'Socrates In Sickness, Socrates In Health'

If you enter the words in the title of this article into your friendly 'Google Search' bar, you will basically not find the reference to its original source.

Okay maybe your search engine is better than mine, but I was not able to find it.

I happen to know roughly speaking, where it does come from, but let's leave that for the moment anyway; it isn't very important for right now.

There is a famous (or at least, it was famous/infamous) quote made by some historical figure along the following lines: "I have seen the coming man, and he frightens me. He is remorseless, without pity, and he is indomitable. He is a 'superman.' "

I could find that, literally nowhere at all down through many many pages of 'Google-Search.'

...so what is the point, though, of obscuring factual incidents of human history, and covering them over with mountains of propaganda, designed to do what, exactly?

Crimean War cannon - in an Australian
park for some reason...

We all know that Hitler was 'bad.' He was a staggeringly negative force in the world for a while. He was an embodiment of evil, and that is so even if you say that he arose because of highly unjust forces pressing onto Germany at the time. Why attempt to alter the precise truth about him, though?

Many of you older heads here will know why, at least on a certain level - most modern politicians copy, word-for-word, from the political speeches of Adolf Hitler. And that is why you cannot find actual copies or films or audio files of his speeches around much these days.

One would have to be a major level 'conspiracy theorist' though, to suggest that there is this vast systematic scheme or plan, to hide many things, in order for people in power and control to use those same things.

Alas. Such am I, or have I so become step-by-step!

What people think...

If I take a masked, black-hooded thug, brandishing a government-issue machine pistol and wearing ballistic gear, part of fifty such individuals in a gang - and that thug beats an unarmed young woman - is this in any case already 'Hitler's vision of the coming master race??'

Today, right now this evening, we have 'proof-positive' (you know, that thing where complete fools expect FIRST to have a judge make a 'finding of fact' or else 'there is no evidence and it didn't happen,' right...?) that young men in the Australian Army, both took some old and young men from their village houses, as well as came upon some unarmed others out in the open fields, and gunned them down in cold blood; that is, they murdered them.

And tonight, we have the Chinese government, officially posting fabricated pictures on so-called 'social media' of an Australian soldier cutting a baby's throat.

A few years ago, we also had film and sound of a drugged-up ISIS kid, being asked on his wireless: 'Habibi, have you killed them all yet?' ...regarding the fate of some Jewish and American and other tourists in the Oberoi Hotel in Mumbai. And you will not find this attack mentioned today, in the so-called 'time line of ISIS/Al Qaeda terrorist attacks' on Wikipedia.

*

Okay so I specifically want to mention these 'obelisks' now that have popped up here and there around the world. These are man-made things, deliberately placed there. And yes, there was a thing happening beforehand, where a handful of people were calling for some symbolic instance of 'an obelisk' such as the one in Kubrick's first true 'grand opus' movie.

But here is my take...

What people don't think.

Take the Biblical figure of 'Elijah.' Elijah is supposedly the identity who reveals things, restores all things, makes known what was hidden, and who 'must come first to restore all things...'

Well that is not quite, well, exactly how it is though. Actually, what happened in the original narrative, the 'template' as it were, for this whole idea, is that Elijah ONLY gave some 'miraculous' food to this widow woman from a place called Zarephath, even while God withheld food from the whole entire rest of the People of Israel at the same exact time!

Let me go around this another way: any real obelisk is a sign from actual 'advanced beings,' not from RT News stringers operating in the dead of night because they have cottoned onto something!

I mean, okay, in the first place, 'obelisk' is perhaps not even a good 'sign,' since it has been associated in the past with wickedness and the practicing of evil - the people of Atlantis had the obelisk thing at the foot of which, they 'made sacrifices of bulls to Poseidon,' the Goths and the Germanic pagans had their 'Irminsul,' and frankly, even Kubrick's obelisk seems to harbinger some advent of greater weaponry and destructive technology advances in the human species in the movie.

However, slipping back to 'Elijah' for a moment again, he did 'came from another place' (IE 'the Tishbite') and he 'went back up' in some kind of fiery chariot. LOL

No 'obelisks' involved. At least, not as far as revealing a few odds and ends to that woman in Zarephath. 

No. We want some happiness and relative quiet and calm, and maybe some fun, even. No 'bull sacrifices' required.

