Gays For Christ

Ha!

Gotcha.

I could take a very cheap shot and just say that Ferdinand de Saussure and Roland Barthes were gay Freemasons...

And I will do that, take the cheap shot and say it.

Saussure, 1857 - 1913, and Barthes 1915 - 1980 were easily more influential than Goebbels in procuring for the world of academia and politics, this basic strategy of political semiotics and 'scientific' propaganda in which, as Goebbels supposedly said: 'the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.'

That Freemason literally worships the Devil, this we know from all of the 'ex-Freemasons' who tell us so - but what is the particular evil of gays?

God killed them at Sodom & Gomorrah, right?

Does not God approve of pink Lamborghinis?
LOL

Well, actually - no. 

The destruction of Babylon and later, Sodom & Gomorrah, were for the same reason:

"The inclination of their hearts was only evil continually." It doesn't say anything about people's sexual proclivities being the actual reason for the 'wrath of Jehovah.'

I'll be even more blunt - it wasn't even Jehovah that actually carried it out; it was a couple of 'beautiful-looking' strangers with pepper spray or something that 'sent the men at Lot's door blind.'

When people say 'agency' it should be remembered that the two beings in the Biblical narrative, were intending to spend the night out in the public square. And the final decision to destroy the place must have been left up to them - since, let's say, in the wildest of all possibilities, they had have been treated so decently 'in the public square overnight,' that they may have had to restrain themselves from such fun with the photon torpedoes or whatever they might have had.

The ordinary human people, though are not anywhere near as decisively cautious and careful in who we obliterate - we slaughtered at least a quarter of a million people in 1945 at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and realistically, it was a lot more than what we are proud to admit in Wikipedia.

You cannot in honesty say that a gay person like Elton John 'does evil continually!' He preserves and curates very important art works, he sings and composes amazing music, he is a very hard-working stage performer, he gives a lot to charities quietly, and isn't known for 'raping good-looking young strangers wishing to spend overnight down in the town square unguarded.'

How about really wild fuchsia then?

So it isn't a logical proposition to hurl being 'gay' at Roland Barthes or Ferdinand de Saussure as any kind of 'sin.'

The Cratylus doesn't do the things that Saussure's written lectures all do - the Cratylus simply presents three main hypotheses and lays them out without actually dictating which of them is the only one that is true or real about the history of human speech; whereas Saussure dictates very assertively, particular things off of sweeping presumptions about race and the way people said things without the slightest bit of proof and evidence for any of it. We do not have recordings of how primitive man made sounds, nor do we have any such thing for any later time either, up until the modern times of Marconi.

Saussure is grossly racist.

And he is a major sophist.

Superficially you might say he is a product of the blooming of the post-Enlightenment era, but I choose to pursue the occultic path as far as Saussure goes: he is a Babylonian demonic personality. If this kind of talk was good enough for Jack Parsons and Aleister Crowley I don't see why you shouldn't allow it for me...

As you will recall, Babylon's eventual fate, was to be confounded by a prodigious incapacity of speech...

But what that really means is not that they were not able to make sounds, or for those sounds not to be intelligible, but that their 'magical occult' ability to employ semiotics and perverted meanings of words... ...was destroyed.

I mean sure, one can always choose to rather get back up onto a bicycle with a broken wheel because that is what one is used to over a long time and have adapted one's life and lifestyle so to do. Instead of using a brand new shiny bicycle that you have never seen before...  

Today's media and all of modern academia have the magical ability to lie and get away with it and be believed.

Right now there are no 'two beautiful strangers out at night in the town square' and certainly no photon torpedoes issuing forth with flames of supernal fire, either.

Anosmia - real anosmia - is the inability to sense what Serge Lutens is saying.

You know, the average Muslim, or at least, the standard Islamic narrative (which 'has holes in it' by the way, in case you haven't heard the scholarly ruling of Sheikh Yasir Qadhi last year) believes that the angel Jibreel (Gabriel) does all of this mass destruction and retribution and slaughtering stuff; but that is nowhere suggested in the Torah or the Bible. Gabriel is just a deliverer of messages from 'on high.'

