Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Sunday, 1 February 2026

The Great Sign Of 12 Stars

Who is the woman with twelve stars as a crown on her head? In Revelation.

Doesn't matter.

What matters is that the Greek word in that passage is 'asteron.'

And that is the same word found in descriptions of 'something that comes down from the skies,' which alights upon the heads of various individuals.

Cold in the New York
canyons right now.

And that 'something' is certainly not 'a dove.'

In the more obscure parts of the works of Plato (LOL; they're all obscure to the modern mind), there is this idea that somewhere 'out there,' dunno where exactly, maybe not even in the physical Universe as such, there is like a hall, in which there are arrayed a number of Eternal, Constants - mathematical things, geometrical things, and other things we do not easily know about, in which the principle of actual life, rests (relies on to exist materially).

Although those physically living beings who embody these particular Constants most nearly, are generally called by men 'gods,' they are themselves wholly materially tied to the unchanging real things in the hall.

To all of us who reside on this fairly modest and somewhat primitive planet below, we have no generally obtaining knowledge of any civilizations that use regeneration tubes in low-gravity space, or that can precisely modify genes even to that extent of creating exact facial representations of individuals, and thus persist as one single line of beings endlessly on and on through many normal profile life-times.

But one way in which Plato has given ordinary human people, to see and to understand about the power of what is in the transcendent hall -, is that any endeavor of a human being is destined to fall short and fall into obscurity itself, if it has no share in the most important of the elements in that unusual hall. 

Future canyons,
future crime-solver.


We ourselves know that almost all of the people we will ever encounter in the natural way, falls short of what we secretly and inwardly hold to be ideal; an ideal representation of what a friend, what a lover, what a leader, what a parent and so on ought to be (as in, as such a thing is held in our mind).

We even hold expectations about ourselves that we can seldom rely on our own selves to deliver.

The standard way of religions is that people pray - they ask and expect, often without actual real delivery, for things.

Even if we say we want for say, health -, it is still a material state consisting of various things.

We when find that we are attracted to someone - to what they do, how they appear and behave - in fact it will be for that 'someone' only in a specific time-frame of their lives.

'Socrates in sickness and Socrates in health, is still the same Socrates,' so the Platonic text goes.

But there are so many notable figures of your own life, of your own personal experience, who are utterly unrecognizable in old age, for instance, compared to how even the world fawned over them in their youth. (This too, is said many times in passages of Plato).

Nothing changes...


Although it is true some people age like fine wine, not many do...

The naive nature of a young actress for example, is charming in its own way, when they are outspoken in their youth - and perfectly absurd in their old age, when they must rely only on logic and reasoning and the soundness of their arguments and not on their looks anymore.

Which are after all, the things people are most easily attracted to, viscerally. Their looks.

Because those are certainly more persuasive in the instant to most of us, than cold logic alone.

We will give the good-looking person's foolish ideas a chance when we would not do so for the words alone.

And because people can be incredibly complex, there are a tiny few who combined good looks and good ideas. These are the Divinely Persuasive.

And yet even Jesus Christ uses the word 'persuade' although He employs that compound idea of Divine Persuasion (who is Herself a God too: Peitho).

How many turn their minds to the ineffable hall, and search around in there to find the Divine Spirit that makes one Persuasive, Attractive, Convincing?

According to those early passages about David, it takes around thirty minutes to have an earnest Divine Seeking, answered in the Positive. Or let's even say, in the Affirmative; which is a better way of rendering it.

One cannot seek to persuade the Divine, by some miscreant or misplaced or underhanded or false or errant approach or request or even, demand.

Thompson House,
the silk place in Bangkok.
Nothing changes...


First we understand what is Divine, and then we move towards it, and then it is attached to one, and then all of our actions afterward are acclaimed and felt, viscerally, without ever being comprehended logically or 'rationally' or in a cold reasoned way.

Of course there is the largest proportion of the population that does not understand what 'the Divine' is or even whether such things exist at all, supposing them most probably to be likely just the speculations of suggestible people and fantasies.

