No 'Blunt Instruments'

I was going to title this something else, but it would have been like a blunt instrument and would have mistreated the subject matter by simply taking it to the level of some kind of metaphorical allusion to Star Trek story arcs.

Basically, we are talking about those episodes written by the Sci Fi writer Theodore Sturgeon to do with the Vulcan T'Pau.

To cut back from there and bring it to what we want to address, all that needs to be said is that for some reason - maybe the Universe was sending info into Sturgeon's head (and many others as well, who were responsible for the show's themes and underlying ideology, you could call it), and consequently the show develops some ideas that actually exist in real human cultures of the ancient past.

'Pure,' but alluring.
And this is according to the story
writers themselves.

Notwithstanding that the roots are in the ancient past, we have been 'eating from the fruits of that ancient tree' though, ourselves, up till today. And I'm not talking about this infamous 'Garden of Eden' tree, although who darn well knows what is all hooked up into things there!

Okay so the fundamental problem with human beings is to do with this word they have: 'love.'

The ancient Greek philosophers understood things better than we do now, today. We are a long way from using a real language with accurate meanings - we have a sinusoidal type of linguistics, where words have completely false meanings often, in fact. This is deliberately done to pull the wool over the eyes of the naive.

This word we use - 'love' - is one part of the 'philo' thing the Greeks had. They are basically still using the same Sanskrit root: 'Lubhyati.'

We also employ many common phrases but never stop to think why we are saying it the way that we do:

'We have love.' But 'God is Love.'

Even in the Christian texts the matter is treated that way too - 'no greater love does someone have...'

But if you examine the whole thing carefully and consciously acknowledging the explicit and implicit intended meanings, then you see that all these ancient writers and thinkers - even Jesus Christ Himself - are demarcating between the human individual's use of 'love' and that there is some kind of 'thing,' as in, an actual 'thing' known as Love which is entirely separate from human beings and that is not simply some phantom that 'comes into existence' because of humans. This is the same fallacy idea, this idea of the action first developing the principle subsequently, that idiots like Richard Dawkins entertain all the time: Pythagoras' Theorem came into existence because of material reality. Not. No it did not though!

When you think 'crushed velvet,'
think T'Pol.

T'Pol the half-Romulan, pseudo-Vulcan humanoid, well she gets into some difficulty because her mind has been 'damaged' from getting addicted to Trellium-D. And this makes her emotions very active, whereas, in the mode of a 'Vulcan' person, she has suppressed them.

Now this is actually close to the ancient Greek idea about 'Lubhyati.'

The word does not actually mean 'he desires' as Wiki claims for people who actually know Sanskrit. It means to go into a frenzy over something you like.

And so, the ancient Greeks correctly wrote that 'Love is a Divine Madness.' The Star Trek Vulcans don't approve of love because it leads to fights and arguments and eventually wars and death and whatever else that is unwanted.

And so their plan is to suppress this 'frenzy;' and as they would say, this 'madness.'

But you cannot actually have love. You do not 'love someone.'

You don't understand how sinister this 'way' that people carry on, really is. It is the reason super advanced beings cannot just come down here and cause the disposition of many problems.

You see, when a human says 'I love so-and-so' what they really mean (without ever admitting it), is that they are intending to obligate that other person on account that they have 'given,' or extended/offered, something of the most important thing that they own, to them. Well that's what they are trying to say.

Art Nouveau in Compton Chapel,
in England. 'The Morning Stars
Sang Together.'

And so, typically, human society fraudulently converts this idea into a fanciful concoction about two people agreeing equivalently, to 'give' some super important internal 'part of themselves.' And so then this forms the legalistic basis of a putative 'spiritual' union and contract - which quickly blends in to the spirit world: real estate, inheritances, money, status, children, civic duties and obligations.

According to the Sanskrit teachings, 'Lubhyati' is a god-thing only. According to the Greek philosophers and to Christian Cosmology, 'Love' is a god, and with the Platonic people and the Christians, Love is the HIGHEST of the Divine Beings; it is actual 'God.'

It is also, as accurately enough portrayed by the Vulcans, a kind of a madness.

Love 'is.' 

And it permanently 'is.' 

A person's ego and self and consciousness can be 'put into a dormancy.' It's like having a light switch on -, and then turning it off.

'I love so-and-so.' No. You 'might' if you are lucky, be able to go into a Spiritual Force which is an actual being. And from which place, you cannot come back out though.

