Why 72 Virgins...

So, Lesbian Jesus, right? That's the latest new 'amazing' stunt from Hollywood - although it is coming via the pretense of being an 'Indie' production. Starring Paris Jackson. Definitely not, Indie.

Well look, you cannot have it 'both ways' (LOL) - either God is All-Powerful, or God is not and has limited capabilities. As an exercise in exploring the themes of human moral agency, it is okay to consider the possibilities of a 'lesbian Jesus.' Albeit I would like to warn women of that inclination of gender political mind, that the world will still crucify you all the same, woman or not.

'Lesbian Jesus' is the Cosine of Radius 1,
if 'X.0' is the Axis origin. LOL
Why not? People say anything these days.

At this point I would like to alert those who have been reading here over recent times, that it is getting to the stage where it is necessary to distract, obscure, and maybe even deceive the mischievous and malevolent... And you know the funny thing is that those kinds of people will easily be led down the wrong paths, because they are seeking power and control themselves, and the means they always think this is to be had, is via 'data, facts and knowledge.'

You may recall a while back that I posted a GIF of a rolling axis, whose twin circles of differing radius nonetheless traced the exact same linear distance when 'rolled out' along the exact same straight track - intuitively, you would think the bigger circle would trace a different distance to the inner circle.

As we look at trigonometry, we see that in fact, wave amplitudes along frequency curves are really, the same thing as the radial distances of the circles we looked at previously in that other (the GIF) example. And so trigonometry simply calculates triangle side lengths and thus the ratios of related inner angles to side lengths. And in 3-D motion (well, that's I suppose 4-D because of the time component), this is all about wavelengths and frequencies, isn't it?

Christianity is not the only traditional religious system under fire from those interested in messing with the 'template' of social constructs we have been using for a long time. 

In Iraq today there is a noted Islamic scholar - Syed Sheikh Ahmed Al-Gubbanchi - who has utterly crashed through the modern Sunni dogma and previously accepted 'facts' about Islam and the Quran, and he has openly said both that the text used today is provably false, basically a forgery and a concoction made by political interests in successive iterations, and that there was something known as 'the Quran' and that it is not this thing around today.

Simple trigonometry - rotational vectors, linear forward.

But he will hit the same wall as indeed Christian scholars will too, when they point to various key passages of text -, which consists of people not really wanting to actually know the truth, even if it is of greater actual, real, even miraculous, benefit to them.

Let's just for 'thought experiment' purposes, take one seemingly completely absurd element - this thing about '72 virgins.' Another one of the current blazing riots going on in Islamic apologetics right now, is the qira'at translation of a word 'al barea' in the Quran. In one version of the written Quran, the word is 'al barea,' (the creation/creatures) and in another one, it is 'al bare/ah' (the innocent). Well look, I am going to say something no one else does say - this word is like the Latin-esque 'prima vera...' Vera. 'B' is often 'V' in many languages. It means the new, the new-born, the first of, and so on; also the purest of.

In geometry and in trigonometry, you can reverse an image, turn a shape around, and see it from a different angle.

EDM festival pashmina shawl

The standard thing in the old days of Christian churches, was that women were supposed to wear veils because they could distract 'angels' that were possibly in attendance there...

A normal human female, someone born and raised on this planet, is affected by a lot of 'life cycle' things, effects that are pertinent to this actual place, this location in Galactic space. Whereas someone from some distant place, even let's just say hypothetically, living on a 'Death Star' satellite somewhere relatively hidden in this solar system, will have no such habitual experience.

And by contrast we all know that men are often aggressive and transgressing, and this is due to the effects of various biochemical effects inside their normal biology - the concept of moral agency among humans is often just a question of how we mediate or modify natural predispositions of biochemistry.

Categorically, the Bible itself depicts 'otherwordly' beings as having the appearance of a rather feminine kind of beauty - but this contradicts, or stands in contradistinction to the idea that 'angels' are distracted and affected by female beauty, per se.

So if we turn the geometry of the narrative construct around, and look at its obverse - what if there are numerically more 'females' in Jannah, than 'males' on account of biochemistry and biochemical predisposition.

