Partying With Elves...

It's becoming like a bit of a 'fugue' around here.

Maybe you've noticed.

What's been going on is that I am 'doing stuff' (that cannot be talked about yet) and things are happening, but I am posting a little bit behind the curve...

Still it's okay.

We have to get some important ideas across first and these take time to convey fully.

I am personally having something of a party with Elves down here. For real.

Santa Maria Novella wax tablets...
Very good little things.

But don't worry. You'll be there soon enough - if some mightn't already have 'gotten there.'

Those of you who are going to receive in your mail after a short while now, important things, well, keep in mind these are the real things - you can get vaguely 'commercially-available' kinds of the same things up to a point but frankly, it's unrealistic to expect that today's manufacturers all necessarily have carried forward the underlying point of it all, though not to say those one or two whose names I have mentioned are not in command of the traditions. They certainly are as far as I can ascertain. They know the ways to make these things. And they have been in the luxury magazine press in interviews at least indicating that indeed these things come from ancient alchemy ideas and purposes.

So some of the older people there must know about the meanings involved.

Possibly. Or very likely or at least up to a point anyway.

There are still ingredients that you will not (yet) receive in the mail but let's make a start nonetheless.

What you should be targeting at eventually formulating, or 'concocting'(!), is what you can see here in this pic about the Santa Maria Novella medicinal cordials. These were explained to Forbes Magazine as originally being literally used for medicinal purposes at meals.

Santa Maria Novella -
Florentine medicinal cordials.

When you realize that a range of modern drugs used (and some are not approved in the USA by the way, but used widely elsewhere around the world) to 'treat' all kinds of pathological conditions from general depression to anxiety and even dementia - were developed originally as 'crowd control toxins...' 

Seroquel, for instance. 

Cholorobenzylidenemalononitrile is a nerve agent. It is a Central Nervous System agonist and a very very powerful one at that. Clonidine is one of the suite of CNS agonist drugs basically developed from crowd and riot control toxins. Except nowadays the big companies have taken every possible step to blot out the history of that on the internet. Instead, the standard and well-known things like Sarin and VX are mentioned widely as if these were the only ones ever experimented with.

The fact is every single one of the ADD/ADHD 'treatments' prescribed medically today have shady pasts in the field of military and 'police' experiments. 

The products that early proto-chemists made had no such malicious entry-points into society.

They are not designed to stop you from seeing Elves and Fairies. Or believing in things usually unseen... Rather the opposite, to be frank.

An interesting aspect to this new book out about the life of young Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, is that he mentions that he is an 'occasional magical thinker.'

They asked if you wanted this 
optional extra, Bill?

Interesting.

It's fine by me, especially since so many people around these days, thanks to the 'medically-prescribed drugs' that they are all on, are not thinkers even at all.

I am not a magical thinker, even though from the outside a lot of people would love to say that I am.

Just because I can have real Elves and Fairies turn up with real gold and silver in their finely-manicured real hands does not make me a 'magical thinker.'

I am not interested in them not turning up, and merely being some kind of figment of my or someone's imagination.

And I am not encouraging anyone to be 'magical thinkers.'

What I want you to be are actual thinkers.

But as they say -, to primitive people, what advanced people do will seem like magic.

LOL

Human beings are very primitive people.

Hope you were paying attention to that last song like I said:

  

Navigating Dystopia

The question of whether a sick society can survive is moot - it has already collapsed.

I cannot bear posting pics of what has been happening in Paris streets because it is not just visually ugly but is a sad and tragic signal of how little your government gives a damn about you.

But then, it is not just your government only who thinks like that: I have economic and financial statistics whose deep analysis reveals something pretty disturbing about much of general modern society, that is to say - the people in the generations who have been in control for so long since WWII.

Just beer.

I am not going to say what this analysis shows right at this time because this is going to have to be left to the first few new transactions of the Digital Dirhams in which the AI process will be given a run-through for those people who become involved at that time - which is later on though, not now...

What is meaningful and productive for all of us to do at this point, is simply determine our own plans for how to make it through the present mess.

...And dare I say, in some personal and private luxury though, it must be added.

Waaa?

Oh yeah.

