Partnering with most of the large social media and all of the major internet Search Engine providers, are half a dozen or so, mainly European-based government Secret Intelligence groups - who both field their own in-house 'astro-turfers,' and pay or simply 'incite' private citizen fools who are already pre-committed to the lunatic 'philosophies' underneath their agendas, so that these all go into Blogspots and social media pages and YouTube videos, and distract from what is being said in there in order to prevent audience members and participants from maintaining their particular direction.
The question is, are you big enough?
Google uses its own in-house data reach infrastructure called 'Jigsaw.Google,' and there are also seemingly at-arms-length groups but that are closely linked to organizations like Google - such as 'Moonshot CVE.'
Moonshot CVE is peopled by Londoners, which doesn't mean anything, because in fact, most of them are children of rich folk from politics in Sri Lanka, or Singapore, or Kuwait or Bahrain.
What they do is go and disrupt what people are already conversing about using a strategic plan known as 'the re-direct method.' In this, astro-turfers (people who deliberately make comments that decry, dispute, gainsay without facts, evidence, even logical bases, or any kinds of meaningful 'idea supports,' and use insulting phraseology or scornful language - in order to give the impression that such views are what ordinary members of the public also believe, or think like) turn up and interact gratuitously to distract from what is being said, and turn the direction to another compass point. Or maybe just bring it down to a lower level.
Superficially, these groups advertise that they are interested in counter-acting extremist terrorism - such as, for example ISIS, which of course, has the public profile of being an extremist terror organisation.
Whereas in fact they literally are 'power-political' operatives with hidden agendas to deceive and to manipulate the currency of thinking and 're-direct' views.
...Sometimes, at least for me it is -, it is entertaining to contemplate which of who are really the 'Babes-In-The-Woods.'
Hollywood actress June Lang, said she never
knew her husband John Rosselli, was
a mobster - she was married to him
for three years.
Now let me tell you something about the man who shot Kennedy and hit him. Yes Rosselli was there too. The thing that people are getting right about Johnny Rosselli was to do with the company he kept, the circles he flitted in - afterall his nickname was 'Handsome Johnny.'
But he couldn't shot the side of a barn door. Not only that, the Mafia is violent and brutal but incompetent - as was evidenced in due course.
The man who shot Kennedy was an absolute world-class - in fact one of the acknowledged best - rifle shots, in the world at the time.
And the whole thing was carried out at the highest possible levels of diplomatic coverage involving the government of the recently assassinated dictator of the Dominican Republic along with several Middle Eastern Arab countries.
The narrative has long been mounted - once again by 'interested by-standers' fronted by covert agencies - that anti-Castro conspirators, angry with Kennedy for a botched invasion plan in Cuba, killed JFK. And never, never, will you see much in any media outlet, that expresses the fact, rather than the presumption as is the case with the Bay-Of-Pigs operatives, that it was the Dominican Republic post-dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo, that blamed the killing of Trujillo, on the American Administration and the CIA; rather than the CIA blaming Kennedy for whatever...
It is also a fact that the CIA was involved, technically involved as established fact, with the supplying of the arms that were used to carry out the assassination (of Trujillo)... ...though failed, coup.
Now I won't be spelling out who the actual professional sniper was, here.
Not spelling it out, anyway. And I can guarantee all of you reading here, that you will not hear a single peep from anyone about it either.
I am not an extremist. I don't believe I have ever threatened anyone with a bullet through the head - well, that is, with the possible exception of Xi, although I wasn't threatening, I was simply observing that there were 14 million Uyghurs that wanted to do that.
And I have never talked about slicing anyone, or anything's throat. In fact, funny, because when I just said that I did NOT think that Allah/Jehovah/or any of those guys wanted to cut the throats of lamb sacrifices, I've actually had someone rush in to say something in opposition to that!
Amazing.
I dunno - d'you think Jigsaw.Google or their University of London/Imperial College-educated bitches in Londonistan even know what a 'verbal Anabasis' is?
Oh most of what goes on "around the internet," at least in my experience, is either looking for some practical useful stuff, or landing on foreign shores and going on a little march, hopefully toward the capital city. In my world those two things are not actually quite related, but I suppose some people might conduct espionage first to find out where they need to march to.
ReplyDeleteI was thinking of something else just now, which you've spoken of many times, about the effect the sense of smell has on our minds, to elicit thoughts of a complex and higher order. On one hand, religion is obviously complete hogwash, and on the other they use these otherworldly techniques to snare our minds, I suppose.
Listen. Rather than just ban you forever... ...how about you go back and examine what you just said right there: 1. bells and smells (enhanced arousal) 'can,' 'might,' maybe even 'do' elicit thoughts of a complex and higher order;
DeleteThen 2. religion is OBVIOUSLY hogwash...