EDM festival gear

Every single commentator from out of the military research fields, who 'went mad and went rogue' and started to produce books and do seminars about the 'aliens' in Roswell, all say - all of them - that these aliens claim to be afraid or at least wary, of the aggressiveness of humans.

The other thing you may discover if you venture into any of the weird and whacky literature, is that the places that any human person are taken to interface with any of these alien groups parked not far off the planet - and there is plenty of written, virtual nonsense, really, about there ever having been some formal US military detachment of selected people 'sent' off-world to learn about technology or whatever - is that these places are virtually completely empty, and they also have a uniform 'white' or glaring, glowing, white color-scheme wherever they take the human personnel.

The reason there are '72' females to every '1' human male, is because this is a superficial effect of biochemistry and 'not-Earth' usual location for someone to be 'living.'

Now I certainly don't expect anyone to 'believe' any of what I am saying here. That would be silly of me. But I would just simply say, that all of the major 'books' of ancient history, especially religious or 'supernatural' narrative 'history,' consist of ideas of those who were trying to convey something, even where they were given extremely accurate explanations of what they were supposed to be looking at, and understanding - and what we tend to do today, what people have tended to do down through centuries, is re-interpret things according to our own immediate levels of science and cultural and social knowledge.

No comment, right?

You cannot break past the pure BS on-line, on places such as Wikipedia typically, and every other place that 'follows suit,' on subjects like the ideas, the language, writing, sounds of words, and their meanings too, and of course the mythology and religion, of ancient Sumeria - you will never get past or be permitted to go beyond Jordan Maxwell's magnetic (and wrong) interpretation about all of this, and the manifesto of popular entertainments like the movie 'Zeitgeist.'

The words 'Inanna,' 'Anunnaki,' and 'Ishtar' are actually in the New Testament... But they are nothing at all, like what people such as Jordan Maxwell, say they are or are meant to describe. And you will not be told what they mean in there, that is, in the Gospels and New Testament, in any modern-day exegesis either. They simply don't know, because - and you will appreciate this, logically - they are coming off the levels of social advancement and awareness, of the past; of past eras. You need to take things from a future perspective, not a past one.

Some of these words are actually in 'the Lord's Prayer.' I have one Russian language translator friend, who does work for the Kremlin now and then, and he has told me: 'You are utterly shameless, aren't you?' And then he described the distance apart in 'word meaning' as being like the valleys made by one's knuckles, and then the side of the wall in the living room, away!

Empty white rooms, Stanley? Yes?

He is wrong.

What I am showing you and telling you are things as best I can locate in generic pics off the internet, that are the exactly closest things to what you will see, if you were literally 'there' yourself. It is what it is.

And if you 'mark your course' according to the course beacons set by the kinds of things implicit in what I have been saying, you will suddenly discover every other thing rapidly falls into place.

The Responsibility Of 'Agency'

I like this concept. The phrasing is rather modern, and it comes from modern academic philosophical discussions of people such as Kant and Bentham and the Australian Utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer. I am personally not a Utilitarian - I do not hold such a stance - however, for the purposes of examining this concept, we must take their own wording about the 'real object of moral action,' which is, that of 'the avoidance of suffering.'

It isn't possible to avoid suffering. Truly moral agents suffer on behalf of so-called 'moral patients' - namely, those others who are entitled to moral consideration, such as the disabled and animals, for instance.

The attractiveness of bubbles...

As individuals, assuming we are of the kind 'who both hear and understand' and therefore are the only ones able to reach this 'other place,' this place of 'nesting in the branches thereof as birds of the air...' ...we cannot personally always sustain the required energy of continuously thinking about the welfare of all other 'moral patients' who are inside our view.

For those of you who have been reading here for some time, it will at some point soon, or it perhaps already has, hit you and hit possibly quite hard, that as soon as you grasp the available power - the power of high speed geometrical maths, futuristic maths, inside your mind, the power that could be there from, as the Taoists say 'consorting with the powers of Heaven...' - you will be turning around, turning back to see what you can do, what you are able to do, for the rest of the world which is in a kind of darkness.

This is typical of those who are applying their moral agency.

There will be odds and ends of things one may be able to do though not much, I would think.

You look at someone like David Wilcock - he may not have everything exactly correct, and I'm sure that he doesn't - but he has a few clues; he got permanently kicked off Wikipedia for 'not being a notable person.' LOL

The complex reflections of life.

