What Happens In The Future

...I'm about to hide things in this article.

I would not really take very seriously any rather recent cultural 'quotable quotes' on the future.

'The future' has proven to be pretty robust for us, given that most of the human race does everything in its power to destroy it most of the time.

That having been said though, it does not mean 'the future for everyone...'

The 'sin' of the people of Sodom and Gomorrah - in the actual Biblical narrative, was their attitude, not their supposed sex crimes.

'Think about the future...'
Prince lyric line from 
Batman!

And today, you can read online reports about modern-day archaeologists 'discovering' some ancient meteor strike somewhere near the Jordan Valley, and which they conclude in these reports, that this must have been the actual natural 'event' re-counted in the Biblical narrative, but which is simply a morality tale there drawing from ancient, though still culturally vaguely 'remembered' local incidents (of the dim past) at the time.

That could well be true.

There are many language and ancient history experts who hold, for example, that the Greek Titan 'Iapetus' is literally the same identity recorded in the Hebrew Bible as 'Japheth.' For some reason not really known to me, they have found a way to believe that Greek ancient societies and their myth-making, is related to the textual records and myth-making accounts of Semitic peoples...

I suppose it is not impossible, given that most Greeks do believe in this semi-serpentine progenitor which is the same person, apparently, as the Hebrews' 'Canaan.'

This is all very amazing to me, frankly, because it is suggestive of a very narrow cultural history of civilized peoples around the Middle East and up into the Eastern Mediterranean - much more so than I would have immediately thought.

But one real 'issue' in trying to manufacture a 'modern, rationalized, scientific meaning' for ancient textual narratives, be they the myths of ancient Japan, or China, or Greece or anywhere, is that this is now taking morality tales - which really are myths - and giving them an actual basis in real happenings of the long long past.

And there is a problem with that - which is, namely, that if the given society does not believe or is not able to link the moral causative elements, then the myth doesn't hold up in their minds and loses its cultural relevance and is forgotten about, lost. So why is it still here?

Orange... ...and what is that, 'mauve?'
It's not 'true cyan' because computers
cannot show that color without
some messin' around.

In other words, why is it all right to say a meteor struck, but then that the people it struck, never actually were these grossly insolent, obstinate, and harmful crowd?

Somehow, there is this imputing that the social/cultural memory lasts as long as the physical event, but not at all with respect to other things, such as what a particular group of people was like.

This is going to be something along the lines of 'yes five hundred thousand Japanese civilians died after nuclear bombs were dropped on them, but actually the people all got on beforehand with those who dropped the bombs on them... ...and no one fought or did bad things; you know, because human beings are good, and they are friendly, and charming, always so peaceful to each other.'

See the problem is not whether you believe 'someone' actually struck Sodom and Gomorrah with a meteor or space lightning or whatever - but that there was some prevailing problem with that group of people and a meteor struck them; the actual key issue being the problematic nature of the people, not the meteor event!

Because if you believe, well, no, they were just 'ordinary people,' and an accidental, incident (which killed them all), has been turned into a morality myth - then you are gratuitously gainsaying one set of facts but then accepting 'a' fact which ran along parallel to the other fact that you have denied - for what logical reason?

French marketing: 'Alexandre J.'

The society around there never said, in drawing what would have been the obvious conclusion: 'Nature/God is a bitch; look what it did to these poor innocent people.'

Instead its memory is quite to the contrary - the social memory is that these guys were a bunch of bastards, to put it crudely.

I have listened to all of the arguments about the scale of the disaster - the number of human deaths. But again, why is this different to the Hiroshima/Nagasaki situation?

Nobody at all says 'there was not a war!'

So when would it to come to be, that human society suddenly alters its current memory that there was a war, to - 'oh, the US destroyed them for no reason at all?'

The US government had a reason, it may have been the wrong reason in an absolute moral sense, but they doubtless did have a reason.

So in other words, to make my own position very clear - today, any super advanced civilization 'extra-the planet,' let's say - would have very good reasons to eliminate most of the human population here.

And your problem is this one - if China sets up very large living platforms in space, then they already would be 'extra-the planet...'

Max Martin - he says Britney Spears
is a genius, by the way.
He produced Adele, Katy Perry, Spears.

And why would they not do things here knowing that you can't go up there and attack them back? Why would they not do those things, knowing that afterwards, they could come back down and have everything to their own liking down here?

It's pointless saying 'not in my lifetime.' 

Because yeah though, it might be in your lifetime!

But meanwhile, things are what they are.

There is no 'God,' and there are no super advanced ET Aliens who are watching you very closely, and well, okay China...

Not to mention the 'Deep State/Reptilian/Rothschilds/who else did I leave out...?'

And of course there are always people willing to surreptitiously fly drones around or play around with projected images in the atmosphere to pretend something too - that's an obvious fact, certainly.

Anyway, it's time for people reading here, to relax. Everything's under control.

LOL

The process is called 'ion plating.'

Hey by the way, did you know, the people with big sophisticated 'sputter' equipment, can 'paint' atomic-sized energetic particles onto glass and metal surfaces, and make things like rainbows on metal or glass? The technique is called 'PVD.'

That's not the trance music producer, it's - 'physical vapor deposition.'

And the general process that is most commercially popular is known as 'rainbow ion plating.'

Pretty cool technology.

Can the human nerve-ending structures pick up 'ions?'

What do you think, can they?

Listen for the lyric line...