What We Can Learn

Well it's more what we can see.

Whether anyone learns anything or not is moot. People just all do whatever they want to do, and Wisdom goes in the streets begging, while they all fete 'kings and queens.'

Hot house flowers - grown in a day, die after the same amount of time.

The one very obvious thing that we can all see from the worldwide discussion about the passing of the Queen of England, and possibly the UK -, is that she is dead.

People do that, see. Human beings tend to do a lot of it and regularly.

You cannot go throw your lot in with the fools who insist they 'know stuff' about life, who do not even have enough of the powers of reason to see that they die after only a very short time.

It's not a long time like you think.

It would be different, if, you could drive around in a Rolls Royce all day everyday and live forever... ...or at least beyond the meager hundred years that the best looked after people might manage to get to; if even they are lucky.

And moreover, if you could live a good life - meaning one filled with interest and excitement and whatever else your inner being requires.

So does living a good life mean the Rolls Royce, or does it mean something over and on top of that? Does it mean an explicit something necessarily above the Rolls?

Okay so you have been real smart and real diligent, and you got yourself a Rolls Royce.

And you drove around in it a little bit then you died.

The end.

*********************

Oh you have no idea how tempted I was to just leave this one finished right there.

The really stupidest, most self-important, crude, arrogant and disingenuous thing that people who call themselves atheists always say, is that the 'fact' that they know there is nothing of them when they die, and that there is no god -, makes them hold immediate life all the more precious.

'All the more' than what? What is the comparison against? To be 'more than' it presupposes there is an 'against something' which is 'less than.' It cannot logically be against anything, since whilst they hold nothing 'at the end' then so what, but how in any case are they able to compare what a theist or even any other person feels about their life? What, are they jumping into people's head now? 

Biggest, most arrogant *holes.

Self-important, self-interested, self-aggrandizing lunatics.

But what we do too, ourselves though, is look at others around us, and we notice that it is desperately unfair that they may have, at a given moment, more or even much more material substance or material wealth, than we have, yet we are trying to not make sheer materialism the stone idol in our lives. So why do not the gods of ultimate pure morality and rational behavior allow us at least some substance; we do not ask for the top-of-the-line latest Rolls Royce!

Our mistake is in this part of the thing - 'rational behavior.'

You can analyze every aspect of your life (and that is not a bad thing to do, or a wrong thing) and go out into the streets, into the city, into the town, looking to make those human dendritic connections with 'right people.'

Won't work though.

Can anyone say why not?

(Rhetorical question - would ask it and leave it hanging in the air for answers if this were a lecture theater; but it isn't). 

You know what human life, normal ordinary human life, is. And yes, normal ordinary human life admits of no god. There is none there, none to be seen. So - atheism. No problem. Very common.

I will lay you the whole of London to a soggy wet bus-ticket that ** commits suicide at the end of his life.

There. Said it for him, although he is not the one I have sketched around the outside of this year earlier here.

You see, it is not so much a question of whether he - this person - has materially 'succeeded' or not in his life, because he clearly has done that (materially been successful). But it's a Jungian thing. Deep inside their unconscious, there is the collective unconscious relating whole swathes of data and information and at some point the person realizes that they have betrayed the whole of the rest of the human race - and that is what they are running from. They are not running away from life, and not from death either, or some kind of painful old age condition. They are trying to literally eliminate the traitor - which they know to have been themselves and themselves alone.

Bizzarrini GT - Strada.
No Rolls Royce for you!

Human is not god in any way whatsoever. Human is a pre-deity condition. And between god and man there is a great gulf. No god will allow the impermanence of mortality to infect it, as such, by saying that 'the god part' will play second fiddle or take orders from the man condition.

And this is why Jesus Christ 'allowed' Himself to be murdered. 'You can rule as king over this whole world, if you but bow to me.' Nope. Nu-uh. And by the way, this makes Satan impermanent as well!

'Murdered,' 'killed' 'dead' doesn't mean anything to God.

Those are all 'man things,' they are not 'God things.'

So yes you may have the Rolls Royce - by God power.

And there is simply nothing of 'rational behavior' entailed in God power. Rational from the human perspective means rational to humans! And humans are idiots and temporary.

What would they know from 'rational??' (You will notice I just studiously avoided actually detailing the 'God power' stuff)...

August Moon Goddess

No, I am not departing from the direction previously discussed.

