'They' are located at ESA-L1 at the orbital point oriented to the first nearest triple star system. There is a major matter transfer well there. NASA knows about this; everybody knows about it who looks up at the sky and into space - the European Space Agency (which named the first Lagrangrian Point), the Russian Space Agency (Roscosmos), the Japanese, Chinese... Everyone.
The Congressional Committee making inquiry into all of this stuff is never going to talk about the fact that many telescopes and cameras are continuously pointed to there and have plenty of filmed evidence of 'things going on,' which is not to say that for the most part they can 'see' anything or film anything visible at all. But there are other means of tracking and these systems have lots of signals being recorded on them.
Basic transport.
The other people who of course, are the people at the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope at Mount Graham, which interfaces with LUCIFER - the Large Binocular Telescope - which is a near infrared array from Teledyne.
The person who can tell the Congressional Inquiry all about what the Vatican, and the CIA have seen, is Daniel Sheehan, the lawyer representing Lou Elizondo. Sheehan also represents some Roman Catholic science and philosophy organization interests.
As far as this theorized on-going current 'Disclosure' project that is pretty-well attested by experts including Elizondo - and here we are talking about 'Disclosure' by whistle-blowers, essentially, but who are all organized among themselves to break the news one way or another, to the public, that the government is fully aware - Sheehan is one of the lead figures who is systematically releasing new information regularly. That is to say 'new to the public.'
In the latest - new - upcoming text I will be posting up around the place in the next week or so now, it will become clear what is behind everything from an ancient historical narrative perspective, and it will be quite astonishing.
Fauci? No - Machiavelli. No statue this time...
There is a certain 'edge' that people I think have been missing for hundreds, no, thousands, of years to do with what in Biblical terms are called 'angelic beings' even despite that the Jews themselves should know things are not so airy fairy like people all suppose.
But a smart person who has read the sections about the Guardians in those old Greek texts, will be able to work something out from this upcoming new text about why 'beings from the heavens' at least in a standard modern Judaeo-Christian mindset, have been given this nice sweet, benign character...
Hah!
Watch... And learn - plenty of different characters, only one really dangerous one:
The three main 'Cosmic moral questions' that humans ask, and are entitled to ask are the following:
1. Why do really atrocious things happen to little children when Jesus Christ Himself said not to do bad things to kids?
Honestly, they're not the world's bestest ever drinks at all. But I've been doing these over the last couple of days - blackberries are in season here. de Toulouse-Loutrec apparently liked these.
2. In our problematic world, where is the absolute unequivocal proof for the existence of a Perfectly Good God? And if He is Good, how come He let the Devil live after that 'war in the heavens?' (See: Star Wars canon, I guess! If you don't want to refer to the Bible, which amounts to the same thing if you translate it properly). In other words though, where does 'Evil' originate from at all?
3. Is there really any hope and why can't these super-beings, be they 'gods' or just 'men from advanced places/civilizations' just cure everything and solve a bunch of stuff and 're-organize' humans to not be 'evil' and just turn up obviously and in material fashion and have it all happen? Why can't they just turn up now? Why can't Jesus re-appear tonight? Or today?
Well I am here to tell you some truly terrible answers to those very good questions.
I can answer each and every one of those questions, and all of their minor parts, in such ways as you would be left awestruck. And those answers would be ones you have never heard before and in all cases you could even 'reach out and touch.'
And then you would all leave your jobs and rush off to some mountain retreat or such like, and point lasers into the sky and what-not.
NASA communicates using visible lasers...
LOL
But before you go laughing sickly at how crazy that is, just understand this much before I render any kinds of specific answers at all - Jung got it right when he expounded on the idea of the collective deep unconscious.
See the problem is that you are all connected whether you like it or not.
So-and-so's mother did not die when they and they alone were a child - that is a part of all of your human condition/s, and if it is not a personally experienced conscious thing in most of you, it is certainly nevertheless shared as part of the collective unconscious in each of you. And that is because we all do personalize other people's tragedies as our tragedy because we have the quality of empathy. And that is only one factor about it.
It is not right to say - as many people now do say - 'you cannot know what I went through.' And it is not right not only because people can imagine and place themselves in the shoes of others, but because the collective unconscious is a real thing. It's not a real 'metaphysical' thing; it's a real real thing.
This business of pretending the collective unconscious does not exist is another attempt at dividing up the human spirit, if not the actual human race.
It's a way of splitting people up and away from themselves and each other.
Now this should, if you are very very smart, start to give you a little inkling of something super-important that goes to the basis of the answers to those questions - and that is it has something to do with energy.
'Nothing can be created or destroyed absolutely, but it changes its form from one state to another.'