All the same, you might only have a little wheat and some oil left... Not a lot to work with to 'have some fun.' But - it shall not fail you.

Lady Catherine.

Recently, we all heard Sidney Powell talk about 'releasing the Kraken' and it might well have been just a literary reference. And now there are actual 'close-to-active-military' sources, speaking in the public, currently talking about some covert team of highly skilled, deep cover, and also pretty awesome soldier-types, whose team is called 'the Kraken.' Sounds like a cool idea to me.

Also sounds potentially pretty 'awesome, frightening, remorseless, and without pity.'

You take 'Santa's elves...' They're only tiny little fragile-looking things. And then from there it all depends on if you're 'naughty or nice,' though, right?

What I mean is sure, you can play with elves, but it's not like Hollywood fairy-tales. Real fairy-tales are pretty freaky for the bad people. One hundred and eighty five THOUSAND Assyrians IN ONE NIGHT. Remember what I said. Yes you can ask, and yes you can play. But behave.

Let us remember the grandfather of Lady Catherine Brudenell-Bruce down here, whose ancestor was a leader in the Charge of the Light Brigade - believe me, some things that look fragile, are not.

The title above for this post is about the fact that we are not 'Super-anything;' we are just men, that is, ordinary people, you and me. When we're in great health we think we are super-people. But otherwise, for just right now, we are ordinary folk. 

Why So Much 'Explaining...'

It's certainly possible to post a straightforward series of simple steps, and the next thing you know... ....well.

And then, just like that man-made prism-shaped metal post someone stuck into the sand in San Juan County, Utah, we could just, I suppose look at it, and toss it into the huge pile of other stupid ideas and stupid objects and 'deep, meaningful writings!'

'Anonymous,' in the immediate earlier posted, advanced the idea that people do harmful things because they have a malignant and narcissistic ego or personality, and their strategy is a 'no lose' (for them) thing, because their egos are served even when they are caught, because there's nothing anyone can do about what they already did, and, I think, the proposition also included that they enjoyed openly watching other people twisting in the breeze once, or even when, they were 'caught.'

This is not just a 'valid' idea - it rather well describes what individuals who create a lot of mischief and harm, actually do; and it describes their style and attitude.

I have several reasons for going round and round in seeming circles, almost never getting to the target of what was aimed at. One reasons is that there are those countless mischievous people who want to grab their hands onto dangerous things and turn them around onto you!

My belief is that they are not genuinely intelligent enough to understand, ultimately, what I am saying here...

In the long run.

This is called 'projection mapping.'
Very cool. Only for rich people, though.
You and I can't go there. 

But like any decent modern thermal-tracking or EMF tracking 'hot' missiles, they are still quite capable of following for quite a long way, and only until you 'notch' them, once their fuel and eventually, their energy too has been sufficiently depleted, will they drop off.

Secondly, the whole presence of dedicated mischief here on this planet is entirely systematic, and very very long-term - it's been going on in exactly the same way, around the same basic issues, for a long while.

When you encounter an individual person, you can 'see' their ego at some point. But the 'style,' the methodology and the 'tell-tale footprint' is always the same.

Fundamentally, you will observe that the simple idea always at work, is to create enough space for a person, or the tippy-top of a grand hierarchy of same-minded beings, to slot in where that space was created - by pushing out your sovereign right to have an idea of your own.

If you take the account of 'Doubting Thomas' and his encounter with a proposed humanly-tangible God, Thomas has the idea that he cannot accept the idea of a being in front of him, either literally being the same individual person he saw crucified, or even any person at all and perhaps instead, a phantasm (perhaps an amazingly modern kind of psychological hallucination brought on by the 'outlier' capacities of the ordinary human mind, when pushed to some emotional crisis point...).

And Thomas expresses the idea that were he to put his own physical material hands into the literal physical material wounds of this 'figure,' then his mind would have to re-consider what it was experiencing.

Cartier, Paris - artificial clouds, nighttime.

So we see the fabricators of the Gospels, interestingly make this disturbingly different response to the standard 'power game' profiles, by what they are offering us, is 'God,' by God then telling Thomas that he is allowed to have that viewpoint, and that moreover, He (putative God in this instance), is going to accommodate Thomas' idea.

So either these story-tellers are very clever people, or they are simply relating a fact.

A 'fact' has no reason to have to disguise itself by means of a tactic. It either is a fact, or it is not a fact.

