I've stopped there today because it was quite a nice surprise, basically to observe that - well, definitely from my point-of-view - she really knows what she is talking about!
Her book is total canon as far as I'm concerned. It out-flies all of these big major world religion texts like the Quran and so on, by as far as from here to the immediate next Galaxy at least.
 |
| Silk hot air balloon models, in a restaurant in Firenze. The Renaissance people developed air travel, from basic ideas they got from China. They never 'flew to the moon.' But they thought about it. Their 'thinking' though was not silly or only 'imagination.' |
None of these other things, apart from a very very few -, go even anywhere near to giving out actually clear, simply-worded, detailed explanations either of the internal human psychological mechanisms and actual sources of dynamic human intelligent energy - or any authentic understanding of the material nature of 'soul.' They're all obtuse and when you examine them closely with facts and with the benefit of modern scientific knowledge, they turn into very obvious deceits; if highly contrived, very clever, as well as long and turgid of course.
I haven't read, this time around, any further just yet, but I imagine, she is going to get into just where it all leads you...
And that's just the logical next place following her actually detailing the techniques of the mind that are necessary in order to 'go somewhere.'
Meaning, to go beyond the animal-brain and reflexive responses that are simply immature and animalistic.
Now here is something hugely practical and highly valuable, if a bit (nay, often it is a lot and then it can become depressing) provoking of the deep cynic in a person -, when it comes to using the processes that she is discussing (and that I have been discussing here for some time):
It will become so so easy to look at another person when they are simply even just standing, sometimes, but definitely when they are talking, and 'see right through them;' to who they are inside, what bits and pieces are in there, and what is missing.
A great example of this is this recent addition to the American political stage - Abdul El-Sayed.
You will see him very often, look away and slightly up to your left on screen (which might be his right in real life unless the image was reversed in the camera/digital vision), when he is constructing some answer to a question about moral and ethical context and justification for something, whatever thing he was just being asked to comment about.
All of these people, are incomplete beings - they do not have the function which takes their own personal consciousness including a self-consciousness 'up above to see down far ahead and back into the past and report to the Ego, facts, reality and complete objective truth.'
 |
| That same lineage produced this. |
Instead, what they are doing is resorting to a manufactured internal image of 'good and bad' a moral template if you will, and the ethics of that -, from within the mind-created imaginary 'scenery.' And then, however, all of these people, 'join mental hands,' as it were, with all others who share that imagery, despite that it is a made-up one, entirely imaginary.
But it is like a realistic painting, full of elements and color and extreme detail - and this makes it seem real or all the more real, you could say.
The problem is that almost none of it is intrinsically rooted to outside hard material realities...
You see, you can't play around with hard external material reality and pretend those things are different to how they are: jump off a very tall building with no harness and you will fall, and then you will die.
That is a 'hard outside material reality.'
Muhammad, however - the Prophet - flew to the moon...
Well just how did he do that, though?
Shirley MacLaine is not going to tell you she ever did that by 'imagining' it, or thinking it, and then, somehow, actually, she physically just left the ground and 'flew to the moon.' For example.
Even the Apostle Paul never says that kind of thing - even he says 'I don't know whether in the body or in the spirit' (that 'I did such-and-such;' like fly away somewhere). He was convinced though, that 'it' did happen, or something happened that left him with particular knowledge, based on facts.
And so the process he does not know - and he says he doesn't know.
 |
| Juliet Prowse. She was also with Shirley MacLaine in Can-Can, and had a cameo role in that. She's a British Indian, part-South African born in Mumbai. |
The point is, it would helpful to any person using their brain, to hear the methods, and in our present time - as I have attempted to outline to those of you who have asked - scientific bases for how any of these things can even be regarded as 'real;' whether only psychologically real, or materially, real.
MacLaine uses the word they had back then in the Eighties - 'visualize.'
I don't use that word, on account that the militantly stupid and ignorant but still insistent that no such things can exist, always steer the meaning of that word to 'back to the imaginary;' that is, what is only happening in the imagination.
But when they do that, they are neither understanding what the word imagination is, and what things the imagination can provide (create, for instance, be creative), nor what the process of thinking, by contrast, entails and is.
Shirley MacLaine is going to tell you, thinking, when it is properly done, is a process of electro-chemistry, micro-electricity (electronics), and energetic dynamics and a hard material physical, if dynamic, reality. That is, in this specific context, of how she is talking about doing it, using it, the brain, and mind - it is not 'imaginary' at all!
...Not an imaginary thing. 'Images' are in any case, only a very small part of what is going on here.
Again, unless one is regularly doing these sorts of things, those things MacLaine talks about and details in her book -, it is not necessarily easy to just 'accept' that they are all true things and real things.
But, taking that example of El-Sayed, and he is only one of a swathe of modern people that do it - you can literally see him, via his eye movements and his face, how it is constantly frowning on the one hand as if to say - 'trust me I am a serious person' - but really, he is frowning because he is actually thinking about matching words, what he is going to say, with the images constructed in his head!
 |
| British India, because this is the Raffles, Jaipur. |
And that is different to when, say a Shirley MacLaine says 'I saw' this and this. Because she does not mean 'she made up' or that she 'imagined' or that she invented, but that she literally has a faculty of seeing, and has true inner vision, but not any 'metaphysical' thing: she actually can literally see. ...With her eyelids closed.
