James Dumb, not James Bond

I am hoping, this will be the very last 'spy-tale' post for a while. Things are going very well in spook-land, and as you know, these kinds of things thrive on quietness and 'nothing going on.'

The fact is, it would be slightly remiss of me to leave you all without some exactitude in understanding what has been going on. Personally, if I were you, I wouldn't worry all that much about people looking into your communications - the thing cuts both ways, and apparently, 'they' haven't even worked that out yet... There is no indication in the bought-for media that anyone has.

Our friend Lee, giving out 'hate Trump' pamphlets

Anyway, back to the main matter here: I would like you to recall the kidnapping by Hezbollah in 1984, of Lieutenant Colonel William Francis Buckley. He was subsequently held, tortured for 15 months and died.

Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for his death.

More recently, in 2011, an individual, one 'Manssor Arbabsiar' was apprehended in the middle of what appeared to Intelligence as a plot to assassinate the then Saudi Ambassador to the United States, Adel al-Jubeir in New York - who is now Saudi Foreign Minister under King Salman. Arbabsiar had engaged some members of the Mexican Los Zetas drug cartel to kill al-Jubeir.

Hezbollah funds itself through its control of Bekaa Valley heroin. And drug cartels in Mexico have had relationships with Middle Eastern and Eastern European drugs controllers in the past. To say that 'security' is a problem in Mexico is putting things mildly, and when you keep in view little incidents such as the temporary 'theft' of Iridium-192 in 2015, and the ease with which false ID papers can be procured in Mexico - you have a matter that has to be treated seriously by security officials and strategists.

Our friend Lee in Russia

I don't really need to make a lot of gratuitous remarks about judges whose motivations are less than entirely obvious, or whether they should be made to watch videos of the torture of Buckley and others - but I will probably end by echoing what Roger Stone recently said about ex-CIA chief Brennan, namely that he was a Communist from way back. It sounds like a REALLY STUPID thing to say in the modern era, post-the Cold War and post-the Soviet Union, but what he means is not 'Soviet' Communist, but academic Marxist-Leninist social and political organization theory 'Communist' and who had some formal affiliation with organized groups of this ilk. Some people call them 'Neo-Marxists.'

There is a saying 'someone convinced against his will remains unconvinced still.' And I am simply not interested any longer in trying to 'convince' anyone of anything.

I just stated the fact that Willam Buckley was really horribly tortured. What you make of it is up to you. And, hopefully this will be the last of these kinds of posts for a while. 

And, finally our friend Lee, at a 'gathering momentum' never Trump rally

Every Drop Of Faith

Yesterday I encountered a very strange thing. A friend of mine, who runs a tiny independent Spanish radio broadcaster, mentioned the name of someone he met at one of the Puerto Banus nightspots - someone whose surname was 'Khashoggi...'

And so I said, no, seriously? 

But then my friend started to describe the person, and I thought, well, hell, that isn't the Khashoggi.

Taken a while back, when Paris
was being young and silly

Turns out this individual is one of the sons of Adnan - one of the most successful salespeople in the world of all time. Possibly it will be many more years before the CIA will de-classify files related to what Adnan Khashoggi did for them over the years. Suffice to mention for the moment though, that Richard Perle shot off to see Khashoggi in Switzerland the minute 9/11 happened; well, a very short short time afterwards, anyway. 

As you will know too, I'm sure, Adnan Khashoggi is(was) Dodi Fayed's uncle.

Oh dear, so many wheels within wheels.

So what is young Khashoggi doing? Well he's arranging these super parties for extremely wealthy people all over the world - he runs a company called ELEQT, whose business is events planning and high level introductions and access. Sort of a 'pre-lobbying' stage, almost gate-keeping, thing.

Same guy, of course

Anyway here's my message to you - you clever clever people who come here and read:

Of course, you can stick your head in the lion's mouth... If you want to. I wouldn't advise it though.

How much trouble is going to end up resulting from all of this? 

Would you say? Knowing, that MI6 fucks up virtually everything it gets its dirty little hands into.

SMH.

Slipping Back Into The Night

You know, if the detective didn't walk down a long dark alley, it wouldn't be that kind of a story, would it. (Why don't you go to the bottom of this piece and play the music video... It'll help). 

It is however exactly that kind of story.

Shadowy figure, dark alleyway, night-time

You must have noticed how suddenly now everyone in the media is an expert on Russia, spying, 'Deep State,' even human psychology!

Amazing, isn't it.

Anyway it's time to place all these toys back into their box now for a little while. In my view anything you see or hear in the wider media about whatever went on, or is going on, so-called behind the scenes, is uninformed right from the get-go. And that includes, I'm afraid, Alex Jones to some extent as of the moment. 