New Age Christianity, or progressive Christianity, is uniform in its agreement that God is a God of Love only, and that all followers of those ideologies must not ever indulge angry sentiments and only be forgiving at all times and not seek destruction and all of this other action-packed drama.

Of course, this type of Christianity also accepts that gays and so on are not specifically condemned by God. The overall idea is that somehow, by just focusing on 'nice stuff' all the time and forgiving everyone always, you can attain 'apotheosis,' I guess.

But this disallows God from owning any amount of the dark, in which case, 'God' is not really 'God' at all, but a limited form of supernatural thing.

'Evil' is not the dark, not darkness.

'Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot...'

'Whose hearts inclined to do only evil continually,' is when people simply must just get up onto that 'bike with the broken wheel' at every turn and at a cost even to their own self-honesty.

Evil is assiduous intent to create a lack of clarity in others' minds that you want to take advantage of.

I came across some views that claim to have researched it, and conclude that only 7% of the history of Mankind covers times of peace, and that the rest of the time Mankind is at war.

Well maybe Man was created in the image and likeness of God but this is evidently a mirror image: God is only 7% destructive.

But He is destructive.

How's your sense of smell these days? First time, these beautiful strangers messed with people's vision...

'Lot - bar the door behind thee.'

New Exercises In Crawling

Here is an exercise for which I will provide the answer by the end here - but, you should 'Google Search' it first before consulting the answer below (which in any case I might simply provide in the comments section later):

From where, does the phrase 'a horse by any other name' come?

Google Search, please.

Most casual observers regularly say, when it comes to ET's - where are the official sources claiming they exist?

Walt Disney and Wernher von Braun

Try the following - 

Jack Parsons - problematic, but still (Jet Propulsion Labs CALTECH - aka NASA)

Russell Targ (the world's historically leading primary researcher into lasers and masers)

Dr David Hawkins (the Manhattan Project)

Christopher Mellon (DIA)

Michael Collins (NASA astronaut)

Edwin Aldrin (NASA astronaut)

...really, you can go on for pages, and categorize those listings into those who say they know for certain, and those scientists who say they believe on account of the statistical probability and so on.

What you will very soon encounter, however, when you look into any or all of these people, is that they spend just as much time and energy talking about 'god' and 'religious beliefs' and meditation and 'mind matters,' you might say - as they do actual hard metal shiny disc-shaped objects with little green people inside them.

And I'm going to tell you why that is.

Early August 1945, the United States government, led by President Harry S. Truman, dropped the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Hiroshima bomb was dropped August 6, and the Nagasaki bomb on August 9.

Nagasaki

Beforehand, all of the chief scientists, chief technicians and chief engineers began compiling a letter to Truman, indicating that they were not in favor of dropping the bomb on civilian populated areas first, but recommended a detonation high overhead as a warning.

Edward Teller, the man most responsible of all for the successful manufacture and functioning of the nuclear weapon, refrained from adding his name to the letter, having been encouraged by J. Robert Oppenheimer to leave the decision in the hands of the better-informed political leaders in Washington...

Afterwards, Teller said his decision not to sign was a mistake.

Dr David Hawkins' role in the Manhattan Project, was as a highest level communications liaison officer between all of the scientists, many of whom were notoriously difficult to relate to when it came to 'normal' other people, and exhibited some irascibility even at the best of times anyway. Hawkins was a mathematician of some regard among the top-line serious professional mathematicians but his main game was psychology.

Later on, Dr David Hawkins owned one of the most successful and lucrative commercial psychology practices coast-to-coast in the United States, and that was even after he went into virtual retirement from that to concentrate on 'meditation.'

Much later on still, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, there were a set of incidents, which dovetailed into vague concerns that had been being voiced by a number of high-placed scientists and some military people as well, that they had been contacted by ET Aliens and told outright that there were to be exactly no future actual using of any nuclear weapons whatsoever and that if it were ever attempted again, there would be the most dire consequences - literally carried out by ET's against whoever was trying to use nuclear weapons.

Veda Naga

The series of incidents, consisted of warnings that nuclear secured facilities would lose all electrical power, even from the localized backup sources, at a specific time - and that is what eventuated. It is from that that sprung quiet inquiries as to how real such warnings were and whether or not they really had come from Extraterrestrial (IE Alien Intelligent Being) sources.

