Roger Bacon, Doctor Of Wonders

Wikipedia, being the echo chamber of arrant nonsense that it is, states very boldly that Roger Bacon (1120 - 1292) is credited as one of the earliest advocates of the modern scientific method. 

And what is that thing 'modern scientific method?'

By the time of Descartes, in the 16th and 17th centuries - which is only around 400 years ago - suddenly science departs very radically from the methodology and directions of anything that Bacon ever did!

Why is that?

How can he have, on the one hand, been an advocate of the modern scientific method, yet at the same time have been literally an occult practitioner, a 'wizard,' an alchemist, and a spiritual religious philosopher??

If we get one of these, Bill, we'll
have to solve detective mysteries!

Well, my friends, by the time you have finished reading the 'add-on' text to the Drinkable Inks article, you will quickly realize that the works referred to in there, have never ever been read by Richard Dawkins or Neil deGrasse Tyson, and on account of which very obvious fact, they simply have absolutely no idea of what they are talking about.

You see, none of them speak or reads Arabic, or ancient high Greek, or Persian, and all that they know of the works translated and used by identities such as Roger Bacon, are things they have been told by others, who also, have never read the works either.

Descartes knew that the Vatican held certain important texts, but he did not have access to them! 'Modern scientists' have never had access to them!

So how could they possibly know what is in them?

Well of course they can't know and they don't know.

But they howl long and hard enough though, don't they?

There is of course, what one can only say is a deeply 'conspiracy theory' kind of reason for why there is such animus against particular kinds of understandings about what it is certain ancient books were saying - and we will go into this soon in here. It's a truly terrible and astonishing thing, and without seeking to draw the attention of Christopher Wray and the FBI generally(!), we must however, at least note that the reason the Borgias had the reputation of killing people - was because that is what they did do afterall. No doubt about it.

Then we'd have to eat some of 
these....

All those who read these ancient classic works in their original forms and understand their meanings having been given the keys to the understanding of them - will necessarily also fall more into the category of the Borgias, than in the category of saints Joe Biden and saint The Pope and saint Everyone-else-and-his-dog-wokey-wokey-wonder-pronoun.

I will not explain explicitly what that means 'fall into the category of the Borgias.'

There is a huge antipathy towards anyone who breaks out from the cookie-cutter 'modern scientific method' mentality - yet that mentality is flawed and based on a false understanding of Aristotle's original arguments and writings. But, and here is where something quite sinister starts to enter into the picture, albeit Richard Dawkins, for example, has never read the 'Mirror For Princes' by al-Kindi, he may say that he 'knows' that its original source was the same book or text also titled the same way, by 'Pseudo-Aristotle.' And here is where the very deliberate 'switch' is being played. See, it's the other way around. Those works that are commonly attributed to 'Aristotle' are false, and virtually fraudulent items of propaganda spawned by those who were at the time very much against the Academy (of real Aristotle). 

Further, unless you are a student of the actual Academy (I mean that ancient one) you will not understand that the reason all the masters of the Academy towards the ends of their lifetimes have what 'seem' like unfinished, or half-completed works, is something to do intrinsically with the teaching method itself, that they were using...

Thus, for example, Plato's Letter to Dion, is intended to be completed by Dion himself (although he was assassinated before that could happen) or another one or more of the Garden School (Academy) - but how they are to be completed is something completely outside of modern science's insistence about anything, because... ...well? Are you able to guess?

...Wear things like those.

You all have been reading here enough already (those of you who have been into the pages for a few years now).

The fact that there are a number of books which appear under the name of 'Aristotle' around the time of his older age and eventual death, are exactly what was supposed to happen, officially. Are you getting what is being said here?

Star Trek had it quite neatly, when they produced an episode called 'Plato's Stepchildren.'

I hope you're getting it now.

Believe me, you are going to be reading some things (in this latest 'add-on' text) which are so astonishing, that you will wonder how it was possible to keep those matters from the wider public for thousands of years.

I will be showing you, for instance, where in the Christian New Testament, the writers expressly detail the Vedic chakra system.

And this, you will grant, is knowledge that the whole entire world of the New Age-y people would give their eye-teeth to know about.

But I will also be showing you how such knowledge is used to kill (as is also detailed in the Rig Veda), and also how it is used to control which people find their way to you and remain there.

And you will clearly see though, how the system itself instantly precludes those who do not accept one simple condition, or let's say it better, set of conditions.

Luckily, all of this is complete nonsense.

And open jars of jam.
Jam today. For us.
Giggle.