You go into the light of something that 'is.'

And then you get totally burned up and are no more.

Moth to the flame.

Richard Dawkins, one of the stupidest men who ever walked the planet, will tell you, that the reason you find someone's face attractive, is because the quality of attractivity (just like gravity, which they all understand really well, right...) arises from the confluence of multiple configurations (this is called the fallacy of number, where something categorical, lies beyond its enumerator, simply because there are so many numbers to look at, that whilst it must be there, we cannot actually say where this is, well, because, you know - too hard/too many numbers/too much to bother with, really. But it is there, really; trust us. We know. We are 'sci-entists'). 

Looks like something you can eat.

 

It just 'arises out of.' Just like the Right-Angle Triangle thing just arises, out of, well out of thin air of course. Because naturally there is no way it can be a thing, that doesn't actually have any specific material substance itself but somehow exerts total power over everything material.

So someone's face and their body and whatever else is attractive, because 'evolution' and the need to replicate and there are all kinds of amazing causative species reproductive reasons for every single angle. Also, why you find crushed velvet attractive.

LOL

I am not the person, like this 'Saint Stephen' and all of them, who, when being stoned to death by the Dawkins's of the day (adamant that they didn't want to hear a different story than the one they were making money out of) as he was dying voiced that God should forgive them.

I am the person who, not only will bring to the fight the declaration that you cannot blaspheme against the Spiritual Divine Agency and get away with it, but I have friends in high places with nasty attitudes too. Who are just looking for an excuse.

Let the fun and games begin. That's what I say. No point stoning me!

Schrodinger's Ukraine/Queen

So, 'Schrodinger's Cat' is this totally famous thought experiment in physics - although the only reason people say it's to do with 'physics' as opposed to reality or psychology too, is that it was devised by a physicist, namely Erwin Schrodinger.

The basic structure of the thing is that there is a cat inside a totally closed box that you cannot see inside of, and there is a meter in there monitoring if even a single atom is decaying. If it detects any radioactivity at all (the atom decaying) then it breaks a flask releasing a poison and killing the cat.

And the box itself is timed to open after one hour.

Schrodinger's Alfa Romeo.
(No it isn't. There's no such thing).

Science says that possibly no atoms at all will decay over one hour, but then again, one may do so even in the first second. Thus, anyone outside of the box will not really be able to know with any kind of certainty if the cat is alive or dead inside the box until after the one hour.

And in the meantime the 'knowable' status of the cat is 'uncertain.'

But this kind of thing is true of any situation where there is a closed system with observers outside of the closed system.

The Ukraine war is such a 'closed system.'

Nobody in the West is getting any true information from 'within the box;' at least not from any public media sources.

Right now as of this immediate second, the Western media story is that the Russians have withdrawn from a few places and that the Ukraine military has 're-taken' either all those places, or some of those places.

And, that is not my information.

My information is that the cat is dead.

Actually it is not important to us what the 'true story' is here, with regard to the Ukraine.

For thousands of years, the Western socio-psychological-religious mindset, has been shaped by a mistaken translation of the words 'El Shaddai' and definitely as well, false and misleading narratives about 'Moses' and this 'Jehovah' character. 'Shaddai' is the leader of the dangerous and violent powers on the mountain top/s - and this repeats the same narrative that Sir Charles Warren and earlier on, a commander of Julius Caesar's, tell about some beings who 'came down on a mountain top and formulated an oath and made a memorial of that oath.' The two things (IE 'Shaddai' and those other beings) are not actually connected, but they are connected in that the public connected them incorrectly with 'supernatural things' that happened on mountains or 'high places.' All of that is too complicated to go into here just now. But in short what we have been left with are a series of mistakes and misunderstandings. The result of which though, is a blanket form of group religious morality, when that does not reflect the human condition as it really is.

Gold shimmer cocktails!

But, just like how modern physicists have not been able to see the difference between 'boundary state conditions,' and their consequences, and instead confuse observation with consequence... ...religious people have also been unable to notice that each human person dies alone. And they haven't really worked out the logical consequence or 'trajectory' of that fact. They say they have, but they haven't at all.

There is no such thing as a 'liminal state' for the dying person with regard to having other living people come with them as in, say, 'half-way...' A person is either deceased from this body and its social surroundings, or they are as yet still alive. It's not so much that I am drawing any kind of attention to someone being 'half-way dead;' no - what I am saying is there is no such thing as half-way removed from living people and yet all units still interacting between each other along the 'half-way' part. If you see what I mean.