The moral dimension regarding the uses of nuclear weapons was already a driving force behind the widespread interest that so many of those who had worked on the Manhattan Project, as well as other top secret mainly weapons research programs - had begun to show in things like Eastern moral philosophy and Buddhism and all things 'Good versus Evil/God versus 'not God.'

Dr David Hawkins has interesting available work out there, which goes into this subject of 'I versus other I,' but his work also shows a lot of his own pre-commitment to Buddhist philosophy and ideology, really.

Dr Steven Greer, prominent ufologist.

Dr Steven Greer, who is not specifically from an actual CIA or military project or program (although he also has had some 'near-to-fully-official' involvement in related official research, at least, since his projects at moments received CIA and Military funding), has a very strong interest also, in meditation and the moral dimension of ET Alien encountering.

Now, here's my point - if you are unable to find out where the statement I outlined in the first paragraph above came from, and let's submit that neither will the whole entire information resources of the CIA itself either be able to say, and the whole panoply of US academia, then - what is the point of any of you pretending you are even close at all to being able to engage with ET Aliens because you are smart enough to?

You are not, smart enough to. Yet.

So, what's the answer? (And why is it important, of course...).

Crawling 101

I was really tossing up whether or not to link in the video down below to 'La Religieuse' a short prose poem by Serge Lutens about a 'vue' of some moments arising partly from when he was a young boy attending at a class in his school (although this was more specifically covered in another poem). And then to do with some other future episode the narrator relates to some idea about 'religion.' ...Or 'beliefs.' In the end I decided, yeah well, I shall.

Like any work of major art, you can read a whole lot of things into it, and people may well have vastly different feelings and perceptions about what is being communicated in the video.

Superficially, the video is also an advertisement - after a fashion - for one of Serge Lutens' commercial 'high cut' product lines.

Serge is himself quite an 'occultic' person; or, occultic personality.

So it is appropriate to use him as a 'clothes horse' on which to layer certain rather occult ideas, if they in fact, originate from some of the more obscure Judaic and Christian narratives.

You see... ...there is this very fanciful subject of the so-called 'Fallen Watcher Angels' who were sent away to Hades and there imprisoned for all Eternity. Except they were not.

In the writings of the Apostle Peter, Jesus Christ descends down to Hades and preaches to those imprisoned there 'who sometime were disobedient' and those that repented He allowed to be released - but only at 'the End Times' when another angel was to be sent down to open the Gates of Hades for those who had repented.

In physics, 'flux' is a transport phenomena - and the word was first introduced into differential calculus by Sir Isaac Newton. Newton was responsible for the inverse square law of the density at source, of energy flux at a given distance away.

This of course says something along the lines that energy density is the inverse of the (energy measured at the) square of the radius (distance from origin).

Now one 'problem' with this in terms of what present beliefs about geometry are, is that there is a distinct implication here entailed about the so-called 'squaring of the circle' problem - which is supposed to be impossible.

Newton's Inverse Square Law

...I'm not going to bore you with any details, but although Newton's inverse square law is a calculus linear measurement function, if you could predict angular momentum frequency (EG EMF) squared inverses too, then by 'neural de-coding' you 'might' be able to dictate into people's brains whole packets of data and even thereby generate exact predictable feelings.

And that's just one thing you could do.

Now, I don't suppose you'd know where that idea just came from, would you? Maybe I'm so smart I just thought of it all by myself.

Just continuing down this speculative path for a minute... ...maybe if I had such technology and calculating methods and processes, I could do things inside people's heads and they would not even be aware what is going on or why they are thinking and feeling a certain way. 

Unlike your typical visual semiotics and ordinary propaganda methods, people would not have to 'see' anything at all, or read anything or be told anything - they would just have palpable feelings that of course, they would not doubt since these were coming from inside of their own selves, as it would seem to them.

Now I know that these so-called 'Fallen Angels' got into a whole lot of trouble for introducing just such previously unknown sorts of ideas and processes to the backward and primitive, unsuspecting human race way back when.

What would be the complete ambit of moral complexity to this kind of thing?