So when you read in Wikipedia what 'Hinduism' is, for example, there is no objective reason for the description in there to contain deception or masking, or hidden semantic qualifiers which shift the meanings of things unnoticed by the unsuspecting.

I could run through a short list of modern public 'philosophers' or at least 'expounders of ideas' and all of them would possess the exact same peculiar habit of telling only one kind of lie:

George Monbiot, Russell Brand, Bernard-Henri Levy, George Soros, Jordan Peterson, even Lionel Nation for that matter - certainly Stephen Fry too and Richard Dawkins...

All of them.

This is what they do - for some odd reason, they want to tell you about the difference between 'non-dualism' and silly stupid primitive ignorant superstition. Same as Wikipedia does.

Thus, when you pick up the Wikipedia entry for John Woodroffe, you will find in there, a statement along the lines that he wrote in English on the 'non-duality' basis of 'Advaita'-ism/Hinduism.

Redpill VR
You can go to a virtual reality dance party

And if you go even to the entry on 'Hinduism' itself, you will again find a continued assertion that a major strand of this religion (it is not a religion at all...) is the concept that only Brahman exists as one single non-dualistic thing.

And then, if you go to any of the almost 2 billion Muslims on the planet, you will once again, encounter the idea that 'Tawhid' is the teaching that 'God is One;' and that Islam is a monotheistic religion. And yes, that is indeed what they all believe - except that is not what the word says or means...

The word means 'to unify' - in fact, it specifically, grammatically, is 'the act of unifying, bringing together.' And what can you bring together if there is only 'one' of it?

So - Tawhid does not mean what modern Muslims think it means.

'Advaita' is arguably, to Sanskrit scholars, not even a word that means 'not dual,' but rather, 'not multiple devas.'

Again, the real basis of Indian classical religious beliefs is the existence of a materially-governing deity Shiva, but who was activated by another Supreme Deity altogether - namely - Adi Shakti.

'Shaktism' specifically is a whole entire range of female divinities within the apex leadership of 'Adi Shakti'

Neon art

There is no monotheism in 'Hinduism.' At all. And that's even if you just use the word in the erroneous way that a lot of modern people do - to imply that it is the 'religion' of the peoples of the Sub-Continent of India. But you try and convince modern people in India of this.

Thomas Aquinas misquoted early Greek texts about the so-called monotheistic 'First Cause' and this gives the path to later spouters like Stephen Fry, the chance to attack this false antithesis on the grounds of modern 'scientific reasoning' and broader concepts about human moral philosophy (Fry accuses 'God' of being a primitive, malign, sadistic, tyrant).

The whole of Stanford University's religious and early philosophy curriculum, is based on the entirely false idea that Aquinas accurately quoted the primary Greek texts; but he did not.

You can get a handful of University degrees - just like Reza Aslan, for example - and spout forth all kinds of nonsense and everyone must be obliged to listen to you.

Is all of this 'just a mistake' that happened over and over never to have been corrected even the once, down through two and a half thousand years?

If I give you a method, let's say, taught to me in a Kung Fu school in Canton, for you to stick your hand right through a concrete wall - in the words of Christian Prince: 'what you will do?'

I was talking with this Jewish rabbi just this week, and as he was propounding some impressive ideas about the Greeks and Western ideas, and how Hebrew ideas challenged those but hadn't succeeded in overpowering them - he came out with this interesting perspective about the comparison between 'the Greek mind' and 'the Jewish mind:'

He said - the Greeks proposed that what you could not see, was not real; and that they had challenged the Jews saying 'well, did Moses actually see God? Have any of you seen God with your actual eyes?'

Whereas - so the Jewish rabbi continued - the Hebrew mind identified the realm of invisible ideas as being as real, probably more real, than merely the passing materially tangible world of things.

There's any amount of speakers on ET aliens, metaphysical things, chakra activation ('cleansing,' and 'balancing...!' LOL), Hindu mantras, Islamic Jinn mysteries, Christian spiritual-ism, Hebrew occultic practices.

None of them will show you how to plunge your hand hand right through a material wall and come out the other side without any harm or effect on your own body (as in, 'ouch!').

None of them will show you how to turn water into wine.

None of them will show you how to find a 'burning bush' that will talk to you.

But all of them want your attention.

Because they all say, that the realm of intangible ideas, is as important as engineering and mathematics and material physics.

