Okay Okay

So.

Not easy.

This is not easy.

I will send all of you who have been in communication off-the-page some direct instructions and a simple resources list.

Fairy goddess of the Peony Pavilion.

I will not be explaining all, right here, openly.

There is absolutely no need at all to go the lengths that a lot of people try to these days, using EEG devices and strobing lights and the like.

For one thing, anything that is even vaguely available publicly costs a bunch of money and there really is no point. 

The thing is, either ancient Oracles such as the Sibylline and the Cumaean were able to see things or they were not - certainly they did not have local-area access to technology of the kind we all buy from Temu!

LOL

It's important for you to know, that modern-day 'Christos' (Christ/Christian) ideas come from a certain root word, that relates to these Oracles - Khrystos.

Google will tend to try and transliterate it to 'Khrestoi' and say this is pronounced 'Khrestoi' or 'Chrestoi' - the speech to a human intermediary, of a Divine Being. 

Welcome to the cocktail bar at the edge
 of your system...

But it is Khrystoi' and 'Khrystos' and from there we get 'Christ.'

And the whole meaning is the same - it is a Divinely-Spoken WORD.

'Khrysme' or 'Khryma'  (cream!) is always associated with this Oracular ritualistic tradition.

But why is it?

'Elaio' is the tree planted by the Goddess Athena in Athens. And, it is also one of the words apparently said by Jesus Christ when He was dying.

Elefthera is to liberate; ephtha is to open.

'E' is the symbol of the energy word. We use it in Physics today.

Fishes swim in water. Birds fly in the air.

Human consciousness can transit to space through the 'E' (flow). ...And whatever the medium is.

When a spirit of a tree is deigned by the Jade Emperor of Heaven, to have earned the right to go to Heaven, it is taken there by a special lightning strike and thunderbolt, leaving behind, in the now dead wood, a field that is linked to the Heavenly Abodes.

So the Taoist magicians have recourse to dealing in 'lightning-struck (particularly) Jujube wood.'

'Diddle me this, Batman.'
'It's obviously the Diddler,
Robin.'

This is a thing in the Taoist Chinese system.

It's nothing you need to be concerned about other than to observe how similar a lot of these 'occult' traditions are across the globe.

Human beings are like trees...

If they completely and finally leave their bodies, they become dead, like the lightning-struck Jujube trees.

Although in art, depictions of strange things like what we are talking about in here right now, always tend to reflect the technology of the particular era - except the unusual thing about the Enoch accounts, is that they make much of the difference in the clothing, and in the apparent cleanliness, compared to Enoch's obtaining normal condition, when he gets taken 'up there;' somewhere, who-knows-where, right?

It is not some other beings, some super-advanced beings, you need to 'ritualize' on - it's you yourself.

You do not have any natural facility or faculty using your own basic senses without the addition of technology, to 'see' into anywhere or see anything with your eyes shut.

But your brain does have a putative capability to pick up complex electromagnetic fields, albeit it is not used to using it, and people do not generally have any kind of easy-access to such 'sensory' cognition.

Let's just do a quick but absolutely vital run-through of where we were at already anyway:

When your brain is holding the sense of something inside the body moving or circulating/rotating at tremendous speed, and you direct your optical networks to focus on those things, you are engaging the optical sensory pathways and memory circuits.

So that actually means if you start getting real coherent signals into those neural network circuits, they will be interpreted as visual effects in the brain.

We tend to visually use idioms
based on our level of technology
and the obtaining
(current) social
structures - but that is actually not
what the Book of Enoch
discloses at all. 

It'll take me a good few hours to formulate and then get around to emailing everyone, but, for right now a couple of things ought already to be standing out:

Let's say you get the email and as you read it you realize oh yeah, this is interesting, I will try that...

The first thing that will actually happen is a sense of excitement and expectation and that could quite easily interfere somewhat, although not necessarily with everybody -, with how your brain relaxes enough to receive and perceive information.

And this is especially the case when you literally see with your open eyes, something signalling back to you from space!

So anyway, anyway, the first step is simply to get the thing going, and we'll worry about the implications later - and there are ENORMOUS implications!

