What You're (Really) Dealing With

Regardless of whether you have already found some access (maybe via one or two of the text documents from here) to the basic conceptual structures of what the people involved for instance, with Steven M. Greer, and also Chris Bledsoe too and similar people with some public profile, are doing -, whether you get your hands on such things and more details maybe, quite soon, the full meaning of what is going on and how it all works and especially too, what you are up against, will only very likely slowly creep up on you in your direct conscious awareness.

You see there's so much entailed in the whole thing.

Ethiopians doing Christmas
drumming.
Is haram
Because it's 'Christmas' stuff.
Drumming is not haram: 'duff duff duff.'
Christmas is haram because it is
pagan and polytheistic: venerating
Three Wise Men from the East,
cows, sheep, lobsters (the Nativity Lobster;
you've heard, right...) Talking Stars,
shepherds, Mary (the Goddess), and
Jupiter and His Son, the Child Bacchus
who dies and resurrects and so on.

And I have always considered it quite wrong to just throw stuff onto the table for simply everyone to 'acquire agency' (joking! but it's still kind of appropriate here).

There are many important reasons why not to go about things that way, but one of the most significant ones is that 'people' are already so far gone, so broken psychologically, that no amount of 'fact and evidence' will change the basic way they approach anything.

Let me give you an example.

Earlier today I was party to a discussion between quite elderly military people, you could even say they were retired or only in capacity as senior advisers of a very mission non-critical sort...

And one of them literally started out by saying there was not any evidence of these UFO's that other, currently-serving members of the Military were saying required to be formally reported to the public on (this mind you, despite that he, the old guy, actually has been briefed that there was a ton of evidence!) but then he qualified what he had said by talking about 'as in silver space ships just landing in front of them right then...'

Within I would say, oh, three minutes of the opening of the 'discussion,' the whole thing turned into a shouting match between two old guys, the first guy I just mentioned and another who was known as quite aggressive and in-your-face at the best of times.

There was shouting, continuous, repetitive insults ('were you on your way to your mother's?' That kind of thing, plus a few swear words here and there), from both sides and what do you think they were actually 'arguing' about...?

Would you believe it was Hitler. I kid you not. One of them just almost casually mentioned the name apropos of I don't even remember - it certainly wasn't significant - and the other began to give a lecture on the merits of Hitler, which was met with loud counter-statements (I could not, to be frank, actually see what they were arguing about - as in, what exact point...) and the lecturing guy said 'you are uneducated -.' To the other old guy.

I was here Friday.
'Raw concrete architecture.'
This place has a stunning new
and modern hotel
built around a restored
'Federation' hotel.
In Perth.
That's real Chanel Chinoiserie
wallpaper you can see inside,
btw...
REAL!

Now seriously what does 'Hitler' have to do with current information on the need to reveal relevant-to-the-public facts about formal government knowledge of UAP/NHI?

By the way, to make things clear, this was a 'meet-up' of policy advisers, right... So it's a political thing. 

I'm watching via a Zoom-type call situation. Kind of. Not 'Zoom' the commercial brand system.

Anyway...

Who -, if anyone had any relevant formally-archived official facts and therefore 'knowledge' would impart to any of these kinds of idiots, information about any of it at all?

Not me, that's for sure.

Clif High, and he ought to be at least slightly known to everyone -, is one of the main individuals who have referred to various 'strange things/sightings' that happened during the Vietnam War, to US serving, I believe in his story's case, helicopter crew. I don't think it happened though to him, but to his father from whom he got the accounts.

I know in a first-hand context myself though, that what alerted the senior commanders to 'something potentially going on that had to be looked at,' was that the C135e signals and communications operators had been literally first 'seeing' (which at first was thought to be them on drugs or just so 'zonked-out' flying high altitudes for so long, nights) 'things flying around' and then having their instruments record those 'things' though.

...And only then, when the helicopter gun-crews started reporting similar things, did it become something way too difficult to just ignore.

Here's the point for you, though, with all of this:

Sooner or later some of you are going to 'come to the surface having had experiences.'

And then after that you will not simply have had experiences though, but you will develop capacities.

And with those capacities you will be able to see the same things the radar and radio and instrument operators in C135e's and KC135E's, saw during the Vietnam War operations, and you will at that point realize how many of the 'opposition' is out there, and just how few of the others there is.

And then, you too will be stuck also with a lot of disquiet about how the usual human's mind carries on...

The reality is that most people are incredibly assertive about what they think they 'know.'

And you cannot change them in being that way.

Pantone 'Color of the Year.'
That drove 'em all 
completely nuts.
Was 'white-man' - 'toxic white-man
patriarchy oppressor -,' white.
LOL

The silver flying saucer can have landed on the ground right in front of their eyes - and they will literally still find a way to get into a fight about...

...Hitler. Or something; anything.

The one totally crucial thing of all time will have happened, and it will have happened or be happening right in front of their eyes, and they will literally not give a damn in terms of clearing the page and starting to behave with some kind of decency and objectivity, but they will literally find the most absurd ways to 'prove' that they were 'right' all along.

Richard Dawkins will do it. Neil DeGrasse Tyson will do it. Michio Kaku will do it.

Absolutely none of them, as in not a single one, will just stand back and say to themselves and to you, more importantly - 'well F* me, I did not know TF what I was talking about at any single point whatsoever.'

And the rest of that inward conversation should go: 'and what gives me the right now to talk at all?? I am embarrassed at what a stubborn self-opinionated fool I was.'

Oh no, they will not say that though. Because five seconds after the 'mind challenge,' they will tell themselves 'but the sci-ence, the sci-ence; I was only following the science...'

Yes. As the Nazis said after they were caught and lined up to be shot: 'I was only following orders.'

The poor guy is
all alone.

See some of you will have heard of the black man Ronald Mallett, the physicist, because I have mentioned him here a few times way back and you may know him anyway from your own reading.

But the public knows 'Neil DeGrasse Tyson' and they have never heard of Ronald Mallet, and they never will do.

And that's even regardless of whatever happens going forward now.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson and his backers, will want to insinuate themselves ahead of real scientists, even after all the cards have fallen and they are shown to be liars and frauds and thieves.

So. I think... regardless of how much real knowledge and facts and evidence and information and data and any other BS word you want to throw into the mix -, it might be wiser to just SU about some things and move forwardly quietly through the tall grass.

So yeah, 200 'bullets.' And a lot of bastards.

We move ahead slowly, and cautiously, and quietly.

Will 'things happen?' Oh yes things will happen.

Don't you worry 'bout that, my son (daughter/friend/sister/brother'ancient Alien Hybrid Human LOL). Oi Oi.