I cannot say I am all that familiar with whoever is leading the current iterations of what Lt. Colonel Jim Channon started and in what directions it is now heading.
A 'cult' is defined as something in which all the membership follow certainly 'rules' but the individual at the top does everything but follow them!
So Lt. Colonel Jim Channon was never ever a cult leader, that's for sure.
Through the glass, darkly. |
Still, in deifying him - which is not entirely irrational a thing to do in his case - no doubt there will be plenty of dogmatic new 'religions' spun off from what actually happened.
Anyone who hasn't yet received all three of the first pdf's please contact right away and get them.
And those who have started to plow through them, are going to realize at some stage, the abundant reasons why those people in the US military who were 'exploring' the same themes and ideas and even technology in many cases, that Lt. Colonel Channon did - seemingly quite suddenly steered away from 'standard chain of command' formats, many even leaving the military and the government altogether.
I will state the main reason explicitly now.
'Killing at a distance' becomes a thing that any individual completely understands instantly they figure 'oh this is a thing, this is a potential reality -,' is not something to share with absolutely anybody and everybody and certainly not among fellow officers or even higher level commanders because - for one thing, the very reason there is military discipline at all is due to the empowerment to kill that the government authorizes, and which by absolute human social moral necessity, must have constraining rules. There is no such thing as a free-for-all of killing among the ranks just because they are issued with material weapons.
But the standard military also has no means of 'killing at a distance' other than by using the tools of guns, bullets, and flying or falling objects like jets and rockets and missiles and bombs.
Nice colors though... |
Whereas Lt. Colonel Channon's group found out that they could do it by other means.
Today, we are aware that there may be technical means of doing things without any apparent 'physical payload' items - vis-a-vis, for example, the so-called 'Havana Syndrome.'
But if it is simply a question of knowledge only, and then any soldier with said knowledge possesses a real weapon... ...well then what?
The whole undercurrent of what Hollywood popularized as being Jim Channon's ideas, was the misinformation that he was saying you could win a war by having some kind of 'holistic' approach... ...but the real sub-text to that is that he was internally acknowledging the need for moral authority for ultimate weaponry.
Now I need to add two things right away for those who have been recipients of the theory texts, essentially, and those are - 1. there is still something missing from those apparent practical instructions, and believe you me, the missing thing 'shatters light in front of your eyes(!)', and 2. there is an unfortunate trap there with the 'dramatic stuff' of seeing the obvious materialistic 'outwards,' and thereby missing or forgetting about the inner things.
I am going to show an example of this right here, which is, namely, the so-called 'true cyan illusion.'
This is of course, not an illusion, but the effect inside your brain, of the optical cones being overstimulated, and then tuning themselves down as a self-adjustment procedure they have, with the consequence of 'seeing' different colors (frequencies) while the optical cones deplete and 'refuse' some frequencies.
So, this is an 'effect' but it is not an 'extra-physical' effect.
But it is still a remarkable effect though because it is not something we encounter in our 'ordinary' use of our vision on a daily basis.
In that same way, what you will encounter using the final element of the 'electron spintronics' is also quote remarkable - but the difference is that it goes well beyond just 'a color' and into every single experience, every single way of experiencing through your normal senses, and into so much more than that too...
The temptation - like what happened to William Shatner - is to think that because he has been able to use a tin can to enter 'space,' and because he has felt with all of his senses, the power of the rocket, the feelings, the vibrations, the noise, the pressure of gravity, that 'space' means 'death' because there is nothing out there and little in the way of sensory stimuli happening out there. ...He hasn't really entered space at all - he is 'going' to it and staying inside a shell which keeps him and space physically apart.
Shatner should have taken his comfort blanket with him - he was feeling all alone up there. |
He hasn't used his quiet mind hardly at all, which is the thing which can 'enter' emptiness, because it has been dominated in the moments by the immediate simple mortal senses.
He never noticed that the Vedas ten thousand years ago already taught that 'Shiva' ('Shi' - no; 'Va' - thing) is Death and also empty space and yet also real life.
Human material lifespan life is death, in fact; in fact it is known certain death at the end of the lifespan.
So Shatner was wrong. But he was misled by the immediacy of the senses and their demanding nature.
If you go with your physical mortal body up into space, then to stay there for any genuine duration, you will need to have both different kinds of physical structural 'habituation' compared to what you grew used to on Earth gravity and conditions, and continuous cloning availability for other reasons we don't need to go into here.
...This music track -, because William Shatner thought he was all alone up there:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your considered comments are welcome