If you simply go by the Book (books because there's a few slightly different versions of them) of Enoch as a guideline, then you will observe that he did not just physically go to places all the time, but sometimes he saw visual information only about other places and other people - and then, finally he disappeared physically although he knew very well that he was off; and told some friends and they watched it happen.

Not saying anything here...

That's that story anyway.

And he ain't been back since.

Right. 

Right?

LOL

But why not just everybody?

Because one of the most obvious implications, or at that point it will be necessary effects not 'implications,' of acknowledging there are 'weird things' going on -  is that you will observe how that a human being is a process not a thing.

You can't just 'take someone' with all of their dysfunctions built from living down here as a worn cog in a broken machine, and expect them to upgrade right away to what can accommodate how a Kardashev Scale III Plus species is living in its social set-up.

I mean, hey, you can take someone though... 

I'm just trying to make it easy, thassall.

Look. Those people all over the world, and there's zillions of them, who scream about evidence and science and atheism and whatever else they want to - are loud-mouthed noisy brats with no brains and a stubborn (and foolish) insistence to validate human dysfunction!!

They're actually not smart and they are not right.

Seeing the light is one thing;
noticing the art and the design
is a whole lifetime's work.

Those of you who get the email, will likely apply the directions and things will happen.

And then your stoopid 'sci-ence' mind will be stuck with the fact of it all.

That's if you're being stoopid.

Which some of you are starting to not be.

  

 

See? No Comments, See??

Well, maybe none of you have seen the flick yet, just like I was not going to either!

But I tell you what, in hindsight it's a funny movie that basically no one of the modern kind of audience person, will understand.

Aw aw yeah, people will think they understand it but you poll a hundred people who have seen it and I guarantee you that not a single one of them will have picked up the 'hidden,' I guess, thing about it.

Ah sure, on one level yeah yeah it's about sex and power and gender rubbish and everything else yawn, who cares...

When you want to stop bad dreams,
you place a bowl of nine - Chinese say
nine - lemons by your head. It works
because 'modern sci-ence'
should (but doesn't of course) know
that the QED molecular spin rate
of the lemon olfactive
compounds very rapidly mediates brain 
switching.

...Back to us here.

There is a faculty, a common plain, everyone-has-it, thing that allows a person to 'see' - as in literally see - with their eyes shut.

Ammon Hillman is an idiot, but he's also a savant idiot. He is taking people right off the trail while at the same time having found the actual real trail.

He actually... ...god I don't know if he is reading here and I very much doubt it, let me put it another way - I know he isn't. 

But - he managed to say the word 'Thespesion' recently (or, if you go to the Leftie-scam Google/Wikipedia, it only says 'thespesia' or 'thespesios'), and that is the word that I talked about here using our language's phrase: the Mind of the Wonderful.

Thespesion means a wonderful and Divine Mind that creates humans - actually, new humans.

And not just new humans but new forms of humans.

He even outright says Genesis was never composed in Hebrew but in Greek.

And he is right.

POINT ONE:

The 'tree' is not a tree (ref: 'Garden of Eden') it is a shaft of some kind of light.

And when you induct that light into you, you look different on the outside to others, to those who haven't got that light - and you can go up and down into some 'above' places.

Joseph does it and there it is called his 'coat of many colors.'

Even the f*ing Formula 1 companies know
the point of colors!!

In Revelation (the Apocalypse) it is also spoken about in the parts there about some Divine Being who 'holds the seven stars in his hand.'

That phrase is straight out of the Chaldean Oracles, of which only a few dozen or so poetic verses are extant and even they come from quotes only, of other people commenting about the real Oracle Text itself which is today long gone.

I'm saying all this to underscore once again, before we get to the thing I have been foreshadowing exposing, that there are techniques used by the Sibyl Cults (which as Hillman correctly explains, is the early Christian Cult followers).

I've told you those techniques.

POINT TWO:

The correct word is not 'visualize;' it is to hold or be able to hold, the sense of a thing in your mind.

You can visualize and that won't get you anywhere because you will not have the feeling, the sense of the actual thing.

