If we double the daily numbers of reads for these kinds of things on e-readers around the globe, well, we will be there.
And you can sit around in coffee places all day, on your Kindle or portable computer, and press buttons and make money, no problem. That is, unless the Russian army invades your coffee place, or unless Victoria Nudelman releases some bio weapon stuff around there and you choke and so on.
Nevertheless, there you will be, somewhere in empty Chelsea, and Kensington - in the Royal Borough of Chelsea and Kensington, musing on the motto of the place: 'How good it is to dwell in unity...'
Well I wouldn't know.
Recently, in a genizah in the South East of France, underneath a wine-selling premises, a fragment of a Hebrew Zohar commentary on the Book of Esther was found - and this is quite interesting, since there are no commentaries on the Book of Esther in the Jewish commentaries at large.
It's only a fragment and I only even heard about this at all via Dr Justin, but in all events the fragment says that 'Esther' is actually Ishtar.
The Hebrew 'religion' or let's call it the JHVH worshiping religion, is quite the helluva mess, really - it's full of weird, unexplained things, and many contradictions. Esther is one of them.
One the one hand, the Prophet Jeremiah hates Astarte, or 'Ishtar;' on the other hand the Zohar commentaries say that the only ritual celebration that Jews will perform after the Coming of the Messiah is the festival of Esther (what they call 'purim').
The Jewish religion is riddled with this same one particular 'contradiction.' Clearly, prior to Moses there are only the Elohim, and Abraham is from Sumeria somewhere and is more or less Ur-ic with family members all with Sumerian names and titles, but after Moses, there is 'JHVH...' And then Daniel, the only guy that actually gets everything correct, is not even regarded as a 'prophet.'
Well, I mean... ...it's hardly at this point a BMW e46, is it?! LOL. You want one?
So what's going on?
Well it's the same thing as the modern flaw in Vedic 'religions.' They also want to maintain this fantasy about Shiva and 'Nada' and 'Brahma,' without detailing what the Vedas themselves actually teach:
Oh sure, 'Nada Brahma' is how everything material comes into being.
But what is that?
'Na' = vibration all the way to and even beyond white light;
'Ma' = calm vibration which is a spatial reflection of that light like a mirror effect, like the moon;
'Shi' = going into, between;
'Va' = the Void;
'Ya' = a manifested thing, 'it happens.'
Or maybe 'just' one of these ones. Still new - 'retromod.'
A-Brah-Ma-Sa-Ra-Ya-Cov...
Surely, I could be wrong.
; )
But without even researching into things at all, I'm prepared to take Dr Sledge's (Dr Justin) word for it about Esther-, the man simply doesn't lie or make things up. And besides, the Biblical Esther story is virtually the same as the Sumerian Ishtar one anyway.
And so is the story of the son of Amenemhat I - Sol-Amen... Although of course that is a later story which has nothing to do with ancient Sumeria, but is to do with Egypt.
Stories stories stories.
Sigh.
Actually they're not just stories. They are reference points for when you meet one of the Safra Bank owners in a coffee shop in Chelsea.
...After having met all of the mothers who were separated from their children in Mariupol.
Or for when you have met neither and are not going to meet either one of them.
But still you have to live in this material world, right?
Same as those other two have to.
You do not have to live in the rubble of downtown Mariupol, and you will for sure not be residing in Cadogan's penthouses anywhere in Kensington or Sloane Square...
So. ...I have to post this now because things are moving very fast.
The Ukrainian government, army, whatever - are constantly laying claim to every bit of stupid nonsense that they can but suddenly, they DAK on the helicopter strike on that fuel storage facility in Belgorod.
Darjeeling. Where Joanna Lumley hails from.
Russian analysts themselves are leaning towards the idea that since the Ukraine army has virtually zero capacity to communicate between its various placements of troops because of the kinzhal missile attacks which took out the entire military communications installations all across the Ukraine - some senior officers isolated in the north eastern zone near Kharkiv made the mission decision on their own and their helicopters carried out the successful attack.
Except there are no helicopters out there and anyone watching the attack itself will realize this was some pretty outstanding flying even given there are good flyers in the Ukrainian air force.
Nowadays, the Russians will go back through continuous satellite vision of the whole area and work out where actually, the helicopters came from.
There has always been a third hand at play here...