But seeing as how this is one of the most significant, and problematic areas for human beings, I am covering it in a thin tissue of cultural myths, in order to lessen the danger.

What danger?

Well let's go to the Wikipedia to see what utter trash and nonsense they are going to spout on the matter...

Here we find them right off the bat entertain complete idiotic and fanciful, even way off the trail nostroms purporting, I suppose, to be some kind of deep, psychological truths.

Lam dang, ho lam dang,
lam dang ho lam dang.
(Lantern, oh lantern). 
Is pronounced 'lum tongue.' LOL

'It most commonly takes place between family members or friends.'

It does?

We are looking at the page titled 'Human bonding.'

Pretty soon in the Wiki article, they try to refer to Plato, then Spinoza and finally Goethe.

Brilliant. All nonsense.

Misquotes stuff, misunderstands everything - all utter rubbish.

I mean Plato, for one, never said, and never could have said 'people engage in a process of developing close, interpersonal relationships.'

'Developing?' What does that mean?

Making something happen that isn't already there?

Because that's what Wikipedia wants to have it be.

But if you go to the developing process of a photograph, for instance, the light has already done something to the exposure, and then by using chemicals, we can arrange the pre-existing image to reflect onto and then appear on photographic paper from the negative.

Nobody 'develops' a photograph out of nothing from something that was not already there in the negative.

This is the same lunacy that the Big Bang nonsense spouts.

If Richard Dawkins can show where the actual principle of the triangle 'evolved' from a rapid expansion of energy, then we can start considering his friend Stephen Hawking's mindless gibberish called 'the Big Bang.'

Paul van Dyk played
in Malta at the Montekristo Estate
(that's the entrance
to the wine cellar in the pic above)
a few days ago, at sunset, in the
Chasing the Sunset Festival Show.
You can see it on YouTube.

These guys all default to 'Oh it just happened, and then we smart humans noticed afterwards along the way that there were such things as number and shape and geometric principles and so on.' 

And then they'll make it even worse: 'And in some other dimension, and completely different Universe... ...well, the geometrical principles and rules are all different; except of course we can't know how or what they are because well, that would be in a different Universe.'

LOL

August Moon Festival is when Artemis, the Goddess associated with bows and arrows, comes down to the Earth and spends time with young maidens and also some young males too.

In the Chinese legend, Chang-e's husband, Hou Yi (or Houyi), was granted the Elixir of Immortality as a reward for shooting down with his bow and arrows, nine burning 'suns' that were destroying the Earth - but a wicked demon called Feng Meng, masquerading as an apprentice in the skill of archery under Hou Yi, killed Hou Yi and attempted to take Chang-e by force, whereupon she drank both drafts of the Elixir of Immortality and ascended to the Moon and the heavens where Feng Meng could not reach her.

Feng Meng is still here alive, on the planet Earth.

Chang-e, although she resides on the Moon, is somewhere on its reverse side, in a palace which cannot be seen except by other immortals. Further, when she comes down to the Earth, she does so with great magical protections, and renders Feng Meng indisposed for a short while, although even so, in reality, and in spite of her appearance at public festivals and parades, when she actually attends with small circles of her young acolytes, she will be there in disguise.

Thus, you can see, that whilst Chang-e has never been one to go out and exact revenge by using death - since that would be slightly unfair, since she herself cannot die - still she is wiser than to simply appear too openly or without a lot of protection. Feng Meng cannot risk attacking her while she is being venerated and surrounded by the public, since Feng Meng's strategy to continue his demonic rule on the planet, has been to convince people that he is benevolent towards them; which he is in fact, not. 

Chang-e descends herself personally in a very open and obvious way though, whenever some notable person or great public figure has attained to an old age as a genuinely benevolent ruler but is about die -, because this is in harmony with the principles of longevity and its ultimate form, which is of course actual immortality, in fact. Thus, Chang-e will escort that person to another abode, away from the cares and troubles of this world. In this kind of situation, Chang-e is guarded by the great warriors of Heaven, who will smite Feng Meng severely if he attempts any wrong-doing.

And none of this need concern us in the slightest, really, except we should note the subtlety of the prosecuting of affairs, by this Goddess, as a good example to us of what we ourselves must do, when exercising the certain limited magical powers that we nonetheless do have.

