"When Star Flowers Fall"

Those of you who have been with us for a while are in for a treat. We're going to write a new 'Bond story' right here.

And the really clever ones among you will end up with dollars in your hand.

I am going to take you, step-by-step, through the active process of what would ordinarily be 'outlier analysis' of an official kind - these things come from academia; they don't come from any 'MI5/6' or anyone else anyway - they start where the intellectuals are, or are being trained.

A writer in Dukes Bar, where Fleming
invented his 'Vesper Martini.' 
Or I think he invented it, or something...

But in this case, not only is this not 'outlier' anything, but you will watch it all unfold before your very eyes in real life, out there 'up' on the world stage, and by the end of it, you will be left wondering whether stories about 'walking on water' are not just true, but ridiculously, absurdly so, and that we have all been led down a garden path into nowhere in life -, where we might have been going actually 'somewhere.'

So... Let us begin.

Sometimes, it is a mistake to read too much into certain things. Tamiko Bolton is not a Chinese 'honey trap.' And she is not a Japanese 'honey trap,' either. She is not a 'honey trap' at all.

But that's not the problem.

...Let me explain something to you that will never make it into the Western newspapers. This week's return to the so-called 'Lux Leaks,' or 'Panama Papers' - although they are now being termed 'the Pandora Papers' - are designed to give everyone the impression that these literally are actual documents obtained or 'leaked' from private banks about secret bank accounts.

Well apart from the fact that secret banking - or 'confidential banking' - does not fundamentally operate this way, in that no such records like these are ever made internally, the source of the 'secret banks' is not in a location where genuine highest level secret banks are.

I don't have a problem with a female
'Bond.' This is Luci Romberg, and she can run up
that wall all the way. And, she is sponsored by
Aston Martin, so I don't know WTH
the Bond producers are doing!!

Oh yes, there is certainly a widespread public opinion to the effect that Panama and Caribbean banking are locations for such things; but it simply isn't true with respect to major private, secret banking.

What you are being 'offered' by the media, are a few African politicians' attempts to hide wealth, as usual too, the Kingdom of Jordan's leadership accounts (Jordan is broke and a puppet of the West) and then, mixed in with those relatively truthful accounts' details, are sophisticated accounting reconstructions, albeit they will proceed from genuine known facts in the hands of MI6 and Europol, but which are not actual 'money' trails but people trails.

To those of you who are very clever, suspicious, and paranoid, the quite recent situation to do with the mistress of the then king of Spain, reveals something: you see, the Spanish king already realized that it would have been little use to him, to use the Spanish 'secret banking' networks... ...to hide his affairs. And so, I am directly asserting that one of the locations of 'secret banking' is Spain, and inter alia particularly those industrial-linked countries that very big Spanish concerns have major associations with - Columbia and Mexico particularly, and I hope you can 'make the connection.' About something... ...that comes from out of those two places.

The Spanish banking scene can handle itself and so it's not a big issue mentioning them here.

And now, I am going to switch back to the recent theme in these pages, to do with assassination. Nobody is free from the 'karma' of killing. Even though I have mentioned in the past, that there is no penalty among the 'ganas' or 'devas' for killing an entity that has not reached the base chakra of the celestial (the human biological 'base chakra' is simply the one you are familiar with, but the 'base chakra' of the divine being, is the violet chakra in the head, or active intentional, willed intellect) - there is a consequence for killing some being that has reached this secondary level, and even for the killing of lesser beings, the higher beings resent that they have to do it at all.

Kris Singh has his Astons
painted with real Moondust. We could
have ours with just plain white paint...
...And the Stardust Melody as its aura.

So their very anger itself is a kind of 'karmic' result.

That is why, by the way, in the Sutras, large earthquakes and volcanic eruptions are said to take place, because they are a foretelling that some major Divinely-ordered killing is going to happen. The anger of the devas is shown before the event, so that afterwards, they do not need to remain angry too much, since the necessary thing has been carried out. It is before the necessary thing that their anger reaches a peak - because they are angry the evil being does not retract from its course and direction while it has a chance to.

When you consider a 'Bond story structure' it looks like there is a 'villain,' but, in fact in all of the books (I can't think of one that isn't this way), there is someone who is not so much simply 'evil,' as unique and innovative in their plan to upset the apple-cart, so to speak.