I certainly couldn't presume to know what that was. And I most certainly would not be so foolishly arrogant as to think that I already had some kind of internal moral compass that was so superior that I could create some kind of 'school program' that taught it to others! By logic I also must conclude that I could not whatsoever think that the 'Law of Moses/Code of Hammurabi' (which is used by Western Courts and Judges to guide them to rule over men) would suffice since according to the standard narratives, these were not what the 'God' who is said to have given them to Moses (in that instance) originally actually gave him!

Moses, from my recollection, sent these back to Jehovah for editing and outright modification, did he not.

Who will we 'learn to crawl' from?

Of course this is not much of an issue to those who have no 'occultic insights...'

The end there is that he basically tells 'the youth that is with me' that what is falling down from the sky and covering everything over with white, is... ...the snow.'

Unless you know a lot more about Serge Lutens and his ideas and beliefs and some scant detail of his own life story that he 'allows out' from his other expressions, it's impossible for me to tell you what he means when he says 'the youth that is with me' and most people, even very artistically-educated ones, always jump to a complete wrong conclusion about it; which he never dispels though, either.

But if you use your own 'film critiquing' knowledge, and break this down, you will at least recall in the short story that he is looking at himself in a mirror - which of course has its own several 'literary meanings' by much tradition over thousands of years. And then, certainly, there is a fairly basic 'Tao,' black-white, mirror image, knowing, naiive metaphor in play as well.

And everyone can come to their own personal individually satisfying conception of what he is trying to say.

'Learning to crawl' is just this. Of course you can stride out onto the icy lake if you want to, and take confidently to the icy slide that decides who the next Doge of Venice will be (when there was a Doge of Venice!). But I would crawl gingerly out onto the glassy surface of the iced lake... And I can recite to you The Cratylus cover-to-cover word-for-word from-beginning-to-end off the top of my head. Which I already guarantee you is more than what those who have memorized the Quran word-for-word and can recite it have done. They, don't even know what 'The Cratylus' is.

Moreover I absolutely guarantee you there is not one single living soul on the planet in any Art School, or University Art faculty either, who can do it either but for sure they know more than what I do about what Serge is saying, right... 

...Which is why I suggest that you should not mess with Fallen Angels. Even if you think that because you are a high-ranking member of some well-established Freemasonic Chapter it will give you adequate power and that you possess enough Wisdom and Knowledge to control what you have conjured up. Ha!

What a laugh.

There they all are - out in the middle of the lake, on the ice, and banging around.

Why 'Watchers?'

Around 3 BC, a commander of Philip II, traveled to a mountain cluster in the Southern end of the Anti-Lebanon mountain range.

He did so, not only because he was a Roman soldier ultimately answering to Rome, and to Caesar Augustus, and not to Herod the Great, who was only 'client king' of Judea to Rome - but also because he was someone with an avid interest in history himself, and with a keen interest to verify or falsify certain local myths and legends.

In his endeavors to uncover the truth or otherwise of particular historical narratives that seemed a bit peculiar or far-fetched on their face - he ended up uncovering easily one of the most stark monuments and mysterious artifacts of all time: that of the 'sanctuary of the fallen watchers,' and the stone memorial of their oath outside of the sanctuary.

This 'sanctuary,' which is sometimes also referred to as a temple, although it is not that - the Roman commander built two more structures beneath the actual sanctuary structure itself - is by the legends or mythologies, meant to have been built literally 'by the hands of the watchers themselves.'  

There still exists to this day, not only the sanctuary structure itself, but the actual 'oath pillar' in a language no one understands, except that there was (Sir Charles Warren, a British explorer, later removed this and took it back to London where it is to this day) an accompanying small stone pillar, almost the same, but translating the first pillar into Greek.

As far as the Greek wording goes, it says that no one should, or is permitted to enter the sanctuary, unless he take the oath (which is on the original monument).

So more or less everyone these days has heard of these mythical or legendary 'watchers' but why are they called 'watchers' and what are they 'watching...'

The presumption has always been that they are 'watching' humans.

For what reason or purpose they do this no one seems to be able to say though.

They are not watchers of human beings.