Thus we can 'go out' to peel back the veils from already existing potentials between ourselves and a small handful of others - yet we must do so without being suspected as to what we are really doing.

And hereth endeth the first-eth lethon - of our lessons regarding how to enable dendritic connections between ourselves and some others, and to procure long-term potentiation of the two-way communication that goes on with dendritic connection activity.

And to summarize the lesson - nobody need know what you are doing, except you yourself, and eventually that specific other person or people.

Chang-e has a hand signal to notify her followers that she is there. It is in the shape you make with your fingers and your hand when you want to throw a shadow image of a rabbit.

 

The People-Tree Branches

So okay, you know the human brain has dendrites and dendritic activity.

This is a systemic process in which tiny little appendages of a nerve cell (or 'neural cell' body called a 'soma') engage in some electrical activity and then establish 'long-term potentiation' of particular favored conductivity pathways of certain dendrites - which theoretically or just about certainly - accounts for memory formation in the brain.

Dendrite is simply a word taken from the Greek word for tree, but really, it more means the branches of trees.

...Meanwhile though, here is the link to the free off-commercial platform pdf of the 'Drinkable Inks' full text: Writer's Block Drinkable Inks Free Full Text PDF

Now back to the normal broadcast (lol). Said Orson Welles.

What you don't know, and the reason you have very limited personal friendships that are truly fulfilling of the propositional definition of the name 'friendship,' including those relationships that are said to be within once's actual close genetic 'family' - is that the same system applies to humans; that is, between one human and other humans.

You are not unintelligent.

Caddyshack - the original movie.
Best ever film on professional
investing. Yes. Yes it was.
Wall Street was the second best, being
a fictionalized account of investing
drawn from the experience of Oliver Stone's
recollection of his Wall Street trader dad.
Caddyshack was factual. 100% factual.

Danny being a 'good boy' was about his
being corruptible.

Although David Icke says that evil Reptilian demonic Satanic (aw, so cool; yes David - more more! Get more lurid please!) 'forces' (notice that recently he's swapped from actual 'Reptilian beings' to just 'forces') run the world and dominate everyone and control everything that you do or are allowed to do - he doesn't know really how this happens or what the real benefit might be to such non-human 'entities.'

Sometimes he does get close though, I'll grant.

Bit of an accident of him just being in the subject territory, I think.

In order to keep themselves alive as a discrete species, and a ruling one, they need to separate you from developing and establishing those long-term potentiated pathways between other actual human beings of an advanced kind (which is what you are).

Although you cannot see it right now, the reason behind all of these massive floods around the world, mostly in either Third World places or places very far away from the central political power hubs - is so that the mechanisms of control, by the evil enemy Empire of Reptilians of David Icke, are degraded catastrophically.

And that's what you will see happening from now on in.

Pakistan will shift around in its global geopolitical position as the de facto and behind-the-scenes religious-political ruler of Saudi Arabia (and hence all of Sunni Islam around the whole world), the concentration of economic value of the viable still-functioning coffee plantations and primary processing plants of Minas Gerais, will limited the ability of Brussels to financially dictate to German and Dutch industry (which together control the Brazilian coffee economy), and the Afro-Arab-Indian rice monopoly of Ahmed Bin Kanoo Group will also enhance its position against China and the USA who are part of the Reptilian Empire (lol - why not? Let's leave it where Icke sets things).

And what this means in the social-political scheme of things, is that human people unit dendrites will be laid in all of these regions, at first expressed as seemingly just a shifting away from Western capitalism - although, this means simply the Brussels/Globalist orbit - but eventually as cultural movement probably of ecology futurism. But this will not be the one that the Globalists wanted to install.

Highest quality hand-made
Italian-American 'carrozzeria'
thing ever made - the original Bizzarrini.

 

They wanted to install Sing 2.0 - a set-up in which 6G data systems monitored your every move and controlled you with 'social credit scores' and all the rest of that dystopian insanity.

And that's just not going to happen now. Even just today, the Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands literally told the government of Australia to * off and stop interfering with its internal politics.

But this is all stuff happening on a huge geo-political scale.

You want to know about things 'closer to home' for you.

You are very likely living inside the globalists' pitch and this means you will be isolated from people of your own higher levels of intelligence and sensibilities, and isolated from any activities involving cooperating groups at your level.