LOL

Because if it were not, and I were silly like, say the reporter, journalist, and writer Tracy Twyman, who started off softly enough writing 'Mind Controlled Sex Slaves and the CIA,' but who ventured into problematic territory when she threatened to divulge who actually were the pedophiles who frequented Epstein Island - I could end up getting myself killed like she did a year or so ago.

I mean I wouldn't though, get myself killed, because I have some 'facilities' and 'access' that she did not have.

Certainly I don't have any kind of pressing need to 'expose' anyone. When there are real crocodiles in the muddy water, believe me, the ducks just disappear from the surface and no one knows anything beyond that simple fact. I know this must sound like a canard.

And every particular word chosen counts.

We shall see though, what we shall see.

Meanwhile, for you and me, our immediate mission is simply to draw those to ourselves that we want, lock out those whom we will, and mess around with those that we must before the end of the whole tale is completely through and the fat lady has stopped singing.

We - you and I - are not the big league leaders; we might be some of the big league players though, that's fair enough to say. 

So let's play. Because with us the fun never ends:

The Inks Extension Text/s

Ah so, it's basically completed. And I'm really happy because I was able to extract the really crucial aspects of how and why these preparations really work. See that - really really really.

I'm not sure whether we should go even one step beyond where we're at right now (not that you have seen these latest pieces) - and I probably will, now that I think about it.

See there's two very interesting aspects of the strands of thinking that have been (luckily) not lost to us, and brought to us by Al Kindi and then later by Ibn al-Haytham and then on through Roger Bacon.

It's fake, it's modern,
but it is atmosphere, you
have to grant that.

Bacon was a stupendously brilliant scientist, but he also had the reputation of literally being a wizard - whatever that means. In his day he was referred to as 'Doctor Wonderful' or more like, if I translated and interpreted what they meant:  'Doctor of Wonders.'

He made a translation of the major Arabic occult work 'Sirr al-'asrar' (Mirror of Princes) and there is no way people then or now, in the general run of things, never mind if they were from academia or not - would ever be able to understand what is being said in those works.

There is just far too much overhang now, from 'sci-entists' who are really intent on keeping the value of the highest ground of knowledge to themselves for mercantile reasons - to gain any intelligent discussion from open public sources about either Roger Bacon or his best written works.

Whether you actually believe a person, for instance, like Immanuel Velikovksy, or not, it is more profitable to examine why he was coming to the conclusions that he did come to, but then advanced as his propositions about religious myths, really.

All the modern-day scientists who would even be prepared to render an opinion on Velikovksy always default to the standard 'he made things up' as their fundamental criticism. And that indeed he did, too!

But it was not why he was being moved towards that kind of 'sci-fi/fantasy/myth explanation' direction in his thinking. He wasn't 'making things up' because he was pathologically creative.

He knew - as in actually literally did know for a fact of language and etymological science - that for example, the Book of Revelation explicitly contains the Vedic chakra system, fully intact and exactly as the Vedas themselves say.

You didn't know that, did ya?

So in the same way, it's more profitable to look into what sources Roger Bacon had, and acknowledge that he, rather than say Richard Dawkins today, actually knows, reads, and understands the ancient languages in which texts by Aristotle and Parmenides and then Al Kindi and so on - were composed originally.

Not fake at all.
Also modern.
Pretty atmospheric, 
you also have to admit.

Dawkins has no such language knowledge or background. And neither did Descartes for that matter. So why are you believing their stupid nonsense??

...As opposed to anyone else's stupid nonsense?

Dawkins doesn't know what he's talking about. He acts as if he does, and he can sound convincing to the ignorant, but he's an egocentric charlatan with a big platform in a modern era of 'platform-ism.'

Look. Let me give it to you with both barrels here.

The reason it is called 'The Secret of Secrets' and 'The Mirror of Princes' is because it is the complete methodology and actual practical guide and steps to doing those things for which 'Pharaoh' was accused by the JOOOZ of Moses, and earlier Nimrod in Babylon when he tried to 'ascend the tower to the Throne of God in Heaven...'

And what were those guys accused of being able to do?

See the thing you have to get around just in terms of logic, is this - Jews all agree there was a Moses (of the exact type of identity they all claim; I don't agree with them but I would only be splitting hairs about it with them anyway); archaeologists all agree there were Pharaohs and they were politically powerful and hugely wealthy and they all agree there are 'pyramids' (which were built by ignorant primitive Egyptians idiots with no machines or instruments and just slaves, right? LOL).

But then so what of it anyway?

The Jews' story is that Pharoah was no more than three feet tall and had magical powers. Go ask them. Go and ask any actually learned Jew in their own traditions, in the Talmud and the commentaries of the Torah, and see what they tell you.

