I could have titled this 'time travel and how you can do it...'
I easily could have.
There are no major issues technically, regarding such a thing, practically speaking.
But trust me you are not really interested in that and most people would be suspicious of such claims and not read closely whatever was being said immediately thereupon. However, I will show you a few pics here which even then, will evade the perceptions of most viewers.
My gut feel is that you are interested in money. You are not interested in vague and/or 'mysterious' words about what are generally thought to be impossible things to do with 'just ideas.'
Dubai Cruise Harbor lighthouse... This is what humans spend their money on. |
The word 'impossible,' though -, today means what you cannot establish and confirm from Google-Searching. Right?
So. We are left with quite a range of 'impossibles:' why the moon looks smaller at the horizon than the apogee of its transit across the sky, that it is impossible to 'square a circle' using just a compass and straight-edge, and so on... ...that kind of thing.
The other day I couldn't even easily find the date of death of Earl Leaf, the photographer responsible for most of the iconic images of Marilyn Monroe - several sites actually listed his age as '115.' He's been deceased though, for forty years as far as I know. There are several obituaries of 'Earl Leaf' but not any in detail for the Earl Leaf.
Still, Wikipedia, right... The source of all truth in the Universe.
Here's one of the great problems with some really ancient texts that touch on matters to do with 'time' and 'time travel:' translation. And secondly, few people realize that the really important texts contain a lot of deliberate 'overburden' in order to confuse the unworthy and deceive the unwise.
The Timaeus is one such of those. This is an impossible text to understand simply from the modern English translations, and unless one is guided by someone with the requisite, well effectively it is occult(-ic) knowledge, about the text, it's difficult to see what relevance to today's world and to today's science and technology, any of it holds.
However, in the Timaeus we find two interesting passages, one says that the material Universe is a moving image of something else, and that this moving version is also eternal but is caused to be moving according to number and that 'moving' we call time; the copy version exists in numbers, whereas Eternity itself rests in unity...
A complex, complicated discussion indeed. One difficulty is with the translated word 'moving.' But we won't go into it now.
How much money the thing, how little money the mind. |
Nevertheless, a second passage also says that, that which is harmonious and happy, unless its 'Creator' is evil,' will never be dissolved nor be liable to the fate of death.
The significant issue with all of the common, even the academic discussions down through the Ages, is that they - I would say deliberately - all misquote this text in particular, as having declared that the material Universe has a 'Creator.' And so it becomes quite easy to go into the darkness of the factually unknown and the possibly - to us - unknowable, and say that, well, there 'could' be things like the Big Bang or some other thing which took place in 'ground zero' material history, and which could also account for energy processes and matter and frequency/wavelength entropy as we can 'see' it today. Hence 'scientific materialism' and/or atheism.
The so-called 'argument from First Cause' (the Cosmological Argument) is most referenced to Thomas Aquinas and he misquoted these early texts such as the Timaeus and even what extant fragments of Parmenides there are - none of which 'argued anything from First Cause' at all; they merely said what appears like a tautology at first, namely, that those things which were created, had a creator.
In fact, they contain quite a different idea altogether, namely that the concept of movement by orderly number does have a clear-cut conceptual primary cause, which is, specifically, orderly numbers!!
That is quite another thing to saying that the Universe does have or must have, 'A Creator.'
Okay so now, I am going to drift, hopefully, unseen (LOL), into something else in the Timaeus, that relates to some bizarre things you can find in US official declassified documents that were previously secret.
Photo by Earl Leaf |
The Timaeus has another strange passage which says something like - that words that can be used, and are used, to relate to, or to describe the 'copy versions' of the Universe's reality, are able to be only 'equivalent expressions;' in other words to convey 'as like as' or 'like unto' or 'something like' and that beings who are not from this passing world of 'reality' are quite casual about such wordings in our reality and don't care particularly about them - but, when it comes to the real Universe, the words themselves that pertain to actual things, are in some connected way part of the things and there is extreme seriousness and particularity about such forms of communication...
