether he was crazy.
But who was he? He was an apprentice, literally a junior (which meant he already had massive talent) camera-operator, rigger, and photographic developer for the Sydney celebrity photographer and other crazy man - Helmut Newton.
Helmut Newton's work, of course, is only about the highest 'haute vie' glamour photographic art in modern times - all the high society women love it; and he knew all of them, rubbed elbows with all of them. Princess Caroline of Monaco, Sylvia Gobbel, Sigourney Weaver; you could go on for days. He was enormously commercially successful, did a ton of marketing - even Hugh Hefner loved him, and that was a stretch for Hugh because he was also an amazing photographer, but apparently, no professional jealousy there.
Now I'm going to 'work back round' the other way for a second. We know Helmut because our Chief of Station SEA, in Singapore gave him a job at the Straits Times, and then arranged a passport for him for Australia.
See, here's an example of the problem we have with the UK people. They had no understanding of the value of a German-Jew, escapee from the Nazis, with sophisticated German photography training. They were going to intern him - actually did that to begin with - until 'someone' busted him out, effectively, with a ticket and a pass to Australia. Got it?
So, Bill, although I haven't told anyone openly who 'black Kluger guys' are, me, you and all else here can pretty much entertain a fairly decent guess. They are not our guys, obviously, even though they claim to be. They are just stoopid guys.
Yeah, sure lady - I know, you're on a diet... I am talking to YOU, JES.
Anyhew...
My olden days 'friend' used to go game fishing with Lee Marvin. Was very handy with a serrated back-edge long blade knife.
He just casually told me one time, that he could lay his hands on some 'stolen artwork' from the Nazis. And he told me because he figured I had 'some' money and many friends with lotsof money. And that's what rich people do, right? They 'acquire' black market stolen art from the Nazis. Right? I don't. I used to think I didn't know anyone who did, but hell, you know; you live - you learn!
Me, I thought he was plain nuts.I would say to him: '*, you have a ton of money, why don't you buy it?' Answer: 'Oh my ex-wife, oh my divorce cost me, is costing me, oh whatever blah, blah, blah.'
So a few years ago, world art experts noticed that in one of Helmut Newton's photographs, there, right there, in the middle of it, with an accent light posed and even shining on it, was a stolen artwork - a well-known item of art that had been stolen by the Nazis, and previously thought 'lost.'
Interesting too but recently, I notice a photo original print of his just went for about $100,000 at a US auction. Actually most of his work goes for that kind of price.
Well don't have any chocolates then, if you don't want to. I'm not forcing you! Sir Robin of Locksley - Gin Truffles.
You see, here is where you can start to plumb, not actually fathom the depth of, but plumb at least - how deep and how smart, are the real top-line field operatives and agents. They can scan an image, and they will do every square inch and they will look at it ten different ways and you can bet your life they know what they're looking at - when all others think they are looking at an upscale, glamour-mag, and nonetheless erotic, art photograph.
The ordinary member of the public today believes all the Nazis are dead. Even US government discretionary employers have gone 'Wokey-Woke!' LOL No Nazis there!
Let's see, how am I going to maneuver this discussion even further back round, round - to the question of whether super-advanced intelligent beings care about us, and find us 'valuable' or 'worthwhile' at all...
Now here's a terrible thing, right: (and when you pose it to yourself in light of what I'm about to say, it really will be a terrible, confronting and a very serious, thing) do you find yourself worthwhile and valuable?
Why? Are you actually happy being who you are... ...physically? Would you like to alter something? Physically. Does your conscious brain energy go completely, into all the physical parts of your body and come back with the impression that, yeah, I'm good; this will do?
...Or do you want to go some more with the DNA iterations until 'you' get your 'feel' perfectly or acceptably right?
If you don't see yourself as valuable like that - why are you expecting any others to?
ET Aliens have the DNA from Julius Caesar. For sure they do.
...If you know how to use it. The BMW is only one part of the ultimate seduction, isn't it?
We know they were there (when I say 'know' I mean this from the standpoint of current 'best information') - because Professor Knuth just told us this would be so, due to space-time differentials compared to 'steady' planet location time; and we also 'know' they take cell samples because all the academic research on 'abductions' says so.
So you tell me - should anyone care about 'you,' that is, the real individual physical you?
Thus I mean your personal DNA.
Here is something to factor in, 'if' some lunatics at some time try and fabricate an 'Alien arrival/invasion/whatever:'
ET Aliens are not using 'Tic Tac' thingy-things to travel to different stars. And they certainly do not require gross matter constructed 'vehicles' to take you anywhere.
However, there are such objects. And I have previously elsewhere fully described what is inside them - a goopy, gel stuff that totally covers the whole 'you.' And then is compressed really significantly to hold you in... But 'in' exactly where?
Well, not 'in,' but together. It is used to keep 'you' together and not diffused up into 'starry light' and all of this.
So, there's 'you,' the physical DNA thing - Julius Caesar, for example. And there's Julius Caesar the personality who established modern 'Roman law' and was very good at dropping behind his quarry and circling back around when they had forgotten to suspect he was doing it or that he was even likely to do it.
Personal identity is about honest intention.
So okay, maybe they might find one or two of us, interesting enough to keep... In a tube. Relax. When there is money to be made, they'll tell us. Cause we're all cool here.
