Once upon a time, in the ancient city of Samarkand, lived the brother of the great King of Kings Shahryar -, whose name was Shah Zaman, he being also a Sultan, indeed the very Sultan of Samarkand.
He, that is, Shah Zaman, perchanced, as grievous fate befell him thus to see it, upon his first wife sleeping with the Royal cook, and witnessing such effrontery to himself, he cut them both twain.
Qasr-al-Sarab... al... Sarab Take note.
Now everything is not exactly as it is today, in our modern times, in this ancient city of Samarkand, for things happen there concerning people who are well-hid from the eyes of modern man today.
What walked casually and almost openly amongst the ordinary population of this ancient city, today is counted with the breed of that which is jnn - that is, hidden, or 'of the Jann,' the well hidden, and the adapted...
It happened on the occasion of the incident of our story, that the elder brother of Shah Zaman, the great Shahanshah (King of Kings) Shahryar, himself, arrived at the palace of Shah Zaman, to make visit upon the opening of the Great Month of Blessings (we call it 'Ramadan') upon his younger brother the Sultan of Samarkand.
After sitting together for awhile, they came to the opinion that all among the breed of women were most evilly deceitful and duplicitous and wicked, and thus it was, that the Great King of Kings himself, purposed and vowed, to marry to himself a new bride each day, and to execute her by the next morn.
Today - tabletop fire bowls; no magic.
Visiting Samarkand at the same time as Shahryar, was Ahmed, Prince of India - and he befell upon the beauty of Peribanou, Princess of the Fairies. Albeit it that that, is itself another tale.
Yet even so, Peribanou was a good friend of Dunyazad -, sister to the maiden Scheherazade whose name means 'of noble lineage.' Now, no one can be of truly noble lineage, who is not daughter of God Himself, and so, we must insist this is the great Zara (Sarab), Daughter of the King of All The Universe, disguised as a noble woman of the city of Samarkand, who, having heard of the vow of Shahryar, has herself purposed to enact a plan - since Mankind makes plans, but god is the Best of Planners.
We need go on no further in this account of ours here, except to make small mention of the family (the Banu) of the Fairies (the Peris). And alas, we would feign expand upon this surely, in high degree, just like the magical tent of Prince Ahmed, which, like the flying ship of the...
...very Queen of Amorous Affairs herself - which was able to expand in size as to fit an whole army, and contract so that it could go into one's pocket - alas but the accounts of all these affairs at Samarkand of this moment are lost in time, forgotten in the sands of ancient history, and blown away by the winds.
Thus to you all: Salaams! Lorang Jakzang! Baraka! Baraka! ...Amadaad. Till the next day.
Partnering with most of the large social media and all of the major internet Search Engine providers, are half a dozen or so, mainly European-based government Secret Intelligence groups - who both field their own in-house 'astro-turfers,' and pay or simply 'incite' private citizen fools who are already pre-committed to the lunatic 'philosophies' underneath their agendas, so that these all go into Blogspots and social media pages and YouTube videos, and distract from what is being said in there in order to prevent audience members and participants from maintaining their particular direction.
The question is, are you big enough?
Google uses its own in-house data reach infrastructure called 'Jigsaw.Google,' and there are also seemingly at-arms-length groups but that are closely linked to organizations like Google - such as 'Moonshot CVE.'
Moonshot CVE is peopled by Londoners, which doesn't mean anything, because in fact, most of them are children of rich folk from politics in Sri Lanka, or Singapore, or Kuwait or Bahrain.
What they do is go and disrupt what people are already conversing about using a strategic plan known as 'the re-direct method.' In this, astro-turfers (people who deliberately make comments that decry, dispute, gainsay without facts, evidence, even logical bases, or any kinds of meaningful 'idea supports,' and use insulting phraseology or scornful language - in order to give the impression that such views are what ordinary members of the public also believe, or think like) turn up and interact gratuitously to distract from what is being said, and turn the direction to another compass point. Or maybe just bring it down to a lower level.