As you all must know by now, Russell Targ was this laser technology pioneer, who received millions of dollars in research funding from the US military, to undertake so-called 'remote viewing' experiments. And, in subsequent declassified material, there are accounts of his having somehow 'remote viewed' inside an ET alien spacecraft, in which, according to his account, he saw bodies lying on tables above which were what looked like hair-dryers(!).
His colleague in the experiments, retired police detective Pat Price, told him that it was his own experience, that the beings who operated the kinds of craft in question, were potentially quite capable of taking Targ's body and storing that like the bodies that he saw, and that he was best advised not to risk any further 'ventures' to such a place.
So, what I mean to convey to all of you here, is that there are some elements of various highly secret - even till today - 'experiments' and other activities, that were not at all, 'simply' imagination-style or hallucinatory or 'visualized' perception kinds of things, but involved real material, and harmful or at least risky matters.
Artificial cloud, by Cartier. |
If you have this outlandishly advanced, extraordinarily technically proficient species of intelligent being, could they know what 'harmonious and happy' constitutes - in respect of human beings - and would they have some means of materially protecting and preserving such; or even, could they, would they, do they, have some means to quite cynically, as far as we might think of it, 'make functioning human bodies...?' As and whenever, they might choose to?
This article is getting rather long, and I can do, but I won't do right here today, explain something about what has come to be known as the Monroe Institute's (patented) hemi-sinc brain process for so-called 'remote viewing.' And you can go read about that on-line for yourselves if you want - and certainly it is true enough, that there have been occasions in the past that the US military has commissioned one or two key individuals in the past, such as Hella Hammid and others, to 'look somewhere' and describe what it was they 'saw' there.
The Monroe Institute's main process, is to do with confirmed 'science' (giggle), about electromagnetic resonance from over-the-ear electronic headphones, which has come to be widely known as 'binaural harmonics.' Wikipedia expresses this as an 'auditory illusion perceived.' However there is no science to the effect that it is an 'illusion;' added hertz equating exactly to the differential of two different but close frequencies on either side of the brain are detected in the midbrain as EMF waves. This is not a 'perception' of an 'illusion.' This is a produced material reality and a fact - although it is possible to go into another argument about what produces the effect, even though that argument has also been dismissed by formal studies already. Such things do not trouble Wikipedia however.
Vicuna by Loro Piana - USD 21,000 So I'm told. |
What I would explain - if I went into things in detail here - are to do with various important elements of the process, that you will likely not be told about for the most part, even were you to pay the fees and go stay at their facility in Virginia, or at the related one at Esalen, California, to study and learn about their systems.
It will suffice for me to just say, that - and make no mistake about it - if you wandered accidentally or unguided, into some place that was not just simply some 'imagined' or 'hallucinated place,' the people in the kinds of places Russell Targ talked about, do not have the same attitudes about 'human life' that we are all used to and take for granted, and you 'might' be in some danger; actual real physical danger of literally losing your life.
And by all of this I also mean to tell you, that there are matters which are still highly classified, which don't constitute 'remote viewing' about space, time, or anything else 'out there' and which because of the fact that they are to do with physical beings and your physical life, are both serious as well as not to be treated casually in any way at all.
Upper Circle - $22, I think. |
When you are dealing with only 'representations' of permanently real things, then you can live in the world of opinions, in which even our 'science' is just another version of that world (of opinions). And that is why Karl Popper wants to keep you inside such a world. He would be obliterated in the other place, and he has no place there - though neither would they keep an artifact of his body nor ever generate a continuous example of such a thing from its substance DNA.
You, on the other hand, they might, but you may not wish to be a piece of meat on a slab just for right now, correct...
You still have a lot of living to do. You could, however, keep a foot in both camps; it's not impossible. Although it is impossible if you Google-Search it.
As Christian Prince regularly says: 'If I show you how to do it, what you will do then?' (He's not a native English speaker, okay!!)
There are those types of people who will always challenge and say - 'go on, go on, just show me, show me.' Those are the sorts of people they will kill as soon as look at, and throw your body over a cliff and that would be if you're lucky. And it would make absolutely no difference if you are from the FBI or the CCP Guoanbu.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your considered comments are welcome