Well, my friend, it OBVIOUSLY though, is not because you yourself just said that the arranged environment and the cognitive responses to that, does something to people's brains.
So where are you, exactly? Are you just a person with blind prejudice and bias who cannot 'see through' the label of 'religion' for instance (and that's no crime in my mind btw) - or are you always going to have a structural incapacity to think coldly. Religion is VERY VERY VERY CLEARLY INDEED, not, 'hogwash' at all - how people employ it could involve deception. The two things are different and it is the nuanced differences that must be looked at perceptively and not dismissively without seeing the what and/or the why of things that are going on.
'To snare our minds' and then again 'otherworldly' but I don't see olfactory science as 'otherworldly.'
You are absolutely stuck in some kind of conspiracy theory mindset that people are out there perpetually trying to 'snare your mind.' Some groups are, yes. But why are you focusing there??
What is 'religion?' You hold some stable 'belief' that being Left and Liberal is the right way without any critical thinking and you ARE being 'religious.' Same goes for being perpetually Right mindlessly.
It is psychologically 'safe' to be consistent in performance of habitual acts - that is what religion does. It produces a psychological sense of safety - and this might be VERY productive and positive for, for instance, addictive personalities and people who have 'risky behavior' personalities. So absolutely not, religion is NOT complete 'hogwash' but it can be and like anything powerful, can be exploited malevolently.
Religion has powerful tools.
A power drill is also a powerful tool and we don't expect people to drive it through their heads, right?
You know, to me, you have a real serious problem - you seem unable to see through to the human beings, the people, THE AGENCY(DAMMIT!) behind the facades like 'religion' or 'politics...' No wonder you were proposing the idea of 'shared agency.' Is this a 'lack?' Well stop engaging with labels and things and wrapping, and start looking at the people behind all of that stuff.
But there are no people behind that stuff! Agency is an illusion. It's all just labels and things and wrappings. Maybe there's more, but we have to use our brains. Really I'm trying to lend some support to TaoOfJones earlier comment. Unfortunately he just replaced religion with aliens to "Deliver us from our fears." What would delivery from fear really mean though? So we have these minds which mostly dwell on labels and wrappings, but also we have these brains which are also obviously capable of feelings which are more powerful than what we think of as dialectic. And the senses we might use to some other end are all tied up with detergents and artificial flavorings and incense, which again is all tied up to a sanctuary which is used by some jackass who wants to make sure we understand the wrappings and labels so that his people know they are diametrical opposed to those other people over there behind some imaginary wall.
DeleteAnd the people who are genuinely interested in truths without regard to how it might affect their own personal standings, end up being the ones who are mentally unfit. I'm speaking directly from life experience here, although I'm avoiding the specifics.
I guess I'm advancing the perspective that "religion" uses more complex senses to shift people from dialectic toward an equally servile "deialectic." The thought that there might be ETs who are the progenitors of this operation on human culture is pretty frightening. I feel like this fear is going to become much more real if/when the US comes out with more detailed public reports about UAPs or whatever.
DeleteI think we are very much in agreement over a single particular issue - namely, that none of us starts off living in this world with any kind of clear-cut, obvious 'manual of operation.' We are stuck with having to also live within long-term pre-existing social patterns and ideas and beliefs, and we grow up finding many of these are extremely suspect if we use critical thinking on them - so, we are kind of stuck with the whole matter of social 'personal standings.'
DeleteNothing is ever 'easy,' apparently. At least not for us poor old human beings.
'Religion' seems to be a social construct that attempts to prolong some striking incident or innovation or 'experienced benefit' and widen it to lots of members of any given social group and then, very typically, it is used to exert power over that group too. Yet this is EXACTLY, PRECISELY, OPPOSITE to the written edicts of the OT prophets - take the obvious Book of Micah, for instance, often used by eschatologists to underpin whatever they are saying is 'about to happen tomorrow(!)' unless you REPENT REPENT.
Yet, this book says the exact opposite - as in, NOT to overpower people, or preach to them and so on, but just deal fairly and honestly and that is all. Literally, ALL.
As far as I understand things - and much is already in readiness to report to Congress - nothing will be announced other than a litany of 'incidents' that have been recorded by multiple signal detection instruments; there is nothing in the way of detailing technicals or mentioning active projects and 'special operations units' which there have been numerous of. So it's going to be a 'nothing-burger.'
(Next post follows on...)
It was suggested to me, recently by someone who knows, that backing was given to the whole 'exposition' by senior elements of intelligence in part to see if the huge mass of the private public would throw up someone with a different, but prospective analysis of the data, hitherto not perceived by any of the internal analysts. Other than that, the whole thing is considered quite dimly, and already steps are being taken to undermine the credibility in the public of the representatives who asked for this in the first place.
