Nabi, 'Nevi'im'

'Prophet' is of course a Greek word: 'Before/in advance' and then 'Telling' (pro + phesein).

Nabi is the original language text Hebrew word that is used in the Deuteronomy texts.

And from that usage comes the widespread idea that the Hebrew religion, and specifically the whole of the Bible itself, especially in context of seeing it as a by-now Western matter - has to do with Jewish prophets and this god identity 'JHVH,' to a very large extent because 'prophets' have been apparently accurately 'telling the future.'

'Enter into' the place of
Prophecy...

But 'Nabi' does not mean 'prophet.' It has been taken to mean prophet and it just plain doesn't.

The US Secretary of State, or those guys who went in physically to decide whether Saddam had WMDs - those people are 'Nabis.'

They are spokespeople for the Power in Existential Effect.

The Jewish Nabi was the enforcer of an agreement that had been made between Moses and a very materially powerful entity, and the Jewish tribes.

'Nabis' had certain specific traditionally laid-down processes they underwent, in order to be able to be 'spokesmen' for JHVH.

Which is why 'Daniel' was not ever a 'prophet' to the Jews; he was not a 'Nabi.'

Strangely though, the great king Nebuchadnezzar accepted Daniel's pronouncements and not the Jewish Nabis who were there also. In one very important instance, only Daniel 'saw' whatever it was that he saw, while the Nabis did not see 'the vision.' They saw nothing.

Se really, we have a problem if we assume that 'JVHV' is actually 'God' god.

Because this 'JVHV' was not able to have his 'Nabis' see what some Daniel was able to. And the big point people miss about this book of the compilation of books we call the 'Bible,' is that Daniel was not in fact forcing anyone to do anything - he was not enforcing the Law of Moses...

When a 'Nabi' spoke for JVHV, then the powers that JVHV clearly wielded, saw to it that whatever retribution the Nabis threatened, happened.

Our problem today, whenever people think 'religion,' is this question of theodicy, but also, why miracles don't happen quickly, when the miracles of the Nabis all pretty much did happen at least quite quickly.

The food of the rich elites.

Yet the whole point of Daniel was that Daniel's access to some Divine Identity or Divine Council (because it is referred to in that book similarly to the way the Elohim are talking about, namely, as a group; and this is reflected in the Apocalypse, where the Council has been extended to include a number of human beings who had attained those roles over much long history of the human race) - was about a very long time in the future, and therefore was nothing really to do with immediately enforcing any current behavior.

Nebuchadnezzar accepted Daniel's word for it, ahead of anyone else's, albeit on the basis of other things to do with Daniel, including that he was not able to be killed in some furnace or other.

The major difference between the Moses material and Daniel, is that those who follow the Law of Moses are 'o-be-dient' (surrender to the Na-bo; the summons, or the summon-er), whereas the apparent teaching of the Book of Daniel is to do with the benefits of learning Wisdom.

And certainly, regardless of simpering pretense, the real reason for Jews being 'obedient' is to avoid the destruction and harm being threatened them by some much more powerful, but definitely not actually Divine, entity.

The New World Order purveyors, are under the clear understanding, that they are 'JVHV.'

And this stems from occultic practices that they all engage in, which give them the impression that there is in fact, no one, actually sitting on any 'throne of God.' And that therefore, they can attain to it themselves, in the form of some 'apotheosis being' which is assumed to be the human as 'evolving,' or an evolutionary Cosmic entity.

They all hold there is such a thing as some kind of 'Cosmic' place, some kind of 'dimension source of immanence.'

Lilac tea cake - 
serious, but subtle..

But it would take another bout of Alex Jones going somewhere, with some video equipment and a mic, for you to see, what it is these lunatics actually believe.   

Because take this from me if nothing else, these guys believe something, believe in something, in just exactly the same way as the most adamant extreme mega church religionista believes.

They are fully convinced. It takes more than a simple personal individual lust for money and material possessions, to consign innocent civilians to a massacre on such a grand scale as what happened in Yugoslavia, or Iraq, or Libya - or as today, in Mariupol. It takes a number of people, all acting together, all in absolute agreement, to arrange that kind of thing.

Billions of dollars, of defective, out-of-date, even Soviet era stockpiled weaponry, being air-freighted into a war-zone, takes some doing at an organized state level.

It's easy enough for me to point to Dr Peter Duncan and say, well, he is a psychotic, but to suggest that five hundred or more senior bureaucrats and top politicians also all are not just psychotic but at the same time uniformly leaning into the same, one singular delusion, is ridiculous.

No.

These people all 'know' something, the same thing - and that is because they see or have seen something; the same something.

And here marks the difference between those who have even an ounce of Wisdom, and those who do not: when something pushes me around emotionally, I don't necessarily think that what pushed me had the actual ability to carry out what it threatened, otherwise I would be a prey and a slave to any kind of empty threats...

See I can go watch a movie and get moved emotionally. 

Yeah yeah. Go on, waste yer money like I told
you not to!

But then afterwards I have to think about what it is I really hold to be true, rather than just pick up the very last, the latest, 'hot potato' and think 'here, here is truth.'

The most sinister thing about the Borg Elites, all of those caught up at the higher levels of Eastern Sun female Freemasonic lodges, or in the Illuminati or at the higher reaches of the world of Freemasonry generally, is that they are not fundamentally incorrect from certain readings of history and of ancient texts. Except they lack the one thing you need absolutely, in order to be able fulfill the 'apotheosis' that they all seek.

Careful planning, high craft, shrewdness, cleverness - these things they all have plenty of -. but of Wisdom they have nothing at all.