You can do well. Others will not.

And then of course this whole ancient quandary of moral duty towards one's fellow human being comes into hard focus once again.

There is a second order of explanation to do with this intrinsic moral duty we all have - if we are not psychopaths or sociopaths - which is in the New Testament. And this is essentially the matter of defining just who exactly is our fellow Man. The Jews already wanted to have it that they were superior to all other races - they were Chosen, by this Jehovah character. And everyone else was not only not 'Chosen,' but actually despised by their concept of God.

And there is a third order too, of this question.

Just bread.

This is that people may hold the same values as described by Jesus Christ (in the example), but then, they also need to have the systems within them, literally the intellectual and maybe you could even say 'soul' bits and pieces all intact, in order to be able to hold such values in the first case.

You cannot project some internal force through a general benevolence outward - unless you are equipped with that faculty; most people have only the sense of the self and their concept about 'general benevolence' is simply a feedback loop via which what they really mean to achieve is a continued benefit to themselves principally. They have no means of understanding that it is possible to benefit others and at the same actually lose to one's self!

See I might take a risk if I thought the optimum outcome will benefit myself - but I would not take that risk if I thought there were no possibility of any benefit to myself. People make this strained justification then about such guaranteed defeat 'altruism' being some kind of species survival thing.

What they are missing is the fact people who talk about 'survival of the species' have already found a personal biochemical benefit in holding that mystical, pseudo-religious view.

They are getting a 'warm glow' from the self-glorification fantasy that someone in the future will applaud them. It's no different from the way people addicted to their own celebrity imagine their fans adoring them - or even the way so many women are attracted to taking 'selfies' and posting them to no one in particular online.

This is simply the extension of cinema screen metaphor Norma Desmond in Sunset Boulevard into the actual human social context - which is really, how things are today. There are a hundred million little 'Norma Desmonds' (and Norm Desmonds) out there all totally power-mad, control-hungry, self-involved, opinionated, brats deciding how the world should be.

The 'people out there, in the dark' are 'Norma Desmond!'

Oh and they're in the dark all right.

Just caviar.

'God' however, is the character who can afford to eliminate himself/herself.

Let's say I 'eliminate myself' from caring about much of the rest of the world, the planet, the environment, the government, the laws, the morals, the rules, the social ways - totally abstain from helping anyone when they are in trouble. Well then I have indeed really 'died to the world.' In any case the world doesn't care about me other than to exploit me, my time, my physical strength as a production unit. Jacinda Ardern cannot 'help' me if she doesn't even know who I am; that is - what I am. 

For one thing I am not 'a unit of production' at all! 

I do not need to be told by Jacinda that she is really, really, doing her best to help me, and to benefit me. She would need to know what I am first, before she was able to determine what things I required.

But if I can see that you're (as in literal you, not me) 'God' then I can literally afford to die, or to risk to die...

Now when I look around me - and I'm a simple sailor - I don't exactly see obvious God anywhere. So then what I do is look around for those who are most like it.

LOL

And that is actually a small number of individuals, and most of them have only one or two particular characteristics that are 'God-like.' But even so, a part of God is still 'God;' under the correct and accurate definition of 'Divinity.' So that will do.

Eventually when all the parts might in theory be integrated, then great - that's the way things should be. ...Maybe one day it will happen.

Meanwhile, the world is crumbling all around me.

And I. Don't. Care.

Pay attention to this song:

 

The Hard Material Reality

 ...How can I explain this?

Just how can I go about explaining all of this.

Well unless you have a precise map of the human mind system - not the brain structure - then you will find it difficult to appreciate just how nuanced and how important the whole thing of human life really is.

You see it is basically a matter of symmetry -, though virtually of opposites.

Now when you realize that this is up a really steep
mountain a long way, and that I grew up
about a mile down the side of this
mountain...
I've been in this 'house' many times.
Down the mountain-side
are crevices and three layers of
jungle.

More than one of you have privately asked about the Monroe Institute's 'Hemi-Sync' system, which is a proprietary process for uncovering some of the underlying networks that the human being can use but often doesn't use in any conscious way. But these are all still in the realm of mind visions and impressions - which is not to say such things are entirely non-material; they are material, but exist within the boundaries of the brain and intelligent awareness at micro levels rather than as larger-scale physical manifestations of hard reality.