Now look that doesn't mean Evil can somehow be changed to 'not Evil.'
But we're going to advance another one of these written text things soon, which is so unbelievably exotic you are really going to think okay okay where is this all really coming from now, because this is not human stuff; this is way outside of up-till-now human knowledge and experience and expertise.
Well I'll tell you!
I have been going up to a huge satellite not far from the Moon, but which is evidently not visible to most of the equipment looking up at the skies and into space.
...And by the way, someone else here has been too.
Luke is the only Gospel in which this idea about Jesus forgiving those who murdered Him occurs, and it contains those well-known words '...Forgive them for they know not what they do.'
It is a bit unfortunate that the commonplace meaning that has been assigned to this is do with this incredibly Pollyanna kind of all-forgiving attitude that Jesus of Nazareth had, or is interpreted to have had.
The reality is that this phrase contains at least two separate meanings and implications - firstly, yes, it says something about forgiveness, but secondly, it is a statement of philosophical fact.
'They know not...'
Through a glass, and not so darkly.
Well but hang on a minute, the Jews and all or most of today's mainstream Christians all teach that Adam and Eve knew Evil.
Well did they or didn't they?
You can try and work around this problem by saying that the phrase itself can be intended as only an immediate reaction to a particular egregious act, namely, that it was actually God Himself these people were killing (and let's not get too caught up in whether this is 'God' or the 'Son of God' because the word really is 'Divinity' and not our modern Germanic-English word 'God') - so 'they knew not that they were killing God...' (And I suppose it would have been all right then, if they had just been killing anyone else, right?).
Whereas they were in fact, doing Evil, because Pilate himself declared Jesus innocent of the alleged crimes in question, and Pilate was Roman Law. They were doing it, but there was someone behind them knowingly pulling their strings. And you can proved that with the other words there: 'Now is the hour that the Ruler of this World is cast down.'
So I don't think we do have a problem with the actual text. We have a problem with people making up false stories about what the text could mean.
What I want to do is give crystal clear direction about where and what...
And part of that is being able to convey the understanding that you are not Evil, and you do not on the whole do evil things and nor do you intend to do them.
Ah well, we will not be travelling to Paris anytime soon!
But this world is kept in the grip of evil schemes and systems and people are held in here, but not only that, there are half-alive people who are exploited to maintain operations, as it were, and they are not even completely human in the sense of what we are all taught to believe that a human is, or that their full capacities extend to having them be.
So there is genuine Evil here and it is trying to rule all things.
It's much smarter than you are.
And it is far older too.
You see, on the one hand Jesus 'went away as on a journey to a far country' but on the other hand He is right at the door.
Well... Which one?
The key is in the word 'as.'
Herb salad for the poor vegetarians here. ...God I don't even dare to tell you about this roast beef roll and Paris dip that I had last night.
'As if on.'
It's useless and pointless waiting without direction or guidance as to what you are waiting upon, and the Evangelicals all think they are waiting for a return in the clouds of this guy in white robes with other white-robed beings bearing harps, I guess.
The text makes it clear what you are waiting for.
Anyone? Anyone?
...It's not so much that there is an incredibly advanced high tech satellite heading towards Earth.
But I intend to talk about such things next up.
For right now, the question is, upon what next thing are you waiting?
Someone in the comments section of the YT video here said this track filled him with so much optimism.
When I say 'timing' I am referring to the nuclear strike that will be happening in Poland, near to Lviv which is in the Ukraine fifty miles from the border with Poland.
This matter is so complicated and the danger of explaining too much about it here way too high, so for right now anyway, we'll have to be satisfied with factoring in that the Polish government passed new laws relating to a 'catastrophic natural event,' last month. So the window of risk for the thing happening is already underway, although we might not have expected anything to have occurred during that month ahead from the time the laws were put in place, fundamentally because the planners will tend to give themselves some buffer in which to make any modifications and real-time reactive re-assessments.
Coming from quite a different place to most human thinking about the dynamics of wars and the way human beings look at such large-scale moral matters as are implicated in these huge conflicts and even great historical changes in society, we are not here taking things from the perspective of ad hoc unfolding, you could say, of human moral civilization...
You see, taken from the standard Judaic (Masoretic aka 'Laws of Moses') perception, humans were these innocent, untainted, morally blank things, and then Adam/Eve/Serpent/Apple - God said 'don't' but people did anyway and then, you have the development of moral character.
There is no way of telling what 'Good' and/or 'Evil' actually means before the 'Fall' and thereafter, the only religious-philosophical standard is failure to just do whatever God says...