The world is intent on staying in permanent darkness. And that is because although 'animated,' as I suggested somewhere recently before, it is not actually alive in the same way as true moral agency in intelligent form, is.

Nothing goes up, which hasn't in the first place descended from the 'up' to the here...

Sadhguru (and I don't agree with him on this), says that human intelligence and intelligent consciousness springs from breaking through some kind of threshold along the curve of natural organic expansion and complexity - and he appeals to the Theory of Evolution to support his premise. I think he is being swayed by the need to sell books and events in the West and to avoid the trouble that Deepak Chopra once got himself into, arguing with Dawkins and various Western academic concepts.

Frankly, nothing could be further from the truth.

And you will realize this as soon as you have the experience of encountering any kind of 'community mind' (this concept itself comes from the academic literature on 'Moral agency' in which there is virtually a political statement being made about people all agreeing together that they are seeking the avoidance of suffering, hence becoming a 'community') which is of a genuinely 'advanced' kind.

You see, what is very clear is just how rigid, rigorously self-defined, organized, unswerving, not bribe-able, these people all are!

As humans we tend to do this kind of 'moral suasion' thing: 'look, if you could just...'

But can I just tempt you...?

But if you could just... 

If, and/or when, you ever get to 'encounter' anything of the kind of thing that I have been talking about here recently, my advice is the immediate next thing you do is stop worrying about the rest of the world, the rest of the planet, the whole planet - just take a break and go where you are being led. They know what they are doing and they have more and better information than we do. If the world is going to hell in a hand-basket (as my dad used to say) it's none of our business and none of our concern and there is moreover nothing we can do about it. If the thing we are working on now eventually comes out, it is going to be very very frightening - not your problem, though. And not mine, either. It is not our problem. So what if these weirdo sci fi futuristic humanoid plague locusts... You know what I'm saying.

We are 'the middle children of history; born to late to explore the planet, too early to explore the stars...' And way too late to effect radical change - to pull the chestnuts out of the fire, as it were; the fire is already burning, and hot and strong.

I'm very much afraid to say, 'it is what it is' now.

'I don't know, John - can you?'

One of the reasons I post some of these EDM trance music items here is that behind what you hear is an awful lot of structure and musical tradition - although it might not immediately seem so. Here is an interesting example. This is Giuseppe Ottaviani. He is a completely classically-trained musician behind it all, behind all the modern technology. These guys are the people who interface with mainstream people like Hans Zimmer, who is one good example of someone who absorbs a lot of their work in order to score big time Hollywood movies.

Ottaviano here is using the Ableton Live 10 computer system, which is effectively an AI processing algorithm, which takes what he inputs, and creates some dynamic, live 'progressional' flows that fulfill his own style of composing, on top of which he then plays after these patterns have been established. This is real AI in partnership with the human being.

  

The Sacred 'Loc-Nar'

So this is an interesting 'framing device' to what I was intending to post in this article anyway.

The 'Sacred Loc-Nar' is this green orb thing, of varying size, but always green and glowing, that holds the original 1981 adult cartoon film of the classic French comic 'Metal Hurlant' (Heavy Metal). In the movie story segments, each mini-story turns on someone having 'found' this strange, mystical, as well as powerful, green object - which virtually always becomes the cause of some major disaster for those who find it.

The adult comic movie, supposedly made in Canada, is quirky (well, it's from a French comic book, after all!), but it's also brilliant. And it's a cult classic. Wikipedia and all other historical records of note now say that the movie was directed by Gerald Potterton, but in fact it was produced by Ivan Reitman (who nowadays says he 'only part produced it') and directed by Robert Altman who went to great lengths to distance himself from it altogether.

Altman hated it. And Reitman more or less disclaims it.

The key writer Dan O'Bannon, is a genuine genius, who wrote the movie 'Alien.' He, together with cartoonist Richard Corben, had been submitting work to the French Adult Comic Magazine Metal Hurlant, a magazine being published in Paris by the cartoon art genius 'Moebius.'