See one of the oddities about the US Navy personnel's nicknaming of those thirty-foot white things flying around, is that the nomenclature is already known in military strategy circles: 'TIC' stands for tactical, or troops-(in-contact).

That is something you never read in any media or press reporting.

Don't ever forget you heard it here first.

So now I'm going to confirm to you that there are some material physical craft and that some people are actually transiting between Earth and there and back. And yet still I am going to go back to the concepts of Hemi-Sync and say they are valid and useful towards this end of actual material physical engaging - for the reasons I indicated at the start here.

The human personal consciousness, for reasons that are not evolutionary in any way and are highly devolutionary (no such English word, I made it up) if anything - is situated within only two areas of the human mind map: in the area to do with suffering, pain and fears, and in the area of appetite for material hedonic sensations and induced action responses.

People justify that they are behaving or acting in benevolent ways only as the extension of these other two matters. That is - they are not intrinsically centered, for example, actually in the material node of benevolence.

And yet there is such a material node, although it has not been uncovered yet by human science. To a certain extent some Jungian, maybe even Freudian old school psychologists do recognize this as a function of the 'child/parent' stage - which it is of course so much more than that though.

Nobody has any template in neuroscience about which specific unique neurotransmitters convey sensations of pleasure to the body and the brain, when adult humans are positioned in the state of feeling benevolent towards any other specific humans... Present neuro-physiology will implicate Oxytocin and that's about all.

The true reality though is that part of the reason scientists have not identified anything else, is because its half-life is just too fast to be observed at the levels looked for.

And so already though, you should be able to see that let's say the paradigm is correct that I am saying, then this could underscore that Monroe's 'Hemi-Sync' is probably at least shifting the mind better into those high speed and extremely precise or discrete coherency processing channels - and which is then why people 'see' things; different things, new things, and in new ways.

The fact is however, that people can be doing this all the time, and are to some extent subconsciously aware of this channel process - and were they to stay ego-consciously in that node, then (human) society itself would be radically different than the way it is.

The truly damning aspect to this is that actual individual human beings literally dissipate as sentient creatures on the individual scale (IE die, disappear completely) unless they are operating on at minimum some of the other nodal foci other than simply the primal ones of sense obligation alone.

We think we are smart as intelligent animals because we have this grandiose invention of for instance 'money;' and we use money as the 'lingua franca' of the primal senses' needs and demands for satisfaction.

The powerful and utterly negative subversion of what the human personal ego consciousness ought to be doing, is that for instance, such people do not require that something be actually true in the absolute, so long as it is true enough to realize some money outcome, or some appetite outcome. Even the removal of pain artificially is quite sinister if it involves repudiating signal pain... The epidemic of people seeking semaglutide injectables and opioids and valium-style psychological state modifying chemicals is one example of people messing around with natural signals telling that something is wrong which they have to address and not cover with a rug (which is what they are all doing).

It takes a massive amount of energy and a highly organized process to take 'you' into some kind of craft that can go faster than well, extreme speeds. 'You' might have to be removed and re-installed into something else, some other kind of humanoid physique. But then that physique, in context of the particular kinds of societies where those beings are - operate fluently across much more than the two simplistic primitive animal 'psychological nodes.'

Which means you do need to be fluent there already before extraction here.

So don't under-estimate just how important it really is to use tools such as Hemi-Sync' or similar things. 

In stock standard present-day psychology people know that the so-called borderline personality disorder has to do with individuals being unable to see nuances in themselves or in other human beings, or nuances in situational matters. These kinds of people make false assumptions about intentions and motivations, and themselves act against both their own interests and the interests of those around them by imputing 'black and white' meanings to things which have no such actual meanings.

This one was made with real snow.

...Meanwhile they can be fully convinced they are serving their own interests by satisfying immediate sense demands arising from the two simplistic psychological nodes of (physical) 'survival' and 'appetite.'

They have zero consciousness that in fact they will in any case be materially physically dead at some future point and there is only the reality of some ego-consciousness endurance beyond that, although all these kinds of people are very adamant that there cannot be, and will not be and so only their 'now' moments are important.