You will recall that in 2014 when the head of the French oil company Total Oil, Christophe de Margerie, was killed, I suggested that he had been murdered in a clandestine operation. At the time, Total was the single biggest foreign investor in the Russian energy sector, with significant two-way trade going on and much closer partnerships being planned.
You will note now, that 2014, was also the so-called 'Maidan uprising' - which was of course a coup d'etat.
And you will further note the pathetic attempts by the Borg to pretend they can stop Europe from buying Russian oil and gas.
I went into here one time in bare feet. But that was because Edward Green next door told me I could while they finished my shoes. Burlington Arcade. You're not supposed to walk around in there in bare feet - they have a Beadle who will throw you out. Except not me. And not you either, 'cuz you know the rules.
Anyway, not to avoid talking about the ways of aristocrat 'glowies,' I will address that now: (and please don't listen to Gonzalo Lira's idea of what 'glowie' means - he is wrong. He is slightly right in that of course there are such things as CIA 'glow-in-the-darks,' but his idea that this means he is able to tell who is a CIA operative because they 'glow' is rubbish. He's just observing what anyone can do, when it comes to people such as 'James Vasquez' and Stanford's Ryan Perkins).
King Solomon was not tricked or confused by the Queen of Sheba turning up at his court in bare feet and wearing the dress of a servant. Now was he.
If you recall the story.
So then. Back to the helicopters.
My friends, when you look at the world's richest bankers today - the Safras and the Rothschilds - one must consider the antecedents.
Those guys started the Crimean War.
Sean Penn is not a glowie in the sense that he is neither in the dark nor is he particularly in-obvious to those without UV lenses. He is pretty obvious to all and sundry or at least he should be. And as Adnan Khashoggi once observed - 'war is good marketing (for me).' And Penn is part of the marketing world generally.
Penn said this week that 'a couple of billionaires could easily end the war.' Well, no; they cannot.
You can buy these new again today, you know.
But they can have started it and they can do quite a lot to keep it going.
And then afterwards, they can sell money to governments for reconstruction and all kinds of things. Maybe they think they can even steal gas and oil and everything that isn't tied down.
And you think you want to go eat with these people in London Town or New York City?
I wouldn't. I'd go there in bare feet and bohemian floral cotton quite deliberately in order just to be observably directed away from them.
Like all empires, in the end, the criminal classes always commit the murdering of the top layers of whoever is trying to run things.
This is why ET Aliens do not make themselves apparent here. They are here but they are not obviously seen anywhere.
The human race is this mixed up grouping of many different kinds of personalities, some of which cannot ever be retrieved from the degradation of their inner natures.
Like wild animals they are motivated by the instant reward only.
'The Firebird.' Leading diamantaire, Laurence Graff bought it from ALROSA, the Russian diamond miner.
They do not look ahead very far, and they cannot see ahead very far at all.
In the human world they can often tend to rule - fundamentally because they will kill their opposition to exert power over the rest of the people there.
These characters take everything that is left over, left lying around, after they have done away with whoever it was they had murdered - who actually put it all together.
And then, they build tombs thereafter, of which they are the 'pharaohs.'
...If you look at the death of Edmond Safra in Monaco in 1999, you will observe many strange things. And too much money.
Today, the Safra Banking Group is huge.
So is the Cadogan empire. Cadogan - the earls of -, own more or less all of Kensington, Sloane Square, all of that and much more too. These places are all empty right now. The merchants are gone, the shopping is dead, the Russian oligarchs have been dispossessed of their properties and their football clubs...
But still, you are meant to believe they are 'wealthy.'
The rest of the criminal classes in London town, of which there are many - from senior academia, all of the politicians without exception, the most senior police, and the weapons business, which naturally includes the secret services particularly - all look upon the Safras and the Cadogans and their apparent obscene money, and lust after it.
And then of course, you have the 'art and PR/marketing elites' there, hanging around, as paid servants of the super wealthy (such as they are styled): the Saatchis, all the art galleries - the Serpentine Gallery's (lol) boss Julia Peyton-Jones, who is the UK's oldest mother at 64...
That kind of thing.
This is Paris, though. Not London. Because in London, there are no tailors left.
When the spies of London go out looking for people to recruit or at least parasite off of, or exploit in some way, they try to take on the attitudes and the lifestyles (so they presume) of those above them who are their masters.
They wonder at and cannot understand why you would not 'bite' say, on the juicy fruit that they offer.
But there are 'rules of class' and these individuals don't know them.