Goldfinger does not want to steal the gold in Fort Knox - he wants to irradiate it to render it useless to trade. He already has a sufficient 'lock' on enough trade-able gold supplies.

To a large extent before the 'ultimate contest' phase begins - the one in which the ludicrously undermanned MI6 throws it's 'Mr Bond James Bond' into the fray - the 'villain' already has the material in hand that he wishes to exploit.

I don't have to kill you to hurt you.

In the same way, if I were a truly evil and villainous person, with amazing resources, I would kidnap Tamika Bolton, not because I do not already know all there is to know about George Soros - but when I tortured her on camera, and showed it to you, then you would believe what it is about George I already know...

The meaningful consequences flow from what you believe, not from what I already know.

And then, of course, since this is just a story, a fictional fairy tale, we too, can throw in our 'Mr Bond James Bond' and he, or she, or some t-gender or neuter Chinese-plus-mixed-ethnic eunuch who likes to wear bunny ears (because this is, as you know, the contemporary glamour fashion ideal... lol), can 'rescue' Tamika and neuter-a-lize the villain of the piece.

LOL

That's not going to happen in our fairy tale, of course, but you know what I mean.

Here's our opening theme song. By MaryJo Lilac, and man can she sing.

Is It Really Dangerous?

(I shouldn't be so dire! I know, I know. I'll get back to the calm, cute stuff soon).

There is a brilliant Australian academic, one time head of China analysis for the Australian Defense Department, Paul Monk - and one of the things he says about analysis that has to be made from only very limited clear facts, or at some distance of time, particularly, from the thing or the people being looked at, is that you have to have an accountable conclusion; when you reach it.

And that is a very important thing.

The Hollywood 'imaginators' call this
a 'biomask.'

There are too many people at highest levels these days who are simply not accountable, realistically, they are not - and their decisions suffer from the arrogance which comes from that level of personal comfort.

The very idea of accountability is manifold. One can be 'accountable' in terms of the process itself that one is using, but then, one can also be accountable in terms of the actual results of the mistakes in reaching a wrong conclusion.

In academic discussions about risk (and this applies equally to economic risk evaluation), one always considers the weight (the value, or the depth of losses) of the outcome when looking at the 'odds,' or the 'chances.'

So, although the odds might be long against something happening, that may not be a sufficient reason not to assume that 'risk' if the outcome itself (the favorable one) were really exorbitantly huge and the 'ante up' not very big. (Leaving aside for the moment the other aspect of 'comparative risk assessment:' the question of making choices between two or several different things).

EG 'Poor soldier risks his head to uncover the mystery of the dancing shoes' - in that fairy tale. If he 'wins,' he will effectively become a prince and get to marry the princess of his choosing.

He is too old to fight in any more wars, he doesn't have many marketable skills, and he is more or less coming to the end of his life anyway...

You gotta love that! Ferrari 375.

Going back to the thing in view here - if an advanced intelligent species were to make overt threats to kill just one person, the 'accountability' question resolves quite neatly and easily to an assessment of the influence spread of that target, and an outright moral assessment over one person's death.

But if they were to make overt threats to literally massacre a lot of people, the moral dimensions shift to well, why? Why actually kill so many individual living people?

If you go back to the ancient traditional narrative, by example (we have to leave out the so-called 'Battle of Kurukshetra;' it's too complicated for the moment to consider that), of Sodom and Gomorrah, was there ever a point where those people were warned at all? That doesn't appear to emerge clearly from the narrative at all. All it says is many people complained for a long time about the behavior of the rulers of S & G.

I actually was listening to a real 
'analyst' (yes, one of those; a female too)
just today and I'm fascinated that she 
thought she was so smart she knew what 'louche'
meant, having repeated what is everywhere
across the internet about what it is supposed
to mean. ...Thought, she knew, anyway.
I never said anything. I'm telling you I don't
believe what the on-line definitions say. And
I don't care they claim some Latin word origin.

It never says that any 'prophet' was ever sent there and told them 'oh you'd be watch out, because otherwise you're gonna get smashed!'

