The Ghost Assassin

The CIA, according to reports (not sure where these 'leaked reports' ever come from - do you know??), called Imad Mughniyeh 'the untraceable ghost.'

Robert Baer, an ex-CIA 'structuralist' - I won't say 'analyst; he was probably a bit more than that - was in the very public arena from early on, saying that al-Mughniyeh was the most deadly terrorist in the world, and much more serious of a threat than Bin Laden.

Imad Mughniyeh. Most dangerous terrorist
ever.

He was killed while passing by on foot, when a car bomb was detonated - on the night of 12 February 2008 in Kafr Sousa, Damascus, Syria.

Imad ibn Javad al Mughniyeh was a Pakistani, not a Lebanese...

And he spoke fluent French and was someone who at times seemed to be able to live in and transit through France freely and at will.

Well, it's a complicated world, see.

But he was not the 'ghost assassin.' 

That would be a term for those who kill you and disappear into the night never to be seen or heard of again. Like - ever.

Let's not go back to the billionaires from Syria who own Formula 1 racing teams, and 'Swiss watch' companies and all of that though. And who own street blocks in the center of Paris. And HO's in Luxembourg.

Anyway.

General Qasem Soleimani.

The person who took over from Mughniyeh was Qasem Soleimani.

If we go back to Robert Baer, we shall note that he explains that the US has often in the past not really understood that 'targeted political murder' has to effect change or else it is worthless.

He says merely 'symbolic assassinations' can serve to strength your enemy, rather than undermine him. 

And he's right.

Which is why there is a faction within secret - highly secret - organizations around the world today, who understand this, and do not over-indulge in such things. But when they do them at all, it is very meaningful.

That is, meaningful to those to whom it should have meaning. And leaving all the rest of us, just sitting there scratching our heads and going 'what happened?'

Baer uses the phrase 'the narrow channeling of violence.'

It's not perceived as a full-blown war then, see.

Robert Baer.

The Western World's traditional prohibition against political assassination altered during the time of Ronald Reagan, when the designation of someone as an 'enemy combatant' became the legal tool to green-light state-sanctioned assassination. But even then, things are not so clear, because murder is a crime and the FBI actually had Robert Baer charged with attempting to kill Saddam Hussein at the same time that the US government formally issued orders to 'capture or kill,' him. 

The charges were dropped in court though after some months of initial hearings. And besides, Baer had nothing to do with it anyway.

An enemy combatant, say, of the Russian government (well that makes things easier to talk about here then, doesn't it!) - might be some Ukrainian who was supplying passable stories about 'Russian interference,' for example. Because people from the Ukraine can easily fly stuff over the heads of the American and UK consumers of such junk -, who would then ignorantly think the stuff was 'Russian.'

Such people are called 'consultants' and 'consultants' are viable targets too.

Make the goat fall over, George.
'Electron Spintronics' - there's
a good part, and a bad part.
You have to be responsible.

No one shoots themselves in the foot on purpose, do they? Because the Biden administration, and the Hillary/Obama Borg elite sponsor the Russian fairy tale narrative. I mean, you can't say they are corrupted by the Ukrainians! Ha ha. What a silly thing! I mean, you can't say US Supreme Court judges are - corrupt!

Let's see Alec be funny again though, right?

So who was it, because it was not an accident.

That question, my friends, you will find yourself asking yourself, over and over and over again in the coming months, until finally you will go 'WTH!' And then by that time it will be too late.

Meanwhile, Alec Baldwin will never do a Trump SNL thing again. And if he tries, it will be even better. Can you imagine the squirming going on in Switzerland right now, in that big room with the sort of circular table where the 'creative people' are, who think up the propaganda?

WPP should re-brand themselves to 'Spectre.' And get Rachel Maddow to do the SNL hit pieces from now on. That will work. Wow, the LSD those guys must be on... They should move now to 'industrial strength manufactured consent.' We've certainly moved out of the 'manufactured funny' stage, the canned laughter funny stage pretending to be political satire.

But why so much intrigue and messing about in the first place, right? If you really have the ability to bring down goats at a distance?

Well just stand back and watch.

I am trying, as I have repeated too, over and over here, to stay away from these dark goings-on.

The Lifestyle 'Up There'

So Shatner thinks there's nothing up there, it's all just pitch black - 'like Death.' ...Is how he described it.