This huge proportion has no visceral emotional experience of a triangle, for argument's sake.

And when they love, they understand such things in terms of chemicals and biology - which is a term they invented to misdirect away from knowledge about life; which they have no knowledge of.

Somehow they yet know that a single-cell amoeba suddenly because of the Soritetic fallacy of the lengthy time horizon - somewhere in that dark shadowy unseen distance over the visible horizon-line -  turned into a three-phase set of complex interrelated proteins called organic DNA, with one particular set of different proteins requiring different DNA being able to find its way along one strand only, of the double-helix, in order to repair or replicate the actual physical shape animal's (or plant's) DNA; which is a different DNA protein to the body shape and living labeled animal function DNA.

In another Galaxy
an orange creamsicle still
sells.



And this is not the same as saying 'God invented the World in 6 Days, 6 thousand years ago' because He certainly did not.

God, is the Cosmic 'World.' In the sense that the material existence is a total absolute composition of the Mathematical and Geometrical Ideals in their complex related Motion of Matter Components.

But 'Motion' itself as an Ideal is far from random.

As a dot or a line or a line segment is an element of Maths, Continuous Motion is an element of Hyper-Maths. It's a discrete concept on its own. We just don't tend to think of it as that.

And Consciousness is also a discrete concept on its own...

We just are not allowed to think of it as that by the mechanical and mechanistic non-Conscious forces that want to keep you down and maintain their ruler-ship over you.

As soon as you realize that Hyper-Maths and Consciousness are the same, you can start to feel the Forces of Attraction and Repelling as they truly are and not as artificial society inures you to believe. 

You are, living in an Artificial Society.

It is not your society.

It is their fabricated construction inside of which they wish to have you placed, in order to use you.

Unless they can use you, they cannot exist for any length.

'Consciousness' is the directly-linked relationship between a unit Mind and the Cosmos which is also 'Mind.' But the Cosmos is Eternal by any meaningful interpretation.

Single-cell amoeba
evolved to invent this, see...
Don't ever forget that.
Don't forget that the
'System' wants to sell you on
this insanity.

'Anti-Consciousness' is the opposite of that: unit mentalities that are not linked with the Cosmos and the other units of Mind.

They are mechanical in that they act and move in accord with physics, but they are not actually conscious yet they do have personal sensation because organic bodies have chemical sensation; this personal sensation and sensibility they construe as (their) consciousness. But it is not true consciousness.

They are rules-based necessarily because they cannot be empathy-based. 

There is such a thing as 'the Force,' and you can use it, not them.

Because the human race is not advanced enough to perceive the phases when an individual is in the Field Effect of the Cosmic Force (and therefore real and permanent), it is not a good idea for advanced civilizations to come here, 'uncloak,' as it were, and offer technology widely or liberally to the whole span of 'human' creatures that are here.

But these 'Orbs' that people are seeing, are indicative -, of something... going on.

Though not for everyone, I'm afraid. (Just a turn of speech; I am not really afraid and nor am I entirely displeased about it).

Nice piano starts around 2:50 in. You can solve mysteries to it.



21 comments:

  1. Hey Old$ I’m still reading here even if my commenting has been non existent. Will take me a few goes at this post and will still probably not understand. I stink at math, everything shuts down above simple arithmetic
    Anyway thought I should say hi and mention how weird I was deleting old screenshots off my phone and found some of your old amoeba Reddit posts, lol
    Anyway I’m off to listen to JE for the first time in an interview with Bannon newly released (leaked) on YT. See for myself why people held court with him outside of what he is accused of

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I mean the big question is - why INDEED were people holding court with him at all... (REDDIT is a highly troubled and problematic place IMO lol).

      Delete
    2. Maybe I should explain that better: all politicians that I know of are not smart enough to be in his company at all. Great heads-up, 113M. That interview is required viewing by anyone and everyone who regularly comes here. ...I'll lay my cards on the table - I don't see how I am not JE. Except that I am not as humble as he is, and I do have some of the answers that he puts down to 'the Dark Matter of Life.' Although I think he probably does as well and is, well, too humble to say out loud. What we are doing here is sticking our hands or at least just one tentative hand at a time, into that 'Dark Matter of Life.'