...And I have mentioned that ordinary dreams are nervous energy 'embers' held together by bits and pieces of memories and their neuro-psychology causation is in order to dissolve/dilute/virtually eliminate the unresolved thinking energy that you never resolved during the affairs of the day.

Sometimes when a significant emotional thing cannot even then be totally eliminated, it can become part of a neurotic condition or a pathology.

And that is not what we are going to be talking about or doing.

These are known as 'Gurkha pants'
and they are really classy and if
another person wears too tight
trouser legs I will personally come
down from space and execute them
myself, personally.
And don't think for one minute that
I won't or I can't.

When I say 'dream' I mean something to do with the Thespesion.

The Thespesion is a God thing, and I think it is even personified maybe in Hesiod or somewhere like that.

And it does not simply create from 'whole cloth' a new creation, but takes whatever is viable and valid and useful from old living beings, and makes them new again and live again.

In fact in the main Christology original sources, not just 'live again' but become perfect and live to the Ultimate Aeon (Eternity).

So why cannot these things just be automatically 'jump-started' as it were from anyone just living and going about their daily activities, and suddenly, the God takes them, kind of grabs them by their hair, I suppose, and makes them all new and what-all?

They can. Who says not.

I didn't say not. I said I am going to show you a slow, methodical, easy, non-scary, pathway.

Now there are all these people on the internet, and well, everywhere really, who say things like Oh if you alter the main 'Christian' way that we have, the Christian Alter (that's their term for what they are doing), then this is wrong...

Well it's also wrong for Muslims to make something or someone else 'God' other than Allah but they all literally pray - 'As-salamu 'alayka ayyuhan-Nabiyyu...'

I am actually, a very
dark personality.
And that's because
it's always dark before
the dawn.
That's right, isn't it?

And that means 'Peace be UNTO YOU, Oh Messenger.' But that guy is dead; he's a dead man. So how is it they are addressing a prayer directly to him?

It doesn't say anywhere not even in a hadith that this is to some 'angel' who then 'takes it to Allah,' who then bestows the sentiment on Muhammad.

This is directly praying to a dead man.

It's completely wrong and they still do it and have ten million creative if ludicrous ways to justify what they are doing.

People want to 'de-bunk' anything they haven't got possession of themselves.

'People' are complete, insistent, stubborn, f*ing morons.

It says, categorically in the Bible, that the Christians and the Jews used the Porphurious - this is the 'Burning Purple' of the Medea Cult and even in one of the Epistles there is direct reference to someone 'Lydia of Thyatira a wealthy businesswoman;' and that 'she sold luxury textiles dyed with the Murex Royal Purple.'

The Masoretic Hebrews who were permitted to be close to the Ark, and acted themselves as sacred oracles -, used shawls dyed with Porphurios - until after that con-ster Josiah, made them change to dark blue.

The lesson is - people, who don't know what they are doing, are all apt to go the way of all 'people.'

And I've told you over and over where that is.

And you can go there too. If you really want.

Or, you can do this and tell me what you saw.

Are you ready?

Do I have enough people's attention here?

By the way - Romy, the character in Babygirl, is paying the guy whatsisname 'Samuel' (played by Harris Dickinson who I don't much like but still) - and, she was paying him from the start.

I was gonna offer a hundred bucks to the first person who picked that up but I know I would be wasting my time, and also, that when I said it, everyone in the whole world would have a hundred creative if ludicrous excuses as to why 'I am wrong.'

What's the price of Silver by the way? Or Gold for that matter.

Anyone buy any French wines yet?

Has anyone managed to work out what I am about to say about the actual 'method' just from the thin strands of clues thus far?

Believe me you are going to get the shock of your life.

Interlude

It's a million degrees and I'm in the city again, fixing up some deal from a Swiss client with the Perth Mint.

The Gold Price is running hard, and the person's IBAN (International Bank Account Number) is not 'clicking' the list of numbers the Mint holds that it is allowed to deal with - except it is UBS and they deal with a large number of those clients.

It's hot out there.

That's not Kidman but it's like
Kidman (kinda was).

I have some time to 'waste' and I don't want to leave the place right now and lo and behold, right in front of me is the Palace Cinema Complex, in the heart of the city and that place is air-conditioned to the max.

I'm going in there!