I mean he's right. There's not a lot up there. You cannot presume it's all so cluttered with ET (Demi says we now must call them 'Extraterrestrials' and not 'Aliens' because the word 'alien' is a bit pejorative) vehicles but that they are all 'cloaked,' and that's why we don't see them...!

Let's face it, even with super advanced, highly intelligent people 'accidents' can happen though, right?

I've been here - it's the Wellesley Hotel
in London. I don't remember it like this though.

And surely if some 'cloaked' craft smashed with real ballistic force into some other 'cloaked' craft, the bits and pieces would possibly no longer be cloaked and then we'd have all of that debris to look at -, examine in the toxic skeptics' 'laboratories' where they could opine about what it all was, and that no matter what else, it could not have been something from an actual intelligent life form - because 'we' humans are the only one of those: and we are the bestest, most smartest, edumacatedest, wokey-est, mostestest in the Universe anyway...

...Luckily we don't make mistakes. Isn't that right, Alec?

You'll lead us to the Promised Land, Alec, right? Because after all, Orange Man Bad, and that's all very funny, right?

Look - if you want to be led to the Promised Land by that fool or any fool like him, off you go.

How soon before a big 'accident' or 'mistake' happens because lunatics and morons are in control? ...They won't stop themselves after a bundle of small 'accidents.'

Power is an addiction. And only fools cannot see that you cannot afford to be sucked into that whirlpool; which is the reason why there are so many lunatics 'in charge/at the top.'

They will not stop themselves.

...Anyway.

Moving right along back to the subject.

Personally I detect a tone of jealousy in the never-ending bleatings of the lunatic, controlled opposition. Just the other day, I had this one 'burner account' person try to argue that she had more entitlement to being able to say what was scientifically admissible as hard evidence than the head of psychiatry at the Harvard Medical School and when I asked for her credentials to be able to do that she stamped her feet and looked at me as if I were being foolish.

Yes it's pretty empty up there near to the Earth - that is, until it isn't.

See, it is dark in London a lot - 
it rains a lot in the day (and night).
So you get table lamps for afternoon tea!

And, there's also a lot fewer beings from somewheres else up there but currently near the Earth.

Surely they want to come down here and play with human beings. Human beings, being as they are, so cute and cuddly and warm and friendly and not very needy... ...right?

Hell anyone would want to associate with human beings.

Right?

...But then, 'Karin' Austin gets taken away up there and Will 'Smith,' and one or two others, and Professor John E. Mack says 'yeah, nup they've been taken all right.'

But that then means that you haven't, whinging woman from wherever who wanted to gainsay the Harvard study.

I asked her 'okay do you know what hard evidence things were photographed in that study? I'm sure you're aware of the basic things that were briefly touched on in several public interviews. But do you know what other things?'

And then I said 'why don't you simply ask Harvard for access to the research papers and some of the filed notes?'

So what's the lifestyle all about, then?

Some, beings; and some people - not all that many.

This is a backwater.

Ordinary, not ordinary.

You can clearly see that we are a backwater planet! We are absolutely nowhere near the action.

There is a fairly common religious, never ever questioned, belief, that we are so super-important, that these supremely powerful beings directly connected to One Supreme Deity, are up there in the clouds holding harps, looking over us, and helping those faithful, religious subjects of the Supreme Deity, even some 'sinners' who 'repent' because 'God loves you.'

Well what about we turn it around the other way:

There is none of that and absolutely no God at all, and definitely no stoopid 'ET Aliens!'

There's only the wonder of Man and his unique, throughout-all-of-the-whole-Entire Cosmos (there we are again, discovering we have met the utter insanity and pure ego-arrogance of Stephen Fry one more time) 'science' and uniquely-evolved ability to manipulate his circumstances with that science - not completely, but still quite a lot though.

What sheer, bare-faced, self-involved, pure ego-driven, madness.

But no - you come down here and show yourselves to us, so that we can stick you under a microscope and judge you. Because, we are self-honest and we have judged ourselves, and there's - no damn *'n' room for anyone else that thinks they are better than us or who want to claim to be smarter.

So why don't you guys just come, right?

Show yourselves.

Hey let's not go too far here!
Some human stuff is pretty cool.