LOL

Actually, funny because the New Testament says 'it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day... ...than for that city.' Meaning various places that are not doing whatever it is that they are supposed to be doing.

Well how is it going to be 'more tolerable?' How much worse intolerable are things expected to be now??

There are a bunch of places in the Jordan Valley, notable now Tall el-Hammam, where there is nothing but sulfur and salt crystals and smashed silicon from what might have been a meteor collision and massive heat damage.

Well I personally cannot condone slaughtering 6 million people or anything from '1' innocent naive person up to that many (6 mil) - in say, oh, um, some island place like Singapore.

So my vote will not be cast for anything like that.

...On the other hand, it wouldn't be beyond the thinking to do something a whole lot worse still.

My my though, what could even be 'a whole lot worse?'

I don't know! Why don't you ask those who deeply probe the Bible. LOL

They must surely know something, at least.

'It will be more tolerable in that day for the land of Sodom...'

Wow. Really?

Not scared at all, anyone, right?

You see these creatures emerging from out of the depths of the abyss wearing their 'biomasks' and we shall see who's tough then. Won't ever happen, you say?

Uh-huh.

Let me see, where shall we cast the lot.

So, what would even be the point of hitting some 'innocent' place like Singapore with HAARP-style weaponry?

Even now, the US State Department is floating some damn silly nonsense about people literally pumping the sound of 'Indian crickets' into those embassies to distract attention from what they were really using to knock down a couple of people.

You can't stop them, see.

Singapore - very pretty colored lights at nighttime.

They will go and go and go and they will suck the blood right out of you even while you're still alive.

Because they are simply not accountable. If you don't know something, then just say it: 'I don't know.' But don't manufacture stories (leave that kind of stuff to people like me, please!) in order to have the public believe you are on top of things, and can handle them, and have things 'under control.' 

These guys totally do not have things under control.

And it is going to get worse.

You gotta understand something, right - you fellas in Washington (forget the UK, you people are lost) - if China wants to send a hundred jet planes near, right up near, to Taiwan's face, then you had better wake up to the fact, the fact mind you, that they have already fully compromised places like Singapore, right under your noses.

More pretty colored lights in Singapore
at nighttime.

So yeah Singapore is 'under the gun.' ...If you go by the 'theory' that Washington was severely warned in no uncertain terms in 1967, regarding the further and future use of nuclear weapons, then you had better plan for, 'things happening' where neither you nor 'they' (being the CCP Chinese) have supposed that you were actually vulnerable. And where you are both mucking around with nukes. And that would be Singers.

The trouble is, I guess people really do want the pain and the suffering and the hurt.

Human cultural, folkloric narratives are replete with this kind of thing. But every single time, you get the same band of leaders - well, actually, they're not 'leaders,' they are rulers and overlords, falling for the same stupid trap. There's nothing really all that mysterious, or occult or even 'esoteric' about it: some guy at the top does not have any limits, and he goes and does ten stupid things more than he might have stopped at and gotten away with - and because he is manipulating a huge underlying web of things, when somebody turns on him, like, oh um, a spider bites his leg and he gets sick and weak, then those around him attack him in order to take over themselves. The whole web falls apart because the spider in the middle is not weaving the strands now. And then, that is when the earthquakes and eruptions and lava and magma - and all of that drama - follow.

When did we post this pic here?
Can't remember. I'll have to go back and look...
Wonder why we did that?

What's 'mysterious' about that? Since when ever did such a thing not happen? Right now today there are MEK people conspiring inside Iran, but we can't talk about that because we might set the cat amongst the pigeons there. Right now today... Well, maybe let's not say any more.

Historians have never thought about the relative 'success' of Mao. What they never factor in is that China was not any kind of geopolitical, economic threat to anyone back then. They'd had a dirty war with Japan, and the world was occupied with smashing the Nazis. Stalin and Mao 'got away' because of the particular historical context. Not because they were smart and not because they were right. When people talk about 'false flags' they always want to pin that on the CIA - but the guy who will make that mistake is Xi. Except he doesn't appreciate that the Germans have several lines direct into his bathroom. And they know what his every single next move is.