He had funny grey skin, big black eyes that transfixed people. And this is simply according to actual Jewish writings.

And he was a 'wizard.'

This was made using 
a recipe of Al Kindi.

Logically you have to get around the fact that he was so bad, that the JOOOZ all wished to escape his clutches. Nimrod was so bad, that Abraham or the proto-JOOOZ wanted to escape him and 'God' actually smashed up his 'tower.'

So why are you believing the other end of the fairy tale but not the seminal causative part?

You want to 'demarcate' between 'sci-ence' and 'wizardry' why...? Because now you tell us 'wizardry doesn't work...'

B**ers! You are a liar.

You 'sci-entist.'

You are scared that people will do to you what Pharaoh was able to do. What Nimrod was able to do. What Aristotle said (if you presume he wrote the 'Secret of Secrets' - the real book of that) that the actual knowledge of Hermes was able to do.

If 'wizardry' as it is being called by the malefic 'sci-entists' is so pathetic and non-functional why not just let people try it, see that it doesn't work and is nonsense, and it will die its predictable natural demise?

Oh oh, but but, you will waste so much time and energy er, er, er, wasting your time, chasing all of these crazy ideas and notions. So, jury in, Roger Bacon is wrong. Never mind we've stolen every single one of his practical ideas. But he's just, just wrong. Now stop going there. Don't look in there.

Sorry that's not good enough.

But but, people will exploit the naive, and use propaganda and lies and the media to, to, er, to get their way even though it will not be based on sci-ence.

And, as Fauxi told you 'we are science.'

Listen. What these fools know about science is nothing at all.They know about lying and politics.

The flames are slowly starting to burn
the crepes...

The minute one 'Bacon' somewhere just whimsically 'takes out' some prominent identity, then you will find the headless chooks all running around the chook-pen, squawking.

Me personally I'm trying to focus and concentrate on making you guys some money here.

That's what I'm focused on.

It's very difficult too, because I don't even know what 'money' even is right now!

LOL

Look if the modern 'sci-entist's' dichotomy of subject matters - the so-called 'issue of demarcation' were genuinely and honestly being rendered by those 'sci-entists,' then you would not be left with the same problem of the reality of the opposition to Moses; the reality of the anti-public stance of Nimrod; the reality of the psychology of what those 'sci-entists' fear.

Because they fear something. And that fear comes from its reality, not its fantasy, because after all, the 'sci-entists' are the last to 'believe' in phantasms and unreality anyway.

The opposition is both real and its power is real. There's ya problem right there.

So what's real about what I am telling you?

How about everything.

My friends in the Islamic community always ask me to produce a Djinn for them.

Well, just make sure you read the up-coming new text:

(Do I ever let you down with the music? Nope. Never do. ...You got to get to about 2 minutes in, using the tools given by this new text. Meanwhile, however... ...you just listen).

Not 'Die' - Die Out

If I showed you a device, and you turned it on, and all of a sudden you looked really, and I mean really stupendously attractive...

See the tactic after that would be to just go hand around places. OMG. They - the people - fawn all over you.

It doesn't say 'and if you eat of this you will die' in Genesis. It says 'and if you eat of it in that day your kind will die out.' And one day is like unto a thousand years.

Am I right?

Give. Me.
The keys.

LOL

Know what I'm talking about, some of you here?

The existential reality of the US Navy's multiple high technology tracking and recording equipment is that UFOs exist - they do materially, physically.

Where no moth destroys.

Why not?

What's up there? What, are there no moths? I happen to like moths.

There's moths. 

We just plain don't 'get' what human life is all about. It is an iterative replicating process with multiple new and different outcomes all the time.

The fact that most of you, or at least many of you/some of you - don't remember your past lives is not my problem.

Linear time is a 'here' thing. It's not a 'there' thing. No such thing as simple linear time if you're travelling 16 trillion miles at least, in just a few moments.

You do need to start living in two places at 
once from now.
You do need to find yourself
some time, to concentrate
on steering away from
this world.

I can meet you, see you along anywhere at all of your time-line. I don't need to set a time next week, schedule some exact moment, where we can all go 'up there' and just hang out for a while. It's up to you to get up there in the first place.

We'll be there. We'll already be there waiting for you.

You catch up. 

The serious philosophical problem 'if' Navy's Tic Tacs are actually really really real - is that this makes whatever is inside of them, whatever the conditions are in there, also existential.

Jesus says 'no moths.' Well He never said that, He simply said they don't destroy your things, your valuable treasures.

The claim is always made by prominent atheists that early Christians thought some 'Second Coming' would happen in their life-times and that this was a failed prophecy of Jesus. 