What's on? Now that's going to be a problem because I seriously detest modern movies and I've already seen the only one doing the rounds that is any good as far as I'm concerned (Widow Clicquot).

Jeeezus. The only thing on is this Kidman 'click bait-y' thing - Babygirl.

I've read no reviews and I'm not going to.

So anyway I'm going to watch it now and I can walk out if I can't stand it (which is what I'm expecting).

Movie starts and I've gone through my 'medium' Fanta or whatever thing it is that it is supposed to be, from the actual soda fountain.

The start seems cringe-y to me. The opening 'orgasm' scene looks faked (but don't make a hasty judgment here; I'll tell you why in a minute as you 'get' what this is about).

Frankly although I don't think most other people are going to say this about it but the start scenes are slightly unpleasant to me - the characters are not empathetic. At least I don't think they are.

I notice this kid actor Esther Rose McGregor, right away out of the blocks is a quality item; delivery outstanding, a small sentence and steals everything from big name actors Banderas and Kidman.

There's one scene where the 
guy sends Kidman a glass
of milk - and she drinks it.
Yeah, you wouldn't want to
be drinking a 'glass of milk'
that I sent anyone!
LOL

This is a very difficult movie, very hard to direct, very difficult to perform by the actors - I realize they are doing a stellar job though...

This is a severely flawed movie but only in the perfectly characteristic way that all modern modern movies are flawed: they need to get you over the 'propositional' gap - the disbelief that would attend a real-life situation but which you must suspend because they want to tell you a story and they have no time to tell it. (Nobody has any time these days).

One of the lines in the movie that occurs twice is when Kidman's character tells this 'intern' that he has 'seven minutes' of the ten scheduled because she has no time.

She is playing the character that is the CEO I think of some huge and tremendously successful robotic warehouse technology corporation whose whole objective is to 'liberate people using AI and robots in order to give people back time.'

LOL

Was a good line and a bright idea.

Unlike in past days, movies now are about sex and 'relationships' (usually problematic ones) whereas previously they were about murders and spying and only incidentally with the 'spice' of adult themes thrown in over the meat and potatoes.

And unlike Widow Clicquot, this remains a 'difficult' movie virtually all the way through although I begin to realize this is being carried by the staff (the actors) and Kidman should win awards for this and so should the kid.

The male protagonist who is not the husband (the husband is played by Banderas) is not good, but he is authentic in the portrayal of a 'contemporary' concept about some kind of post-modernista 'dominant.' As far as the directing and the intent of the movie, maybe it's better that he is not at all a sympathetic character; the movie might not make as much sense if he were.

I know this is feeling to me like a re-make of in part Demi Moore and Michael Douglas/Donald Sutherland's 'Disclosure' and something else that I can't place - but the ending lines are definitely things I have heard before. But it does have a contemporary twist that has to do with lots of nuanced things.

What ze actual f*! Oo iz zis guy Bill Smith?
I'm sure ah dohn no 'im...
U noh 'im, Bill?
You see 'im somewhere before
maybe?
'e look a bit familiar to me.

It's a much better movie than I was expecting.

In these pages here we have been talking about solutions not dysfunction without resolution.

You can't say I have no sense of humor because hey, I went to see this flick, and I really did enjoy (in a sense I enjoyed it...) it.

The basic theme is that (some, certainly not the husband played by Banderas) humans are tied to their deep core physical feelings, their senses - you could say it is a very sensual move, that is true enough - and there is no spirituality that can resolve anything after that.

An interesting line in the film delivered by Kidman is: 'you're confusing morality and ambition.'

I find that an interesting thought.

It's juvenile but it's still a thing that people 'act out' on.

And then there is a sort of movie-land resolution and it quite works and then all of a sudden, when taken as a whole, the whole thing works and some ideas revisited at the end dove-tail back to the start and you realize things were not exactly, necessarily as they seemed when you saw the opening scenes.

The husband is a successful stage director and producer and he was working on a season of the Ibsen play 'Hedda Gabler' and there you also have this dark(-er, slightly darker than it already is!) theme of suicide and what could lead people to do that.

Nobody commits suicide in the movie.