Safras might know them, since they were bankers to the merchants of the Ottomans (but then, that too makes them murderers and accomplices and accessories to murder), and Cadogans you would presume should know them but who knows what has happened in the intervening years between the era of the Romantic poets and now.
Lady C, apparently, does know.
Bo Bruce 100% does know.
And the rest? What do they know? Can they really 'recognize' another aristocrat? Or are they following the fakery of modern times, after they, the Londoners, committed regicide - and possibly did it again with Princess Di.
...So LSE and Imperial College have people inside the secret services going around looking for 'remote viewers' too; oh yes they do!
Bo Bruce occasionally wanders around in dirty bare feet.
But the London secret services field guys (they mostly all are men, and mostly gay but pretending not to be - think Alexander Downer...), they want to show you Tricker's shoes or Church's shoes and try to impress you with those, and then they act all domineering and quite rude to serving staff and this is their idea of what the high aristocracy does, you see.
There is an old Spanish saying about household staff being one's 'unavoidable enemies' and I do not ascribe to it personally, but the idea has some salutary merit.
Lady Brudenell-Bruce.
Lily Safra would never - as in not ever ever - be seen in bare feet with a dirty face, anywhere in public.
But I would, and so would, I imagine Bo Bruce; and Diana Spencer should have except she was not taken into someone's confidence at a young enough age and had to grow up on her own, like mold.
Oh it is not that we are unable to dress, or to dress ourselves.
LOL
...There's this tremendous play, written for ITV Sunday Night (live) Drama on television in the UK, called 'Married To Death.'
It doesn't seem to exist anymore anywhere on film as far as anybody knows, and only those people who saw it have some recollection of the thing at all. The BBC archivists destroyed all the copies of it.
Anyway, in this play, which was written by the incredible John Mortimer, Robert Culp, in his best-ever performance I think, plays a minor aristocrat who disappeared in Australia, presumed deceased, but who returns and then no one recognizes him -, but his wife, played by Diana Rigg, after a short while insists that it is indeed he, the missing husband, and albeit everyone else within the rest of the family remaining quiet but skeptical, kind of lives happily ever after.
In this live performance play in the UK, called 'Married To Death.'
Most commoners think the story is that the wife prefers this 'new edition' husband, who is probably better in the bedroom 'now,' to the old one.
But if that is not the underlying 'story' then, how does she recognize him as the legitimate m'lord?
Well...
All I can tell you is that most people who have viewed the thing, when pushed really hard, because they are all intellectuals, right, since no one else ever watched 'Late Nite English television live drama plays...' ...when pushed hard on what was the backing music being tinkled out on some studio piano, say that it probably was one of Chopin's Polonaise pieces.
It wasn't.
Although partly it was, because there was a coda from there in it.
It actually mostly was 'Dans la lande' by Cecile Chaminade, a woman composer of the 19th and 20th centuries.
So, the next time you see Charles Saatchi with his 'new' (ish) long term girlfriend Trinny Woodall (grandfather was the controller of the whole of the UK steel industry during WWII), you can always walk up to them in bare feet, even sporting a dirty face, to ask politely if they know which piece of Chaminade's was played live during the missing episode of ITV's Sunday Night Drama featuring Dame Diana Rigg (not yet a dame then, of course).
If they say 'shoo' to you well then you certainly know they are of quite low class.
And but what's the point of class?
One of the main ALROSA mines in Russia.
And how would that even affect something like one's ability to access what is or should be, rather a natural faculty of people, namely, 'remote viewing?'
W-e-e-e-ll...
When the Shekinah descended to Earth, and she lowered Herself, down down down (those are the exact words of the hidden Zohar texts about it), she was 'visible in pants, with little apples tied to her cuffs, and fur around it, and with the goat-skin tassels on her aegis...'
Now if you know what that all means...
...Meanwhile, some clown from 'Five Eyes' comes up to you and says 'do you want to be in our private club, we have a reciprocal agreement with the Tanglin Club in Singapore. You can stay there overnight or even for a couple of days!'
You consider it for a moment or two, and then you have to say, because you (mostly) always speak the whole truth:
'Oh they won't let me in though. 'Cuz sometimes I wear no shoes. So it's okay. I'll just stay out here, with the peasants.'
'But what about our London private bespoke shoe service?!'
'What would be the point of it?' You mutter, sadly. 'Sometimes I wear no shoes.'
And then of course, sooner or later they go stupid and say something like, 'phwoar, look at her *s. She works for us, you know. You know. Nod nod wink wink.'
