All those who have been reading here for some time, will already be distinguished apart from other people by certain important characteristics.
In any given situation, anyone of those at all, you will access all available data that you can, and you will make strategic analyses, and arrive at the optimum key decision better than anyone else on the planet.
Serge Mansau design |
Without noticing it, all of you have had exposure to Democritus, and to Atomic Number Theory, Plane Geometry, Mechanics, numbers in motion, shapes and sizes in motion, and especially exposure to how these things works together aka to the highest form of mathematics, which is known as 'music' at Oxford and Cambridge.
You know which things fit into what spaces. Maybe by now it is instinctive, intuitive, but you know.
And you do know, that if I mislabel something critical, then poor results eventuate in the usual 'cause and effect' structure of our world.
If someone deliberately mislabels something and has you continually using that incorrect label, then they are acting with some kind of mal-intent. They can get people to the point that everyone becomes totally convinced this thing is to be called 'so-and-so' when really, it should be 'such-and-such.'
With this strategic mislabeling, whenever someone goes to pick up that tool for something really important, they pick up the wrong thing.
Fabrica - Engineering research center, Treviso. |
And nothing works in that context where that specific tool was needed.
Now once that has become a blanket social 'rule,' then you begin to deal with an additional phenomenon, which is different to the first problem - that is, you have to deal with human emotions themselves, with human feelings, human psychology OVER AND ABOVE the facts and the truth.
We - that is we here (only) - should be able to think of the human existential situation as 'Gaussian:' it consists of a bell-curve of all times, all people, all places, all duration... And, it consists of a large number of items inside those curves.
You should readily be able to perceive that without asking like Mr. Permanently-Seeking-Evidence, 'whether' it is so or not.
Scientists know, that if you tried to 'reason out' a deadly situation such as a tiger leaping out of the bushes at you, and perceive it consciously and 'reason through' a response, you'll be dead.
And so, Mr.Permanently-Seeking-Evidence - this is you. This is your mindset and where you are at.
Tomorrowland - Belgium |
'ET Aliens' spring out at you from behind the metaphorical starry shrubbery - and you have to 'reason out' whether they are benign or dangerous. Alternatively, the government is planning a big scam in which 'ET Aliens' are going to spring out at you from behind the Hollywood thicket.
You're dead.
You're already dead meat.
'Jehovah -' well that was simple, he just demanded a few hundred virgins as 'heave offering.'
His obvious power was so superior that of course, it was impossible for Moses to argue too much about it.
But hang on a minute - those 'Tic Tacs' are also vastly superior in their exhibited technology. So what now? More 'heave offering' virgins? We're in big trouble now - we are, afterall, the Mocconna planet: 'we had virgins, but er, we run out.'
So, moving on... (LOL Pivot warning).
Milli Vanilli. Remember them? Were very successful and then ran into a brick wall over the allegations that they were lip-synching their pop songs.
Must be true, right? Everyone said so - the music industry media, the general news media, everyone.
Frank Farian's music was so successful that he became the single biggest producer/artist above and beyond the major studios and he was totally independent. He was so far out in front, they had 'gold albums' - he had diamond ones as well. Frank sang the main male lead of the radio track version of Milli Vanilli's hit songs, but it was a different act where he sang tracks himself unstated and then also used an actual 'stated' singer - who was Bobby Farrell - and that act was Boney M.
All the bad publicity was aimed at two young bunnies with no management - Fabrice Morvan and Rob Pilatus. There is nothing at all in the Wiki entry about Boney M regarding any kind of fraud. Boney M were selling 100, 120 million records per hit - which in those days, still means a billion dollars per hit, when you factor in actual shows and merchandise. Actual billion, those days, actual money.
The substitution 'fraud' was to do with Frank Farian's belief that the market did not want to see his white German face singing that kind of music.
Fabrice Morvan |
Only a division of Sony - Arista records - and Morvan and Pilatus, were ever sued.