To them.

Although they all try to build monuments to their 'name.' LOL

What would be the point of showing anyone that 100% for sure there has always been the ego-consciousness survival potential for the human entity - and that this may be demonstrated utterly materially without having to resort to philosophical discussion!

All it would achieve is the artificial attempt to deceive about moving the ego-consciousness into the benevolence position - so that this can be exploited in order to go back and satisfy the primitive desires principally.

All women that you know in the world want a 'high value' partner to show interest in 'exclusively them,' in order that their genes be passed on into the long-term future - so the story goes. That story found its way into a pop psychology book called 'the Selfish Gene.'

There is no such gene.

All this is is the misstep of humans in their so-called 'evolutionary process' away from a multi-node psychology and into this stuck ditch of primitive animal 'one shot life cycle' motivations.

The fact that you cannot see what the material sensory pay-offs are for socially-shared ego benevolence positioning beyond the obvious ones potentially of food and sex, is no excuse for an intelligent being.

And here is the 'worst' aspect: 'Jesus - are you saving everyone?' 'No, that lot is going over the cliff.'

The question is not merely that you are benevolent, but who you are to be benevolent towards.

Well, you can most certainly start with yourself.

 

Not Teasing

I was not ever trying to tease anyone here - or just be 'teasing.'

Obviously that is not how things are necessarily going to come across because I have never posted pics of anything that goes on down here!

Well, that's not exactly true - I posted some of JES and also the Lux Partum German affair. Whether you can tell that there are any 'people' in the audience who should not be there according to 'sci-ence...' Well, I cannot say.

Let's go down the rabbit-hole.
This is the Lafite-Rothschild
cellars for some of their
best wines.

But given that there are one or two people reading along with us who have voiced some sense of 'tease,' it might be appropriate to swing away from the money side of things just for a short while and go back to covering the 'other subject' for just a minute or two.

The main thing about not saying too much all that openly is that we are dealing with extraordinarily dangerous matters. We are dealing with the fact that governments themselves do want to know that there really are 'other people' here. To some extent they do know it, except it has been bottled up into the Intel fraternities where it has managed to exist as a secret to do with nuclear weapons - and there has never really been so much 'activity' that things needed to be extricated from that shadowy crevice.

To say that anyone here has regularly actual meetings with suspicious characters, is only inviting trouble.

It would already be possible to know where to look if someone made a systemic examination of all of the posts here across several years.

I'm going to try and explain this - or at least, my own attitude and sense of where and when or even if, it will be appropriate to openly say anything very detailed...

I am going to explain it by talking about something right off what you would think is even vaguely connected. Someone.

But to at least find a kind of a bridging point I can say that I have always said we are misusing our own communication tools - those of our own normal senses - in the way we assume 'talking' is actual intelligent communicating. It is not.

'Talking' or speaking intelligent sensible connected meaning words - is in fact a way of mischievously presenting insufficient real information about what we think and feel.

Some people blush when they tell lies or say something embarrassing to them, and that is a minimalist parallel communications tool that should go along with the spoken word; the fact we have very little range of skin flush signalling is a negative aspect of human evolution.

Only because the pic is
cute.
To me it is, anyway.

Certain well-known identities in fields of communicating - film directors, drama producers, maybe some stage people, opera and ballet artists and creators - do have a set of tools they all use and know about, but which they mostly never discuss with others.

Roger Vadim is a guy who is one of these and to the extent that I know that he really is, then, look, hey - I have to deal with him...

And you might not know I mean there.

Vadim was not necessarily demeaning of the women actors he directed and produced, but I would say he dismissed them utterly as worthy of his deepest honesty and highest intellectual thoughts. I think Bardot was on to him to some extent. But I don't think Fonda ever was. I think Pickett had some idea and thankfully was subject to much criticism from the professional media tribes of vandals and Vadim passed away from this Earth quickly after his work with her so she avoided the biggest problem that is entailed with going too deeply into the truth.

For one thing, the people of the human race generally crucify Truth all day long. Do not fancy for one second you are a 'good' people, a 'good' species - nor that you are even all that particularly intelligent.