So. Whatever happens, you have a bunch of people to 'pin it on.' LOL

Sure I'd love it to be the case that super-dooper technology could be provided like people provide parks - everyone goes to them and enjoys them: Muslims wearing cricket gear play English cricket, Sudanese and Senegalese play soccer football, mothers take their li'l kids to the swings and slides and sandpit, angry old men and self-involved young women take their dogs around.

But racehorses, you don't train on these wide open spaces with lots of lush green grass. They get small round lunge yards, and very restricted compounds and narrow training strips...

But when they get onto the big wide open bowling-green racetrack... Well...

Electron Spintronics Massage Therapy

Yep. The time has come, the Walrus said.

So we have this release of incredible information available now.

But this is really an 'only for money' thing. At the top end it is, anyway.

And that's because partly, it's very dangerous stuff.

This is not an old car. This is 
a brand new car. A complete
recreation, with modern running gear,
of a Lancia.

I 'might' - might - put up some broad explanations here depending...

It's the same thing as the 'Digital Dirhams' pricing and you have to go through there anyway because whoever gets involved will have the exact same thing going on with them: they will get a specific registration number eventually, with an underlying value returning back via the parent 'Digital Dirham.' 

Because, you see, 'spintronics' is nothing but an extension of some ideas from optics written about way back by Al Kindi, the Arabic writer! Oh yes. It's another thing that Einstein thieved and same with today's fake-assed 'scientists' - all they know how to do is thieve and pretend they 'discovered' something -, came up with it themselves. Some of you are not going to liek that, but it's true though. What did Einstein really come up with himself? He stole the main stuff from Olinto De Pretto and appropriated everything else that Max Planck really discovered, turning it into his own 'stock in trade' and branding it with his name all over everything. Everybody knows it. They're just sold on the mythology of Einstein today because that's what the propaganda has been in schools and Universities.  

And the T-shirts...!

Whoever mentioned that - if you want to go ahead and plan to actually make them - well we can sell them via the same process as well if you want. 

Because, because, in the fullness of time, all the people actually using the electron spintronics technology will probably want to identify themselves as possessing it and able to use for other people.

This is not available to anyone anywhere else in the whole world. This is literally straight off a 'craft.'

Yeah you don't believe that, do you?

But not this Lancia - this really is
an 'old' car. And it's red. 

Hah!

Little do you know, brothers and sisters - that is -, human 'cousins.'

I don't know about 'Daughters of Elysium,' though; that could already be some heavy metal band or something like. Cultural miss-appropriation again! What can you do? Nothing.

'Aliens' Gifts Of Salt' is to do with electron spintronics.

There. Said it.

Maybe we could say 'People From Elysium.'

Well, they are 'people.'

Here are some pics of 'people.'

One of them is G. Bruce Boyer - the leading American journalist on high quality men's attire.

In one of his lectures, Boyer told a story about a literary writer being asked how come 'we cannot build these things, like this anymore?' (He was talking about some French cathedral, I think). And the writer in the story of Boyer, says: 'Well that's easy. We do not have convictions anymore.'

Boyer - journalist.

It's not completely true that 'we' cannot build such amazing art things anymore.

I think the chief designer at BMW today, Domagoj Dukec can do it and has done it.

The Italians in the car business have completely lost it though. 

Yet the Italians in the clothing business seem not to have. And you have to just consider who is really running the big heavy industrials in Italy - there is no longer any Gianni Agnelli. 

They are fakers now. Frauds. They have no style - not in heavy industry, not the top guys there.

People like Bill Gates too. Even he says 'I have a lot of money.' Well do you though?

Show me. Build the cathedral.

Build the Lancia.

He's slinging off at Bezos and the shape of that stoopid 'rocket' but what has he got? Anything better?

...So what can you do with electron spintronics?

Well what does David R. Hawkins say?

But everybody wants a gun in their hands. They still want to go see a Bond flick where the protagonist shoots someone with his little pistol in his hand that he is waving around.

Okay at least, 'that he pulled out of his tux.' LOL

You want the tux?

You have to listen to G. Bruce Boyer, at minimum.

You don't want the Bond girl because there isn't any Bond girl anymore.

Why can't 'we' make them like we used to...?

The Bond girls.

Nice little cute, calm, tame song, by another friend - the very very beautiful Haliene.