I'm not pampering your egos here. There is no way anyone comes here and stays here if they are not of well above average intellect and education and possessed of a very advanced capability of understanding highly sophisticated concepts, especially human relationship and human psychology concepts.

So what we will be doing over coming days and weeks, is exploring the advanced tools and techniques of attaining, maintaining and managing, human dendritic propagation.

One of our members here, just recently mentioned to me about a particular piece of music, and it was a great suggestion, because, what I tend to do, is go with those things I know from the producers themselves, have a pretty 'hammer over the head' kind of BPM rating, and bass lines and those cross-pattern melodic 'stabs' which - well, what they technically do in your neurology is exploit this thing call the wave edge drop-off.

See we get habituated to our own brain wave stimulations, and then the brain stops being acutely on alert for that particular thing then. So this is what happens when people become used to a certain drug or medication, for instance; it's exactly the same thing although most doctors assume (wrongly) that the physiology itself is being materially shaped and altered and that this is causing the chemical 'toleration.' Well that is a different thing though. That's when something is actually harming the internal structure.

The higher the brain wave edge drop-off, the greater the neural signalling effect and clarity.

But this is all still just about signal strength and clarity, it's not saying anything about why. Icke just says 'coherence/coherent thought.' He's wrong when it comes to providing an explanation of why. We'll get into that in future pieces here.

Anyway today we have fairly accessible somewhat sophisticated little devices that can 'read' the brain wave force 'spill-over' into the skin's nerves using transducers and some algorithms - you can easily 'see' that in fact your brain is switching over to a certain state, when, for example, you have used some of the compounds we have been discussing.

So whereas in the past many malicious and deliberately destructive mind-set people will quickly say 'Oh such-and-such didn't work on me,' well today, you can stick a headset onto them and see that they are straight out lying!

Having said that, you will be able to observe though, that with the piece of music below, which is very different to the stuff I normally post here, yet at the same time, it has all of the key components that will 'give you a feeling;' what they call a 'vibe.'

The substances in the compositions talked about off-line here, produce these 3-D mind acuity conditions and the result is very pleasurable.

And it doesn't have to be just from those tracks that we are posting here normally. In fact, in many people's personal 'pre-set' edge-detection neural connections, they will already have some patterns that produce repeatable 'feelings' which they like and find pleasurable.

David Icke - The Right/The Wrong

Maybe it would be better termed 'the missing parts' or even 'the deficiency.'

Meanwhile, just as an aside, here - extracted recipes from Yuhanna ibn Masawaiyh's writings in Venice: 'Writer's Block Drinkable Inks'

The FULL Drinkable Inks narrative text 

(If this is not free to read in your location, well just read one of the other free titles under my titles at Kindle, and let me know and I will get you a link to the 'off-platform' free pdfs).

NB. Commercially-available dried ingredients may not in every instance be as potent as the fresh ingredients.

Hey I kinda like David Icke. Any time someone goes 'out there' and says 'lower astral plane demonic Satanic Reptilian evil conspiracy' well, give me more.

He even says that people like Bill Gates and Fauxi and Soros are just demonically-possessed zombies.

Cool!

It's all very nice and it's making me go and find a beer from some stockpile my cousin sent over to me...

But we can't all just sit pushing our backs deeper into the sofa from the cinematic thrill of it all, and drink beer and eat nuts and then fall asleep knowing that Icke has 'outed' the evil Satanic global conspiracy for us, because and then so what...? Okay it's nice to be nodding and have someone else on the big media platforms (he is on them, don't you worry about that) nodding back for us so that it feels like we have company in our cherished stupidity, but where does it leave us? We're still all stuck in the same place, in the same predicament of having to comply with moronic zombies who are not even vampires. 

Vampires at least, wear swish clothes.

Lake Lefroy in Western Australia.
This is just a tiny fraction of it. It is so large
it's bigger than some countries.
I've been there. Those islands in the
distance literally look
when you are standing there, like they are
floating in the sky.
It's quite amazing.

 

And in the mornings after, we still find that our blood has been sucked again overnight anyway and will be sucked all through the day as well.

David is doing what the whole nine yards of the 'system' has always done, has continuously done, for thousands of years - he is committing some pretty basic fallacies in front of our eyes and getting away with it because part of what he says is true enough.

He is not a sinister figure though as far as I'm concerned, and I don't think he's doing anything 'adverse' on purpose. He sees his role as that of alerting 'the common mind' to a fundamental problem.