Heavy Metal 1981 comes across in some sense as a 'left-over' piece from the Sixties' cultural mindset, but then, the mindset of the adults in the Sixties, who were of course, in the first place not 'Sixties people' themselves but from an entirely earlier generation, is likewise an earlier one. Yet it radically overcomes all of the Sixties' failure of intellect and produces extraordinarily insightful but also confronting and not politically-correct philosophical arguments.

Altman always wanted to be regarded as a serious director and he never was that, certainly not of any note in the way that he wished to be perceived - which was as another Scorsese, at minimum.

Temple of the Sacred 'Loc-Nar.' LOL
From the movie...

Anyway the point re what I was going to try and get at here, is that there is a certain 'twisted quirkiness' in real life, and this 'adult cartoon' arguably captures it well enough. Altman didn't think so, neither did Reitman.

The 'twisted quirkiness' is this: ...well, why? But why?

And what you will only find, across almost every single major 'religious philosophical understanding,' for instance, is this kind of thing: they will go all the way through clearly rational and valid and testable, sound hypotheses, but then swerve away at the end, into a kind of a 'reality gone missing,' or a 'missing reality' which they say is real, but simply cannot be established in material reality as a fact. Like this, here: (take the modern Veda interpretations - not the actual Vedas, by the way, just the way people want to say that they are...). Your five senses are misleading, and so when you activate your 'Kundalini' you suppress the quality of illusion that is produced by your five senses, and you will 'see' the Universal 'reality' in a 'pure' spiritual way, and then after you do that deeply and successfully, you will see everywhere and into everything spiritually, and you will abandon your material life... Literally, they will say 'abandon.'

Strange, green liquid... What is it? (More LOL, just joking,
okay? Cleans your hands, doesn't do anything else).

Well now, see, when you were a small child, you had your five senses, and then you grew up, and the processing your brain did of what those senses brought you was more complex, and more complexity was there in your experiences, and you saw that life was more complex... ...and yes sure it involved disappointment, but to switch into manufacturing a stance on that disappointment by accusing it of only being part of a total illusion, is a self-justification, a rationalizing, of failure; it's not a recognition of any kind of external reality at all. It's an internal intellectual position. Now you can 'handle' external reality all you want that way, yes you certainly can, but that doesn't 'make it actually so.'

So I was going to 'quickly' add on top of the recent direction of discussions here, that no, I am not saying 'water-into-wine' metaphorically, although it can be that too. I am saying actual drinkable wine. Otherwise what's the point? You're either God, or you ain't god; stop pulling our legs.

You see, I am being confronted by the NASA stuff, in which there is every scientific and empirically testable reason to conclude that there are much more advanced intelligent species around the place, many of whom are literally themselves (we're not, they are) capable of traveling the vast distances to here. And, they do it.

And this introduces, not so much religious philosophy aspects (although it does also do that on one level), but this idea about complexity.

My conclusion is that if you merely take the same natural course and direction of what you yourself experienced growing from a child to a much older and more experienced adult, all that will happen is that your appreciation of the complexity of what your senses are telling you, about life and about all of the dynamics in there, reaches various thresholds, and you go past them into more enhanced ways of looking at things.

Strange green dress... What is this?! Take it off,
at once!

Now why would it be that you then suddenly turned backwards, and snuffed out what had been serving you perfectly well up until this second, in order to replace all of it with a hypothetical 'spiritual' other sense that no one can 'see' and that you yourself cannot 'see' but only 'imagine,' really. Sure they want to say 'oh but it is a spiritual, therefore non-material form of seeing...' It's not any kind of seeing; it's delusion.

If you go to the mainstream Christian mentality, it isn't any different. It's all 'spiritual.' If you go the Islamic it's precisely the same. Pie in the sky, when you die; jam yesterday and jam tomorrow, but never jam today.

Listen, the word in the New Testament about what 'descended down onto them forcibly' is not 'dove' although it can be taken to say 'a dove' in Greek. 

Here we at last get some truth out of Wiki. They actually mention the word might be coming from the Semitic 'bird of Ishtar' but that 'makes it only worse' (I mean it makes my point even more cuttingly). The word in Genesis is 'Ishsha,' which is not translated at all into English, and you will see the footnotes there about that. They don't translated it either because they don't know what it means, or means to say, or 'they' do and won't say. 

