Why The CIA Is Superior

If you take most of the world's Intelligence groups - most of them, far and away most, have no independent information source that is at the core of their 'corporate memory.' 

If you take Australia's or Canada's main actual non-political Intelligence organizations (leave out Australia's 'ASIO' that is a political agency from its inception), they all rely on National Libraries including the University ones, as their main broad knowledge resource.

MI6 relies on the Bodleian.

Just a librarian. 

Yes, it is true there are both officially-designated liaison officials (usually top-line professors and their personal staff) as well as senior librarians who interface directly with the agencies and organizations in covert communication - but apart from the internal records of incidents and events and briefs handed down by government, there exists no central intelligence data bank of broad information.

The CIA, on the other hand, is already intimately tied to the US Library system. I would be giving part of the game away a bit too far here, if I specified how where and which one/s, but there are also global engineering and technical libraries that are structurally part of the CIA (albeit you don't know that 'openly'). 

And the CIA maintains its own internal academic and scientific knowledge base - and that is different to anything you know about or will learn by going to an open institution such as a University anywhere.

So, where the MI6 people will all follow the Oxford/Cambridge/others UK teachings regarding the kinds of subjects we have been indulging here over the last year - so that they certainly know about ideas like Boltzman Machines and Markov Random Field generating of neural energetic patterns independent of optic nerve stimulation from light reflections and actual photon sources.

If they see someone like the blind card player Richard Turner, in a convention in London, they will think he is there to perform some card tricks. And that is all.

Richard is older now, so it may not be so bad mentioning his name.

Poor Al Waleed. His NYC 'Oak Room'
is still closed. He should
have foreseen Covid...

The CIA, on the other hand, knows what it did. Why it did it, what it was aiming to achieve - all these things are completely known internally because the various research projects that link to what the MI6 people will presume is just Boltzman neural artifacts of a rare kind, were things the CIA searched for themselves and were not trying to 'analyze' from out of just 'cases appearing out in the public' - the way, say, the Charles Bonnet Syndrome was labelled.

The mistake the standard academia people make in this matter, is to do with confusing the idea of 'energy' finding places to go in parallel optically-related neural networks, with the actual brain's detection of actual energy signals that are not in the first place optic... They don't like that last bit because they have a pre-existing commitment to the belief that no such thing can happen.

You see, the idea with the Charles Bonnet Syndrome is that yes, the people who have this rare condition are not 'going crazy' and 'seeing things which are not there' - in the sense that current science says that well, yes, they are there except only as more or less random but still apparently meaningful energy signals coming from the brain and the human physiology, not from the outside.

Richard Turner is very open that he is diagnosed to have Charles Bonnet Syndrome. And so people just happily go on with their business around him.

Except the CIA - just sayin' as an example, not saying anything else - might ask him different questions because their records show that what he can do is pick up energy that is being generated from external sources and make sense of it.

Actually, what is frightening about the stupidity of who all are passing themselves off as scientists these days, kp (I'm not trying to pick on you, but you particularly have raised on many occasions the importance of public science) is that they have not apparently been able to relate what Turner does, to an obvious analog in that is, simply, a different sense channel. And I have already spoken about the mischief of Karl Popper in this regard.

I mean, hey, musicians do it all the time with sound...

Francesca Bianchi - one of the world's
greatest olfactory 'musicians.'

Olfactory technicians do it all the time too.

What I mean is not that they 'sense' what is not there, but that they are well-aware of structures and patterns that have independent objective meaning.

If you think a musician cannot describe to you a chair or a table using only sound, you're wrong!

They just don't do it a lot and we do not have a strong social convention to communicate in that way.

Non-musicians do not have enough knowledge about what it is that musicians actually do. Some people don't even appreciate music that much, and 'comprehend' more substantial - as in grosser - audio stimulation as 'communication' such as the beat of a drum on a slave ship. It is not 'music' but they 'get it' as a piece of audio signalling.

So the wrap up, for those of you who are diligently messing around with the Gateway Experience-type systems and training, is that you are indeed not going to see, initially, the physical objects that are there in front of you which are ordinarily disclosed via the optic sense channel - in other words, using photons that bounce off shapes or that come from heat sources - you will see the things that are there that may be disclosed by a different frequency of energy.

At some levels of frequencies, it is surprising how little is there, at other levels quite choking how much nonsense is there.

People 'on the outside' act all very blase about these things, but the first thing that happens to anyone who plays around with any of these things, these areas and then encounters what they did not at all really expect to find - is shock. They quickly take many steps back away from what they have experienced.

Don't be too sure you can handle what you could find.

We were discussing in here just then (I mean some of us here in our actual street address offices), about all of this murmuring going on about TEOTW and cataclysms and so on - I suggest you don't worry about people on YT channels screaming about this stuff. Just take note maybe, of big league professional card-players. If a certain number of them suspiciously all take off for nether parts all of a sudden, well okay then, then even I would start to pack my bags.

...At minimum they have reliably fine-tuned, er, intuition.

You heard this song here already, right? ...Or you thought you did?