But you - you who read here - do not represent 'the common mind.'

You want the solution. You already know about the problems.

The two big ways the truly sinister people try to fool - well, succeed in fooling - people is the 'confusion of the inverse' fallacy, and the 'elicit conversion' fallacy.

Muslim apologists do it all the time: 'Christians say God is Jesus.' Well but they don't though; they say Jesus is God. The issue is that the definition of one word is about the meaning of it as a descriptive (and thus all of the characteristics and qualities that describe 'it') and a title; while the meaning of the other word is just someone's name and identity for a particular given space of Earthly time in context that this is to do with 'God' manifesting or projecting as a human person for humans to 'see' using their human senses and intelligence.

The woke and social thought police do it all the time - and that's because they are part of the sinister conspiracy of the demonic.

Back to a bit of reality, okay?

If you listen to an interview of Rose McGowan, the words and the phrasing she uses, although okay it is highly critical of males, still doesn't sound particularly as if she is criticizing 'the male' as such. For instance, she says the Academy of Motion Picture Directors is made up of over 90% males, and mostly white males.

So that is not the same thing as saying that all males throughout the world are wicked, cunning, conniving, or sinister, and white(!) - because logically 'the Academy (of MPDs)' is just a small restrictive group 'of males.'

But the woke crowd will use almost the exact same words and phrasing that McGowan does but it will mean an entirely different thing in their mouths.

Let me give a better example:

The Greek philosopher Speusippus is claimed by modern academia (although how they would know I am not quite sure) to have taken over or 'inherited' Plato's Academy after he disappeared - although they will never ever say disappeared, just as they will outright lie and say 'Oh Lycurgus (the Law-Giver of Sparta) was a made-up mythical person who never really lived' (on account that he too 'disappeared').

And they will quickly add that Speusippus disputed with Plato's Theory of Forms.

Well but did he though?

No he didn't.

He simply pointed out (what is also missing in the Icke view of everything) that Plato never taught that the Forms, separate though they were from material reality, did not contain all of material reality. And that is a hugely significant point about what Speusippus was saying. But no one in modern academia has seriously read either Plato fully, or Speusippus and so they don't even have that much depth of the required and necessary knowledge to distinguish the real point of what Speusippus said. But by repeating it without explaining it, it is made to seem that somehow the person who took Plato's Academy forward was both contradicting Plato and thereby exposing some kind of mistake or defect in the teachings of Plato and of course, therewith you can undermine all of Plato because he is made to seem 'just another, any old other, ancient thinker.'

Get away from there, Bill.
I know you want to go there.
LOL

What Plato himself actually said, was that it was going to be difficult or impossible to teach ordinary people, or to say to them, on account of which too was the actual reason Pythagoras never taught those exact same higher level things except to his disciples who had been with him over fourteen years - that one and the same seemingly contradictory things were able to exist simultaneously!

Well that is not the way modern academia wants to have you believe what Speusippus said about the Forms.

Icke says there are possessed - as in demonically-possessed - people who are organized as a conspiracy against the average human; and who then exploit people and make vast amounts of wealth and rule in perfect luxury and dominion.

And presumably, there is nothing you can do about it. Well he doesn't say what you can genuinely practically do about it.

Of course it's all true. What he says. Well, partly true to sufficient of an extent that it hits home to the intrinsic sensibilities of people who know darn well that the media and governments and certain corporate entities and institutions are total malevolent liars.

With us, it is 'jam today.'
Because we are the real deal,
and that makes all the difference.

But you see, if it were really true that the Forms were separate and entirely distinct from material reality as such, and that 'they were incorrect' or incorrectly conceived by Plato - as they claim Speusippus said - then for sure you would have no means to counterbalance the wicked evil 'demonically-possessed' conspirators. And those people would have you believe it too, since then, you would not bother to reach forth your hand, and take of the fruit of the Forms, and use, and benefit thereby.

Would you?

'For in that day you shall surely die.'

But who though, who 'shall surely die?'

It is insane to want to believe or even to think and suppose from the logical perspective, that let's say we do have really amazing advanced civilizations out there elsewhere in the Galaxy and out even further than - but somehow we 'need' it to be the case that 'heaven' is where then, exactly? And why would it necessarily be 'better' than or even different to, what 'ordinary' massively advanced cultures of real physical people were able to achieve and attain to...