Now that doesn't really make any practical sense if one is going to suggest that at any point Mankind was 'allowed to have,' moral agency.
Maldon salt. Each original crystal is shaped like a tiny pyramid. You get these on Mars you know... No you don't. Was just kidding and being stupid. They make the pyramids in a factory near Essex, England.
And I'll explain that better right now:
Okay fair enough you might be a good Muslim, or a good Christian, a good Jew and therefore for you it's adequate to say that you should - not just that you must, 'obey God.'
But 'should' is avoiding the basic question about how and what specific details this all entails.
For example, Adam never had an Apple iPad and Moses never had an Android Tablet either.
So then when they (means 'humans/Mankind') did get those toys, then do they just ask God now 'okay what is the moral teaching about how to use these things?' Because the point really is that if it's all only about seeking God's decision, then in every new situation, at every point of a new innovation, some new piece of technology never before seen, there is no internal frame from which to make agency judgments as the individual who is responsible for the moral decision.
And that gives the lie to this story about 'the Fall of Adam' and Adam and Eve eating the Forbidden Fruit and all of that - because that story is really an assertion of nothing but the mindless unthinking acceptance of obedience to someone and something outside of one's self as a human being.
Really, Adam could not have 'fallen' because he did not have personal moral standing and agency in the first place to have 'fallen' from.
And this position of things is proliferated still today, with Islam, which explicitly is slavery and submission to Allah. There is absolutely no gradation of judgment of moral decision with the lives of humans in Islam - Allah literally predestines people and consigns them to Hell or to Heaven (with Houris).
They make this in Woking, which is not anywhere near Essex, I don't think.
This is not in any way a real or a realistic reflection of human life however, and how intelligent people can accept that this narrative is any kind of official edict from an actual Divine Mind is utterly absurd in the extreme. But, people - billions of them - do it all day long and it is not restricted to Islam but is to be found in virtually all of the law-based religious philosophies.
But the far bigger problem with the basic 'Eden' moral 'Good/Evil' narrative is this, and worst of all it is literally within the text itself - there is a massive problem with the story on logic lines:
'And you were counted as first among the Cherubs who stood before God the Most High, and from the day you were created the timbrels were made for you (the express meaning of the phrase according to all Hebrew sources, is that whoever this being was, whether you say Lucifer or Samech Mem Aleph Lamed - IE Samael, he was the leader of the angelic choir and heavenly musicians).'
Now that's a problem though.
Because music is not morally neutral.
Which means that for sure, in logic Satan, the Enemy to Man, knew long before Eden's Fall what Good and Evil both were and knew how to compose those in mixtures -, just as we humans all, in life do some rash and stupid things, some actually bad IE 'evil' things, and some good things too.
Man, sometimes I can just handle a coffee and that's all! This one has 'happiness' and 'Dreams' on a coaster under it. Well that'll do.
So did that mean that humans when they were just 'Adam and Eve' never heard music at all before? Or really does it mean that Good and Evil are not exclusively simply obeying God, but they exist as a set of intangible Universal primary idea forms (just as musical modes pre-exist music or song composition), that can be used by any agent with sufficient active intelligence in a given set of circumstances, in other words in dynamic contexts of particular and often if not always different competing forces and pressures and interposing objects resolving into a moral outcome (IE moral judgment).
Clearly 'Evil' cannot be part of God and so the idea forms themselves are not part of God as such, but are something propositional and intellectually-derived as, not a phantasm, but a theoretical form, real only when manifested in actuality, in material events and their outcomes.
Human morality, or lack of it, the practice of nation-state and government and political evil is not an ad hoc unfolding of anything in new circumstances, and moment-to-moment dynamics.
It is something that comes from a deliberate, intellectualizing about well-and-truly pre-existing absolute idea forms; pre-existing to any human person's given life, or lifespan.
The only way Adam and Eve could have morally fallen, is from that moment when they were genuinely and realistically able to intellectualize from moral forms which existed outside of themselves.
And then, the situation still demands them to have chosen the wrong ways from those moral forms. And why did they do that according to the Bible? Because of curiosity, if you simply go by the superficial metaphor of the eating of the Forbidden Fruit. So curiosity is evil then, is it? Or results in evil. Well we know that sometimes it might or can, but does that mean that it always will - no. So the standard teaching taken from the Bible Book of Genesis is clearly wrong.
The way people have been looking at this is like the way some insurer would look at accident risk: curiosity sometimes kills the cat, so let's assign a risk factor to it and then damn you all to Hell.
This is ridiculous.
Here is the Truth:
There is such a Being that you can call 'Satan.'