Ah, you don't exist.

...All of those who have got involved with the 'Electron Spintronics' - if they have read into it some way by now (and there are some of you who already had experience of this anyway, and a background in it to a large extent), know that it will take weeks and weeks of preparation before you are ready and able to meet, to encounter with any kind of actually advanced intelligence beings from elsewhere.

And yes they might turn out to be your friends, as in pretty friendly towards you - though they will never ever be that, to the standard sorry and pathetic excuse of a subject known as 'human Man.' SMH 

What a pathetic waste of time that thing is.

On the whole, on the whole. ...But then you do get the odd exception now and then.

Human beings are 'just children' in a sense. More importantly though, they need to appreciate that they are just children and require to be developed in very advanced ways. Most human children are fantastic, but they grow and develop into this atrocious thing called 'human adults.'

 

Channon, But Not The Cult One

I cannot say I am all that familiar with whoever is leading the current iterations of what Lt. Colonel Jim Channon started and in what directions it is now heading.

A 'cult' is defined as something in which all the membership follow certainly 'rules' but the individual at the top does everything but follow them!

So Lt. Colonel Jim Channon was never ever a cult leader, that's for sure.

Through the glass, darkly.

Still, in deifying him - which is not entirely irrational a thing to do in his case - no doubt there will be plenty of dogmatic new 'religions' spun off from what actually happened.

Anyone who hasn't yet received all three of the first pdf's please contact right away and get them. 

And those who have started to plow through them, are going to realize at some stage, the abundant reasons why those people in the US military who were 'exploring' the same themes and ideas and even technology in many cases, that Lt. Colonel Channon did - seemingly quite suddenly steered away from 'standard chain of command' formats, many even leaving the military and the government altogether.

I will state the main reason explicitly now.

'Killing at a distance' becomes a thing that any individual completely understands instantly they figure 'oh this is a thing, this is a potential reality -,' is not something to share with absolutely anybody and everybody and certainly not among fellow officers or even higher level commanders because - for one thing, the very reason there is military discipline at all is due to the empowerment to kill that the government authorizes, and which by absolute human social moral necessity, must have constraining rules. There is no such thing as a free-for-all of killing among the ranks just because they are issued with material weapons.

But the standard military also has no means of 'killing at a distance' other than by using the tools of guns, bullets, and flying or falling objects like jets and rockets and missiles and bombs.

Nice colors though...

Whereas Lt. Colonel Channon's group found out that they could do it by other means.

Today, we are aware that there may be technical means of doing things without any apparent 'physical payload' items - vis-a-vis, for example, the so-called 'Havana Syndrome.'

But if it is simply a question of knowledge only, and then any soldier with said knowledge possesses a real weapon... ...well then what?

The whole undercurrent of what Hollywood popularized as being Jim Channon's ideas, was the misinformation that he was saying you could win a war by having some kind of 'holistic' approach... ...but the real sub-text to that is that he was internally acknowledging the need for moral authority for ultimate weaponry.

Now I need to add two things right away for those who have been recipients of the theory texts, essentially, and those are - 1. there is still something missing from those apparent practical instructions, and believe you me, the missing thing 'shatters light in front of your eyes(!)', and 2. there is an unfortunate trap there with the 'dramatic stuff' of seeing the obvious materialistic 'outwards,' and thereby missing or forgetting about the inner things.

I am going to show an example of this right here, which is, namely, the so-called 'true cyan illusion.'

The 'true cyan illusion.' Just focus on the
white dot and stay there for a full minute
until you see a blue rim appear and then,
stay focused on the dot, and you will see
'true cyan' appear as a glow. Just be patient - 
probably takes 2 minutes, and then, pull your head 
back a bit while staying focused on the white dot.

This is of course, not an illusion, but the effect inside your brain, of the optical cones being overstimulated, and then tuning themselves down as a self-adjustment procedure they have, with the consequence of 'seeing' different colors (frequencies) while the optical cones deplete and 'refuse' some frequencies.

So, this is an 'effect' but it is not an 'extra-physical' effect.

But it is still a remarkable effect though because it is not something we encounter in our 'ordinary' use of our vision on a daily basis.

In that same way, what you will encounter using the final element of the 'electron spintronics' is also quote remarkable - but the difference is that it goes well beyond just 'a color' and into every single experience, every single way of experiencing through your normal senses, and into so much more than that too...