You see if it were the case that Muslims, or Jews, or Anglicans or Apostate Heretic modern Christians could go along with the old person, or the terminally ill person, who is dying, half-way into death, you know, accompanying them literally into the dead state step-by-step, but then come back once the dying person goes 'right across to the other side,' well then, we could legitimately have some accounts of what life is really about, and what death is really about, and thus what 'divine moral thinking' is really about...

However the clear-cut fact is, that no such thing happens.

It's not very complicated...

And that's okay.

But what it ought to have done is have humans realize that human life - that is to say, human people, individual life - is all about a closed box, same as the one for Schrodinger's Cat.

Waaa?!

Yeah.

Look. It's so simple.

Why haven't people worked this out before?

If you are a sponge, and you are in a bowl of water, and someone comes and pours some dye into the bowl, well then, all the little sponges in there will just become the color of the dye.

And that is what 'they' try to have happen here with you, human.

That is what a very wicked, evil and malign group of beings are doing to you. Because, afterall, logically you cannot be judged individually, on your own, then, since you have been colored from without.

But if you cannot be individually separated, and analysed as to what your true internal characteristics are, then neither can you get into/go into Heaven either. Because for one thing, people can only harmonize with those other things and beings that are actually resonant with what they truly are on the inside. And you cannot be ascertained as to what you truly are individually, because you have spent your whole life as a 'group being(!),' albeit supposedly as a unit with agency(!) that made up that group.

But nah nah nah nah nah. That kind of thing is just plainly not true on its face (I mean your human life's social programming). Because 'you' can no longer be determined at all as to who you really are - on account you have been subject to a group dye-ing process...

And then when you actually die - it's a whole different and very abrupt thing: 'you,' are suddenly completely on your own for real!

And the pedantic beings out there will go: 'Nah, you are lying to us. Go away. Go back down there where you belong. You belong where you always chose to hang out - with Joe Biden and Zelensky and George Soros and Barack Obama and Professor Richard Dawkins. They are your friends. Aren't they? And with your jobs and your finance and economics and quantitative easing money. Go away. Leave here. This is not a place for you.' 

And then you go: 'But that's not me. I have my own personal individual being. Honest.'

And they go: 'But you never listened to Calvin when he pointed out to you the utter, shamelessly foolish nonsense that you have been schooled into believing. So you had the choice. Why are you complaining now? It's going to take you decades just to restore any kind of clear personal self structure for yourself. And how are you going to do that up here? We're all having a good time up here because we can trust everyone that is here. Except not you. We cannot trust you at all, and you cannot trust you either, what's more...'

Calvin was right and you knew he was right, because his logic was sound. But you chose to listen to CNN, and Soros, and Biden, and Dawkins, and Einstein (the lying, thieving crumb), and anyone with some public face and platform, ahead of reality and truth. You even had the audacity to laugh and say 'but what is truth?'

Truth is when you are carted off like the Queen of England and it won't make no difference for her either.

'But I was loved. All my people loved me.'

Oh, they did? Why?

Solomon, in all his glory,
Subhanallah...

Why did they?

But come, sell all that you have, rich man, give it all up, and give it away to the poor and store up for yourself treasure in another place where you will never lose it. He he he he he he. Too late. That guy came and went.

It's only the laughing cavalier left now.

And the wealthy man's face was crest-fallen, for he knew that he could not give up all of his wealth and his lifestyle.

Don't worry. All is not yet lost. Camel, needle, all that funny stuff.

Those of you who are pretty smart, will have been able to work out from this article alone, what the 'language of the birds' is; how to use it, and even what it is like beyond death. What it is in fact really like; what it is all about.

In fact, some of you will have worked it out for sure, from what you just read here, if you understood it. Because you are going to put it into practice and suddenly the light shines.

What is the Light of the World? Only the real truth is the light.

My friend, the real truth is who are you inside, absent of all the other people's truths and their influence.

You saw it in front of your own eyes this week yourself. You saw one of the biggest identities on the world stage (though for what actual reason, who knows), who lived in palaces with servants and impossible amounts of wealth and surrounded by 'important' people - get taken away with nothing in material reality; lucky if you would get six feet of dirt.

I agree with you, Brits.

That's the human being. This self-aggrandizing BS-artist, who imposes themselves on every other creature and asserts loud and long for their 'rights' and the right to dictate everything all the time to everyone else, meanwhile throwing a few bones to the dogs to salve the listener's consciences.