They can have seen human activity, for sure.

A mysterious road...

But they are watchers of 'gates' and 'doorways' into special places.

Those that are not allowed to go through those gates are prevented from so doing, by the gate watchmen.

Now a thing that does not permit anyone at all to enter through it, is not a 'gate' at all, but a simple wall or barrier; it is not any kind of entrance to anywhere.

Which means that some are allowed to enter these gates, and some not.

The idea that 'watchers' or the gates they are or were 'watching' are not physical, is problematic, since the story goes that a certain number (specifically 200) of these 'watchers' ended up procreating with human women and had children.

On the one hand, at some point thereafter most of the children of this interbreeding were destroyed from the planet, Lamech and his children - Noah of course, but then also the evil ruler Nimrod, survived and the children of this line is still with us today; if you go by the standard narrative, this one of which... doesn't have any holes in it at all, according to either the Judaic or the Christian, nor indeed even the Islamic traditions!

The two Roman temples built in 'memorial' to the fallen watchers, is called in today's Islamic Arabic cultural history of Lebanon - Qasr Chbib. 'Qasr; means castle, and 'chbib' has a double meaning: 'stop it,' or 'lovers.'

The highest secret oath in the highest degree level of modern Freemasonry, is the oath of Qasr Chbib. This is the thing partly expressed in the baleful words against Tom Cruise's character, which were sulfurously hissed at him by 'Red Cloak' as a warning against talking about what he had seen.

It is not straightforward at all, why there was such an aggressive reaction against the acts of these 'watchers' thereafter as a consequence of their actions, despite that evidently in the story, their offspring wrought a lot of damage on the Earth. And in attempting to understand it yourself - because I will not be outright declaring in what the main problem lies - one should bear in mind that not, all the offspring were destroyed and several indeed became 'prophets' according to the Judaic and Christian beliefs.

This is the 'oath pillar' 
in Greek - now located in London.

The problem with so much common popular 'skepticism' is that it is deeply rooted in fundamental ignorance, especially about the meanings of ancient words translated inexactly.

The Wikipedia will report that the actual 'temple' or sanctuary of the fallen watchers is an 'Adyton' (innermost sanctuary). However, the actual spot itself is called 'Ar-dys' - which is a word in an otherworldly language altogether but it is recorded in Second Enoch as the actual name of the place. It means 'gate' or 'portal' into the dark but rich expanse of the luminaries wherein there are great treasures.

If you try to go to 'Adyton' or 'Qasr Chbib' even today, and you manage to get the permits from the Lebanon government (there is no reason why they wouldn't give such a thing to say, some rich explorer kids from Dubai for instance; maybe the producers of the hit show 'Mysterious Middle East') you will nevertheless be challenged by beings at the 'gate' inside the sanctuary.

And if you have the correct password, they will grant you entry.

And you will go by 'Ar-Dys.'

'Then I Run...'

Serge Lutens is an interesting person. He has lived for many years now, far away from Paris where his two main studio/showrooms are - one which is literally inside the Palais Royal in Paris - in Marrakech.

The Palais Royal is a former royal palace (of the Sun King, eventually) albeit it was built ostensibly for Cardinal Richelieu to begin with, and currently is the headquarters of the French government's Ministry of Culture.

Serge Luten's birth and early childhood is slightly shrouded in mystery, but at minimum it is known that both his father and mother were in diplomatic roles in Europe.

He says himself that he had a 'complicated' relationship with his mother and the standard Euro-snob narrative is that he himself is gay.

I cannot say that I personally like his graphic designs or his photography in the sense of 'like;' 'am attracted to.' The images are very different to anything that resides anywhere near the obvious conscious surface of my own brain, or even anywhere down deep and dark, and/or in any of the undergrowth in there(!), so far as I know.

But having listened to a number of his interviews in the french language and in English too, and read some of his writing, what strikes me is his extraordinary ability to feel.

And so then I go back and look at his photographs and design work and wonder at it.

And then when you turn it in your hands, you realize that it is wonderful. There are no answers in any of it, at least not to me because well frankly, I am not that smart - certainly not that kind of smart that those art critics and others are, who can explain to you what all these things mean. Or 'might' mean.