And Stephen Fry and Wikipedia will tell you, by the same token, that although there 'may be' an ultimate reality, there is only one of it, it's 'the Singularity' and whatever you think, it will never ever belong to you, you cannot command it, and after all, fancy being so egotistical to think you could do, and you will never grasp it or understand it fully (they always produce the qualification of 'fully')...

...but perhaps, if you just make way for them, make some space for them and their ideas, and for the institutions that stand behind them, then all will be well with you.

Otherwise, you're going to get hurt. By them.

Got it?

This is a power thing.

Evil is about power. Power over you.

This is a place in Svalbard,
where they are stockpiling seeds, 
in case of a global catastrophe. Nice.

My comprehension of some strange and outlandish things, is that, for sure you can grasp them yourself, and wield the powers that go along with all of that - but the others who are already there before you or I, also have a say in what goes on, and maybe we should make some attempt at coming to terms with who they are, what they are like, and what they don't like and might respond and react violently to. To be in that circle, you have to be like them.

You have to be 'Tawhid.'

And I guarantee you, there ain't two billion of them out there! There's maybe like, two hundred. Just one of them single-handedly, can slaughter eighty thousand in one night. You wanna play with these guys?

I'll show you. No problem.

You will see with your eyes, feel with your hands, eat and drink with your tongue and mouth with them too, if you like.

But is it time, Morgiana? Is it time?

Don't know. Not sure.

There's plenty down here in the box though. Plenty of stuff. Life is long. LOL

Why Germany

Those of you who read the free Inkitt - or even the commercial release more complete version on Amazon/Kindle - of 'The CIA Lost Archive Files' will know that it was foreshadowed in there, that there was something 'about to go down in Germany.'

Germany is a very large country, relatively speaking, and it houses numerous very large organizations. Helmut Kohl, is lauded in Wikipedia as a great German, and someone who 'helped unify Europe...'

German lighting show...

The fact is, though, that there were not only 'conspiracy theories' that he had been taking massive bribes for a long time, but the political career of one Jorg Haider was built on that charge - resulting, if you go by the conspiracy theories - in the eventual assassination of Haider.

In part, there had been proven charges concerning illegal bank accounts and illegal donations - much the same as the charges currently being faced by French politician and former President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy - by the party that Kohl was leader of, the CDU.

...Moving to the immediate 'now,' this week's main conspiracy story doing the rounds is that some US Army Special Operations people shot up a CIA-protected joint in Frankfurt and took from there, the Scytl election counting servers. Scytl is seemingly, the rival firm that provides this kind of hardware and software, and which competes with Dominion. However Scytl and Dominion have always used each other as 'man-in-the-middle' covers for whichever country either one of them are 'operating on' at any given time.

What was said in the free read which was circularized about six months ago at least, is that there are very sophisticated 'real-time, live-stream' enabled, servers and programs, run from Germany - with the implication that they 'could' give you a visual output that was 'managed' from a control room somewhere. This would be inclusive of the so-called 'deep fake' television style visuals and audio streams.

Robe projection lighting at
Lux Partum

None of these kinds of things can ever be said openly, in such a way that the opposition can realize that materially empowered people are already 'on to them.'

As I write this, I am also right now, watching the live-stream PVD show... using the particular 'type' of software. (Paul Van Dyk Sunday Session 27).

...But I actually wanted to swerve right away from all of this; it's on 'auto pilot' and will end up in the SCOTUS as well as with State legislatures making some decisions.

Wanted to take a deep dive into why there are these mindsets on this planet that are intent on lying, cheating, stealing, and, in the end, deliberate unprovoked murder.

Funny Things From Declassified Material

I could have titled this 'time travel and how you can do it...'

I easily could have.

There are no major issues technically, regarding such a thing, practically speaking.

But trust me you are not really interested in that and most people would be suspicious of such claims and not read closely whatever was being said immediately thereupon. However, I will show you a few pics here which even then, will evade the perceptions of most viewers.

My gut feel is that you are interested in money. You are not interested in vague and/or 'mysterious' words about what are generally thought to be impossible things to do with 'just ideas.'

Dubai Cruise Harbor
lighthouse... This is what humans
spend their money on.

The word 'impossible,' though -, today means what you cannot establish and confirm from Google-Searching. Right?