You don't even know what you're doing! Wandering around with nuclear bombs and things, but not knowing a single thing about who and what you are.

And you expect ET Aliens to come and talk to you. About what? About what your little human ego wants, and what your tiny little minds are able to 'think,' to 'conceive?'

'On The Front Foot'

This is an English expression, that means outmaneuvering an opponent or competitor. Some people think this is taken from the game of soccer, and refers to the idea that a player is using a a foot forward to advance the ball but this is not the most likely source.

The expression is from the game of cricket, and means that the player hitting the ball being delivered in to him fast, is yet stepping forward and attacking it. And this means he must place his 'front foot' down the pitch, stepping forward to be able to bring his bat down with a powerful centrifugal force, and hit directly into the flight of the in-coming ball.

Life itself is an opponent. 

If it outmaneuvers you you are dead.

'The green language...'

And sure sometimes you must step backwards and defend.

I asked a rhetorical question in an earlier piece here, namely whether or not the statement of Jesus of Nazareth about certain people not 'tasting death' before they witnessed the Kingdom of Heaven descending out of the clouds to them was a failed prediction.

No one answered.

Superficially, this is a 'failed prediction,' because no one has lived here all that time since the statement a couple of thousand years ago; no one 'has not died' - except maybe Count Dracula though even he started off his little adventure just six hundred years ago, not two thousand. So even the Count is not that old, really, when it comes down to it.

However the particular passages lead immediately to the account about a couple of disciples going up a mountain and seeing some kind of strange meeting between three people dressed in brightly shining white clothes, having appeared out of some clouds that came down, enveloping the scene.

We have just seen even the longest-reigning UK monarch last but 96 years.

That's not a whole lot (of years).

But hey hey, wait on just a minute!

I think this is a privately custom-built
new Delahaye roadster. New.

What if though, really, some guys did see such a thing as described? As I was have said previously here as well - the Divine will not brook mortality to enter its genuine presence and remain as it was. The two things do not mix: ice cannot stay in a fire.

Either one overcomes the other or they may not remain together at all.

Because they are elementary forces, and qualities of ubiquitous being that affect all that is in them - material existence in the temporal world transitions continuously through its Gaussian profile; Eternity does not change at all.

If you go in to 'the cloud that descends,' you cannot come out of it...

That is to say, you cannot come out of it unchanged and in fact you will have changed completely.

The 'language of the birds' if it is the language of the spirit, exists outside of the Gaussian Curve. It is not about what is rational or reasonable going along the paradigm of what ebbs and flows in nature, what swells and reaches its peak and then dies.

Attempts at manufacturing some codified set of symbols or sounds supposed to be 'the language of the birds' or 'the green language,' that are temporal are sheerest nonsense and made-up things.

However you will indeed find that academia has set out all kinds of mythical nonsense and laid claim to having deciphered the code of la langue verte - producing much learned discussion and publishing books and academic texts saying what this language actually is, tying it to the coded writings of alchemists and also some of the songs and poetry of the troubadours during the so-called 'High Middle Ages.'

...Yet it is possible to slowly slip into that cloud.

Rustic bread and fish.
No wine there...
You have to bring the wine.

Yes first though you have to find the cloud, the right kind - although the fact is, that you know yourself those pics they always take of the UAPs are all hazy, and surrounded, as it were by mist, fog or cloudiness.

What is there inside of that 'haziness' is a powerful fact. It does not brook argument by humans. And once you are inside it, inside whatever is behind the 'cloud,' you can see, will see, the meaning of all things, and the nature of real things versus those that are not real but only passing phantasms of the arrogant and mediocre human minds around you here in this world, on this planet, and at this time.

Unless you enter the cloud, you cannot know the language of the fluttering things. Which is the more accurate expression; not 'language of the birds.' : )

Some of you will already know what was just said there.

The human heart has the innate potential to be something important. By which is not meant simply the organ and its muscles and chambers that pump blood.

Where we are treading right now though, is on extremely mystical territory. We are entering into a mysterious place...

What We Can Learn

Well it's more what we can see.

Whether anyone learns anything or not is moot. People just all do whatever they want to do, and Wisdom goes in the streets begging, while they all fete 'kings and queens.'

Hot house flowers - grown in a day, die after the same amount of time.

The one very obvious thing that we can all see from the worldwide discussion about the passing of the Queen of England, and possibly the UK -, is that she is dead.