The Forms are real. Reality is real, but it's also complete. And there's your missing link.

The Knights Who Say 'Ni'

So... ...You are about to learn a secret here, that sent many a knave to their untimely and horrible death.

You are also about to find out why someone like myself has no time for fools masquerading as 'scientists.'

...But just as an aside for a second, however: McCanard, McTrudueau, McKULTRA. And, 20 people killed, many more injured. Canada. Amazing.

Twenty people! Goodness me...

Anyway.

Well it is pretty dark
where we're going...

You're all very familiar with the Monty Python gag, now an internet meme, in which some crusader knights think they heard about an order of monks and nuns, who belonged to the Order of Saint Denis. Even Wikipedia, GD it(!) gets even this wrong now, and explains the story from half-way in: namely, that (by this time), the leader of the knights thinks they are the keepers of some sacred words including 'Ni.'

The peasants have already worked out that it must have been the Knights of Denis (pronounced 'Denise' in French) although some think the horsemen may have been intoning that they were the Knights of Saint De-nise.

And then though, the knights themselves - who have actually no idea what they are talking about - start to say that they are the Knights who say 'Ni.' 'We are the Knights-oo-say-'Ni.'

Anyway it's a complete mess. And that's the point.

One of our associates here had cause to speak with some of their more distant family members - who were about to travel to Malta where they had business, and would be starting some more companies there.

Lot's of money, lot's of tax issues. That kind of thing that none of us here have exposure to.

And this associate relayed first to me, because I hadn't heard yet, that the 'Pope' (fake Pope), was altering the organizational structure of the Knights of Malta.

Hmn.

Knights of Malta have three ranks - the top ones who swear an oath of poverty (in some sense, at least), the middle rank which swears allegiance to the Order, and the base rank, which doesn't swear anything at all but is nonetheless 'inducted' somehow.

The modern Knights of Malta have assumed a particular 'Order of Chivalry and Merit' established by a Grand Master of a secret Order, namely the King of Prussia, in 1811 - this being the Royal Order of Saint John.

I like the wooden thing. All you
vegetarians can look away.

Now it's hard to know which 'Saint John' this is meant to really refer to, but this is another place now, where you are going to see references to this word 'pseudo,' and in this case here, we are talking about the Spanish friar (Juan de la Cruz 1542 - 1591) who took his ideas, as far as academics go, from someone 'Pseudo-Dionysius' a Neo-Platonic philosopher of the 5th century.

A couple of hundred years before this 'Juan,' Philip IV King of France, got rid of the Knights Templar and tortured and executed their Grand Master. Every book you will ever read says that the King 1. owed a lot of money (to the Templars and to the Spanish Jews), 2. He wanted to find out the source of the Templars' wealth, and 3. He thought they were heretics.

And then all of the history (fairy tales) say that this Grand Master uttered the name of the demon they worshiped, who gave them all their money, and he drew an image of this demon which we all know today as 'Baphomet.'

Back to the 16th century and another one of these 'Templar'-style militaristic priests - Juan de la Cruz (aka the 'Juan' I was referring to earlier; who is also 'Saint John,' ostensibly 'of the Cross') - is also tortured, for what reason it is best left up to ignoramuses like Richard Dawkins to dictate to you what that really was.

Because he knows, right.

Woven into the modern mythology about 'Baphomet' is the legend that Alexander the Great went inside the Temple of Memphis where he saw the Goat-Headed God - same as the one depicted in the Templar's figure.

As you know, being the liguists that you all are, 'B' is pronounced 'P' by the Egyptian Arabic speakers, and 'P' is often also pronounced as 'B' by them. (Think wall scenes at Dendera).

I know, having conversed with a couple of you off these pages, that some of you are already 'onto it' or at least so close to the nub of what I am about to say that well, you'll more or less be able to put two and two together.

That's pretty tame, right?
Is not. Is dripping in cognac.

Certainly, you already know there is an Egyptian connection, there is an 'Alexander the Great' connection (this bit I will spell out here in a moment), and since they spoke 'Graeco-Egyptian' back then, you already are taking a close look at the 'met' component of the compound word.

So, it's 'meta' of course. Not just 'met.' But same thing anyway.

Pseudo-Aristotle.

Well he wrote his 'Mirror for Princes' expressly for Alexander the Great.