      Delete
    3. Do I have a billion or more dollars? Well, as I tell the rich Chinese kids who ask me about the 'old days' in the Markets - 'All of those who were there around me and had far bigger profiles and apparently, more money, are all dead, went to jail, left the country, went bankrupt and mn, ARE actually all dead now. And I am not and never went through any of those other things.'

      Delete
    4. Recognising that the interview was designed to show the public another side of JE I’m not sure I got much insight other than his passions are finance and mathematical complexity as pertains to complex systems such as the financial world and what is considered life, I guess.
      He didn’t like being asked if his money was dirty even though he responded that it wasn’t and was earned legally. I’m not convinced he was truthful as when pressed about using dirty money to fund polio vaccination he turned the question into whether it mattered where the money came from to those mothers that now had vaccinated children. Though it sounded altruistic it had me wondering whether charity of this sort is used as part of a financial/political deal or some way of balancing the good with the bad in their minds.
      He tells us that a banana is alive but dodges the consciousness question. He doesn’t like labels. I guess he’s interested in what is life but he doesn’t say anything that gives me insight into the value he places on it.
      I also feel that he didn’t like being asked about whether he questioned how he got himself to the point of being incarcerated. He said that it was merely interesting - another side of the same coin.
      He didn’t like being asked if he was the devil incarnate. He scratches the back of his neck. It made him uncomfortable. Maybe it’s a question he hasn’t answered for himself, whether he considers himself the bad guy.
      Again it’s a PR interview and his responses were simplified I guess for the viewing public. His descriptions of physics, complexity etc were pretty basic - butterfly flaps it’s wings, see this table is solid, as examples. I didn’t witness genius I guess I’m saying.
      But why were people holding court with him? My guess is that it was for advice (financial), charity or having an interest in the same complexities of life.
      We may never know the full story of how JE came to be the billionaire he was, how involved he was in international affairs, who shaped him, who his bosses were. Maybe W.Webb research is as close as we get to the story. I still get the feeling that he was working against humanity and for the interests of a subset of people who are the same.
      If he really was a genius then it’s a shame we didn’t get to see the best of his mind raising all boats as they say. Also I realise I keep past tensing things but I don’t think he took his own life.

      Now please tell us about dark matter Old$ (please don’t say neutrinos I’m dumb remember)

      Delete
    5. I don't think he's a genius. I noticed the same things that you did. He is interested in key things but he doesn't seem to have any real advanced insights into any of them. Also, Bannon is either not a great interviewer or he is deliberately cutting Epstein off on certain subjects. Epstein referenced Soros and the UK Pound Affair (which is early on in his career) and also they both raised BCCI (which is bin Laden and associated parties) - but on both occasions Epstein was cut off from talking about the matters more deeply. For all the media-portrayed 'concern' about his dirty money sources, no one ever seems to say WHO were his actual 'dirty money clients' and why are none of them ever featured in any of these 'Epstein Files?' Wexner cannot be seriously considered 'dirty money.' David Rockefeller is not a candidate either here. Epstein is clearly a CIA asset. Hence he is the front end of 'entrapment' of foreign and high-placed figures. And so, for that matter, is Bannon albeit he is on the other side to the Brennan/Obama/Harvard-Yale Academia faction.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. But he definitely is a lot smarter than people have credited and he says and does things that suggest to me he has extremely good organizational skills -, with people. He can also 'get in' and he can stay at the table. He is 100% CIA. The style and the training is obvious. But it is 'high end' too though. The 'street people' (field operatives) there are different.