And then the reality of it is that what she sees adds up to factual things, objective, hard material things with hard material consequences.
Imaginary things regularly fail to add up when it comes to our waking hard material physical reality.
The process is about energy, real actual organised, internal human sensory and sensory field energy - and because it is really driven by real actual energy, there are always necessary 'output' events -; effects, consequences, results.
It's Physics, not Metaphysics.
Muhammad never flew or went to the moon.
Shirley MacLaine has done and can do.
Because the human micro-electric circuitry is highly-composed, highly-organised, structured, integrated - it is a thing, a single thing made up of lots of parts. That, is the 'individual human conscious being.' The human material body and all of its bio-chemical components and systems, are only there to provide more or less raw sense input data ultimately into the mind.
 |
| I shouldn't really do this, because I know some people go out and buy stuff like this! This is not that expensive though. |
The simple material body then, is not 'you.' It is the sense data provider. And that is, all it is.
Whereas Abdul El-Sayed literally has no concept, certainly no experience of, an-other 'body' or energetic organised integrated structure, he has got to resort to a self-misled notion about reality which is merely just a set of templates, memories in his material brain cells animated by the bio-chemistry while that is still happening - to refer to his 'template' of 'reality' - by contrast a complete and advanced-consciousness person, can always and continuously refer to immediate direct energy signals, coming to them faster than the Speed of Light, which are harmonically vibrating (or not as the case may be; they could be generating dissonance) with their own personal integrated energy field structure ex-the material body.
Shirley MacLaine - the real one, the one 'inside' if you will - cannot die. Muhammad already has died. The problem with 'Muhammad' is that there is a clear dissonance in his ethical narrative: nobody needs to repeat 'programs' to develop muscle-memory for enslavement and autonomic slavery. The truth and the reality is the complete opposite of that! 'Seeing' Truth is seeing God. Talking about God as if you know but know one else does - is deception; often deliberate deception enforced through guilt and demands of honor and faithfulness and unthinking blind loyalty. That's the essence of spiritual DISSONANCE. In fact it's the ultimate dissonance for and in the human soul.
Anybody who really has some 'touch' with their own healthy inner being, so long as it is indeed advanced, will feel the difference between harmonies, and dissonances coming from ideas.
There is a really strong dissonance often, with what political people say and do, and your own inner integrated structural field. There is a really strong dissonance, between words coming off a page, and your own inner common sense!
The justifications that are always thrown at the unsuspecting, the totally innocent in the matter, by the extremely malicious and underhanded, every politician and tyrant on the planet that ever walked - are always along the lines of 'believe me/trust me' - you are nothing, I am everything; God spoke to me... And, 'you are disloyal!' ...Don't you feel guilty?
LOL
The fact is, a thing either is, or it just plain isn't.
There isn't any 'untouchable text' or special words that make up for the difference. If Shirley MacLaine's view is correct, you will be able to get the Orbs to turn up (at minimum!) - and more.
Ah, but doesn't the Book say not to put The Lord Thy God to the Test?
Well who made this character 'God' though?
The Christian Bible (for one good example) certainly does not say not to put Him to the Test.
In fact it says, 'Go on then, if you simply have to stick your fingers into this Flesh and feel the wounds and the blood, well go on, then.'
 |
| At least you can't go buy that though. It's way too expensive. |
And that guy did and it was all there as specified.
(And that's the point - stuff needs to be real. It can't be this forever fairy tale narrative stories and words all the time with no hard manifested reality).
Yes it must have been a bit of a shock, no doubt.
People, human beings, are all, mostly all, just so backward...
We have spent a couple of years now in here, talking about the harmonies.
What I like about how MacLaine writes in her book - and I think it is totally her doing the actual writing, not some 'after-market editor aka ghostwriter' - is that she is succinct, practical, completely pragmatic. She flawlessly went from 'seven colored chakras' to 'body language' and, thirty-five years ago, pre-empted me on what I am now saying about Abdul El-Sayed and how he talks. She goes on to explain why a fit body sustains that shape on account of the 'inner energy situation' primarily, and well before anyone goes to the gym to work out.
It's not just the brain's 'mind-set' that is there, that has to be in place; there is the necessary balance in the subtle energetic 'body.'
You guys really need to work hard on sticking your fingers deep into the flesh. Getting those Orbs to appear for you.
You can do it. 100% you can do it.
Frightening people by telling them 'Oh you are going against God' is first of all a lie, second of all it is an outrageous lie, and third of all its is deliberately designed to hold them back from reaching out... ...their hands to the Tree of Life, and eat of its Fruit, and so, Live Forever.
The Tree of Life is the Harmonies. The Fruit are the Melodies.
Here is the real story: But if you eat of the Fruit of the Template that you yourselves made up, in the Garden of your own Mortal and Deficient Minds, in the Tree of your own Imaginations and those of the miscreants who lied to you, and pretend those things are 'Good and Evil' instead of to really ascend Above and see the Reality - you will surely die in that very day!
And that's the Fact.
Go on. Keep risking that I am wrong. See where you end up.
Put your hand out, and take the Real Fruit.
'...And then Satan took him to a high place and said Behold, all of these Earthly Kingdoms I will give to you, if you but bow down to me and become enslaved to me, and worship me.' And people always ask where in the Bible did Jesus say 'I am God, Worship me.' He didn't.
[This is by Yasin Guven - 'All About Melodies']:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your considered comments are welcome