Superficially, these groups advertise that they are interested in counter-acting extremist terrorism - such as, for example ISIS, which of course, has the public profile of being an extremist terror organisation.
Whereas in fact they literally are 'power-political' operatives with hidden agendas to deceive and to manipulate the currency of thinking and 're-direct' views.
...Sometimes, at least for me it is -, it is entertaining to contemplate which of who are really the 'Babes-In-The-Woods.'
Hollywood actress June Lang, said she never knew her husband John Rosselli, was a mobster - she was married to him for three years.
Now let me tell you something about the man who shot Kennedy and hit him. Yes Rosselli was there too. The thing that people are getting right about Johnny Rosselli was to do with the company he kept, the circles he flitted in - afterall his nickname was 'Handsome Johnny.'
But he couldn't shot the side of a barn door. Not only that, the Mafia is violent and brutal but incompetent - as was evidenced in due course.
The man who shot Kennedy was an absolute world-class - in fact one of the acknowledged best - rifle shots, in the world at the time.
And the whole thing was carried out at the highest possible levels of diplomatic coverage involving the government of the recently assassinated dictator of the Dominican Republic along with several Middle Eastern Arab countries.
The narrative has long been mounted - once again by 'interested by-standers' fronted by covert agencies - that anti-Castro conspirators, angry with Kennedy for a botched invasion plan in Cuba, killed JFK. And never, never, will you see much in any media outlet, that expresses the fact, rather than the presumption as is the case with the Bay-Of-Pigs operatives, that it was the Dominican Republic post-dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo, that blamed the killing of Trujillo, on the American Administration and the CIA; rather than the CIA blaming Kennedy for whatever...
It is also a fact that the CIA was involved, technically involved as established fact, with the supplying of the arms that were used to carry out the assassination (of Trujillo)... ...though failed, coup.
Now I won't be spelling out who the actual professional sniper was, here.
Not spelling it out, anyway. And I can guarantee all of you reading here, that you will not hear a single peep from anyone about it either.
I am not an extremist. I don't believe I have ever threatened anyone with a bullet through the head - well, that is, with the possible exception of Xi, although I wasn't threatening, I was simply observing that there were 14 million Uyghurs that wanted to do that.
And I have never talked about slicing anyone, or anything's throat. In fact, funny, because when I just said that I did NOT think that Allah/Jehovah/or any of those guys wanted to cut the throats of lamb sacrifices, I've actually had someone rush in to say something in opposition to that!
Amazing.
I dunno - d'you think Jigsaw.Google or their University of London/Imperial College-educated bitches in Londonistan even know what a 'verbal Anabasis' is?
'Phenomenological' is not any longer exactly the right way to describe the thing I wish to discuss with you all tonight (or, today; wherever you are...). This word now means a set of philosophical approaches to 'reality' or how humans are conscious of reality.
The way I was setting out to phrase it, might still apply though - and this is how I was going to say it:
'What is the phenomena-logic, of Mid-Eastern religions?'
For Muslims, it is going to be Ramadan on Monday 23 April.
And for Jews, it is going to be the Second Passover on April 26.
...There are two 'Passovers' as you know, for Jews.
Anyway, let's not beat around the bush for forty years - the question is, how many times, did Moses celebrate the Passover Lamb sacrifice, when he was wandering around the desert for forty years?
Answer - once.
Only one time.
And how is the sacrificed thing meant to be killed - if it is approved of by 'God?'
Now the overall telling of the 'Moses' story as it has been handed down through broad tradition - is BS, and we know it is BS because this 'God' either has no moral problem stealing the work of other people (Code of Hammurabi) and passing it off as His own (which calls into question what 'absolute morality' is and even why there should be a 'Law' at all if there isn't an absolute morality that God Himself doesn't even abide by for one thing...), or else, 'He' isn't really an actual 'God' at all, and then, that would make every thing else in the usual story make a bit more sense.
So I asked a number of genuine experts - Kosher certifying rabbis as well as Halal inspectors - well, but how exactly, was any 'sacrifice' designated functionally, to be actually approved by 'God?' ...In the actual literature.
A holy place, and a perfect 'offering.'
The answer is, a bunch of fire came down from Heaven and consumed the sacrifice completely.
Nobody cut a lamb's throat as the actual act of sanctification at all.
So - where are the phenomena of today's Jewish rituals, and Christian rituals...?
Do 'tongues of flame' descend down upon people in churches and cathedrals, or is it just someone lighting a few candles and stuff?
At least, you know, when those trees burned from the inside in California - had someone had the presence of mind to say they were doing a sacrifice out there, they could have had a few 'believers' follow them then on social media afterwards.
The Moses tradition is false, but the Elijah one is not: in the case of Elijah, a beam of fire from somewhere 'above' came down and 'consumed' the sacrifice.
You see - we have this whole thing totally screwed up.
What is the point of continually finding some 'perfect' living thing - Isaac, or some 'red heifer,' or a 'Passover Lamb' without 'blemish' and then have the thing disappear up some transporter beam?
Because, as you also know, the 'Bethlehem' where they raise 'Passover Lambs' is not the same exact spot as the 'town' of Bethlehem - but it is a place nearby, where shepherds raise these very special sheep, see, and when they are born they wrap them in a special covering to protect them from even scratching themselves...
...And what are we supposed to 'learn' from all of this?
A dove...? Iranian Islamic sacred image of a 'peri-asteron.' By Mahmoud Farshchian.
So if - I dunno, four/five billion people on the planet tell you it's a 'dove' in the New Testament, and I tell you it's not a dove, who is right?
I know you - you want to see the fire consume the lamb, see the tongues of flame, see the something but not a dove.
And you're right!
The rest is just a show, theater.
Still I do think we all need to be a bit cautious of 'phenomena' too - especially in this day and age, where the technology allows some things that are a bit 'gee-whiz' too.
Trust me, if you think Jewish rabbinical authorities today (and I have it from pretty decent sources, I don't mind naming Rabbi Alon Anavar for one - that most of them are horrendously corrupt) are silly enough to just produce a red heifer sacrifice out at Jerusalem, then you have them underrated by a long way short of what and who they are.
They're going to produce a show for you, all right.
Here! Here in this video-cam footage - a fuzzy zoom image.
What about down there in the Antarctic? That 'strange' circular area of broken ice.
Or how about at the Vatican Cathedral - have all the people in there found out where Jesus is, since it is Easter -, by 'Google Searching' it on their iPhones yet?
This is from an official Christian publication. Where is the fucking 'dove' in any Gospel anywhere in the tomb scene?? People make things up and then they get others to believe any crap.
Imagine, there is the Pope, 2021, and he knows that at Easter, in the back of everyone's minds is this very basic question - well where the damn hell is he?
The Zindiq of Birmingham, Islamic scholar Mufti Abu Layth says the real Islamic teaching is Jesus is NOT returning. 'Zindiq' is the term of opprobrium being given to Abu Layth by his vast number of enemies around the globe, in the world of Sunni Muslims who mostly all don't like what he is saying.
Technically, as far as Islam is concerned, well no, Jesus cannot return because then that would make Muhammad NOT the last prophet afterall...
Do not think I cannot disclose the whole entire secret of this to you - because I can, and there is a secret too. For - 'He is not in the desert, he is not in the inner rooms.' That's what it says in the Gospels, right?
I mean, some of you are thinking this is some kind of stoopid joke.
But I guarantee you - you could be a zillionaire on one of the world's biggest luxury cruising yachts, and for all the money in the world you could not get what I am going to give out right here right now:
The secret, friends, is not 'who' is Christ, or 'where' is Christ...
..but rather, what is 'Christ.' Because Christ absolutely does NOT, mean 'Messiah;' 'Messiah' means 'Messiah' - separate words, separate and different, meanings, albeit linked.
Check Philippians 1:21
'Christ' in any case, is not someone's surname... Which is the way it is too regularly thought about, whether it be by Christians and Muslims alike. It is in fact, a place; a field...
Fair enough, if you were on that luxury cruise ship, you would at minimum want to have a few Romanian ladies of 'low social responsibility' (as Putin terms them) - unlike his gymnasts, I gather, to whom he has a few children living in Graubunden.
Thermal spring spa in Vals, Graubunden. Yeahhhhhh. Let's go there.
But I give you the periasteroi. Which do you want? The Romanians or the star fairies?
The key passages in the Gospels use words that are completely incorrectly translated - for example, when the tomb door was rolled open, there was a 'neos-ennos' in there, not a neanias. There is 'Our-anos' and there are 'anu's' and there are also 'neos-ennos.'
Where is the dove, in any account in the Bible anywhere, about what was inside the tomb??!
You find me one and I will convert to a KP atheist scientist or even a Muslim immediately.
What's the point though, for people like me?
Hell I can go all over the internet, on YouTube and all I will find is endless lunatics telling me about how to 'heal' your chakras by doing something I dunno what, and that chakras mean 'wheels...'
Doesn't mean 'wheels.'
Wooden 'chakra' slicing block... lol
Fuck me. Honestly.
Is there even anything wrong with your 'chakras' that they need to be healed? How come everything needs to be healed all the damn time? 'Dan Cooper' (aka Bill smith aka other things) just sent me a joke pic on FB about this girl asking her boyfriend what he was wearing because she found that she was 'loosening up all over.' And there was a pic of WD40 beside the guy...
LOL
Maybe the WD40 was working on her chakras.
Paris - can you fold the Peking Duck pancake for me? Hey Paris...? Can you?
Every now and then, some of these videos are cute, and the music calming and all of that. Even I listen to a few of them every now and again. And then skip over to Bjorn Andreas Bull-Hansen. I'm not going to head out into the snow though, just sit in the armchair and imagine that I am 'going out and burning logs in the snow...' I'll let Bjorn whine away about how everything is bad.
But you are never even going to find your chakras much less heal them! Not watching all of that nonsense.
Tell you what I like.
I like these mature skilled women in tight red silk dresses, fold the peach and tea (you know this, don't you - I mean you do know they are flavored pancakes, right?) thin pancakes, or if traditional, then the tea and mandarin-flavored thin pancakes, around the slices of 'five spice' crispy duck and cucumber... ...with the sauce slowly poured over it in front of you - all deftly done with long chopsticks.
And then I like when one of them trips up on their high heels. ...I didn't do that. Well I didn't, did I?
...and then the other one trips as well. And I just say, oh it must be that section of carpet there.
No 'periasteroi' for me!
They can read minds, see. I get stuff thrown at me with them.
If you take most of the world's Intelligence groups - most of them, far and away most, have no independent information source that is at the core of their 'corporate memory.'
If you take Australia's or Canada's main actual non-political Intelligence organizations (leave out Australia's 'ASIO' that is a political agency from its inception), they all rely on National Libraries including the University ones, as their main broad knowledge resource.
MI6 relies on the Bodleian.
Just a librarian.
Yes, it is true there are both officially-designated liaison officials (usually top-line professors and their personal staff) as well as senior librarians who interface directly with the agencies and organizations in covert communication - but apart from the internal records of incidents and events and briefs handed down by government, there exists no central intelligence data bank of broad information.
The CIA, on the other hand, is already intimately tied to the US Library system. I would be giving part of the game away a bit too far here, if I specified how where and which one/s, but there are also global engineering and technical libraries that are structurally part of the CIA (albeit you don't know that 'openly').
And the CIA maintains its own internal academic and scientific knowledge base - and that is different to anything you know about or will learn by going to an open institution such as a University anywhere.