Did you see what I just did there?

In one foul swoop, I just tossed idiots like Richard Dawkins and all of that lot of fools and morons, into the intellectual bin. And forever - if you're smart enough to realize what just happened there.

Because they have clearly, zero knowledge in this direction, whilst loudly and rancidly decrying anyone who doesn't adopt their foolish nonsense about Aristotle's 'Nature of Living Things' (where Dawkins thinks he got his 'inspiration' as a biologist and evolution-scientist)

Look, if 'Pseudo-Aristotle' is so 'fabricated,' and 'Pseudo-Dionysius' so, well, don't-know-what -, then how come y'all have to torture their exponents all the time to extract some 'secret' or other concerning wealth? As in, actual literal material wealth?

Back to the 'structure' of the Knights of Malta.

No. Back to the structure of the Lyceum of Aristotle.

Ah, there you go.
That's pretty safe.
Isn't it?

You see, only one or just a small few people were designated to have the role of getting material wealth for all the others in the Academy or the 'Garden' as it was also called. So these guys (and women too) had to swear an oath to Apollo or Minerva or someone of those kinds of Gods, to not be swayed by a desire for personal wealth, and to distribute fairly what they got to the other members of the School. 

And then the main body of members swore an oath as well - because they were going to be given secrets to protect. And then maybe other associates did not have to swear any kind of oath at all.

The 'Pope' has no idea, Dawkins has no idea, Cartesians have no idea, modern academia has no idea, most Freemasons no matter how high in degree or rank have no idea. The only thing they know about is how steal from you, and torture you to get what they want if they are given even an inch to do it in.

These things like 'the Knights of Saint John of the Cross (Malta)' are vestiges of something deep in the past. 'They've' heard about something and have tried to pull it to themselves by force, which includes by force of propaganda against ordinary people.

But I've tied what those things relate to by telling you outright: Alexander the Great/Pseudo-Aristotle and the 'Mirror for Princes;' The Knights Templar and the 'demon of Memphis' aka the Goat of Mendes where Alexander went and saw this 'entity,' and the supposed/mythological source power of the wealth of the Order of the Templars; Saint John of the Cross of Spain, and his writings taken from 'Pseudo-Dionysius.'

The thing that ties them all together is that every single one of them had access to one specific item of knowledge or learning, preserved in specific books or texts which deal with very very important things to do with money and power and life.

You yourself have actually read that text.

Except you don't know it. You've never been shown how to interpret what you were reading. 

In external practical life and reality, people take something they see has power and at some stage provided someone - now long gone from the place though - wealth; and then they assume it for themselves and tell the naive around them 'follow me.' Sure they find out bits and pieces of things. But nothing that is the actual real thing.

This is no joke.
This is Malta - Church of Saint John.
And yes, gold leaf, but the stuff
made in Venice...
How 'bout that.

You put your idiot friend Richard Dawkins in a locked room and after ten days see what happens (to him). He'll be dead as a doorstop when you open the door. That's what'll happen to him.

It's important for you to have read this first, before you get to see the Drinkable Ink stuff.

Because at some point you will want to go into the ideas about money and wealth, from 'Pseudo-Whoever.' And you can, because you've already had the stern warnings and lectures.

And just always remember - 'they' will torture you and they will kill you too. Because they are jealous and cannot have what you can have. Not because they are rational 'sci-entists' and you are not. After a while you will see and understand how come they can never have what you can have.

...And, there's no point extending that line of thought further than that here, in case, well -, Christopher Wray. Which way are the canards flying now?

'Canard' - that's French for duck, isn't it? French. That would be 'French' Canada - where the 20 got murdered. 'Every key word counts.' Remember that here? When was that said here?

What I continually said was I was not going to be extremely explicit because it involved death and I 'might' draw the attention of the FBI. LOLOLOL. I'm not laughing at the people who got killed. I'm laughing at the FBI and all the smart alecs who think they know what's going on.

'I might draw the attention of the FBI...' Hah! That would be the day though, right. Right now it's just 'ordinary nobodies' who got murdered. Nobody at the FBI or anywhere else cares about them. Still, it pays to be a little bit cautious. And I care about the 'nobodies' because they are all somebody to some one. Did anyone cry when Nero died though? I dunno. Could have. We shall see. We shall see, in modern times, what happens. And we shall see what 'subtlety' is in store.