See, for sure there is an implication of the word part 'aster;' star.

So I'm telling you, explicitly, we are dealing with something here that virtually no one has ever talked about properly, either from the ancient texts in any culture, but specifically for the Western mind, from the Judaeo-Christian texts -, and it is definitely not 'spiritual' as in completely incorporeal, and unseen. Although, yes for sure, there is the not plainly visible, as well as the stuff CERN is working on, namely, Neutrinos and 'invisible Universal particle lines,' and there certainly is moral and absolute reality 'Spirit.' There are all of those things; IE extreme complexity. 

Who actually got close to this in a recent YouTube channel dissertation was the prominent modern Islamic scholar Mufti Abu Layth. And that's because he's using the great Arabic Aristotelian texts as his sources.

But we are dealing with the 'quirky,' and also the intelligent 'other' person/individual conscious agent/agency. You can't push this around, in the same way you might, say a subservient intellect - this is a much higher intellect than we are, or than we have been. They're not going to be pushed around the way we humans all like to push those we overpower, around.

No advanced alien intelligence would be either, and we cannot expect them to be. Would they get so pissed off that they whack us in the head at some point, or just benevolently look down patronizingly, and disregard as? 

Very patronizing. WTF is that BTW, he is holding; betcha
he doesn't even know, and that's because he's an actor.
Prolly he thinks it's a scarf, an expensive scarf.

You cannot, just go doing a bunch of 'Kundalini' yoga and then somehow enter some exorbitantly advanced intellectual standing, without breaching through the reality of what that would be in your ordinary sensory context.

You cannot, do a bunch of 'chakra spinning' practices, and suddenly spin your way out of the human social context and messiness in there.

Judaeo-Christianity is a bit peculiar, frankly, because - well, a lot of deep ancient texts are - there are words in there which mean quite different things to what we commonly think that they do mean, and different to how we traditional 'take them' to mean: for example, the Jewish texts like the Zohar and so on, say 'columbarium' (like a dovecot), and also 'Palace of the Bird's Nest,' and in the New Testament, they say 'where the Eagle nests...'

How would they, for instance, back in those days, describe, say Darth Vader's 'Death Star?' Well okay I'm saying Death Star! Maybe we could say 'Life Star.' 

Waddya think? Any some good this one mayt? (As my Serbian Chicago Comex boss used to say to me when he had a winner and wanted to feign being a stoopid ignorant Slavic backwoodsman). 

Occult Technology

If you fly a machine in through sophisticated, mostly Russian or Chinese-made radar domes these days, it is something occult.

'Occult' just means hidden, right?

'Trigonometry' - and people tend to say it like 'trigger-nometry' - is about the angle relationships of tri-angles.

Looking for something very important

The most tricky thing about trigonometry is the fact that two-dimensionally, it can appear that some axis point is linear, whereas in actuality of several dimensions, these 'points' are depicting an orbital dynamic - maybe waves, frequencies, rotations, ellipses. It gets really complicated when you want to start looking at things that do have 'triangular' characteristics but which are not regular 'triangles' as such, like for instance, an ice-cream cone.

Looking at something in only two-dimensions when that thing has shape and mass and thickness, involves 'occult' angles, 'occult' lines.

The old-fashioned cathode ray tube is a lot like this: it takes data from three-dimensions and composes them into a two-dimensional screen image. But even so, it is the data signal clarity which in the first place is absolutely crucial to getting an image at all. So 'broadcasts' involve discrete wavelength transmissions - this is so that no outside 'static' (IE meaningless, data-irrelevant) energy is introduced into the input at the receiver end.

In the New Testament Jesus Christ has his apostles sent to follow some 'bearer of a jug of clear water' to the upper rooms of the wealthy Cleophas' place. And, at the marriage celebration, he also asks

Chopard 'High Jewellery.'

for jugs of very clear water.

It's all about the clarity of the medium, and then the flow of something which is quite clear.

The modern human mind is filled with rubbish. There is generally speaking nothing but static in there; there is so much external energy invading your brain, not so much your neural senses (taste, touch, sight, sound, proprioception, so on) because these are easily handled by the brain itself, and filtered into the appropriate data streams. No, it is the fact that the actual sent 'coherent' signals that other people give you, are themselves rubbish - that is, people are sending you nonsense disguised as communication.