This is a brand new car. Brand new. And it is a real car. Real. 'Heritage' body made new from the original molds.
And then you say 'I'm gay though.' And the guy sits backwards because he is gay and he knows that you are not.
And he's perplexed. This is one of the 'glam boys,' right - of Imperial College. He's one of 'the chosen few.' And I don't mean anything to do with Moses.
He knows you are not as smart as he is, because no one is that smart and you certainly are not, but he never figured - given what he'd been told - that you were that dumb either.
There is an angel with a flaming sword, and a great big wall of fire all around...
So, yeah, remote viewing.
Guys like Safra and even Cadogan, are living in a Fool's Paradise. ...Now to get into the real Paradise -.
Now stick with me on this, 'kay? Because I will explain the resolution to the puzzle - if you haven't already worked it out, or you have, or think you might have and want confirmation. Next article.
Hold these words in mind now - 'Evil,' Immediate present reality, appearance, andexistential power.
***
Of course the danger with these things is that as soon as someone gets wind of something that is genuinely and completely real, and works and has power for certain individuals, then, the poor innocents who are on the outside but in the vicinity of, get swiped at.
The Cathars were an exact example of this.
Ah, yer can't have that one either! Thank god.
They had brought 'something,' no one knows really what in terms of mystical belief these days, but the main French Catholic leader (Philip II of the House of Capet) took an enormous aversion to those Catholics and Cathars who were influencing them in the South of France there and basically killed them all. By academic estimations anywhere between 200,000 people to as much as 1,000,000 possibly - were slaughtered over twenty years from 1209 to 1229.
Superficially, the story goes that it was the Pope in Rome who instigated the mass murders and no doubt he gave the official orders to carry out a 'crusade,' but behind it all we have to consider that the rival House to the apparent 'throne of France' (...although Phillip II was in fact the first ever to style himself 'King of France' as such) - the Angevins were located there and not far away and close to the Angevins was the House of Aragon. If the Cathars and the Southern French Catholics all swerved towards allegiance to the Angevins and Aragon, then Philip's hold on the throne was in trouble.
...But I don't want to waste too much time here going into all the history. I don't even want to delve deeply into whether or not the Cathars were some part of what is essentially the witch cult of the Magdalene. Suffice to say they came through the Byzantine world as merchants and traders and were heavily influenced by Arabic and Islamic scholars, of which there were still many in Spain and in the South of France by then, although the Hebrew Zohar had not yet formally been exposed in the Kingdom of Leon, which is in Northern Iberia, quite close by.
The question was raised, is remote viewing 'witchcraft?'
What I actually want to do here, is go directly to the power of 'something' - something you can really see, feel and touch and use.
And that makes it dangerous. Just remember that.
This is Maxim's 'Blue Room.' Except it isn't blue here of course. But trust me, that's just an optical illusion of lighting, because it is actually blue, light 'powder blue.'
If we go back to the three-point filter of how to access or 'define' the numinous; the actual numinous experience, then it is this:
Acknowledging the existential reality of a particular divine being;
Experiencing the existential reality of that being;
Experiencing and using the existential power of that being.
Without all of those things, then you are merely being involved in something deceitful and probably fake - although maybe one is just dabbling or being led by those who have insufficient knowledge.
Now one must understand that when the ancient Greeks talked about the 'death' of some god, they did not mean death like we use the term. A god who was killed - say, as in the situation of Uranus and Cronus - was removed from interacting in and with the Cosmos, and resided in a separate place for 'seven Eras.'
We should also understand from this that Uranus was not the whole cause of Creation as such, but only a key part of it; it was some very mysterious three other beings who made that.
These beings are weaving your immediate present reality, from knowledge of the Past, and the Forces striving to come into Being from the Future...
Unless that immediate present reality is in touch with the Past and the Future, it is Evil - because it has no concern for past wrongs, and no moral requirement to address them from the Future appearance of Justice, or a just outcome, a justified scene.
Again, don't worry about what other later writers claim, but stick to Hesiod and the Sibylline Oracles, because these are broadly-speaking correct.
Same place, still not 'blue.'
Jesus Christ is clearly addressing His Father - Uranus - in the Lord's Prayer; He says it explicitly. People try and work round it by implementing various phonemic variations of the word, but He is clearly saying 'Uranus.'
And this also clears up a relevant mystery about the perennial question of theodicy.