Someone please tell me why that is a stupid nonsensical challenge.

We always want to know mechanisms, and material physical structural codes and rules and engineering stuff - which is why there is a lack of serious focus given to 'storing your treasures' somewhere's else, other than in your Wells Fargo bank vault.

We want to know how things are 'kept materially together' out there in invisible UFO 'space.'

I listened to Charlie Munger's recent interview. He doesn't even know what the future will bring. And he's probably the best of the post-WWII overall era investors. He's doing the same thing everyone else always does - 'Oh this is bad, this is terrible, this spells TEOTW, et cetera.'

Yeah but what's the solution?

We all know things are bad. They always are bad! They always have been bad, even terrible, and often.

So?

So what?

Don't the f* worry about how things are kept together. They are and you know it.

You know it now because you have actually seen it.

So are you having a walk-in dresser with hot cloths up there 'where no moth can eat the cotton and the cashmere?'

Well?

I laughed my head off earlier this week when an Australian Opposition Party spokesman on economic matters rose in the House just before the Treasurer was about to give his address.

Shades of the speech-writer of the great Paul J. Keating, I thought... This is what he said:

"The Treasurer is about to come in, bare-footed, robes flowing, the incense burning..."

LOLOLOLOL

...I am trying to go as hard as I can to get this additional part to the 'Drinkable Inks' texts.

It will be finalized soon.

Are there moths in NYC?

And then, I will expect more than just the one of you who we saw up here just recently. Don't lie. You got here, one of you.

What I really want though, is the 'money shot.' Ah yeah, why not? We need to see the 'fields clothed in grass.' And you know where that comes from.

I mean that your streets should be paved in gold.

Luca Turin is the guy who enunciated this idea about the brain lighting up like a constellation. He linked it to music, not simply or not merely color. The spectral colors are just an heuristic thing that helps you to do what you have to do. Sure 'someone' can send this tuned EMF transmitter and extract you right out of your human body and jeez then you will see what your eyes really look like. Mine are frikkin' scary, man!

They are long and dark and sharp and truly very very frightening.

Which is why - that person who managed to get up here - they turned you around so that you were facing away from the eyes. Those eyes...

What allows you to stay is that you have all of the right qualities.

Down in the planet, there are plenty of reasonable-looking people, but they are DNA lines that are running out, and beneath the superficial 'looks' is a lot of nastiness and not in any good way.

From Our Perspective...

From our perspective today, we want answers for our thinking minds - not just 'money' or material things to satisfy various sense. Although yes, of course we still want that, nay - we actually need it.

'Your Father in Heaven knows what you need.'

We don't just 'want' stuff; we need stuff.

Meal planning for the Elves
again...

It's all very well for the relationship expert to say it's a red flag when some woman says: 'A real man would...'

I mean what are you gonna do, the two of you super-brilliant 'emotionally-balanced/non-narcissistic' people - just sit there holding hands across an empty card table?

Looking lovingly into each other's eyes. For hours and hours. Having nothing, knowing little, 'needing' less - because 'you have each other...'

Well that's just stupid.

Meanwhile, I've been having some conversations with a few of you privately, and although we are not going to explain everything in detail out in the open here, at least we can say a couple of things that will radically alter this business about 'having things' - more to the point getting things.

How many people in the world today are familiar with the word 'visualization?' 

Ten million? A hundred million? Maybe much much more than that?

Well 'red' light is 620 to 750 nm.

That is not a 'visualization.' That is a specific, discrete amount of actual energy.

All of your neural circuits are bio-electrical.

As Luca Turin puts it, when your brain recognizes a Beethoven symphony, the neurons - all networked together in your head - light up like a constellation.

Music develops neural network connection firings in wave formations, with energy, frequency, and cycles which are Gaussian.

The 'ultra-violet catastrophe' of the Gauss Curve for spectral colors are exactly the same: IE Gaussian.

You cannot 'visualize' the color 'red' and expect something special to happen inside your neurology.

But you can make the red energy happen at your neural network nodes, sufficient enough to provide the first line of the ascending spectral Gaussian Curve.

Spectral light is not something Isaac Newton discovered. He stole it from Al-Kindi's Optics (9th century) and from there anyway it was taken by Ibn al-Haytham (10th century). Al-Kindi got it from having worked with Greek books of Plato and some others. ...And then now we come to me. And to you.

Well let's say we take this concept a long way further up the garden path here (just keep thinking of me like some innocent little child leading you by the hand, don't worry...), all the way to uncovering whole entire systems and structures and discrete bio-electric energy patterns, so large and so complex that heck, you can identify one of them as some person you know.