You don't need to be hearing from people after the event - you want to hear about stuff before it happens. Which is not to say AJ doesn't have a fair record of getting some things right ahead of the curve. But he is committed to having to produce a show every day, more or less. Russian spies, Russian spies. Palace intrigue. Bohemian Grove, crazy rich people.

Don't get me wrong, he's a good journalist no matter what you think of his style. He lets all the balloons float but then he also checks facts too.

But hell why is the media the story? We all know the reason there - the lights go on, the cameras have their little pilot lights go blip-blip and the guy up there in front can't help his ego get in the way of it all. God knows, I probably would be the worst.

Why do we have to have earth-shaking things to talk about all the time in any case? You'll become hyperactive and over-anxious if that were the position all the time.

Time to take a deep breath. 

'Did you get it?'
Or, in proper English: 'Did yoh ge i'?'

You know if you read very very carefully between the lines from here on in, you'll 'get it...'

Spies? Russians? Don't know; wouldn't know anything about that kind of thing. Leaks? Wouldn't know anything about that. Way too sophisticated for me. That's what we have the FBI for, to go after the leakers. To find suspects and then fuck them up good.

Alleged leakers anyway, because we have this 'innocent until proven guilty' thing here. It's part of our values, of our system. 

Now don't bring 'morality' into it, will you?!

Just watch the fireworks and enjoy the ride. 

But you do know, don't you - I have never cried wolf, not even the one single time.

You're gonna watch the 'leaker' burn and fry. Sorry, alleged leaker.

Poor bastard, never leaked anything at all.  (For female, it's also 'bastard').

You got that, didn't you? Like any investment, there are FOUR ways to hold a position: the right to buy, and the right to sell, the obligation to buy, and the obligation to sell. Four, ways.

Flynn was one side of an intercepted conversation. And he was identified by the media.

Got it now?

Upgrading The CIA

Don't be taken in by the media and what is effectively only widespread gossip about the 'Intelligence Community.'

Just who do people think they are talking about?!

The beginnings of the US professional Intelligence Services have deep roots into the most progressive (not political use of the word), sophisticated, and advanced technology-based organizations, and mostly, these were private corporations: Eastman-Kodak advanced photography (high altitude cameras and computerized image interpreting), Bell and Howell (an offshoot of the 'Howard Hughes' R&D team), Glomar Deep-Sea Ventures, various Aeronautic and Aerospace corporations, AT&T, Honeywell, IBM, et cetera.

Behind the scenes right now, is a simply massive purge of the foreign agent plants and money corruption that has riddled American academia and many layers of bureaucracy for years - the judiciary, police, the FBI, private security entities, others. This will go on virtually for the entire up-coming 'next four years.' It will need to.

The BBC last week had the sheer audacity to use this pic
in an article they ran on the female who was the current head of 'Q'
section - the clandestine technology supply division in MI6.
The pic is straight off a post I made here some time ago, which admittedly I
later withdrew/redacted part of, but you know I'm right too all the same. This girl above,
looks French to me...

Be prepared for a continuation of the 'open source' policy directives of the 'old school' CIA - more and better internet systems and processes and technology; freer, not more regulated.

And absolutely, stand by for the releasing of some amazing, even staggeringly amazing latest technology and gadgetry that will be made available into the commercial marketplace.

What has been given the incorrect term of 'those on the political Left,' have well and truly overstepped the mark of what ordinary spontaneous political protest and forceful presentation of a viewpoint means. These are funded, malicious, ulterior motive-possessing, Fifth Columnists with a subversive agenda coming in from outside of the country - and certainly not 'from Russia!' 

Those who will be granted access to the upgrade programs intended for various information gathering and strategic analysis departments will not include all who presently have so-called 'security clearance.' I'm pretty sure Admiral Mike Rogers will appreciate the initiatives that he has been talking about for years at last being implemented.

'So, I take it you will not use reason.'

The danger of course, that such stunningly powerful new capabilities bring, is for the ease with which j*s could go missing in the dead of night, like they did in the Cheka-flavoured Lenin Era of that particular totalitarian regime! I'm not sure whether I can get away with saying that kind of thing and claim the words fit into just philosophical conceptions about 'free speech.'

I have a friend who does not 'believe in' the
idea of 'female marines' 

However, it can only be an expectation of the natural reaction to the type of 'soft coup' that was just interdicted in the United States - the so-called 'political elite' or 'political Left' have only themselves to blame for it.

When it happens, not if, you won't find me complaining. There is a time and place to worry about 'social justice' and proper legal processes. Now is not that time. I mean I don't think people really know how close they came to a total disaster. I think they have some suspicion, which is put down in the media as 'conspiracy thinking.' 