The temptation - like what happened to William Shatner - is to think that because he has been able to use a tin can to enter 'space,' and because he has felt with all of his senses, the power of the rocket, the feelings, the vibrations, the noise, the pressure of gravity, that 'space' means 'death' because there is nothing out there and little in the way of sensory stimuli happening out there. ...He hasn't really entered space at all - he is 'going' to it and staying inside a shell which keeps him and space physically apart.

Shatner should have taken
his comfort blanket with him -
he was feeling all alone up there.

He hasn't used his quiet mind hardly at all, which is the thing which can 'enter' emptiness, because it has been dominated in the moments by the immediate simple mortal senses.

He never noticed that the Vedas ten thousand years ago already taught that 'Shiva' ('Shi' - no; 'Va' - thing) is Death and also empty space and yet also real life. 

Human material lifespan life is death, in fact; in fact it is known certain death at the end of the lifespan.

So Shatner was wrong. But he was misled by the immediacy of the senses and their demanding nature.

If you go with your physical mortal body up into space, then to stay there for any genuine duration, you will need to have both different kinds of physical structural 'habituation' compared to what you grew used to on Earth gravity and conditions, and continuous cloning availability for other reasons we don't need to go into here.

...This music track -, because William Shatner thought he was all alone up there:

News Confirming

So, as we have been saying here for months on end, those who do have the real 'inside knowledge,' will tell you that there is no internal view that ET Aliens all 'come here in peace' - at least, not in the way too many people want to think about it.

Today, the standard mainstream news media started to release the statements of Dr Robert Jacobs, the official military photographer at the US nuclear ballistic missile test sites, saying that he has and that there is, official US government and military film of 'UFO's' slow motion circling nuclear missile warheads and shooting 'laser-like' beams in tightly-grouped shots into them, destroying them on the launch platforms.

Which basically confirms what Captain Robert Salas has been saying for a long time.

Big, noisy, dramatic. Nuclear ballistic 
missile. US one. Works pretty good.

This is exactly in line with what I have been saying here for some time, and going further here, to saying that some of the US intel people knew or know, that there have been communications to the direct and explicit position that ET Aliens do not acknowledge nor do they accept the structures of governments or of society here on Earth and that whilst they will not interfere dramatically, they may be doing other things to do with their own objectives and if governments or human beings get in the way... ...they will be dealt with 'in no uncertain terms.'

ET Aliens are in no way these cute-sy, shy, retiring, exaggeratedly weird-looking hairless beings of the internet memes.

...At some point I will go into what our connection with Lt Colonel Jim Channon and Colonel Nick Rowe was.

The point of following all of the 'extra-Blogsite' text material that we have put out there already, is so that you will know what exactly, is going on, and how, to make use of it, and where and when, to make contact, and why, this is powerfully valuable to you.

I think I've been really at pains to explain to 'dabblers,' that this is not something without its attendant risks. 

Meaning, take an attitude with guys with bigger guns than you and you might find out they are not as patient as everyone wants to impose on them to be.

News from Dr Robert Jacobs

What Happens In The Future

...I'm about to hide things in this article.

I would not really take very seriously any rather recent cultural 'quotable quotes' on the future.

'The future' has proven to be pretty robust for us, given that most of the human race does everything in its power to destroy it most of the time.

That having been said though, it does not mean 'the future for everyone...'

The 'sin' of the people of Sodom and Gomorrah - in the actual Biblical narrative, was their attitude, not their supposed sex crimes.

'Think about the future...'
Prince lyric line from 
Batman!

And today, you can read online reports about modern-day archaeologists 'discovering' some ancient meteor strike somewhere near the Jordan Valley, and which they conclude in these reports, that this must have been the actual natural 'event' re-counted in the Biblical narrative, but which is simply a morality tale there drawing from ancient, though still culturally vaguely 'remembered' local incidents (of the dim past) at the time.

That could well be true.

There are many language and ancient history experts who hold, for example, that the Greek Titan 'Iapetus' is literally the same identity recorded in the Hebrew Bible as 'Japheth.' For some reason not really known to me, they have found a way to believe that Greek ancient societies and their myth-making, is related to the textual records and myth-making accounts of Semitic peoples...