      Delete
    8. All of these kinds of questions are only able to be 'answered' in human terms (present human society and science) from the standpoint of the 'conventions' we apply to phenomena. These things are in any case, matters of 'phenomenology;' by which is meant that 'light' is emitted whenever a 'source' hits another particle: not that 'photons' actually travel materially. So, because matter gets close to Light Speed at the PHENOMENON of a Dark Hole, the 'light' which appears from any of such particles 'freezes' (slows right down) because the particles themselves are approaching the speed of light. And that is why the regions appear 'dark(ish).' They have some lengths of energy that are emitted. The Material Universe is a phenomenon obeying a system of conventions. It is not either 'a' thing nor a bunch of individual things - it is a system of rules that happen (phenomena). That is all. 'Black Holes' are not special. They are part of the phenomenon of rules and systems. They 'behave' in a certain way according to the rules of THE Phenomenon. They are not a 'process' in the sense that simply because matter goes into them and adds to the density, something else happens on the end of an equation. Same as photons are not 'things' in a process; they are phenomena obeying rules and conventions. The only 'things' that are real - ARE the rules and the principles: geometry, number, boundary state conditions, succession (linearity, circularity, chirality) aka 'motion.' The only thing that 'science' ever does or ever can do, is make observations about the interactions and then apply conventions to them (rules). Science does not explain WHAT;' only that and how/when/sort of 'where.'

      Delete
    9. So not a genius but well trained. Bannon seemed to think financial genius at least. Ignoring the insider connections I guess or not knowing how to ask? Me, I would be like why, who, why, where.
      I got the sense of him being well organised as well. An infiltrator, networker and facilitator. What ideas were being fostered amongst his elite friends I wonder at all those edgy dinners. Now that would be interesting to know. But not really.
      I’ve decided that I don’t want to uncover or participate in the they whatever they are society. I really just want to connect to the Cosmic mind and have a fun and beautiful life before it runs out (and knowing where the eff I move to when the lights go out iykwim)

      Delete
    10. Not saying that the edgy dinners wouldn’t be fun mind you
      https://web.archive.org/web/20151008065140/https://www.edge.org/event/the-edge-billionaires-dinner-2004

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. If you were humble you wouldn’t be you though right. Same as if I understood math I wouldn’t be me. Hahaha

      Delete
  3. "Who is the woman with twelve stars as a crown on her head? In Revelation."

    I'm still very interested in this "unknown" Goddess.

    ReplyDelete
  4. TheDeathOfClassicalPaganism5 February 2026 at 07:23

    Who is the "Woman with 12 Stars"?

    I nominate Chappell Roan.

    Although she is a bit vapid - but she has the right *look*.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought maybe Sophia because she is the counterpart of Jesus in Gnosticism and also because if she seemingly represents the earth then she sits between the sun and the moon? It’s all riddles to me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd really like to know more about Sophia.

      Delete
    2. Hey euterpe nice to see you. Hope this year is treating you well already.
      I’d really like to know more about Sophia too

      Delete
    3. Thanks eleven, I'm having a tough few months mental health-wise. Pushing on though.

      A copy of the Chaldean Oracles, Ruth Majercik translation, came in the mail this morning. I'm reading the introduction now, just read "...in the underworld of Platonism, abstract philosophical speculation gives way at this point to mythic formulations and a complex proliferation of cosmic entities is introduced, with a dominant female principle, in each case, operating at all levels and directly responsible for material creation as we know it. In certain Gnostic systems, for example, she is Ennoia or Sophia; in the Chaldean system, Dynamis or Hecate; in the Hermetica, Life or Nature. Despite the abstract quality of most of these names, a definite personal function is assigned to each: the Gnostic Sophia experiences feelings of grief and fear, she gives birth to the Demiurge, Ialdabaoth; the Chaldean Hecate generates life from her right hip; the Hermetic Nature entices and unites with the primal Anthropos." It continues on. Anyway, I'm excited about this book.

      Delete
    4. I’m wishing you all the best euterpe, projecting easy times for you
      A lot of Gnostic Sophia has been appearing on my YT feed lately which is probably why I thought of her in answer to Old$ question.
      One thing I saw asked the question what if the fall of Sophia was not an accident but part of the divine plan. And that our journey here mirrors that of Sophia from forgetfulness to remembering the awareness within us.
      Im excited to hear more about your book and the other topics they cover in addition to Sophia.

      Delete

Your considered comments are welcome