So far, in this story, the narrative is that the kids in Milli Vanilli are frauds, and not really singers or musicians, and that Arista Records too, for instance, are hiring, contracting the kids not knowing that they are not musical...
Right?
So, Clive Davis, who produced Aretha Franklin, Dionne Warwick, Janis Joplin, Whitney Houston, and on and on and on - Carly Simon, the Kinks, Lou Reed, and on and on; well, he couldn't tell these kids were not musicians, right?
I mean really, how stupid are human beings?
Or just how twisted and deceptive is the social-political-economic structure that all humans are stuck inside of, really?
So seriously, some of you - one in particular - actually knows what 'evidence' is when you see it in front of your eyes, right? You sure about that, right?
Once you see the light, it is downhill to there. |
When you go out into your local city, or your fav hang-outs, you are seeing through a veil. You are looking at the legs of a really swish, naturally tall, lean, ridiculously well-dressed girl, fishnets, designer short pants, very high heels though not thin stiletto heels, more like mules, flowing hair. A few meters up the shopping street, she is not wearing fishnets but opaque nylons... And, she's never been inside any store in your eyesight and recollection, nor ducked into an alley or anything.
No more than fifteen minutes, max. But you never observed the stocking change. And neither did anyone else.
Same as no one here noticed the 'tower of Babylon' in the sci fi art pic in a previous Blog post here, and matched it to the design of Serge Mansau. Or did someone?
And on the Gaussian curve, where does the fifteen minutes of the long-legged woman lie? Meaningless, right? Tiny tiny fraction of the curve.
Would it be gauche of me to admit that a Monkees tune (e.g., "Daydream Believer") could be transcendent art? LOL
ReplyDelete---------------------------
"I don't believe in original melodies. There are only so many computations of eight notes." - Mick Jagger
But only if we agree on those 8 notes, i.e., only those 8 sound frequencies, eh?
----------------------
“One day Dostoevsky threw out the enigmatic remark: 'Beauty will save the world.' What sort of a statement is that? For a long time I considered it mere words. How could that be possible? When in bloodthirsty history did beauty ever save anyone from anything? Ennobled, uplifted, yes - but whom has it saved?
'There is, however, a certain peculiarity in the essence of beauty, a peculiarity in the status of art: namely, the convincingness of a true work of art is completely irrefutable and it forces even an opposing heart to surrender. It is possible to compose an outwardly smooth and elegant political speech, a headstrong article, a social program, or a philosophical system on the basis of both a mistake and a lie. What is hidden, what distorted, will not immediately become obvious.
'Then a contradictory speech, article, program, a differently constructed philosophy rallies in opposition - and all just as elegant and smooth, and once again it works. Which is why such things are both trusted and mistrusted...
'But a work of art bears within itself its own verification: conceptions which are devised or stretched do not stand being portrayed in images, they all come crashing down, appear sickly and pale, convince no one. But those works of art which have scooped up the truth and presented it to us as a living force - they take hold of us, compel us, and nobody ever, not even in ages to come, will appear to refute them.
"So perhaps that ancient trinity of Truth, Goodness and Beauty is not simply an empty, faded formula as we thought in the days of our self-confident, materialistic youth? If the tops of these three trees converge, as the scholars maintained, but the too blatant, too direct stems of Truth and Goodness are crushed, cut down, not allowed through - then perhaps the fantastic, unpredictable, unexpected stems of Beauty will push through and soar to that very same place, and in so doing will fulfil the work of all three?"
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Beautiful. Tracking in on (genuine/real) truth...
ReplyDeleteIt is not so simple as people think, that they 'just agree' on those notes: the notes multiplied by the speed of light = colors.
Talking of veils - congratulations you have finally been reported to the thought police; this site is now officially a deceptive site courtesy of google safe browsing !!
ReplyDeleteOh, cool! LOL I wonder why... A badge of honor.
Delete