Some of you, not all of you, still think I'm kidding around. I dare you to go to Haliene's Twitter account... That will be 'Alien' except with an 'H.' Is that what it says there, or not? LOL

The Crisis Of Villainy

As soon as someone is cast in the role of a major movie 'villain's' part, or they actually end up playing the character in the movie - whatever movie it is - forever they are 'type-cast' as bad and as evil.

All film-goers (even myself included!), are 'credulous' always in a sense, because we deliberately choose to 'suspend the bridge of disbelief' as soon as we enter the cinema.

Yet, even so, we do still carry into the movie house with us our own actual personal life's context - the whole audience does do that - and so in a sociological sense, our credulity extends only insofar as certain functional internal story elements go; it does not extend past that into completely false ideas about the societies in which we live.

Lukasz Gottwald - 'Dr Luke.'
Very successful record producer.
Came out of a box...

In places that are not free societies - as far as any of us may say that any one of us really does live in any such a free place anyway nowadays - things are many stages removed from actual social context being reflected as truth inside the story up on the screen. You will not watch a film in China today that says bad things about the CCP, or it's 'Emperor For Life,' Xi.

You will smile, and clap at the appropriate key moments.

...In China. ...Watching a China-made film.

Movies like 'Bond' will attempt to reflect the modern social context inside the movie, as part of an audience-accessible 'reality' - especially when it comes to mechanistic matters, say, of science and technology.

The public expects it.

The most fundamental 'functional' elements of a Bond movie are: 'Bond is kind of good, his employers are completely good, and the villains are bad, purest evil.'

And no one believes that any more.

A percentage of the audience takes in with it, the suspicion that MI5 arranged and carried out the murder of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed. It doesn't matter why they did that, it's the impression now left in the minds of many people out in the public.

A percentage of the global audience takes in with it, a pre-commitment to Harry and Megan, and a general antipathy towards the UK side of things.

Ken McCallum - current DG of MI5

Notwithstanding that such perceptions might be wildly ludicrous (and I'm not saying they are, necessarily; there will certainly be completely opposed views of course), yet it is simply a fact that the audience is today polarized, very divided, and there are reasons for it:

The UK government is, for instance, grossly improperly detaining Julian Assange - there has never been any legal opinion at any level in the 'British legal mind,' to the effect that Justice delayed is in anyone's interests at all.

A large chunk of a global audience is rooting for the UK government and by association the 'Crown' - to fail and to lose.

I am very personally aware of what the 'issue' is with Julian Assange but even I cannot go that far to think or plan about 'assassinating him' simply because I might or could have government backing to do it (we're talking about a movie fictional context here!). Yet evidence is being tendered to a UK court this week to the effect that such a plan was genuinely 'on the table' with some 'arm' of a secret agency somewhere.

Morality does not come in the liquid dregs of a martini coup!

Just because someone 'orders a martini' is no indication that they are morally okay beneath the hard surface!

Czar Peter the Great Mont Blanc pen.

This martini business, yes, is a leitmotif for the Bond character but so what though?

But now I am going to lay something on you that you might not have thought about before...

Fleming was not a member of the active, operational UK secret services.

He was a reporter for The Sunday Times newspaper (not connected with 'The Times').

And now I'm going to tell you something 'funny' about UK newspapers - for one thing 'The Times' is one of the chief recruiting agencies for MI5.

For reasons not known to anybody, all UK spies are gay. 

And so, even though Fleming never worked for 'The Times,' my friends - his whole thing about the womanizer 'Bond' is a joke Fleming is throwing at the London City establishment in their 'shadowy world' where they are all gay.

Additionally, there is another theme running across any of these matters to do with major national issues, and that is that 'class' at the putative 'top,' is also split along various European family lines and ancient loyalties.

Pic sent in by our 'man in the field.' Fact.

'Henry White ' - the man who started The Sunday Times, was not English; he might have been Irish or Scots and way way back, from some kind of Norse roots. Again, on top of that, the White Family is from the British Indian Army circles and that places them firmly not, in the mob from London City; which is the same crowd that backs the Windsors.

Sir Roger Hollis, now, was he actually a double agent - literally was the man in charge for a good long time, from 1956 to 1965, of MI5. He had been, previously the Deputy Director General under Dick White. And there's your problem right there - White was from the 'White' family (The Sunday Times).

