Message To Mufti Abu Layth

The Second Coming Of Jesus.

My friend in the House of Wisdom (Bayt al Hikmah - a mysterious place you don't really need to know about if you read here...), the estimable Mufti Abu Layth Al-Maliki, has recently caused a slight, a very slight 'disturbance in the field,' for Sunni Muslims around the world, when he declared that 'Isa (AS)' who is a figure in the Islamic teaching that some say is roughly equivalent to 'Jesus,' is not returning according to any authentic scripture in Islam and especially not in the Quran itself.

Now, interestingly, this discussion, controversy, if you will, does not occur at all among standard Christians because they all believe that Jesus will 'return' aka 'the Second Coming.' 

And yet, Jesus in the Bible Himself does not say things exactly like so, because He uses the term 'the Christ...' As in 'some will say here is the Christ, or there is the Christ but do not believe them.'

And we must know that certainly in the actual text of the Gospels and Acts themselves, Jesus appears several times in different outward facial and physical forms, so that he is not recognized initially, not even by most of those who knew him very well. So we do indeed have an existential problem to do with what His outward appearance shall necessarily be like.

NEVERTHELESS! ...As my other friend the estimable Rabbi Alon Anavar often says (he says 'nevertheless' a lot...) - nevertheless you are wrong, dude; your Muftiness:

For here. Here it is! And trust me, he is not just coming again, but again as well a time after that, and no doubt several times several times(!) again.

Jesus - hanging out with Monica Bellucci.

Now, amabad (means moving on to the next subject, in Arabic; it is not the question 'am I bad?') yani (means 'okay' in Arabic, not half the male Greeks in the world's name) - amabad, forsooth let us move on to hitting some Swamis around the ears while we're at this exercise.

I cannot believe how just by wearing some saffron robe and all, people just get to say whatever the damn hell they want and we all sit there nodding our heads assuming that for sure they must know at least what they are talking about in their 'religion' or 'exotic philosophy.'

But bruvvers (Manchester for the Islamic phrase 'brothers') - 'Om Tat Sat' does NOT mean 'manifestation of the One Supreme Being.'

Everybody wants to go on this patrol of meeting up in the dark jungle of human crassness, ignorance, and stupidity - to say that 'oh well, there is only ONE god and therefore we all worship the same thing but in different ways.'

Nah-uh. No we don't.

There is no 'One God' anyway! ...Let me show you what there is.

There isn't any 'Singularity' throughout the whole of the Universe and even literal 'Infinity' in physics is not actually 'infinite' because we can demonstrate that eventually a light beam (or wave or whatever the heck it is) disappears up its own, no, wait, something happens to it whereby either the standard laws of physics change or something, but it does not go on forever, because otherwise at the 'end/way out there' stage it would  be traveling faster than itself...

In our language and understanding of all that there is, we simply have generic labels at the top of categories, and then items that fall UNDER the category label are multiple and several and 'itemS.' The generic word 'Divinity' does not at all imply Singularity, it implies the generic label of characteristics under which fall all units thereof (the category). The Specific of the Generic in this case would be nonsense because it wouldn't exist!

Anything with an identifiable characteristic, does have 'item' existence beneath the generic label - because it is IDENTIFIABLE as different from any other thing. If it is actually different to ALL things, then it simply does not exist. You cannot have a thing with a category label with completely unique characteristics that do not have examples of them in reality... The correct word for that is simply 'nothing' or non-existence.

Also Jesus, right? From a cave painting
in India that is 2000 years old.

God is not, and CANnot, be absolutely 'different' to ALL things. The contradiction of the 'standard Islamic narrative' in this is that there -, in Islam, those proponents themselves have constructed 99 attributes or 'names' of Allah. Ninety-nine things that Allah is in FACT similar to...

If he is NOT 'similar' to them, then he is not entitled to have those 'names.'

Om Tat Sat means 'The Field of God is Real.'

...Now I could have ten thousand new Muslim readers here, if briefly, if I linked this Blog page to Mufti Abu Layth's Facebook page, but then, he would want to argue with me, and they would all want to do so and I would have more fights on my hand than just from our one lonely dissident voice - the illustrious KP.

But then, if I posted that link, I wouldn't want to tell you all next (well, I want to tell you, not them all) how to make genies appear to you and do some stuff for you.

Because next thing, we might have all 'genie fights' around the whole globe, hey?

Do you know, by the way, the 'elite' are planning to erase the Great Pyramid of Giza with a faked asteroid hit there?

Anyway forget that. It's already too long for today's powers of concentration to read any further so we shall leave the 'summoning of the Djinn' for another...

...heck why not though.

Chinese Opera has the exact same
myth story of 'Tilottama' the most beautiful
being in the Universe - even down to the same name
as the Indian Vedic narratives.

The Universal Field of God is Real. And all things in that field are kind and loving. And, if you are yourself kind and loving, then you harmonize with all of those things and you will be their friend and they shall be your friends - and, as friends, they will do whatever is in their powers to do, should you ask it of them.

Good enough 'shared agency' there, for you, Mr KP?

Not too complicated? Maybe it's so simple that for sure it must be wrong; and therefore I must be wrong. (Mr Moto: 'Perhaps - I could be wrong.' lol)