You cannot be intelligent if you are using such a limited range of what your possible, or potential communications tools actually are.

Roger Vadim never explained what his method was with any of his female stars. Most people like him leave such 'explanations' to the end stages of their lives - and many expected Kubrick to do it, but he never did either.

Kubrick never had the same technique or skills that Vadim had, with his female actors, but he certainly did with the all the male ones: he completely did it with Peter Sellers, for example.

I have always considered that there may come a time much later on in my life, at which I might or maybe should explain a few things clearly. I certainly have possession of certain facts and 'things' that would completely challenge everything you ever thought you knew that human science 'knew.'

Human science is not even close.

At the same time there is a tremendous militancy of stupidity among most of the prominent public figures - and we have seen it recently with Sam Harris, where he literally said that 'if, Covid was more deadly, and the vaccines more obviously effective, then, maybe people would not have had such foolish conspiracy theory tendencies about how the scientists all lied about the problem and the dangers.' Canadian public philosopher Gad Saad has said this is like saying our table cloth would make a beautiful setting for our roast dinner if we had a table to lay it out it on... ...if we had a beautiful table-cloth.

...If we had a roast dinner.

What this means is that confronted with absolute cold hard evidence people would just simply deny it in favor of their previous commitments to some viewpoint, which was now obviously wrong though.

'A' truth, is that right here, there is already a place where people are building on pretty important philosophical understandings about logic and human psychology too.

And so I would like for us to accept that there are a number of fine minds already here, who ought to be looking at new problems, or even just other ideas not exactly problems as such, and applying their mind tools onto those matters. ...On a dynamic, 'each and every day' basis.

We don't need to go back and go over the same old ground all the time all the time.

We already are the beneficiaries of Jesus, Enoch, Elijah, Plato, Pythagoras, Freud, Jung and so on.

We did not 'go up to heaven' either with Elijah or Enoch or Jesus - and as for the last dude, He literally said some would be down here and having to 'wait' for something.

There's plenty of YouTube people claiming He is coming back next Tuesday or thereabouts though, as you know.

For me, I would hope you could consider the possibility that you might just apply some tools and techniques from all of these people without having to 'go up' anywhere (and likely not return!) - and have effects on situations right here and right now.

Oh of course, I know, a laser canon or something would certainly have an effect - but then that is not the thing Vadim used on his actors. Now was it?

So but if Vadim could twist Fonda's mind without blasting it with a laser weapon (although who knows what he had on the set of Barbarella), then why do you feel you need to come visit with some ET Aliens in space ships and maybe acquire some light sabers or whatever?

If Vadim was able to twist Jane Fonda's mind...

Good enough though?

Are there ET Alien space ships and do they have weapons in there? 

What would be the point though, of anyone going up there if they were permanently prey to a Vadim-style set of techniques because they did not want to change their own minds?

And what makes you think you are at all entitled to 'go there' when you adamantly resist looking at first principles in the matter?

Rather than worry about, or ask to see the space craft and the occupants, why not bring some Earth problems to here and let's all of us work on them.

You're all smart enough in a combined way.

You don't need anybody else's brain-power. Okay you might need some fun nights with Fonda but then, that was already in the toolkit of Vadim; he ain't here on the planet right now, but so what?

Are you able to work out what he was doing all by yourself?

  

What We Have That Others Haven't

Some of you who have been reading here for a long while now, and maybe even reading some of the 'off-site' books on Amazon/Kindle, already will have formed the view that either whoever is really behind this place is in league with some kind of functionally active Intel organization somewhere, or else maybe in league with 'demons' (lol) or actual ET Aliens - or all three!

So now we will take things up a notch for you guys (which is a term that includes 'gals' of course), because you will be able to link what you are about to read with what you already have read. Whereas those new to this will simply see only this one moment and see it very likely as simply an ordinary potential advanced perspective on a well-known subject: namely 'AI.'

I like retro sci-fi, don't you?

But the fact is, most of you will appreciate, that there is no such thing as 'AI' in this world today.