So you are -  maybe not you, but people are - responding therefore to 'information-action-response' paradigms but where the information is deeply suspect as truly important for you.

Somewhere else in the New Testament it says something about widows or older women if they get too involved with getting pleasure and comfort from the world apparent around them, are only entertaining what is dead. 

'Dead' is perhaps not exactly the right word, but the passage was comparing the 'world' the ordinary material world, with some other world.

However when you go out into the broad public streets, by which I mean to say any place there are people, a lot of people going about 'their daily affairs' - you are looking at what is already dead. Sure it moves, it speaks, it can answer your questions, but in fact it is not intelligently alive in any enduring form...

Wine is just flavors, sugar, acetic acid, and alcohol. And water.

Looks like one of these 'new' amber wines

It is the composition of the components that makes the difference between any old thing, including the infamous and lethally toxic 'wood alcohol' that rural Slavs make and regularly kill themselves drinking... ...and say, Terroir wine. 
  
I can tell you a hundred thousand times and in many different ways, that you should experience, um... ...say, I dunno, what? Satisfaction. Or, fulfillment. Security. Happiness.

When you go looking for great investments, and they accumulate some money and your stack builds up, then maybe you can add 'wealth.' Is that a feeling? Well there is an internet meme that goes something like 'money can't buy you happiness but it is better to be rich and unhappy, than poor and miserable.'

But I think you absolutely need a clear signal, a clear data stream, and one that is carrying actually relevant information, before you are going to actually experience anything enduring and which is truly 'alive' in the sense that your mind is seeking for.

You're looking for 'alive.' You will find and secure no real joy, if it is not exactly that quality of experience...

Atlantis, you will recall, was not destroyed because the people there were wealthy and powerful, but because their extreme wealth and power no longer sat well on their shoulders.

When you look around you, wherever you are, wherever you may be, at first you think you might like to have many friends, or just any friends(!), you may even concern yourself with romantic liaisons, or partner/s.

What happens if you come to a realization that these people are all dead, or if not dead exactly, then sleeping, dormant like in some fairy tale or mythical narrative?

What makes me say they are dead? 

If they are not living in joy they are dead.

And you will, to your amazement, find that dead people, joyless dead people, have this agitation nonetheless about them to incessantly 'get' something, and to have you also rush about striving after something that you need to 'get.'

That's the human race - 'Sleeping Beauty,' 2020AD.

What will you need to get? At any time will it be for them to clear their minds of the drivel inside there? Never. It will never be that.

You just get things, more things, expensive things, even impossible things, and then, everything will be fine and you will be loved. Or at least respected. That is the human race. If only Xi Jinping can get, the Ladakh border region from India, if only Iran can get, some nuclear weapons, if only if only if only. And they need to get, you to comply with their desires, to get.

And then, after around a hundred years each of them, they all die.

So they must strive to get, quickly. Because they all need to have, before time runs out for them and they die and go to nothingness.

The only thing you need to get, is clarity to wash through whatever is clouding your vision.

We will never be able to calculate the inner angles of spinning triangles traversing an ellipsoid path as fast as some juvenile from another much more advanced planet - and that is partly because we don't even have the formulas to do it, although we certainly have the calculators on our iPhones.

Some juvenile. That's where we're at. You can tell yourself all day long that you know what you really want in life, what is good for you, what your 'religious ideology' and all else is all about - and these kids will turn you out so fast your head will spin. And most of you reading will have to look on-line for the 'urban slang dictionary' to know what I just said. I know what I said, and I meant it, and that is because I have had a little peek into what is going on 'outside.'

  

Exclusively; Women ONLY!

Yeah how are we going to stop the guys, right?

I'm not telling who is writing this article.

If you go 'taking off the masks' because some professor of psychology wants you to unveil your authentic, true self - do you know what you will find?

...That your personality, your 'authentic self' is made up of a lot of real memories and experiences that you have had. You will find only suffering, pain, disappointment, and misery in there, mostly.

Monroe no, um, er, no make-up.

Is that what you want to show to everyone?

And so then the theory is that people you want to love you will, what, respond to your dire personal life circumstances? Because they have no means to respond to anything else...?