Because you see, Zeus 'handles' Cronus by truncating him into little segments, although he has not actually 'killed him,' and nor has he cast him down or out of rulership of the human world. For the human world was 'common to all...' And because Cronus could not go to Olympus, he was king here instead.
What that means is Cronus is 'separated' from Olympus, same as Ares also has become 'cast out' from there. If we take this even simply in a complex metaphorical sense, then it does make critical sense of certain important things.
Because now we are going to see the problem of evil, where it comes from and why it is not possible - as too many New Age people and others suggest - to just 'be One.' Even this abiding notion about 'forgiving one's enemies' is completely misrepresenting what is being said in ancient writings - even the Sanskrit ones; the Vedas, rather than just the Western Bible.
The way I am going to look at this is to give a practical example:
You can prove that 'the strength of your mind' and/or the focus of your will, alone - is not going to make 'unnatural' things happen.
Sure, women all claim to be able to 'hold' but why don't you try to employ the 'strength of your mind and the power of your focused will' the next time you need to go and *ss.
See what happens. This is magical thinking and it is stoopid.
Your brain and your natural mind has no power to do anything very much.
And that is because its job is to manage the physical senses in accordance with what they are themselves intended to function actually doing.
So unless you are able to access a totally different 'mind' and gain, as a friend here appositely said 'system root privileges,' then can do nothing 'supernatural.'
'Magical thinking' though, is not 'witchcraft.' Ah. Witchcraft is fantastical...
Magical thinking is false thinking. 'Fantasy' comes from a Greek word that means 'to appear.'
No, if something actually 'appears' then it is no longer false.
If it is simply 'imaginary' or an hallucination then it is not completely 'false' but it is still a much lesser 'reality' - it is something on a lesser level of reality than our immediate conscious sense of reality.
Uranus is the Ruling Light of the Cosmic Whole of Intelligible Reality.
There are some other identities who are the currents of your emotion and your life. So these are two - one is coming down from Above, while the other wells up in you from Below.
You are yourself someone with an individual personal intelligent consciousness.
You sense and you feel things.
Having a strong feeling to pee is an immediate, biologically mechanical/mechanistic process and the sense of it is locked in the visible and material organic present.
Having a strong feeling about some injustice is about the affairs and the trajectory of the past, meeting up in the existential present, being affected by the appearance of Justice in the Perfect Future. That is about the invisible past, and the invisible future...
You remote view through imagination. Or you can remote view through some process that accesses some different level, perhaps non human physical material, mind.
Or you can envisage matters from some peculiar idea that you have as to what even constitutes 'Justice' but sure as hell, many of you will feel things viscerally, inside your body with your actual material senses, organically, when you even merely hear about an Azov guy stabbing a knife into the eye and into the brain of some soldier, who then died.
Evil, is when someone is so cut off from the knowledge and the vision of a Future Perfect Justice, that they go to the Ukraine, like John McCain did, and foment some mass public action and emotional responses in the crowd, based on the need to grab some money now, and to have power over other human beings, disregarding that they have any right to the full truth and to broad knowledge.
When John McCain told the crowd in Maidan Square that - 'This is about you, it is only about you and what you want,' he was lying.
It was about stealing money from the US taxpayer, it was about keeping illegal biological weapons laboratories open there and not telling anyone, it was about installing nuclear weapons technology, and it was about procuring 'regime change' in Russia, fomenting trouble in order to 'justify' the existence of NATO and therewith have the participating countries pay America money to have NATO at all.
Human beings, and elves too - it is never what they are, but what they will be.
A Perfect Vision of a Just Future is that Russia does its own thing, Ukraine its own thing, and neither of them are armed with nuclear weapons and neither has any desire or need to possess such things at all.
Well that's quite easy to achieve, but it depends on people having intellectual access to the Future, to the Conception of Justice For All as a vision. And this is a heavenly vision. But then, that's the point. Without that vision you become Evil. And then you have plenty of justifications, but never actual Justice.
Well hopefully so far, we have taken people into a perceptual existential acceptance of an invisible but powerful reality, namely, the warp and weft of the Past and the Future, into the Fabric of the Now. But not just any future - as an Evil personality like McCain or Fauci will propose namely, one that benefits them ahead of others - but one that is materially, existentially, actually and truly Just: where you stand on the podium not just Fauci or McCain, and you, say what you want.
And the other people actually hear you and listen to you.