It is not 'artificial' (because it is real, mechanistic...) and it is not 'intelligence' because it is so far away from what constitutes human intelligence that one cannot legitimately employ the same term to describe the two different things.

Human intelligence is composed of conscious decision-making - including analysis and drives to action - coming through personal emotional sensations of pleasure and displeasure.

No machines anywhere have any systems which can truly equivalently appreciate the meaning of what humans experience when they (humans) make value decisions from feelings.

The world of science contains a grooved-in view about what neuroscience says that 'emotions' and 'feelings' are - and this view is completely erroneous.

Science has not even discovered anywhere close to the range of neurotransmitters that it would need to in order to be able to say anything meaningfully conclusive about how the human feels pleasure and displeasure. Right now it focuses on Dopamine and Serotonin, largely.

Nevertheless, we all know that there is a swelling tide to throw the term 'AI' into everything new coming across the technology threshold - and so we must expect to see it ('AI') everywhere soon.

Unless you've had the real thing,
in the right environment - 
you don't know what 'transcendence' is.

But virtually none of it will really be 'Artificial Intelligence.'

A better way of labeling a decent example of something like what is being talked about so casually, is 'human fabricated machine learning systems with response protocols for human interactions.'

And then of course, maybe somewhere way out in space... ...lol - there will be civilizations who have enabled some kind of emulative human emotion system for a fabricated machine being.

Now here is something that is a long way away from Malthus and all of the present human psychology studies that you have ever read:

There is a seeming vagary about human emotions - which comes from the fact that they move across a map-able set of 'meaning' nodes, or foci - and these movements are stochastic.

Which means they can be analyzed statistically, but they cannot be predicted accurately.

Now.

Yes they cannot be predicted by your earth scientists.

But they can be determined (that is, forced) by ours.

This is the real dude that makes these
things - 'Argos.'
Dunno. Is he good or bad?
We'll let the AI decide.
lol

If human emotional prioritization is stochastic only, then it cannot ever be emulated in a machine learning tool (software/program).

Malthus wants to say that 'transcendence' is on top of his pyramid or hierarchy of value that (all standard/normal) humans have - but then he does not say whether this feeling of transcendence is the same for the guy who is eating beef burgundy jaffles with french onion sauce on the side, as for the one who is praying in a church or temple.

...And the assigning of value and meaning, to both of those two might be very different in an economic system.

And thus Malthus's AI program which is expecting to give you some brilliant insight into making money in a global economic framework, for example - is bound to fail.

But Malthus is the guy they will teach at your local Universities, and he will indeed necessarily be the pathway that all of those graduates go, when they are fabricating their fake 'AI' thingies for you. 

We, on the other hand, will yes, use a 'sample sizes and values' model - pretty much the same pattern discerning system that US military war-planners use today in their war-games; except we will know what goes into the seemingly stochastic data arising from human decision sample sets.

And this, is what you will get each time that you 'activate' one of the utility tokens you have from here...

Ah yeah.
We have it all.

In other words we do have an AI system.

But what motivates the otherwise stochastic human emotion-based outcomes?

My friends, some of you should be having the hairs standing up behind your neck right now.

What makes our AI system valuable is that it works - because it is so far in advance of anything on this planet right now.

I mean, hey, for example, it's all very well a few runners-after telling you now in the media that 'scientists' can maneuver lightning with laser beams - but 'scientists' can't do that... They can only repeat what they were told to look for - and found.

So. Guide-star lasers and volcanic lightning. Somebody can move lightning about but not earth scientists.

...Accountants have pushed people into thinking that economic systems are devoid of human emotion when it comes to profit-seeking.

But if I suggested to you that even the word 'liquidity' in practice is not just the fact, that something can be turned into cash in 24 hours, but the other fact that attends it always, that if the asset is in some human being's hands, then a lot depends on whether they want to release it for cash at all!

Yes it might be liquid, which doesn't mean to say that it should be liquidated.

What makes this place you're reading at valuable is its understanding of stochastic systems in human emotional decision-trees.

Every activated unit, nominally @ $100 each, obtains one time-decaying stochastic analysis of a 'sample sizes and values model' instance of something in the world of humans -, possibly something in the economic world.

And each and every one of them will be incredibly exciting.