These things have a tendency throughout history of always going too far first one way, then the other. I could be wrong but right now I have absolutely zero qualms about riding the horse - or the tiger - moving strongly forward. At the very least, you will see, and take the benefits from simply amazing technology improvements and improvements in your life and lifestyle.

Later on, maybe, there will a time to take stock of whatever problematic completely new over-powering aspects have come into being. Not now.

Too Many Lights Shining Too Brightly

And so, what have we seen - since people such as myself are literally 'under orders' to shut up for a while?

We have seen so many new spins on whatever went on, that every man has some 'inside run' on secret service stuff and for me, at least, there are now too many lights on in the subway and I can't tell what is there behind all the signal noise.

The Khamsin - a wind blowing in from the desert.
...Oppressive, hot, dry, and dusty, wind.

It's swiftly all becoming one big blur of 'information.' LOL

None of which (big light glaring information) is even remotely true. That stuff is not information, it's bs.

Yep. We're all keeping quiet for a good while now - those of us who have some appreciation of what is required by the expert professionals sitting in the key drivers' chairs right now.

And some have even kept their chairs - and that speaks volumes.

I have a comment about Fox, though. This has become more than a little interesting - Fox is fed material from direct sources now as we all realize. Consequently, their recent shows in which they are allowing Muslims and the Islamic voice to speak its position is interesting. I observed Martha Maccallum not one single time challenge a gentleman on her show this morning say that 'true Islam does not discriminate against gays or women and encourages freedom of conscience and is in no way supportive of terrorism.' He was very adamant about it and was pretty sincere as far as I could see.

Woo-hoo! 'Conqueror of THE WORLD,' no less...

And that's quite amazing because this is some 'fantasy Islam' of which he speaks. Islam is submission and surrender to the Will of Allah, and the Will of Allah as explicitly stated in his Word 'the Koran' is to kill all Christians and all Jews wherever you find them until all are in submission to Allah.

Furthermore, it is obligatory on Muslims to either contribute to Jihad (which is not some fantasy 'inner struggle' at all but physical conquest) or do 'Hijra' which is 'immigration in the Cause of Allah;' and to quote Surah 4:89 'Allah rejects those who do not RUSH in the way of Allah.'

I wonder this is not Fox leading Muslims on to hanging themselves at some point in the near future. 

Indeed, do not be fooled.

Islam is not by any means a religion at all. It is a cult that has spread so extensively because it is as though Jim Jones had have totally prevailed, and whilst yes, killing many, yet himself lived and started out elsewhere (say, like a move from Madina to Mecca) gained more forced followers and been replaced by only the most brutal bloodthirsty slaughterers of all time - Umar Al-Khattab and Tipu Sultan (massacred from the low estimate of 80 million Hindus, to the high estimate of 400 million).

Islam is NOT a religion. You can play around with what you only 'think' it is, and then you are going to be held responsible in history for what happened next.

People like Steve Pieczenik, a supposed ex-CIA consultant psychologist during the abduction of the Italian politician Aldo Moro, fails to ever mention things like that the Red Brigade, who abducted Moro, were funded by drug money from the Muslim-controlled Bekaa Valley, and the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

This nonsense has been going on a long time - too long for fools to be indulged in their ignorance any more. And it doesn't make any difference if the fool sits on a Supreme Court as a judge; he still a fool in this respect if he thinks Islam is 'a religion.'

Here's what Muslims say after some figure of medieval history who did 'the right thing' as far as the Koran goes: 'Radiallahu taala anhu;' - Allah is please with him.

'Doing the right thing' means cutting your head off and raping your wife and enslaving your children. This is EXPLICITLY the edicts and the commands and the words and the meanings according to ALL the tafsir (legalistic teachings of the hadiths). There is no such thing as 'moderate Islam.' But there is such a thing as 'taqiyya' - lying to and deceiving non-Muslims - spelled out in the Koran and recommended for Muslims to do against 'the Jews, the Christians' and the Polytheists and the rest.' Means you, who watch CNN. Also means you too, Mr, Judge-on-the-Supreme Court. They'll cut your head off as well. Even while the fine sentiments and naiive 'fellow-man' lecture is still coming from your mouth.

Beyond the immediate crisis, is a longer range socio-psychological one, in which the ignorant poor ordinary folk will no doubt take it into their heads 'oh, the Americans won't let us into their country because they hate us, and they are malicious, bad people.'

And so the policies that have a chance of avoiding future issues and yet still handling the current ones, are almost too sophisticated to hope for from whoever is pushing the media's myopic outlook today.