So. We are left with quite a range of 'impossibles:' why the moon looks smaller at the horizon than the apogee of its transit across the sky, that it is impossible to 'square a circle' using just a compass and straight-edge, and so on... ...that kind of thing.

The other day I couldn't even easily find the date of death of Earl Leaf, the photographer responsible for most of the iconic images of Marilyn Monroe - several sites actually listed his age as '115.' He's been deceased though, for forty years as far as I know. There are several obituaries of 'Earl Leaf' but not any in detail for the Earl Leaf.

Still, Wikipedia, right... The source of all truth in the Universe.

Here's one of the great problems with some really ancient texts that touch on matters to do with 'time' and 'time travel:' translation. And secondly, few people realize that the really important texts contain a lot of deliberate 'overburden' in order to confuse the unworthy and deceive the unwise.

The Timaeus is one such of those. This is an impossible text to understand simply from the modern English translations, and unless one is guided by someone with the requisite, well effectively it is occult(-ic) knowledge, about the text, it's difficult to see what relevance to today's world and to today's science and technology, any of it holds.

However, in the Timaeus we find two interesting passages, one says that the material Universe is a moving image of something else, and that this moving version is also eternal but is caused to be moving according to number and that 'moving' we call time; the copy version exists in numbers, whereas Eternity itself rests in unity...

A complex, complicated discussion indeed. One difficulty is with the translated word 'moving.' But we won't go into it now.

How much money the thing, how little
money the mind.

Nevertheless, a second passage also says that, that which is harmonious and happy, unless its 'Creator' is evil,' will never be dissolved nor be liable to the fate of death.

The significant issue with all of the common, even the academic discussions down through the Ages, is that they - I would say deliberately - all misquote this text in particular, as having declared that the material Universe has a 'Creator.' And so it becomes quite easy to go into the darkness of the factually unknown and the possibly - to us - unknowable, and say that, well, there 'could' be things like the Big Bang or some other thing which took place in 'ground zero' material history, and which could also account for energy processes and matter and frequency/wavelength entropy as we can 'see' it today. Hence 'scientific materialism' and/or atheism.

The so-called 'argument from First Cause' (the Cosmological Argument) is most referenced to Thomas Aquinas and he misquoted these early texts such as the Timaeus and even what extant fragments of Parmenides there are - none of which 'argued anything from First Cause' at all; they merely said what appears like a tautology at first, namely, that those things which were created, had a creator.

In fact, they contain quite a different idea altogether, namely that the concept of movement by orderly number does have a clear-cut conceptual primary cause, which is, specifically, orderly numbers!!

That is quite another thing to saying that the Universe does have or must have, 'A Creator.'

Okay so now, I am going to drift, hopefully, unseen (LOL), into something else in the Timaeus, that relates to some bizarre things you can find in US official declassified documents that were previously secret.

Photo by Earl Leaf

The Timaeus has another strange passage which says something like - that words that can be used, and are used, to relate to, or to describe the 'copy versions' of the Universe's reality, are able to be only 'equivalent expressions;' in other words to convey 'as like as' or 'like unto' or 'something like' and that beings who are not from this passing world of 'reality' are quite casual about such wordings in our reality and don't care particularly about them - but, when it comes to the real Universe, the words themselves that pertain to actual things, are in some connected way part of the things and there is extreme seriousness and particularity about such forms of communication...

As you all must know by now, Russell Targ was this laser technology pioneer, who received millions of dollars in research funding from the US military, to undertake so-called 'remote viewing' experiments. And, in subsequent declassified material, there are accounts of his having somehow 'remote viewed' inside an ET alien spacecraft, in which, according to his account, he saw bodies lying on tables above which were what looked like hair-dryers(!).

His colleague in the experiments, retired police detective Pat Price, told him that it was his own experience, that the beings who operated the kinds of craft in question, were potentially quite capable of taking Targ's body and storing that like the bodies that he saw, and that he was best advised not to risk any further 'ventures' to such a place.

So, what I mean to convey to all of you here, is that there are some elements of various highly secret - even till today - 'experiments' and other activities, that were not at all, 'simply' imagination-style or hallucinatory or 'visualized' perception kinds of things, but involved real material, and harmful or at least risky matters.

Artificial cloud, by Cartier.