People do that, see. Human beings tend to do a lot of it and regularly.

You cannot go throw your lot in with the fools who insist they 'know stuff' about life, who do not even have enough of the powers of reason to see that they die after only a very short time.

It's not a long time like you think.

It would be different, if, you could drive around in a Rolls Royce all day everyday and live forever... ...or at least beyond the meager hundred years that the best looked after people might manage to get to; if even they are lucky.

And moreover, if you could live a good life - meaning one filled with interest and excitement and whatever else your inner being requires.

So does living a good life mean the Rolls Royce, or does it mean something over and on top of that? Does it mean an explicit something necessarily above the Rolls?

Okay so you have been real smart and real diligent, and you got yourself a Rolls Royce.

And you drove around in it a little bit then you died.

The end.

*********************

Oh you have no idea how tempted I was to just leave this one finished right there.

The really stupidest, most self-important, crude, arrogant and disingenuous thing that people who call themselves atheists always say, is that the 'fact' that they know there is nothing of them when they die, and that there is no god -, makes them hold immediate life all the more precious.

'All the more' than what? What is the comparison against? To be 'more than' it presupposes there is an 'against something' which is 'less than.' It cannot logically be against anything, since whilst they hold nothing 'at the end' then so what, but how in any case are they able to compare what a theist or even any other person feels about their life? What, are they jumping into people's head now? 

Biggest, most arrogant *holes.

Self-important, self-interested, self-aggrandizing lunatics.

But what we do too, ourselves though, is look at others around us, and we notice that it is desperately unfair that they may have, at a given moment, more or even much more material substance or material wealth, than we have, yet we are trying to not make sheer materialism the stone idol in our lives. So why do not the gods of ultimate pure morality and rational behavior allow us at least some substance; we do not ask for the top-of-the-line latest Rolls Royce!

Our mistake is in this part of the thing - 'rational behavior.'

You can analyze every aspect of your life (and that is not a bad thing to do, or a wrong thing) and go out into the streets, into the city, into the town, looking to make those human dendritic connections with 'right people.'

Won't work though.

Can anyone say why not?

(Rhetorical question - would ask it and leave it hanging in the air for answers if this were a lecture theater; but it isn't). 

You know what human life, normal ordinary human life, is. And yes, normal ordinary human life admits of no god. There is none there, none to be seen. So - atheism. No problem. Very common.

I will lay you the whole of London to a soggy wet bus-ticket that ** commits suicide at the end of his life.

There. Said it for him, although he is not the one I have sketched around the outside of this year earlier here.

You see, it is not so much a question of whether he - this person - has materially 'succeeded' or not in his life, because he clearly has done that (materially been successful). But it's a Jungian thing. Deep inside their unconscious, there is the collective unconscious relating whole swathes of data and information and at some point the person realizes that they have betrayed the whole of the rest of the human race - and that is what they are running from. They are not running away from life, and not from death either, or some kind of painful old age condition. They are trying to literally eliminate the traitor - which they know to have been themselves and themselves alone.

Bizzarrini GT - Strada.
No Rolls Royce for you!

Human is not god in any way whatsoever. Human is a pre-deity condition. And between god and man there is a great gulf. No god will allow the impermanence of mortality to infect it, as such, by saying that 'the god part' will play second fiddle or take orders from the man condition.

And this is why Jesus Christ 'allowed' Himself to be murdered. 'You can rule as king over this whole world, if you but bow to me.' Nope. Nu-uh. And by the way, this makes Satan impermanent as well!

'Murdered,' 'killed' 'dead' doesn't mean anything to God.

Those are all 'man things,' they are not 'God things.'

So yes you may have the Rolls Royce - by God power.

And there is simply nothing of 'rational behavior' entailed in God power. Rational from the human perspective means rational to humans! And humans are idiots and temporary.

What would they know from 'rational??' (You will notice I just studiously avoided actually detailing the 'God power' stuff)...

August Moon Goddess

No, I am not departing from the direction previously discussed.

But seeing as how this is one of the most significant, and problematic areas for human beings, I am covering it in a thin tissue of cultural myths, in order to lessen the danger.

What danger?

Well let's go to the Wikipedia to see what utter trash and nonsense they are going to spout on the matter...

Here we find them right off the bat entertain complete idiotic and fanciful, even way off the trail nostroms purporting, I suppose, to be some kind of deep, psychological truths.