I suppose it is not impossible, given that most Greeks do believe in this semi-serpentine progenitor which is the same person, apparently, as the Hebrews' 'Canaan.'

This is all very amazing to me, frankly, because it is suggestive of a very narrow cultural history of civilized peoples around the Middle East and up into the Eastern Mediterranean - much more so than I would have immediately thought.

But one real 'issue' in trying to manufacture a 'modern, rationalized, scientific meaning' for ancient textual narratives, be they the myths of ancient Japan, or China, or Greece or anywhere, is that this is now taking morality tales - which really are myths - and giving them an actual basis in real happenings of the long long past.

And there is a problem with that - which is, namely, that if the given society does not believe or is not able to link the moral causative elements, then the myth doesn't hold up in their minds and loses its cultural relevance and is forgotten about, lost. So why is it still here?

Orange... ...and what is that, 'mauve?'
It's not 'true cyan' because computers
cannot show that color without
some messin' around.

In other words, why is it all right to say a meteor struck, but then that the people it struck, never actually were these grossly insolent, obstinate, and harmful crowd?

Somehow, there is this imputing that the social/cultural memory lasts as long as the physical event, but not at all with respect to other things, such as what a particular group of people was like.

This is going to be something along the lines of 'yes five hundred thousand Japanese civilians died after nuclear bombs were dropped on them, but actually the people all got on beforehand with those who dropped the bombs on them... ...and no one fought or did bad things; you know, because human beings are good, and they are friendly, and charming, always so peaceful to each other.'

See the problem is not whether you believe 'someone' actually struck Sodom and Gomorrah with a meteor or space lightning or whatever - but that there was some prevailing problem with that group of people and a meteor struck them; the actual key issue being the problematic nature of the people, not the meteor event!

Because if you believe, well, no, they were just 'ordinary people,' and an accidental, incident (which killed them all), has been turned into a morality myth - then you are gratuitously gainsaying one set of facts but then accepting 'a' fact which ran along parallel to the other fact that you have denied - for what logical reason?

French marketing: 'Alexandre J.'

The society around there never said, in drawing what would have been the obvious conclusion: 'Nature/God is a bitch; look what it did to these poor innocent people.'

Instead its memory is quite to the contrary - the social memory is that these guys were a bunch of bastards, to put it crudely.

I have listened to all of the arguments about the scale of the disaster - the number of human deaths. But again, why is this different to the Hiroshima/Nagasaki situation?

Nobody at all says 'there was not a war!'

So when would it to come to be, that human society suddenly alters its current memory that there was a war, to - 'oh, the US destroyed them for no reason at all?'

The US government had a reason, it may have been the wrong reason in an absolute moral sense, but they doubtless did have a reason.

So in other words, to make my own position very clear - today, any super advanced civilization 'extra-the planet,' let's say - would have very good reasons to eliminate most of the human population here.

And your problem is this one - if China sets up very large living platforms in space, then they already would be 'extra-the planet...'

Max Martin - he says Britney Spears
is a genius, by the way.
He produced Adele, Katy Perry, Spears.

And why would they not do things here knowing that you can't go up there and attack them back? Why would they not do those things, knowing that afterwards, they could come back down and have everything to their own liking down here?

It's pointless saying 'not in my lifetime.' 

Because yeah though, it might be in your lifetime!

But meanwhile, things are what they are.

There is no 'God,' and there are no super advanced ET Aliens who are watching you very closely, and well, okay China...

Not to mention the 'Deep State/Reptilian/Rothschilds/who else did I leave out...?'

And of course there are always people willing to surreptitiously fly drones around or play around with projected images in the atmosphere to pretend something too - that's an obvious fact, certainly.

Anyway, it's time for people reading here, to relax. Everything's under control.

LOL

The process is called 'ion plating.'

Hey by the way, did you know, the people with big sophisticated 'sputter' equipment, can 'paint' atomic-sized energetic particles onto glass and metal surfaces, and make things like rainbows on metal or glass? The technique is called 'PVD.'

That's not the trance music producer, it's - 'physical vapor deposition.'

And the general process that is most commercially popular is known as 'rainbow ion plating.'

Pretty cool technology.

Can the human nerve-ending structures pick up 'ions?'

What do you think, can they?

Listen for the lyric line...