Now if you imagine that we are all stuck in the Earth's reality, and deal only with 'visions' and imaginary concepts, and thoughts alone, and so that 'remote viewing' is the only thing and itself is some vague or pseudo-hallucinogenic procedural outcome that CIA people messing with LSD and other substances and techniques have decided is the real enough deal...
...and therefore it is what 'witchcraft' could be or is and was but was not yet explained as it is now by modern science - well then you are wrong.
I think I left enough out so that not too many people get into too much hot water with all of this.
There are great and treacherous, dangerous powers in this world. It is not safe here.
That's this guy the Fahnenjunker auf der Bundeswehr, und Reichsfuhrer auf der Nazi SS.
Fun and games youngster.
That's it.
1900 - 1945.
Bit down on a cyanide pill and died. And that was the end of the fun and games.
Well anyway, long before he suicided, and when the fun and games were only really just beginning to get into full swing, he compiled this work on the treatment of people who lived their traditional cultures, and specifically, he went looking into how the English had been treating witches.
Red, and velvet - very favorite colors and substances of witches. This is PureDistance 'Rubikona.'
This compilation of records and accounts was called 'Die Hexenkartothek' aka the 'investigation into witch trials' - with a view to establishing that the Catholic Church vos zeeking to eliminate the German heritage und zpezifikally Aryan womanhood.
Vich it prolly vos.
Today's conception of even what a witch is, is riddled with a whole bunch of historical documents and writings all blended up into a nice little gluten-free syrup via the wonder-workings of Hollywood screen-writers.
Julius Caesar, whose accounts of various peoples and places I have a completely high regard for, observed that the English druids seemed to follow a practice whereby after a while, they required the sacrificial death of the chief druid, and his secretaries wrote quite a bit on the Gallic and English druids. There is a lot of connection between British Isles traditional stories and French ones. In fact, Merlin is supposed to be 'buried' in the Broceliande Forest aka the Paimpont Forest in Brittany.
Ah. Now. Here we come into the mischief of mixed up pop cultural ideas.
Because for one thing, 'Merlin the magician,' was not a magician, but a witch.
There are very few witches, even in popular culture that you know about.
What you know about - that is, if you are not already especially learned in this area - are names and figures and identities and stories and so on, that involve weird and mysterious things and that have been caught up in a coverall and usually false nomenclature of 'witch' and of 'witchcraft.'
The whole story about 'covens' is nonsense.
This is to keep your feet on the ground here! Well, you know - it's late at night, you're reading all of this stuff about witches! You might be a millie and get all anxious. Unless you're a glowie... Even so, pizza is pizza, right?! I mean, come on.
What you should understand about what you have heard, is that - everything is right, and everything is wrong.
Yes the terms you have heard and been told about are mostly all correct, but no, they are not about what you have been told they are about.
I mean, let's step away though, from all of this modern Wicca stuff; that is not what I am talking about.
I am talking about a 'witch.'
An actual witch. Not a pretend one. Or a made up one.
Some wags on Quora rightly pose the question, look, if witches are not humans, then just looking at their DNA would prove it but no one has ever been able to show that!
But witches are not humans. They are cambions.
And this means they move between - like a cam-shaft - the world we see and know, and another one in which you require to have a totally different type of material body to even exist there.
Witches will consistently have one or both natural human parents missing and they cannot die - and so, they do not actually 'reproduce' like humans and they seldom are married therefore. That is to say they cannot and do not proceed along this usual way that all humans go, of having children and passing on their estates when they expire and their souls being extracted or 'disappeared' and lost or evaporated or thrown back into a blender or whatever the Jewish mystical scholars prognosticate.
Here we can meet another matter, the reason why the Greek gods generally really disliked the kind of sorcery that involved the killing of living things (fauxi; harvesting their blood with a sickle), in order to take their disturbed or confused souls and cause them to inhabit unsuspecting humans for some purpose.
We actually see an example of it in the Gospel account of the herd of pigs. You see, this is the 'closing' of an earlier story: the person possessed by a whole lot of demons, well, had to have had those 'demons' come from somewhere beforehand, and that would likely have been from satanic magic or black magic ritual slaughtered pigs; which is why Jesus sent them back into where they were more appropriately 'housed,' which was in the herd of pigs round there, who then cast themselves into the sea in order to 're-boot' the en-souling of a bunch of materially existing, living pigs so that each individual little piggy had the right level of piggy 'soul' going on with it.