Lam dang, ho lam dang,
lam dang ho lam dang.
(Lantern, oh lantern). 
Is pronounced 'lum tongue.' LOL

'It most commonly takes place between family members or friends.'

It does?

We are looking at the page titled 'Human bonding.'

Pretty soon in the Wiki article, they try to refer to Plato, then Spinoza and finally Goethe.

Brilliant. All nonsense.

Misquotes stuff, misunderstands everything - all utter rubbish.

I mean Plato, for one, never said, and never could have said 'people engage in a process of developing close, interpersonal relationships.'

'Developing?' What does that mean?

Making something happen that isn't already there?

Because that's what Wikipedia wants to have it be.

But if you go to the developing process of a photograph, for instance, the light has already done something to the exposure, and then by using chemicals, we can arrange the pre-existing image to reflect onto and then appear on photographic paper from the negative.

Nobody 'develops' a photograph out of nothing from something that was not already there in the negative.

This is the same lunacy that the Big Bang nonsense spouts.

If Richard Dawkins can show where the actual principle of the triangle 'evolved' from a rapid expansion of energy, then we can start considering his friend Stephen Hawking's mindless gibberish called 'the Big Bang.'

Paul van Dyk played
in Malta at the Montekristo Estate
(that's the entrance
to the wine cellar in the pic above)
a few days ago, at sunset, in the
Chasing the Sunset Festival Show.
You can see it on YouTube.

These guys all default to 'Oh it just happened, and then we smart humans noticed afterwards along the way that there were such things as number and shape and geometric principles and so on.' 

And then they'll make it even worse: 'And in some other dimension, and completely different Universe... ...well, the geometrical principles and rules are all different; except of course we can't know how or what they are because well, that would be in a different Universe.'

LOL

August Moon Festival is when Artemis, the Goddess associated with bows and arrows, comes down to the Earth and spends time with young maidens and also some young males too.

In the Chinese legend, Chang-e's husband, Hou Yi (or Houyi), was granted the Elixir of Immortality as a reward for shooting down with his bow and arrows, nine burning 'suns' that were destroying the Earth - but a wicked demon called Feng Meng, masquerading as an apprentice in the skill of archery under Hou Yi, killed Hou Yi and attempted to take Chang-e by force, whereupon she drank both drafts of the Elixir of Immortality and ascended to the Moon and the heavens where Feng Meng could not reach her.

Feng Meng is still here alive, on the planet Earth.

Chang-e, although she resides on the Moon, is somewhere on its reverse side, in a palace which cannot be seen except by other immortals. Further, when she comes down to the Earth, she does so with great magical protections, and renders Feng Meng indisposed for a short while, although even so, in reality, and in spite of her appearance at public festivals and parades, when she actually attends with small circles of her young acolytes, she will be there in disguise.

Thus, you can see, that whilst Chang-e has never been one to go out and exact revenge by using death - since that would be slightly unfair, since she herself cannot die - still she is wiser than to simply appear too openly or without a lot of protection. Feng Meng cannot risk attacking her while she is being venerated and surrounded by the public, since Feng Meng's strategy to continue his demonic rule on the planet, has been to convince people that he is benevolent towards them; which he is in fact, not. 

Chang-e descends herself personally in a very open and obvious way though, whenever some notable person or great public figure has attained to an old age as a genuinely benevolent ruler but is about die -, because this is in harmony with the principles of longevity and its ultimate form, which is of course actual immortality, in fact. Thus, Chang-e will escort that person to another abode, away from the cares and troubles of this world. In this kind of situation, Chang-e is guarded by the great warriors of Heaven, who will smite Feng Meng severely if he attempts any wrong-doing.

And none of this need concern us in the slightest, really, except we should note the subtlety of the prosecuting of affairs, by this Goddess, as a good example to us of what we ourselves must do, when exercising the certain limited magical powers that we nonetheless do have.

Thus we can 'go out' to peel back the veils from already existing potentials between ourselves and a small handful of others - yet we must do so without being suspected as to what we are really doing.

And hereth endeth the first-eth lethon - of our lessons regarding how to enable dendritic connections between ourselves and some others, and to procure long-term potentiation of the two-way communication that goes on with dendritic connection activity.

And to summarize the lesson - nobody need know what you are doing, except you yourself, and eventually that specific other person or people.

Chang-e has a hand signal to notify her followers that she is there. It is in the shape you make with your fingers and your hand when you want to throw a shadow image of a rabbit.