Everyone's quite rich and everyone's very successful and of course they seem to have time to f* up their lives but really, at the same time they have no mindset that can handle what is being presented to the viewer as this 'deep, dark. innate,' psychology thing that (some) humans have that make them interesting to all of us lurid voyeurs.

Nobody 'flies away on the 
nightflight' in this movie...

LOL

I didn't think Kidman was capable of doing this role at this time -, I did think she was maybe a bit 'past it' but then, that is not actually the character (the one I was expecting) she is playing here - she is openly playing an older person; a much older person. McGregor tells her (she is the daughter) that she 'looks like Grandma' and Kidman's character never blinks at it, not one time.

There are a few 'modernistic' gender aspects present (with the daughter) but the movie is not preachy in any way at all. Which is different to what you get everywhere now.

It's a good movie, it's a very valid set of ideas in there and people deserve to get awards for this - I think it would have been very difficult for people to act in and the director and producer to make properly. But they do it.

It resolves nothing of course. 

We resolve stuff in here.

...I leave the cinema, it's still a million degrees outside in broad daylight, and so hot that I am not even hungry.

The reality is Kidman is getting richer but she is not getting any younger.

I am getting younger.

LOL

Fact.

It's partly a time-dilation thing but then at some point...

You know the rest of the story or at least by now you should do.

I'm not going away anywhere yet though so don't worry. There is a lot more 'delivery' to achieve here. As well as a lot more monkey business. 

      

 

 

Grappling With What To Say...

Or, how fast to say it, that is.

Anyway.

So...

So.

I stuck this page up on FaceBook see. And lo and behold it got swamped with responses.

And now I'm stuck with having to maybe cut a whole long saga short and go to the end stage before traveling through the middle!

LOL

Ah well. That's not new for us here, is it.

[First I wanna mention this. I went out for a walk last night, past the local MG Dealership,  and the yard had about fifty new cars there. Right in the middle of the showroom behind the big glass windows, was this old, but extremely well-renovated MG TC. It was a work of art. All the rest of the stuff was complete rubbish; utterly worthless. In human life, there is something that originates something, and then after that it descends into nonsense and rubbish, taken there by idiots who have no clue]. 

Anyway, the thing is this - Ammon Hillman wants to tell everybody that the Christian story is about drugs, and sex -, I guess he would want to say.

And he tells everyone there is this thing called the 'Porphurious' and so on, and how this was used by the earlier oracular traditions.

So what. Unless he tells us what it is and how to do it.

I mean, no Tik Tok videos - no God/god, no ET's, no UAP's no nuthin'.

It's the modern world, come on.

God appears on the Mountain to Moses - Moses must take selfies with God, right. Otherwise no can do, sorry Moses; you can keep your 'Ten Commandments.'

Suddenly, we want to go from this
world, to some other, 'better' place.
And that's because we have no clue
about what is going on.
For sure there are 'other places'
but they are also interwoven with 'here'
places.

...So I'm going to tell you about the 'Secret' Book of the Three Sovereigns. This is a great Taoist Classic that I am entitled to speak about on account of having been inducted into the tradition and a particular 'lineage' (aka Sect) in China some time ago. And I stuck the pic of that onto the FB page. And literally I got a couple of spam or I don't know what, 'queries' anyway that maybe I was using someone else's photos!

LOL

Ah no. That's truly me and yeah, I am the guy they patterned 'Men Who Stare At Goats' on. Oh but yes indeed-y.

I have never not mentioned here that I trained at the same place that that movie production's technical consultant, Guy Savelli (US Marines Unarmed Combat trainer), trained at - only I was there a lot earlier than he was.

What I really want to do is engage with some hard-core modern Christians though, because it seems to me they are up in the air about what is 'demonic' practice and so on, and what is trad values stuff.

They are supposed to be very well conversant with sacred 'Chrism' and yet, I suspect absolutely none of them at all, knows or realizes that this is a Shaolin and a Taoism thing - it's called 'Bai Shang' in those systems and it means a scared oil made using Myrrh.

Now, although everyone wants to say the 'Three Wise Men' from the East... ...were Arabs and Muslims (anachronism but then, Muslims say everyone was a Muslim originally, even Abraham who met with THREE Divine people at the Oaks of Mamre) -. Or Egyptians at minimum.

