Simple And Obvious, But Huge

Prior to around 320-something BC, there are literally no as in zero at all, references in any writings, documents, stones, monuments, coins, in Hebrew or in Greek or any other language, of any of the figures of the Old Testament - anywhere; not in Jerusalem or that broader area generally.

'Abraham' simply does not exist as a figure. And there are no names associated with the Torah identities in Hebrew or Judaic records - no 'Isaac,' no 'Benjamin,' no nothing. Maybe if you take Sanskrit words, you can force in 'Abram' and 'Sarah.' 

The poor man Falernus,
made this kind of thing to give
to the God of Wine, when He
visited.

The standard religious beliefs say that Abraham was around maybe at 2000 BC.

Now this actually does not mean none of the stories have some true basis, what it means is that the things passed down are unreliable.

And that does not make Islam and the modern interpretations of that involving this idea of 'corrupted Jewish literature' correct at all - far from it in fact, because the Quranic literature is literally the worst for borrowing other earlier stories and frikking around with them.

I will explain some very obvious and key elements and then attempt to ensure that no one is suddenly left thereby in a vacuum of religious beliefs and ideas!

The infamous Book or Books of Enoch, is a perfect example to look at:

There is only maybe eight-odd pages of sacred verse form writing in those texts that can be authentic.

And that is also, not an explanation of why it was not forcefully included in Canon because it is definitely somewhat in there... Jesus quotes Enoch directly and so do plenty of other places of the Gospel Writers and of the Letters.

The verse form sections are Enoch. But that is all that is actually from Enoch. Surprisingly, people seem not to notice that all the other parts are written in the third person in 'profane prose' (as Ammon Hillman would say) with some quotations claiming to be of what Enoch said, presumably to some other recorder! 

Everything else, whilst in some places making reference to things that were culturally known and/or folkloric incident knowledge (was based on incidents that happened and were passed down or were part of group memory) - were made up in order to justify the use of force and violence by dictators and leaders and rulers and have nothing whatsoever to do with Godly things; the same is true of the whole of the Bible and also the Quran in particular.

It is well-known for instance, that drinking alcohol is forbidden (aka 'haram') in Islam, but what is never talked about is the reason specified in the Quran (Surah al Maidah) - which is that when you are killing people, it adversely affects your capacity to kill efficiently if you are drunk...

None of these books have anything to do with 'God.'

And the God of Wine
rewarded him.

Steven M. Greer is getting better and better by the day, and it is because he is firmly underscoring that an individual's attitude is critical to interaction with advanced intelligent beings located just off the planet.

Greer recently made mention of the fact that he had been offered some items of technology, some devices, by the Russell Targ group and the military intel 'remote viewing' people, which mechanistically placed a person in that 'communication mode' with ETs. But he declined to use it because it circumvented the reality about a person's necessary intention in making contact at all. And he is completely right.

When we talk about 'electron spintronics' I could put together such devices but they are entirely unnecessary. [Which is not to say that I am not putting something together for you, because I am but it is an extremely cut-down version].

Greer is now providing quite a lot of video of the 'lights' responding to whatever his Ce5 groups are doing out in Joshua Tree and other places - and unless those of you who have already got some basic techniques via here are either not implementing them because of insufficient time or other reasons, or really not 'doing it right' - by now you yourself won't absolutely need to see videos of stuff like that because you have already personally seen the responses and could be a lot of other things besides.

It is completely obvious - when you know about Greek sacred oracular verse - that the Book of Enoch contains only a tiny section which is really 'Enoch.' And that section or those relatively few short sections never talk about anything violent or any sort of retribution by God except in the most generalistic ways: 'sin and the spirits created by wicked mortal flesh are destroyed...' He doesn't say people are destroyed and he never says in any of the verse form sections that the so-called 'Fallen Angels' are done anything with in particular. These are all utterly ridiculous stories added in later. 

What is ridiculous about them is simply that either God is this incompetent power-mad over-reactive entity with absolutely no foreknowledge of anything at all (especially with not even a slight suspicion of what is an obvious likely consequence of having good-looking females enter the scene where there are powerful 'Watchers!' lol), or well -, the stories are lies.

Yes it is true technology is such a thing that as it advances, it is capable of producing ever more powerful weaponry; that is an obvious fact about it.

In our day, a poor man
might not even have that much
to offer (the vegetables).
And there are already plenty
of rich people that surely
the God of Wine would 
better like to visit - yes?

So I would say make sure you don't so obviously show an ego that simply needs to have prime billing all the time, and that you can work with others and as part of a team where such a team is lead by the consensus formed around the best logical argument.

And that does not mean you cannot strongly argue a particular point or the merits of a case. It just means that a stage is reached where the winning logical case is uplifted by all, not just by some; that is not by only those who argued it in the first place where the others did not.

Here is how Enoch puts it:

'These words are for a remote generation, at a time far in the future when people have learned a great many things, and those who are not evil are selectively supported...'