And this is not to confuse 'spirit' with 'soul' here. We're still talking a whole complete 'structure' and not some power capacity.
I'm not going to show you witches, but I am going to show you people who are around them, real ones; close to them. That's Carlos - he passed away sadly, last year - and Cecile Zarokian. Cecile made Rubikona.
So why did the churches and the state around Europe and in America pursue 'witches' and kill them or torture them?
Well obviously, and we all can acknowledge this, this was a 'brand battle' between systems of beliefs and rituals.
See but it's 'only' about beliefs, not about science - as in, real knowledge.
There are three levels of knowledge about numinous things, or you could say, numinous 'realities:'
1. acknowledging the existential reality of something, or some one, a god;
2. experiencing the existential presence of that thing, or that being;
3. the real existential power, of that being or thing or person.
A: Jesus is God;
Experience His real presence in the bread and the wine;
? (Churches - Believe and follow, or else I will kill you).
B. Allah is God;
Experience the Holy Quran of Allah;
? (Jihadis - Believe or else I will kill you).
Even C. JVHV is God;
Experience 'the Glory' as it passes by and burns fire on the mountain;
? (Take you wandering lost through a desert 40 years, feed you snakes, kill you).
A 'witch' by actual definition is a supernatural being. And I have said they are not humans at all, but some other species.
However that also means one has to feed them through the 3-point filter as above. And this is rare in historical narratives, actually.
You see (and I'm sure you completely do see!), if it were really true that some 'witch hunter' had even captured a real genuine witch, then they would have to explain how come they had power over that witch so that they could capture it and hold it.
This was easy of course, because, as with any 'false flag' or straw man or 'false positive' you can say just about anything about it and your power over it since the thing is, well, false and not the real thing to begin with, with any powers or characteristics.
Ah. Tea.
You could produce a cure for a disease, for instance, and if the disease were not real in the first place, well, who could say you were wrong about your cure?
Mullah Nasruddin already demonstrated this, with his experiment of the bread crumbs and the suburban garden tigers. Bread crumbs scare away tigers. This is a scientific fact. I heard it myself from Richard Dawkins. Who confirmed the Arab's earlier experimentation.
From this we can see that sc-ience, is so true...
Whereas witches do not exist.
And Quora says so.
The mixing up of druids and magicians and sorcerers - especially with shamanic individuals, gives us today's wrong ideas about who and what witches are and what their rituals and practices are.
'Coven' simply means 'meeting' it doesn't imply an on-going group of people.
Shakespeare gets it right here with his Scottish play rendering, and he even gets the numbers right:
"When shall we three meet again?
In thunder, lightning, or in rain?"
Act 1, Scene 1. That play. That one.
The main reason for 'witch hunts' simply has to be the contest for brand supremacy.
'A' reason could be, or might be, because someone in power wanted to head off another person who had the power to harm them from a distance, unseen, and unobserved; in the shadows. But presuming the worried person was not in fact, crazy, then this would equivalently presume that such persons - as in say, them being real witches - actually possessed such powers. Which they do not, because in first place science and Quora say that no such people even exist.
As a human, you want to get together with some other person, start a family, and leave a thriving estate.
When two humans get together, what you will find is that they nod in agreement with each other if they want to get on, or they fight and argue if they couldn't care less.
Neither party is preparing concerning what it is they are going to proffer to the other party, so that the discussions are over new and very well-considered things, with the prospect of further active thinking and objective debate...
Those whose occupation it is, to conduct such deep inquiries and carry out the subsequent formulations of positions, do not take kindly to the presence nearby of time-wasters or those unable to add positively and beneficially to the demanding efforts.
Can a human being become a witch?
My grandfather's sisters actually owned this place, before WWII. This actual place.
If they physically went through some changes then yes.
Human children go to schools, where they are obliged to 'learn' either social compliancy or some kinds of 'science' nonsense, which is simply the current standing of particular knowledge at the given time. But then after that bout of 'learning' they get together, generally in intimate pairs, and nod in absolute and total superficial agreement, neither one caring about whether a thing is really true or not, so long as they get from the other what they want.
So humans never attain 'Wisdom.' Consequently they can never be 'witches' - who are wise individuals. Human children start off with the potential for Wisdom, and when that potential is very high in them, they can become 'swapped' as into one of these so-called changelings: cambions.
These phrases like 'drawing down the Moon,' these are all true but you will not ever see their proper explanation anywhere.
-04.png)