This color is called 'Orange
Cinnabar.' Real Cinnabar is a toxic
substance of course, so when you
read the typical Chinese 'occult' or 
'secret' books, I'm not sure whether
you should treat them seriously, frankly.
Because a lot them carry
on about 'Cinnabar.'

Shaolin monks have been being sent out from the Temples (and who knows when these even started - just because three major ones described in history books were burned down does not mean there were not already more than three previously) since forever.

The Shaolin Temples were repositories of medical and physiology knowledge just as much as anything else.

Here is the thing though:

It is the Western system that has the best understanding about why the rituals and practices as described in various sacred texts, work.

Take for example the Christian idea - 'God' is this 'Total Divinity,' see. And an aspect of it, that is existentially present all the time, is a Spirit which pervades absolutely everywhere all at once.

Now.

Now... You and I are going about our profane (worldly) affairs, and yet this Divine Invisible Mind is still around and cognizant but not engaging.

How do you change the setting of what you are doing, to engage with the Utterly Superior God thing?

That is the point of ritual.

That is what it is all about.

You are inviting the Divine Being to engage with you personally, when you change your mode away from the merely profane.

And this does not mean you do not suddenly need anymore to be a material living person.

It just means you have temporarily stepped away from the mundane and the profane, into the different, realms.

Now here is where what you are hearing from me is a quantum step away from what you read about in books made by people with no actual direct lineage practical knowledge.

In undertaking the rituals
to do with 'relationships'
you must use a peach-colored
silk blindfold.

Whereas in books they say 'there are three worlds - the Underworld, the Human World, and the Heavenly World;' I say, the Underworld simply means the Past, the Human World means your moving present and linear time experience of the 'Now,' and the Heavenly World literally means 'the Future.' 

And although one might incorrectly presume 'the Future' therefore means an as yet non-existent reality albeit a potential one, in fact it is an orientation.

All those who live in the Heavenly Realms, are always creating, making new, building on the past, being innovative, listening to the Present, and choosing between various potential options.

That is all.

'Hell' or the Underworld, means being stuck in the dysfunctional Past.

The Present is just your mortal life now - which is capable of taking you right back to the Past again, or leading you into the Forever Future.

When inducted people practice the secret Taoist or Wu Shu rituals, they are blindfolded, and the colors of the silks used, are there to communicate to the Hidden Realm beings, what your intention is on that occasion, and also what your status as far as being a protected being, is.

So because of having to rush a little on the other page, I will explaining to them there about one of the three things people are most commonly interested in, namely, their relationships.

This requires the Orange or Orange-and-Gold silk scarf used as a blindfold.

I have not told them yet that there is a process whereby it becomes possible to literally see, in these other places (although I mentioned it here) - but this thing is related to what Hillman is always going on about but does not really know practically-speaking about or how to do.

Dior - Chinoiserie.

I hope you are noticing that nothing you have been being told here recently, is not actual practical step instruction that you can yourself do, and achieve direct experiential results from.

And believe me, I can give you line-for-line categorically modern science for why these things work. 

And I can tie them back to statements made in ancient holy texts that you are well aware about but have never been explained fully concerning.

All of you who have been financially involved here in the past will get accurate and complete details about the process that 100% no question at all, will literally have you, like, switching some previously seeming hidden faculty on and you will see, into another place; into other places.

The very first time you 'make it' you will jump back with a shock about how real it all is.

Right now I am only dickering around a bit in order to sync up with what I am doing on the FB page. 

Being Rich In Today's World

This is not easy!

Yesterday night, I walked around the whole city, from East at the river ferry place, to all the way across town to the end of the North (basically food/Chinatown/ethnic-y) section...

It has been very hot here, and it was quite warm in the evening yesterday.

What did I find?

I ended up just having a coffee.
Not here and it wasn't in the
morning anyway.
But it was pretty much like this.

Queues outside of every single place that sold sit-down food and drink. Literally was queues.

Tonight - which is significantly cooler - there is hardly anyone around anywhere. Fair enough it is Sunday night here right now and people are I guess thinking about the beginning of the working week ahead.