We are not going to tell you about the way certain people just 'toy with' the world of human beings. Not here, and not openly.

We know what you seek. A lot of people do.

Just imagine a group of people, all of whom have nothing but sad experiences. So here you are, with your boyfriend, husband, friend, so on and so forth, and they are casting their eye over some other individual... ...who is, as you well guess, just another person filled with sadness inside, disappointment, and failure. And just like you do, they also most certainly deserve 'rescue;' a form of rescuing anyway. So that means you are looking at the potential of your own 'failure' one more time. And you get angry. Exactly, as indeed you should too.

Now modern social programming wants to tell you - 'you are resilient, you are strong, what makes you worthy is that you bounce back.'

Oh yeah yeah yeah. ...Until you are - 'not resilient no more.' 

And then - the bin for you. It's all over. So sure, you just keep on sucking up that specious 'social programming' - go on, why don't you.

The cost of great - and I do mean great - handbags, goes like this: Chanel Tartan or Tweed around $1,500, Prada around $1,800, and then the rest go up from there and are too expensive, really. Not that you should turn one down when your check account says 'it is possible!'

94 this month. Happy Birthday month, Marilyn.

A good handbag will make you feel great.

But now I want you to ask yourself, what would make Marilyn Monroe experience joy?

Trust me, this is the thing in the old ancient books called: 'Socrates in health, Socrates in sickness...' Is he still 'Socrates?'

The human race - you - are a being somewhere between abject misery and suffering, and joy. You can never be 'Socrates in absolutis.' Um, well, that is, you ca-a-a-n, b-u-u-t...

What is going to make you experience joy? And can you hang around with other people who are in the mode of joy. What is joy?

The Vedic texts on the experiential bases of the human consciousness, say that there are 114 'chakras' in total (there is some discussion that there is one more than... some mysterious thing...) and that for a 'normie' human being to feel utter satisfaction in this life, they require only 21 of these to be functioning. How many you got 'functioning?' Right now.

The Sanskrit word 'Akasha' (and don't look at Wiki or Google, they tell lies or they proliferate rubbish) means 'the Axis:' the functioning 'up and down forever, into Infinity' of the intelligence of the Cosmos. It means 'axis,' or crossing-point. You 'break the cross-point' and no one is connected then, certainly if you break yours no one is connected to you, nothing is cohesive, and you get chaos.

'Joy,' is, there is only one such thing.

Real thing, not photo-shopped.

There is only one such mind that beholds it. You take off your 'masks,' and then empty yourself of your own ego (that responds with anger or desire to who and what is outside you) and your necessary personality and you are in big trouble, let me tell you - you will not be 'resolving' your 'issues' or any of your problems.

There is only one 'Axis.' Your axis is the same as Marilyn Monroe's. Your are not the same personality, but you are the same person. And that is the nuclear bomb power of the so-called 'Latent Female Energy' of a particular, much storied sort of Yoga that plenty of people think they are 'doing' especially out in L.A.

There is no word 'tree' in the Book of Genesis - it is 'Xylon,' and this means 'X'-ylon: axis of life, or of the living.

Okay? In Hebrew they want to say 'Ess.' Which can mean 'sheaves taken together,' or 'shaft.' It means 'inner core.' 

The Xylon is a great huge shaft apparently of some kind of light, leading up into the highest reaches of Heaven, from the lowest reaches thereof, which is 'merely' 'the Paradise (Garden).' The 'Paradise' part is probably from a Persian root word; modern day Iran...

Boom!

Yesterday, the Parchin nuclear research facility in Iran was destroyed by some 'little white flying things.' And the Iran government is starting an investigation now, of what happened. Dunno why they want to 'launch an investigation' now. I told y'all it was going to happen months ago. Not to worry though, I'm sure the Iranians also have University professors who know everything. That is why they look into the doors flying open after the horse has bolted.

Make sure you don't get yourself caught in the misery of the world of human relationships.  At best these people are using less than twenty per cent of what any kinds of advanced intelligent being is going to be using. And you want the handbag, don't you? Take the handbag. It's nice. You'll like it. It's good.

And do you think they have designer handbags out there in that 'Paradise' place? For myself, my joy would not be complete without those things. How about you?