To me they don't have any obvious meaning. It's just that I am watching someone say something to the world of other human...

...Oh, but wait. Did I tell you that CIA has a file on Serge Lutens?

His friend - 'the man with the
golden gun...'

It's probably a little lost in the back archives now, but it was a very special thing back when Marilyn Monroe was alive, and before that. Serge worked with some pretty clever Japanese industrial chemists, and all of them for the American Secret Service just after the war.

...I was going to say 'of other human beings,' wasn't I?

Yes. Sometimes great artists can speak to the world of other human beings and say something - but then, it is not always heard or understood even when it is heard.

I mean, you too, do want to say something to others, right?

What is it, that you want to tell them?

Some psychologist-types say that Serge wants to tell the world he hated his mother, others that he loved his mother. I mean seriously though, who cares what anyone thinks about their mothers! Because, after all, right, we are animals evolved from the primordial slime and we just sleep and digest, and feed and breed. And then we die. We have exactly no depth of feeling at all about things that have passed; we have not depth of feeling - other than what is in front of our greedy little eyes right now or in our lusting imagination for the near future. And if we 'miss out' on over-powering someone nearby, and having and exerting control all the time, we get angry. And then we do something bad against others. And this doesn't stop us from being angry, but at least we can tell ourselves that we 'have power.'

We have no art. We are artless.

But we have Netflix and 'Game of Thrones.'

And the throne in Paris is officially 'unoccupied,' and in any case it is contested by two or even three claimants.

The carnival ride - Kitty's 'carnival ride.' lol

Serge has his showroom in Richelieu's old buildings.

Everything is permanently in transition and knowledge is only relative.

Perhaps 'Black Lives Matter' will shortly take over the administration of the Palais Royal and kick Serge Lutens out.

And the transition will take place and any knowledge of why it ever was that Serge Lutens was so great will evaporate.

Serge made this perfume once, that had the scent of gunpowder in it, like you have drifting all around you when you are at the carnival area in Paris at nighttime. ...And candy floss. And women's iris butter lipstick. Marilyn's style of lipstick.

He also did another one as well, a homage to Marlene Dietrich - called 'La fille de Berlin.' After, 'Ich bin ein Berliner,' I guess.

Serge had a friend one time - a crack-shot with a rifle.

Things are all different, of course, these days.

Nobody does any bad things noh moh, right?

Deep inside, way deep deep down inside of people, are they really quite angry and resentful of so many things - or are they traumatized and numb by what life has dished out to them. There is a mass human psychological problem issue, isn't there? Maybe it isn't people's fault either - because so much of it is just 'external bad things happening to them.'

This is a dangerous place, this human world. Serge Lutens has more or less run away and hid. 

I think... Here is what I think - I think that inasmuch as I do know for sure that there are far superior intelligent beings from distant stars, and they are hereabouts at least; and far superior than ordinary human beings (and it is an interesting question a poster here made, about how they got there at all, to that position of advanced moral reasoning if not from a 'similar' evolution process that the human race thinks it is on), I think they are not all that interested in 'saving people' just from themselves, as it were. 

I mean, if you are able to solve your own internal conflicts and angers and come out of the whirlpool of life with some balance and the ability to be socially interesting without all of the risky patterns of conflict and aggression that human beings have tended to exhibit rather a lot down through history - it would be better for humans to do that than to have it 'done for them' by some other lot, surely.

I don't need to caption this, seriously
do I - all of you over 55?

But I think there has been enough history already to show that there is no 'process' of moral evolution' going on via the presumed 'dialectic' or 'two-polar conflict dynamic' that is the standard condition of human society and always has been.

This thing we are witnessing right now over the election of the US President - it is all about a passive-aggressive psychopathology.

What people really want to do - on either side - is to shoot someone. Lin Wood already voiced that and he has a platform but a zillion other 'little' people have said as much all over social media.

If a super advanced ET Alien went and visited Serge Lutens, in Marrakech, or when he was having lunch at El Buli in Spain when that was still there, would Serge want 'technology' to go shoot someone - he has enough cause, from what I understand of his life - or would he want some advanced ideas and some insights into new things to make?