But that is not entirely it. I have noticed this before: when it is ridiculously hot, people go out into very uncomfortable situations, and mill around in noisy crowds and end up some place packed to the gills, where the noisy crowd is compressed in an enclosed space, even if it is air-conditioned so what; and the tables are full and the service cannot be as optimal as it might be, put it that way.

The signs that the mass of the population - and this applies anywhere and everywhere in the world today - is inclined to change habits if you presume they envisage things could be made better through change, do not exist.

Those signs of an inclination to think ahead, and to formulate better ways - never existed.

Cycles of change have happened as the result of the introduction of new technologies, and the population-wide economic distribution effects of large-scale deaths through plagues or war or both.

Human beings are not forward-looking proactive in terms of style of intellect.

Some individuals sometimes are, and these are deemed 'reformers' or eccentrics.

And so we make a mistake when we think of the great religious conceptions of the world that include in their picture, otherworldly beings - 'higher' beings, beings of greater fundamental intellect and certainly, of greater knowledge - and think that all humans simply because of the teachings, are able to quickly access such realms or to hold the kinds of thinking that meet the 'normal' standard of those putative higher minds.

The fact is, even the Bible New Testament clearly says - 'you shall seek me but where I go now you cannot follow (yet)...'

Cannot follow.

Fleming patterned Bond on
this guy and Hoagy Carmichael.

And that was not a statement made simply to presage the actual death, because of the phrase 'you shall seek me.' 

And then the rest of that is about 'in my Father's House there are many mansions,' and 'I go to prepare a place for you' and so on. So it was not an initial statement about death.

So how do we 'not make the mistake' - of thinking that anyone can easily understand or fit into the places and among the people of very advanced societies?

First we have to know what the 'mind of the wonderful' means.

It's a pointless exercise meeting wonderful people if we do not appreciate that they possess 'a mind of the wonderful;' they are wonderful.

All of these images across the popular internet and sponsored in any case by the general media anyway - depicting these weird-looking, gaunt-faced, huge bug-eyed creatures theorized as being what ET Aliens look like - are just so much utter rubbish.

The only difference between an ordinary human being and some being from a very highly advanced culture and civilization somewhere else, exists in the way of thinking that that other being has compared to what a typical Earth-bound human has and exhibits.

To meet with them on terms that are realistic for both sides (considering that both claim 'intelligence'), we must enter into the presence of the mind of the wonderful; we must enter into a field of which we seldom experience here.

This one is a bit too exotic for Fleming
to impute to Bond, but then, it hadn't been
created at that time anyway! 
It's pretty good however.

We must become part of that field.

We cannot keep looking at things the way ordinary mortal - and restricted - human beings all do.

But what is the difference? How can we make the jump across?

We must possess a mind of the wonderful. Our own mind must be wonderful in every way itself - or at least start to be like that.

Human beings tend to lose things. They lose their mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, pets, possessions, money, position, status (according to the rest of standard society).

You are all about to get completely shocked with what you will soon learn, and I am not delaying that approach to the knowledge.

...A smart person will already begin to be able to, as they say, stick two-and-two together with what I will show you next (now). I won't show it all but I will point to the beginning thereof.

What Ammon does not know about...

Dr Ammon Hillman thinks the people in the early Christian cult stuck something over their eyelids that enabled them to see; just like the original Cult of Medea was able to at some unknown time in history but certainly more than a thousand years prior to Jesus of Nazareth.

And why are natural things capable of opening doors to an unnatural realm?

Because Genesis does not start like this - 'In the Beginning;' but like this in actuality: 'THE Beginning CONTAINS ALL THINGS Good as well as Evil and from beginnings to endings, the Alpha through to the Omega and everything in between.' 

What the heck is this?
I think it's a Duesenberg.
That's more Sayers than Fleming...

You, you -, contain the capacity to have a mind of the wonderful. It's already within you.

Things that you pick up on the seashore...

Have purposes undreamed of by the common.

We make light of death because we never make light of the Force and Power of certain other things. ...Things which the common think they can have, or that they do have, and most of them believe they will have, on account of money.

LOL