I'm not a big fan of this person, or of any people to be honest, generally speaking, but I'm confused why you're so keen to go to town on my "shared agency" remark. Such reworkings of familiar things could be helpful to many people, especially as they seek to steer "their collectives" away from devolving into the usual freaky commune failure attempts.
Oh, but yes, it is so true that there have since forever been 'freaky' even SUPER-STUPID, ultra freaky collectives that have devolved into great failure attempts. This is so true.
One of the things I really do want to do here, is make a very clear-cut distinction between those with some verifiable history and background that makes some of the things they say 'legitimate' as far as it goes - and those that are absolutely deliberate 'plants' for unworthy purposes. Albeit, of course, there are also the third thing, which is namely, outright fakes who have jumped to whatever bandwagon they misconceive is there going on.
If you notice, though I'm not sure it is all that obvious unless you are asked to think about it - I steer right away from anything that is 'too troubling' on any kind of emotionally negative way in this Blog...
Now. Let's presume although I doubt it will happen any time soon, certainly not publicly, so let's place in a different context: you were with me, at a pub somewhere, along with two or three others, including more than just myself with some let's just 'narratives' or provable history. The person you would get is different to how I might appear to 'come across' here. You would get at least one or two truly horrible stories and you verged very close to getting them even here on account of YOUR particular 'style' (I am laughing, so don't take this the wrong way; it's an 'lol' thing).
It's not a good idea to - especially nowadays when everyone has 'social media' - reveal things about world identities that you all 'know and love.' Have feted and worshiped for decades...
I think, especially since you raised it in this way, 'explore' in a better light, the 'problems' and or 'relative issues' when the wrong people use the phrase 'shared agency.' Albeit, if you are familiar with the movie in which the character 'Larry Hooper' was main antagonist (played by Kevin Spacey), some things will be clear enough. Yet, they still do require better clarification.
You know, people always ask for 'proof'and 'hard evidence.' I could say a few things that it IS impossible for the US Government on an official basis to deny or even attempt to deny. But that is just about myself.
Nielsen said 'ET Aliens come in groups and meet humans in groups as groups.' Not a direct quote but about right. I think, at least for now, that is the point I wanted to draw from out of that clip.
And I think I have already made it perfectly clear that not only are 'they' here right now, but I have spelled out where you can find them! ...Now. Why aren't people rushing out with cameras and checking? I'll tell you why - those who know, know already and don't WANT to share. And the rest are in commercial businesses whose agendas are driven not by any journalistic motives at all, but by whatever plan is coming from their boards of owners.
Now if, in the next article I try to be as ABSOLUTELY EXPLICIT as I can, then don't stamp all over it before you have thought VERY CAREFULLY about what was said.
I will tell you CLEARLY in one SPECIFIC part where I fit into things, but I need to caveat that by adding that it is BY FAR NOWHERE EVEN CLOSE to the whole of my own involvement.
Yes I understand what you say about "the wrong people" using the concept. It's fairly clear that you have some stories to tell and that they are not the type that leave you feeling hopeful for the future of humans. Fiduciary duty is an interesting legal concept and it is abused all the time. Speaking from personal experience.
This point this Nielsen person is making about groups is really great. I also like that you've given some "if you're going to open yourself up with these meditative practices then you should also be doing these other things that can help with being defensive."
There's just so much I personally think you are so far from fully comprehending that it is becoming increasingly difficult to underscore that this MAY NOT BE FOR YOU!
Some of the most basic personalized technical equipment is so expensive, and the commitment of time so high, that this is really an area of 'exploration' only suggested to those with tons of time on their hands and enough money to live in various different environments, far far away from the normal run-of-the-mill lifestyles, and that is not to say 'urban' because there are a good deal of these sorts of specialized facilities available within modern cities.
I'm not a big fan of this person, or of any people to be honest, generally speaking, but I'm confused why you're so keen to go to town on my "shared agency" remark. Such reworkings of familiar things could be helpful to many people, especially as they seek to steer "their collectives" away from devolving into the usual freaky commune failure attempts.
ReplyDeleteOh, but yes, it is so true that there have since forever been 'freaky' even SUPER-STUPID, ultra freaky collectives that have devolved into great failure attempts. This is so true.
ReplyDeleteOne of the things I really do want to do here, is make a very clear-cut distinction between those with some verifiable history and background that makes some of the things they say 'legitimate' as far as it goes - and those that are absolutely deliberate 'plants' for unworthy purposes. Albeit, of course, there are also the third thing, which is namely, outright fakes who have jumped to whatever bandwagon they misconceive is there going on.
If you notice, though I'm not sure it is all that obvious unless you are asked to think about it - I steer right away from anything that is 'too troubling' on any kind of emotionally negative way in this Blog...
Now. Let's presume although I doubt it will happen any time soon, certainly not publicly, so let's place in a different context: you were with me, at a pub somewhere, along with two or three others, including more than just myself with some let's just 'narratives' or provable history. The person you would get is different to how I might appear to 'come across' here. You would get at least one or two truly horrible stories and you verged very close to getting them even here on account of YOUR particular 'style' (I am laughing, so don't take this the wrong way; it's an 'lol' thing).
It's not a good idea to - especially nowadays when everyone has 'social media' - reveal things about world identities that you all 'know and love.' Have feted and worshiped for decades...
I think, especially since you raised it in this way, 'explore' in a better light, the 'problems' and or 'relative issues' when the wrong people use the phrase 'shared agency.' Albeit, if you are familiar with the movie in which the character 'Larry Hooper' was main antagonist (played by Kevin Spacey), some things will be clear enough. Yet, they still do require better clarification.
You know, people always ask for 'proof'and 'hard evidence.' I could say a few things that it IS impossible for the US Government on an official basis to deny or even attempt to deny. But that is just about myself.
Nielsen said 'ET Aliens come in groups and meet humans in groups as groups.' Not a direct quote but about right. I think, at least for now, that is the point I wanted to draw from out of that clip.
And I think I have already made it perfectly clear that not only are 'they' here right now, but I have spelled out where you can find them! ...Now. Why aren't people rushing out with cameras and checking? I'll tell you why - those who know, know already and don't WANT to share. And the rest are in commercial businesses whose agendas are driven not by any journalistic motives at all, but by whatever plan is coming from their boards of owners.
Now if, in the next article I try to be as ABSOLUTELY EXPLICIT as I can, then don't stamp all over it before you have thought VERY CAREFULLY about what was said.
I will tell you CLEARLY in one SPECIFIC part where I fit into things, but I need to caveat that by adding that it is BY FAR NOWHERE EVEN CLOSE to the whole of my own involvement.
Yes I understand what you say about "the wrong people" using the concept. It's fairly clear that you have some stories to tell and that they are not the type that leave you feeling hopeful for the future of humans. Fiduciary duty is an interesting legal concept and it is abused all the time. Speaking from personal experience.
ReplyDeleteThis point this Nielsen person is making about groups is really great. I also like that you've given some "if you're going to open yourself up with these meditative practices then you should also be doing these other things that can help with being defensive."
There's just so much I personally think you are so far from fully comprehending that it is becoming increasingly difficult to underscore that this MAY NOT BE FOR YOU!
ReplyDeleteSome of the most basic personalized technical equipment is so expensive, and the commitment of time so high, that this is really an area of 'exploration' only suggested to those with tons of time on their hands and enough money to live in various different environments, far far away from the normal run-of-the-mill lifestyles, and that is not to say 'urban' because there are a good deal of these sorts of specialized facilities available within modern cities.