If you have this outlandishly advanced, extraordinarily technically proficient species of intelligent being, could they know what 'harmonious and happy' constitutes - in respect of human beings - and would they have some means of materially protecting and preserving such; or even, could they, would they, do they, have some means to quite cynically, as far as we might think of it, 'make functioning human bodies...?' As and whenever, they might choose to?

This article is getting rather long, and I can do, but I won't do right here today, explain something about what has come to be known as the Monroe Institute's (patented) hemi-sinc brain process for so-called 'remote viewing.' And you can go read about that on-line for yourselves if you want - and certainly it is true enough, that there have been occasions in the past that the US military has commissioned one or two key individuals in the past, such as Hella Hammid and others, to 'look somewhere' and describe what it was they 'saw' there.

The Monroe Institute's main process, is to do with confirmed 'science' (giggle), about electromagnetic resonance from over-the-ear electronic headphones, which has come to be widely known as 'binaural harmonics.' Wikipedia expresses this as an 'auditory illusion perceived.' However there is no science to the effect that it is an 'illusion;' added hertz equating exactly to the differential of two different but close frequencies on either side of the brain are detected in the midbrain as EMF waves. This is not a 'perception' of an 'illusion.' This is a produced material reality and a fact - although it is possible to go into another argument about what produces the effect, even though that argument has also been dismissed by formal studies already. Such things do not trouble Wikipedia however.

Vicuna by Loro Piana - USD 21,000
So I'm told.

What I would explain - if I went into things in detail here - are to do with various important elements of the process, that you will likely not be told about for the most part, even were you to pay the fees and go stay at their facility in Virginia, or at the related one at Esalen, California, to study and learn about their systems.

It will suffice for me to just say, that - and make no mistake about it - if you wandered accidentally or unguided, into some place that was not just simply some 'imagined' or 'hallucinated place,' the people in the kinds of places Russell Targ talked about, do not have the same attitudes about 'human life' that we are all used to and take for granted, and you 'might' be in some danger; actual real physical danger of literally losing your life. 

And by all of this I also mean to tell you, that there are matters which are still highly classified, which don't constitute 'remote viewing' about space, time, or anything else 'out there' and which because of the fact that they are to do with physical beings and your physical life, are both serious as well as not to be treated casually in any way at all.

Upper Circle - $22, I think.

When you are dealing with only 'representations' of permanently real things, then you can live in the world of opinions, in which even our 'science' is just another version of that world (of opinions). And that is why Karl Popper wants to keep you inside such a world. He would be obliterated in the other place, and he has no place there - though neither would they keep an artifact of his body nor ever generate a continuous example of such a thing from its substance DNA.

You, on the other hand, they might, but you may not wish to be a piece of meat on a slab just for right now, correct...

You still have a lot of living to do. You could, however, keep a foot in both camps; it's not impossible. Although it is impossible if you Google-Search it. 

As Christian Prince regularly says: 'If I show you how to do it, what you will do then?' (He's not a native English speaker, okay!!)

There are those types of people who will always challenge and say - 'go on, go on, just show me, show me.' Those are the sorts of people they will kill as soon as look at, and throw your body over a cliff and that would be if you're lucky. And it would make absolutely no difference if you are from the FBI or the CCP Guoanbu.

Yes, Leo Strauss - And 'Time Travel'

One of our readers here wisely suggested the name of the American-German philosopher Leo Strauss as someone people should become acquainted with before they dive too deeply into this place!

So let's both link to one of his books, as well as say a few words about why Strauss is so important in our time:

'Persecution and the Art of Writing' Strauss

Leo Strauss is notable for lots of reasons, but one of the most significant for us, in our time, is that he was a critic of Karl Popper, the individual George Soros points to all the time, as being influential to the way Soros thinks and plans.

For me this is like the thief leaving his fingerprints...

St Paul's Cathedral - occult symbols
everywhere in there...

Popper was a London academia favored person. And we make a very serious mistake thinking that people just become evil all by themselves, or that they are misguided, or just a child of some temporarily obtaining era. Or that new people, new thinkers on the scene, go through temporary characteristic phases in history, and that society equivalently goes through such 'phases.'

But hidden underneath the long turgid, academic sentences, is the fact, for instance, that the difference between Adolf Hitler... ...and Karl Popper - is nothing. Popper is so deceptive in the way he speaks, that it sounds like he is decrying Hitler... But it is specious talk.