So, where the MI6 people will all follow the Oxford/Cambridge/others UK teachings regarding the kinds of subjects we have been indulging here over the last year - so that they certainly know about ideas like Boltzman Machines and Markov Random Field generating of neural energetic patterns independent of optic nerve stimulation from light reflections and actual photon sources.
If they see someone like the blind card player Richard Turner, in a convention in London, they will think he is there to perform some card tricks. And that is all.
Richard is older now, so it may not be so bad mentioning his name.
Poor Al Waleed. His NYC 'Oak Room' is still closed. He should have foreseen Covid...
The CIA, on the other hand, knows what it did. Why it did it, what it was aiming to achieve - all these things are completely known internally because the various research projects that link to what the MI6 people will presume is just Boltzman neural artifacts of a rare kind, were things the CIA searched for themselves and were not trying to 'analyze' from out of just 'cases appearing out in the public' - the way, say, the Charles Bonnet Syndrome was labelled.
The mistake the standard academia people make in this matter, is to do with confusing the idea of 'energy' finding places to go in parallel optically-related neural networks, with the actual brain's detection of actual energy signals that are not in the first place optic... They don't like that last bit because they have a pre-existing commitment to the belief that no such thing can happen.
You see, the idea with the Charles Bonnet Syndrome is that yes, the people who have this rare condition are not 'going crazy' and 'seeing things which are not there' - in the sense that current science says that well, yes, they are there except only as more or less random but still apparently meaningful energy signals coming from the brain and the human physiology, not from the outside.
Richard Turner is very open that he is diagnosed to have Charles Bonnet Syndrome. And so people just happily go on with their business around him.
Except the CIA - just sayin' as an example, not saying anything else - might ask him different questions because their records show that what he can do is pick up energy that is being generated from external sources and make sense of it.
Actually, what is frightening about the stupidity of who all are passing themselves off as scientists these days, kp (I'm not trying to pick on you, but you particularly have raised on many occasions the importance of public science) is that they have not apparently been able to relate what Turner does, to an obvious analog in that is, simply, a different sense channel. And I have already spoken about the mischief of Karl Popper in this regard.
I mean, hey, musicians do it all the time with sound...
Francesca Bianchi - one of the world's greatest olfactory 'musicians.'
Olfactory technicians do it all the time too.
What I mean is not that they 'sense' what is not there, but that they are well-aware of structures and patterns that have independent objective meaning.
If you think a musician cannot describe to you a chair or a table using only sound, you're wrong!
They just don't do it a lot and we do not have a strong social convention to communicate in that way.
Non-musicians do not have enough knowledge about what it is that musicians actually do. Some people don't even appreciate music that much, and 'comprehend' more substantial - as in grosser - audio stimulation as 'communication' such as the beat of a drum on a slave ship. It is not 'music' but they 'get it' as a piece of audio signalling.
So the wrap up, for those of you who are diligently messing around with the Gateway Experience-type systems and training, is that you are indeed not going to see, initially, the physical objects that are there in front of you which are ordinarily disclosed via the optic sense channel - in other words, using photons that bounce off shapes or that come from heat sources - you will see the things that are there that may be disclosed by a different frequency of energy.
At some levels of frequencies, it is surprising how little is there, at other levels quite choking how much nonsense is there.
People 'on the outside' act all very blase about these things, but the first thing that happens to anyone who plays around with any of these things, these areas and then encounters what they did not at all really expect to find - is shock. They quickly take many steps back away from what they have experienced.
Don't be too sure you can handle what you could find.
We were discussing in here just then (I mean some of us here in our actual street address offices), about all of this murmuring going on about TEOTW and cataclysms and so on - I suggest you don't worry about people on YT channels screaming about this stuff. Just take note maybe, of big league professional card-players. If a certain number of them suspiciously all take off for nether parts all of a sudden, well okay then, then even I would start to pack my bags.
...At minimum they have reliably fine-tuned, er, intuition.
You heard this song here already, right? ...Or you thought you did?