Hollis though, was a man with deeply split loyalties, because he would have been sympathetic to White and his moderately aristocratic ties, because... ...Hollis was a relative of the Russian Royal Family. I'm afraid, and in spite of major propaganda by the UK spooks over decades and decades to pretend that it isn't so - it is so.

Now you see the other problem MI5 and MI6 have, with people like me, is you try and pull the wool over the eyes of those not in the aristocracy and well fine, you might get away with it.

But they will be walking up a very long and steep road to even pretend any of them there today have the 'inner linguistics' which are known only to actual aristocracy...

Hollis was partly of Russian aristocratic descent.

Did that necessarily make him the actual double agent the CIA itself and the assorted 'witch-smellers' of the UK spycatcher group - people such as Jane Sissmore (born in Bengal...) thought that he was?

It doesn't matter.

From our man. Or woman, not saying.

What matters for the sake of finding out what a solid, believable movie 'villain' character would be today - is defining what the public hates viscerally today.

It hates being cheated.

It hates people lording it over them with overwhelming power (EG Emperor Xi of Beijing), who have cheated to get there and then cheat to remain there.

I hope though, you are getting the point that no one can really tell who or what 'the UK' actually represents today. It certainly does not represent an ideal system of human legal justice...

And if they have been trading uninterrupted with China for more than two hundred and fifty years, despite what was going on on the surface, then what even is such a thing as 'a side?' Assange got support from Chinese technology people. But the UK is going out of its way to, well, subtly kill him, really.

The US wants him, but funnily enough they still haven't actually got him. The story was floated that the CIA had plans to kill him...

These matters are way too convoluted to be reduced into some caricature of 'villainy' that can be represented easily in a pop flick.

The World War eras - I and II - gave the public the idea that guns and knives and bombs are the weaponry of choice. The presumed sheer potency of a tiny little pistol in the hands of Mr Bond, James Bond, is a weird kind of psychological support to people who had been bombed in the wars. For generations, they all still felt there was some chance of 'fighting back' - defending oneself - with a little gun in your hands.

Human inside? You wouldn't know.
How would you know??

Even today, the most well-equipped preppers all over the place have semi-auto rifles and Glocks and all that kind of thing. They really do feel, that when the zombies invade - or the ET Aliens that look like insects, or I dunno what else - that some bullets will resolve the situation.

The thing that gives Americans the right to have a gun, legally in their hands, is a piece of paper with some words on it.

It is a little bit of a chicken-and-egg question. Which came first, the gun that backed the piece of paper, or the guy with the words and the ideas?

'Power' does matter - always.

But in the same way that not enough people will ever be around in the general public to comprehend the meaning of the pic above about the pen, fewer still will understand this: 'What are you, O mighty mountain?'

The world has moved on since the times of the recent really big wars - WWI and WWII.

So have a certain tiny small handful of people too.

The 'Bond' of today is so scary, so genuinely powerful, that if you actually told it you the ordinary member of the general public what he/she were like, they would possibly want to turn on them.

The 'villain' is also the 'Bond,' in one sense.

Garrison Restaurant - 
not far from those Ferraris. LOL
Not our pic, though.

It is no longer about 'liberating' the public from oppression - the general public has utterly and fully chosen its fate.  

The public is dying.

Its leaders all believe they are living and surviving but they too, are dying.

And I know you don't believe me.

It's the smile you should take several looks at though... 

Happy Playtime

Soon, here, right here in this very place, there will be some matters arrive - which 'are unusual and likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialized knowledge or interest.'

If you go Google-search the word 'esoteric,' you will find: 'intended for or likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialized knowledge or interest.'

LOL

I would cast this fellow as 'Q' and I
just gave a lot away right there.

Well I'm not exactly sure why they would be 'of interest to only a small number of people,' because in fact, everyone is looking for these things and cannot find them.

See one problem is of course, that no one really expects to find them!

The forward projections of science are just as filled with silly and often really quite trivial too, fantasies that everyone already knows cannot be fulfilled. For example, personal consciousness being transferred into your computer; some latest AI machine... Or, switching off all of the aging genes entirely and then, even integrating some kind of 'self-fixing' biological process into a living human body - so that, when your flying jet-scooter crashes into the side of a building you 'didn't see coming(!)' all of your physical injuries will self-heal in about twenty minutes.