And so the difference between the occult Nazi Castle of Wewelsburg, and the London School of Economics, or Oxford, or Cambridge, is also... ...nothing.

The 'crypt' at Wewelsburg Castle
They do art, there now...

Popper denied that arithmetic mathematics was real. And none of us today, actually reacts terribly to the phrases 'empirical falsification' or 'falsifiable' - and we assume automatically that these are quite standard ideas that we apply to why science is true and real and functional.

However, Popper coined these phrases, and he used it to effectively, deny the entire objective reality of science, and to substitute actual science, with a form of it that was continuously affirmed, or validated (they even use this word universally in modern academic degrees) by a consensus viewpoint of 'approved' people...

Popper's 'empirical falsification' proposition is that something (IE anything; everything) may be contradicted by evidence.

The occult symbols at Wewelsburg

And let me put it this way then: ...may be contradicted by 'evidence.' 

Talk about going around in circles! Muslim apologists should love (and they do, of course) this. We have some 'fact;' but is is now contradicted by 'evidence.' And what is 'evidence?' Well it is a fact, of course. And what is a fact? Well - evidence! Can't you understand anything?? LOL

Anyway the Queen knighted Popper in 1965.

Popper is classed under the label of being a 'liberal.' Or among that category of 'liberal thinkers.'

He said this about DNA: 'The origin of life and the genetic code is a disturbing riddle.'

There are one or two among you here - certainly Rob, for one - who will immediately have lights go off in their minds about, well, why should someone say such a thing as this, about DNA, of all things...?

Disturbing. And, a riddle. Popper said.

Really?

Why?

St Paul's Cathedral again

I can point you to a couple of creditable people, who, having gone to a certain place near Manasarovar Lake, near Mount Kailash, and undertaking some 'yogic practices' will report that they had actual real experiences of 'angelic beings' (at least, let's just say they must have been Indian-looking ones, or maybe Chinese ones... lol), so then - 

why cannot it be also something able to be reported by others with their feet usually on the ground quite firmly, that there is a hidden inner chamber at Oxford University, where this tall, burned and otherwise red skinned personality with horns on its head, and the scent of sulfur wafting around it, turns up and advances certain thoughts and ideas into the heads of mischievous people like Karl Popper and George Soros?

I put it in these terms so as to avoid outright telling you that is what happens at those places.

Highest degree Freemasons will know
where this leads.
St Paul's again.

I am 63 and have spent the large part of my life reading books including the most obtuse ones, since probably less than 10 years of age, and I cannot say that I would be able suddenly materially 'grab a hold of' certain really complex bodies and systems of philosophy and swing them about bodily the way Karl Popper does. I wouldn't claim to be able to do it if I had read and studied over ten lifetimes.

But I can tell you, that nothing that comes out of his mouth is casual, or benign - they are only the most sinister, malevolent, and anti-human life propositions that you will ever be likely to find anywhere. Pure Satanism, pure Satanic evil.

That is what they are.

But simply immense, in their knowledge and power over knowledge, and immense in a preternatural way.

Right now, today, as of this exact precise second, your life is in the hands of the ideas that emanated from Karl Popper - if that is who they really 'emanated' from.

The falsifiability of an election's objective results - usually dependent upon who actually voted and where they intended to cast that vote - is 'evidenced' in the hands of a thousand media outlets and a hundred thousand 'social media' voices.

Just have a nice cup of tea, though, right?
No cause for alarm.

And there is not a goddamn thing you can do about it.You walked right into this 'era,' this 'age,' this 'society' - because we both of us, expected that everyone else here has had only one life-time and neither you nor I nor they can have been able to lay such sophisticated traps in the way of the 'continuity' of education, or social and cultural memory. You and I both thought that Adolf Hitler died in that bunker, or else, at least, in Chile or someplace where he was being quiet under the false name of 'Wolfe' or whatever the conspiracy stories were.

But if Adolf Hitler is dead, and all of those judges who sent Jews to the concentration camps and those black-shirts arrested them for owning property, and for saying black is black when they should have said it was green if the SS ordered it so... ...then who is Emmet G. Sullivan?

Okay this is all too long to post in one shot. I had been going to post something about time travel as it might be applied to yon Jennifer Connelly, who is now drifting from us because of this long article, away, away, away into the forgotten earlier posts...

'Come back. Come ba-a-a-a-c-k...'