Instant Bridge

It's interesting that the concept of entropy was just now raised (in the immediate previous post's comment section).

Entropy is the 'unavailability of a system's thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work.'

However the current physics extension of this is the notion that everything in the material Universe is tending towards absolute randomness and 'unavailability of thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work.'

This is just a blatantly false idea about hard reality.

I mean I guess it's only 'blatantly false' to those whose perspective is already from a certain enlightened standpoint...

t

The figure of the obelisk
is an ancient one.

It seems to forever elude the minds of the scientists of recent centuries, that in absolute observable categorical fact - the 'Universe' is not anything linear at all.

The Universe both tends towards randomness, as well and at the same time that it tends towards complete amorphous continuity which includes flow and function(/s). In other words it is only expanding insofar as it may be considered a 'bubble' from the human mind's perspective on the inside, but it is a contained set in absolute reality within which light maintains a perfect 'everywhere' existence within the sum set of material normalcy, and the so-called 'black holes' actually being something outside of the normalcy conditions... ...as far as people know just for the present moment.

Not only need we say 'light' but the sub-photon quanta such as neutrinos in particular must be held to be part of the 'everywhere field' potential; they (can) go everywhere, and they are everywhere, and they are in permanent motion. Neutrinos do not stop and neither do photons.

If consciousness is the 'obelisk' (referencing the famous symbol in Kubrick's movie 2001), and we are conscious - then we should be 'praying' (if we're going to do that - or else let's call it 'looking to the inner mystical obelisk') to the Universally interchangeable monoliths of our own consciousness...

And this is not the same thing at all as supposing that 'we are God;' it simply proposes that we are the obelisk - which in turn has some mysterious, possibly divine, relationship to the existential reality.

'Obelisk' literally means the shaft of Baal.

And the Book of Genesis speaks of a shaft - which has been mistranslated into this idea about a 'tree' in the garden and so on. 

But all-in-all, critically, it is necessary to observe that light and sub-atomic field components such as neutrinos - connect our consciousness with the Universe.

The bridge - and it is an instant bridge - is light.

The Red Rocks amphitheater
in Colorado.

The peak conscious mind at any given moment in the seeming or apparent linear existence of the material Universe - is therefore necessarily also the same mind as the real 'God mind' whatever that is (in the same was as Kubrick never clearly defined what was behind the intelligence of the obelisk).

Kubrick shows the obelisk as benevolent, powerful - indeed it is literally all-powerful - all-knowing, but in some ways ineffable.

The peak example of a conscious intelligent mind must be the 'chief cornerstone.' It has to be that or at minimum a materially existing equivalent to some ineffable 'super mind/God mind.'

You don't actually have to be such a mind yourself. You merely need to be in touch with it and the bridge is categorically that of whatever thing is everywhere and goes everywhere in the Universe: it is bound to be light plain and simple; and all of the other tied co-efficient's of field theory and electromagnetic propagation caused by light.

In the total (relatively total...! lol) darkness of deep nighttime, your own living electromagnetic and thermal energy is sufficient light albeit at low wavelengths. And in the broad daylight there is a stupendous amount of bouncing around photons except the orderliness of these is dubious - hence here the system is tending towards randomness and chaos.

'I cannot see God.' 'I cannot make contact with super-advanced ET Aliens (EG Kubrick's obelisk) who may be here or coming here.'

Yes you can.

What does this cost in money...

And by the way, just because the word 'obelisk' means 'the shaft of Baal' does not mean that you are 'worshiping Baal' whenever you think about the light field as the paramount means of communicating with some 'Divine' or some super-sensory aware/super sensory technology system's personal identity and mind.

Paul (Bulos, in the Arabic Islamic literature - same guy by the way) was on the road to Damascus when he was struck to the ground by some 'invisible force field' and had his mind illuminated to the point of a kind of optical vertigo, which he called blindness through the brightness of the light.

This all 'happened to him' whereas you are happening into the light field all on your own account, by the actual intentional will of your own deciding self.

'I want to see the light.' 

Well actually no, you do not want to simply 'see it.' You want to acknowledge that it is the connecting thing between you, between your mind -, and whatever benevolent, super-powerful, super-intelligent, mind, is out there. And it is not through words or even ideas that provide the actual path, the connection - it is through whatever makes up the uniform field around you and that extends into the place that there is another mind not your mind.

Paul said a super-bright surrounding light - but that was happening to him. 

...Just bringing things back down to earth
a little bit.

And here is where this whole concept of ethics and morality comes right into a very sharp focus:

If, there is such a mind, and it is truly benevolent, truly honest, also 'existential Truth' as such - then you have to be very careful that you do not tread on its sensibilities because you are (let's just say for the sake of the argument's case) not honest, not benevolent, not truthful or attracted by truth and otherwise arrogant in such a way as to provoke some unhappy response!

Yet, all the same, if you are an example of the potential for 'peak mind,' then you are both entitled to bridge the gap, as well as obligated as an intelligent being seeking proper place in the Universal existence to attempt to bridge that gap.

The process is thus, utterly straightforward. You want, you want things, you desire, you have desires, so you probe the Existential Universal Reality for Intelligent Super-Mind via connection.

I guarantee that you will get the most fulsome results.

This 'lingua franca' of money that virtually everyone uses today in the modern world to pretend that are going to get what they want via it - is absolute rubbish.

There is your 'entropy:' your tendency towards chaos and randomness, because all of the intentions and will-powers of people are all so conflicted.

And that is why you are also 'not God.' 'God' is the Super Mind thing that you channel your thoughts into via the light field. It is a discrete area outside of you but that you can breach into and connect with on its terms and only beneficially when these are also mutual terms (IE you agree with them)  And then that Super Mind processes all of the realities and renders back to you the empowered outcome. It only seems like an 'AI' mind or 'AI-powered obelisk' (EG Kubrick's conception) because it calculates on the basis of full facts and complete knowledge.

Except it is not machine mind and therefore only artificial intelligence.

It is real intelligence and when you realize that it is, I mean fully feel that it is - that's when you have made connection.

All things (that you can imagine and think of) are possible.

They are.

You need faith because you are living in a linear paradigm and reside only on one spot as it moves forward along that line.

You are not a servant of this Super Mind.

Not the only person whose feet
I would...
...But it's a start for an arrogant
guy like me, right?

That is precisely what the meaning of being entranced by the Demonic or Satanic mind, is. This supremely hostile mind does not want you to be mutually involved with the actual Super Mind! It cannot afford that to happen.

What makes you or anyone believe, that they are inferior to the intentions, and to the Will, and to the designs of a designing God-Mind? So inferior that they are merely servants?

How does the scriptural saying 'God made Man in His own Image and Likeness' fit with any such contradicting concept of inferiority and servant status?

It does not.

Period.

Tear the mask off the Devil. As soon as you see or hear the unqualified phrase 'servant of God' run like hell.

Friend of God you should be. A friend also serves, yes; but as a friend not a slave.

Beware the incredible subtleties of intelligence and of 'mind.'

Yes, servant; but this is qualified by 'in what way a servant?'

Yes Jesus washed feet but He was not ordered by anyone to do that - He did it as a spontaneous act of His own choosing.