The jet-bikes will happen, the other stuff will not.

But still, today's scientists are pulled on by the adventure of thinking and talking rubbish and fantasizing about an impossible future.

And then, big-noting themselves to all and sundry about 'how much promise science holds.'

Science is limited by geometry.

This is 'M.'

Actually, the correct wording is 'delimited.' It means having fixed boundaries.

People fantasize about finding certain things, but they don't have genuine hopes of realizing on those things.

Let me give you a banal example, though one which is timely, and one that I have been rolling around in my mind for years now:

The Bond Producers cannot write an authentic contemporary 'Bond villain,' see. Never mind that they have been living off those villains that a long-dead Trans-Atlantic Brit invented out of an era that...

...okay, partly, I come from that era. Let me tell you what would have happened to a woman in high society who told her mother, aunts, female friends - that she had been raped (whether by Bond or someone else).

They would have slapped her face.

That is something you, if you are from today's generations of youngsters (I mean people younger than sixty at least!), would not even begin to have the first idea about why that would have ever even been the case.

Trust me, my friends, there were no dumb women in upper class society. Not as a general rule. Sure there might have been dumb women, but I never met any.

But there are dumb women today. Plenty of them.

Kristen Stewart is not one of them.

That is a proper Hebrides wool tartan
on the right and a 'certain' armorial
family colors on the left.
And none of it, is by accident.
Poor Andrew. LOL

All of you who have been reading here for a very long time, know that I am a Stewart - as in, literally that kind of Stewart. So is she. 

Those of you who have read that book of ours 'How She Should Make Love - The Witches Of Demeter' should have just fallen off your chair then, unless you too are pretty thick, which I know you are not.

When you watch the trailer for the just-released hit flick 'Spencer' you will hear K-Stew deliver the lines 'Here in this house, there is no future; the past and the present are the same thing.'

For those lines alone, she should win the Oscar outright 'by panels of fencing,' as they say.

I am an aristocrat make no mistake, and an authentic one. The Windsors, in our eyes, are middle class people - they are not aristocrats. They never came from aristocracy and they have never been aristocracy.

K-Stew is the very epitome of aristocracy.

LOL - got it yet?

I'm not sure because I haven't Google-searched it (Google is truth, Google is God), but I think last year the twenty-five year embargo period on the Crown Coroner's ruling and the summing up in the trial of Dr Stephen Ward was up - but the UK government slapped on a further twenty six years to keep those things secret from the public.

Now why would that be, d'you think, if they had nothing to hide? There is no 'Communist threat.' There is no 'Soviet Union.'

This is real 'liminality' here
in this pic. Very good photography.
...It's turning to evening now, see.
Time when the monsters come out.

I mean of course I could tell you what the 'Profumo Affair' was really all about. Same as I could divulge secrets about the government of say, Singapore, for example, that would curl your eyelashes.

But I'll not do those things.

Just yet.

Another problem with the latest iteration of the Bond films, is that they know perfectly well the villains are the UK 'secret services' themselves which are all linked up to global banking and finance and the top tier accountancy firms, not so much the lawyer firms which are American-based albeit with 'global head offices' in Switzerland.

Deep down inside people's souls, they have this disquiet that 'if' the UK secret service somewhere, killed Princess Di and Dodi, then they - the audience, the public - cannot whole-heartedly give their support to Bond.

So yeah, I want Orlando, Katheryn Pereira's wife, to be the next Bond, but then again, I really don't want him caught up in all of that saga. I know he's working out heaps to get a 'buff' body and all... He wants the role.

...See how I neatly took y'all away from the esoteric matters that will soon crop up here.

Bond is playtime, nothing more.

Oh yeah he can do it, all right.
Don't you worry 'bout that!

But nothing less though, either!

Maybe just one time more, before we go into the esotericism here, you can all indulge me, just one more time - as I set out for you what a really good 'Bond villain' would be like, in the next exciting article.

And hey, if you have ideas too about that let us know.

And if you hated what I just posted, well, as Brie Larson... Nah nah, you can let me know that as well.