DeleteThe problem being, it involves admitting we do not possess the advanced technology that is clearly existent in 'someone's' hands. And so, the 'spin' is already afoot.
It's hard to imagine what more 'fear' is even able to be heaped upon the minds of the masses at large right now, though.
But we may have entered a stage, in global human technology and civilization infrastructure, at which even the complete natural disaster-style obliteration of a whole key place like say, Singapore, could be rapidly overcome and the supply lines re-constructed.
We might have already become 'the Borg' and not realized it!!
My directions is 'where do we go from here' unless we have some meaningful and reliably accurate comprehension of what we were about in the past. That is why I do not dismiss 'religion' as we see it today, lightly, because it came from something yes, different than what is currently depicted - but what, exactly, was that. or were those things. I was astonished the other day, when listening to a modern-day European Vedic teacher and sort of 'chakra and all of that' teacher, when he wanted to say that the narrative of Krisna and Arjuna was merely a metaphor for the inner struggles humans always have... He read out the early chapter of the Gita expressly saying the avatar of Visnu DOES materially manifest periodically - and then went on to deny it anyway. These guys all have large swathes of 'followers.' Which is amazing to me. They all mouth 'words' and Vedic technical terms, and I never heard him one single time demonstrate any Yogic practice derived from these terms and ideas.
He was just lecturing. And that's what they mostly all do and even those that don't are very 'patchy.'
You SHOULD be able to speak in the language of Jinn if you claim to know about them, you SHOULD be able to have them appear if you claim to know that kind of occult matter, you SHOULD be able to 'manifest a Pentacost Dove' if that's what you think the Gospels say and you are a Christian Priest, you SHOULD be able to introduce us to your Shakti Dakini if you are a Tibetan monk.
Nothing less, don't you agree, will do?
I think if you are any of those people and you are talking about it to other people, then you should be able to say "I find it very humbling to think that it might be possible to directly experience these things I have only read about." Unfortunately the culture seems to sort of punish people who are like that.
DeleteI think that if you can manifest a "pentecost dove" (so in other words, an ET if I'm following right) then you should not do so, and the "dove" should definitely not encourage people who don't understand to believe that you can do so...
No such thing as a Pentecost 'dove...' lol Just sayin'.
DeleteOf course, there IS such a thing as the Costa Rica 'Pentecost Dove' - that's an actual white bird that lives on those islands there and apparently, so I'm led to think, hovers in beams of light that shine down through the tree branches in the forests there. But no actual 'Pentecost' (religious) dove. Not unless you are David Copperfield doing magic tricks, or the Vatican keeping pigeons and doves for the tourists.
Since ET's are actual 'people,' you cannot 'manifest' them! They do whatever they want to do. ...Maybe we can just ask them nicely. Hullo Hullo. Any ET's out there? Anyone, anyone? Maybe we can take out a new U-28A Draco and fly around sending out general radio signals: 'Hullo hullo. This is a special unit under the authority of President Joe Biden of the United States of America....'
ET: Chuckle. Gprzzshshsshphth-choke-stiffled huge laugh.
Hmm, at first I was not pleased with my "capital" error, but then I googled the definition and discovered that it is in some ways more appropriate. But the thing about capital I learned while working in antique shops is that there are these little rooms, and some people don't want to go from one to the other, or believe they can't. So for instance "folks in poor neighborhoods in chicago don't HAVE to shop at aldi, there's better grocery stores a short drive away, about the same distance..."
ReplyDeleteYeah. Lucien Sarti. Oh, those Corsicans!, eh?
ReplyDeleteBut ya know, there does seem to have been another one there, yes? I mean, there were two different rounds: a frangible that struck the head (thus the need to send the brain "missing", so as to hide the frangible bits that scattered inside the brain matter...), and an FMJ that apparently went through the target firt and also hit the Guv. (What pop group sang: "I shot the President, but I did not shoot John Connally"? LOL)
Anyway, someone should make a film of Sarti's life. A thriller would be fine. Don't you think he deserves a pop tribute to his performance art?
firt/first
Deletehttps://spartacus-educational.com/JFKsarti.htm
DeleteHell, I mean there's always Eric Sarti... Even our friend Daniella Di Lillo (Nora En Pure) has a few re-mixes of his music.
DeleteWhat is categorically evident, is that there was a big big network involved - which is the sign of a proper, professional 'hit.' This stuff about 'one assassin' is movie-land nonsense. Never happens outside of the dumb Mafia (who all got caught eventually, anyway), and movies. Even Jackal used teams.