And he knows about moral Good and Evil and really, you don't; at least not in anywhere near the depth that he does. And he has taken the decision, the terminal decision, to employ actual Evil in order to counter literally the Power and Position of 'God' - who is also a real Being.
And in fact the only thing that is standing in his way, is you. And that's because you could have real moral agency at the same time at which you started to gain real material power and technology too.
Which means that it is not God alone that the Devil has on his hands to fight - it's also potentially you, but only if and when you wake up to what you can do.
The Devil is not dead. He has not yet passed away, certainly not from this planet.
And that means that you are exposed and very vulnerable because if he finds out that I have been talking with you, and between us we put some power into your hands, you're in big trouble!
'Truth' must be: everything is true and correct, not just some things. Yet it is very clear that religious ideologies and most branded systems of thinking contain some truth blended with a lot of other things.
I personally would not make a big deal of paying money (or not paying any money) and imputing that this necessarily implies that you are or are not, getting truth; you might always get some truth. In the end everyone of mature age and mind must use their own intrinsic discrimination to see what something amounts to when considered objectively.
For me I see something like the Monroe Institute as being something particularly suited to retirees who want to go somewhere and do something different to just heading off to some Caribbean beach and so on.
In the olden days...
The systems used in there are definitely not inauthentic at all and they are very good at achieving some 'perception capability' goals.
My own direction over many recent months here has not been to focus on 'meditation' or various techniques that could be construed as being more or less 'meditative state' things.
What I am really trying to point out is that okay so guys are stepping out of the forty-foot long US Navy-filmed flying craft.
Then what?
Okay they are way more advanced than you - than 'us;' than we humans. They have better, more advanced technology and much more complex, sophisticated styles of life and forms of society.
But we, who are we? Just who are we expecting them to meet?
So Jesus returns tomorrow night, right, but some dozens of age pensioners at my local pharmacy ask Him, fairly nicely, though many pretty tersely and impatiently too - 'Please just can you wait around a bit while we get our scripts for our drugs on which we are very addicted, filled?'
'We'll hear you, hear what you have to say and all, but actually we don't want to be really healed as such, because this is who we are. We are chemically-dependent, angry, impatient, arrogant and self-important beings, who in fact know more and better than you anyway. But yes, yes, you are super-powerful, we know, we know...'
Red snapper, fennel and smoked tomato broth.
Or a couple of thousand mother-ships turn up and every one of the ten billion human beings are assigned their own individual case officers, who will patiently listen to their whinges and whines and complaints, and give them very advanced high-tech solutions and a guided tour of the space ship, whatever... ...Maybe even their very own 'Star Trek-y' sort of attire, perhaps white like the angels wore in the Bible narratives.
Is that how things are happening; going to happen?
Do you think?
2 Thessalonians 9: 9 - 11:
"...every sort of evil that deceives those that are perishing. They are perishing because they refuse truth."
Perishing.
Means dying, going to die; be dead.
And dead is dead. In the Bible, especially the New Testament, this does not mean 'go somewhere and be judged.' It does not mean 'sleep with Abraham.'
It means dead.
Can the US Congressional Inquiry into the little white US Navy flying things produce an ET Alien (upon subpoena to give evidence before it) to appear there or anywhere?
No it cannot.
And Jesus is not going coming back there either.
Doesn't matter how many subpoenas they send to Him.
The problem for the general world is not so much that He may or might not, or that He will be going some place else and having fish dinner at your house, maybe...
It's that little white Tic Tacs carry heap big fire-stick in them.
Back in the olden days, when America actually had the technology and the ideas and the mentality to make this.
KP is always, and I do mean it seems that he is always preoccupied and absorbed with spending money but mostly, with not spending it, but I know that it only takes a tiny turn in your mindset to ask ET Aliens for some cash before they insist on showing up for real. At least then you and I will be able to entertain them and have the calmness to keep quiet when it comes time to shut up and just listen and stop telling everyone 'wot fer' and 'what we all know.'
'Sci-entists' no doubt, absolutely no doubt at all, want to sit around 'with equivalent agency' and compare notes sweetly and see just how smart they are given that they are coming from a fairly 'new' civilization here on planet Earth... ...Compared to the slow-learner Aliens who have been around for so many hundreds of thousands of years - in order to get this far as they have evidently gotten.
NASA will have Michio Kaku interface with the ET Aliens to represent the US Government and Academia.
...Because like, obviously they respect y'all, right. Academics simply must be respected! Afterall! I mean to say!
Not like they have been looking at humans for a long time already and have plenty of individuals' DNA in tubes somewhere and have monitored the whole thing and don't know already enough about who Michio Kaku is and all his little brothers and little sisters are, and who the government is, and what they represent, and whose interests.