Well I tell you what -, you harmonically entangle yourself at the quantum level with say, um, Adolf Hitler, then. Go on. Is that what you want to do?

Is it?

Let's 'give it' that he killed six million Jews, right?

And Jesus made six thousand (only six thousand) loaves and fishes.

Just scale it up, li'l kid.

The story says there was a young boy who had a basket with some loaves and fishes: apparently five loaves and only two fishes.

Now the difference though, between Jesus and say, Howard Hughes, was that Howard still did a whole lot of work to make anything at all; whereas Jesus did nothing.

Both of them are still part of the Infinite Field of David R. Hawkins. The question for you is who do you want to communicate with by harmonic resonance - given that we are not talking about some simplistic form of it, but a highly complex and sophisticated form of it.

And as I was saying before, communication is this minimum 'four way' freeway, not a two-lane back alley, or a two-way side-street.

So no problem. Now we have real live ET Aliens here. And we have that because US Navy says so, give or take.

Well you for sure know how to get into their minds...

Not US Navy's mind, that's a sheer impossibility. That isn't a mind - that is a bunch of filing cabinets and only FBI can do that, even though it would be completely illegal in most circumstances, but they still 'can' do it. Whether they get the right command structure permission or not is irrelevant, they can and they will if they thought it would undermine democracy with some escapade like that.

You have a lot of people, a lot of organized groups against you ever realizing how far you can go with all of this.

...Nevertheless, we begin soon.

From right here.

And no one will see a GD thing.

Today our minds want to know 'how it all works.' That's why it takes us so long to get anywhere.

Where do you want to be?

And Sometimes The Point Is Euphoria Too

Okay so we have dealt with the fact that there are multiple things going on when highest-level communication is going on between really intelligent beings.

And you are one of those species that is potentially entitled to say yes 'super intelligent;' we are a super intelligent species. Possibly, maybe. 

Communication is such a complex thing in reality. There must be open-ended questions being asked in both directions, and there will also be so-called 'closed questions:' meaning requiring yes/no type answers.

So we watched Anna N., flinging her flowers to the guys in the audience. All those rich guys there.

Real 'August Moon Festival' this
year is around about now, this whole 
next week and a bit. This is when
the Goddess 'Chang-e' comes down from
the Moon and plays down here.

'He is not a real man unless he gives you a Birkin bag...'

Yeah well all right. It's true though. Except most guys won't have the money to get you a Birkin bag.

But this doesn't mean they should all just forget about Birkin bags!

I was watching this video that came in my YT feed just the other day, and a woman dating expert or coach or something - and she was a legit University-trained psych - was giving out these supposed 'red flag' warning signs about her own sex, basically betraying them all for the sake of academia. Stabbing them in the back, in the neck -, like the guy who attacked Salman Rushdie the other day. 

LOL She was the one who ran out that 'he is not a real man unless -' thing and said women who even say that just once are not women you should be getting involved with.

Well but why not? What, because you cannot get her a Birkin bag?? And then somehow you actually believe in yourself that you are 'not a real man' then, do you? No, of course not.

She says it. So what.

So this academic woman has issued a fatwa on women then, has she, and all the men jihadis now have to go stab some women (figuratively, except not because...) in the necks of their dreams.

Well I can get you any number of Birkin bags literally in your 'dreams!' (Can we not, though, guys? All of you who have already 'been up there.' You know where I mean. And like I said, don't make the mistake of thinking this all is 'just' visionary stuff, because when you get actually suddenly get swiped off you'll freak out. Isn't that so, Karin Austin - Professor John Mack person... Scoop marks to 'prove' it and all, afterwards). And that person from here who has been emailing with us this week, and binge-watching Professor David R. Hawkins - well you know the Field is infinitely powerful and will actually get you the Birkin!

Come on man!

Women want Birkin bags. They want someone to spend the measly $8,000 (cheapest ones) on them for a Birkin.

And a Birkin bag.

Well what's the difference between 'what women want' and what you all want from say, super advanced ET Aliens who will come down and land on the White House lawns?

'Would' you give someone an $8,000 Birkin bag?

If you had it to give?

That's the real question, isn't it, and we cannot give either the gods, or 'God,' or the ET Aliens an inch here!

Do you have it to give?

That's the big question.

Never mind hiding up in the clouds and stuff.

Because in a very short while there will be maybe five maybe ten kids from right here who will be 'going up to the White Room' and sooner or later after that it will be 'now can we have some Birkins please?' 

(By the way, we're already down here).

So, moving from Anna Netrebko last time, we now just find our bestie, JES: