...To go into certain matters more deeply. To bring our often winding-way discussions down to a more grounded spot; not just to make things more clearly 'down-to-earth,' but have us arrive at a completely practical set of intellectual tools and understandings.
[This will contain the subject of 'Azazel' later on in here down the page].
It is rare that I refer to someone specific in the general external media -, though I must add that here I mean what we can find on the basic platforms like YouTube, rather than on legacy television media sources albeit this particular gentleman has been interviewed by Dr Phil.
I am talking about the military field propaganda officer Chase Hughes.
Contemporary 'classic' sports car design. |
Now you can spend a lot of time going over a tremendous amount of material made by Mr Hughes but I would suggest simply taking some time - and it will be virtually over two hours or more although you need merely scan through the video and focus on the key parts to cut how much time is required to get the lessons to be had there - to watch the recent discussion with interviewer Leon Hendrix: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJdjCy35Hww&list=LL&index=7&t=2185s
Leon is a young man and not by any stretch some kind of austere and experienced interviewer, but he is all that is required for someone like Chase Hughes to cover vital territory and do it almost by using Leon Hendrix himself with his minor insecurities, as the test case subject.
At some relatively early point in this particular interview, you might start to realize or at least gather an appreciation, that if you are in any sort of encounter with for example, a literal advanced ET Alien person, the basis of the verbal communication involved even if it proceeds like ordinary speech of the kind that we humans use in common daily society regularly - will have just so many signals available to the truly super-advanced and pre-planned individual there and that we would be best served if we by the same token were properly guided and had planned ahead.
I move to the esoteric and rare subject of this figure known as 'Azazel' now, but place the discussion firmly in terms of a modern intellectual framework.
So I think when we look back at myth narratives from the past we almost by default just accept the stories themselves as having a certain narrative integrity at least - that in fact they may not really have in terms of actual history...
'Azazel' is typically spoken about in Jewish folklore and also in some of the esoteric traditions such as the Kabbalah, as something to do with the sacrifice of a goat that is led out into the desert and let loose to go who-knows-where although the hypothesis is that it is being sent to this possibly malevolent 'angel' called 'Azazel.'
In the deeper Zohar teachings, a lot rests on the esoteric meaning of the letter 'Zain' ('Z').
This is indicative of a force that is like what the letter 'S' also represents, but is cutting, jagged, super-fast, like lightning - and all of the folkloric traditions say the 'angel' being is brilliant and blinding like a hot desert sun or like the super-bright rising sun in the stark and waterless desert.
Azazel is held to be very powerful, whereas frankly, none of the so-called 'Fallen Angels' under their commander Semyaza, is necessarily quite all that particularly powerful in the whole scheme of things.
Because of the fact that the dangers of the desert are deadly, the folklore ended up to the effect that 'Azazel' is an, or even the, Angel of Death.
Actually what I am trying to assert here, is that it is not valuable to go around worrying or even caring that this or that being is powerful, or at least more powerful than any of us.
By getting the point of what Chase Hughes is saying, we will see that it is actually much more important that we know how to be 'the same powerful' psychologically, if not materially and physically and in terms also of practical technology and so on.
There is nobody coming here 'from the stars' that is a negative or an evil being as such - no such beings exist in any successful form of society and civilization able to reach to here by planned journey or by intentional design.
Ergo, there is no 'Azazel' who is either an Alien being, or what the past scriptural authors construed as 'from the heavens/from heaven/from the heavenly stars' - either here or coming.
There was and still is however, some reality behind the idea that there were beings who took up residence high up on mountains and were thus referred to as 'of the lofty (mountain) abodes.' And this means 'zebul;' that's where the root meaning comes from.
The Zahara - it is hot and dry and there is nothing much there. It is difficult to traverse and many things die that go in there, and they never come out. |
From those high places such beings were able to 'look down' at the humans on the slopes and in the valleys and to monitor them and be 'overlords' to them.
Hughes is making the telling point that what we are in our non-public lives, leaks out subtly and gives alert people the exact description of who we really are at any given time when we are trying to relate to the other person, to 'put the best face on' for them, as it were.
Okay so maybe you will soon meet an Alien person right here in full living material reality in your 'ordinary' daily lives... But after watching Chase Hughes you will - you certainly should - take all steps to change up to be able to meet them on an equal footing.
And which you will be able to achieve.
But watching and coming to terms with what Hughes is teaching will also have you realize why they do not and will not show themselves to just anyone -, to any 'ordinary' person.
And that is because they are not evil, and will not manipulate people or take advantage of them. Humans are easily taken advantage of. That is one thing Chase Hughes very fulsomely proves even though he only does it merely through what he says alone. One way of looking at it is to say that when he speaks he is extraordinarily content-rich.
But it is time now -, that precise moment is coming very soon, when you will be ready to encounter something face-to-face, that seldom people expect to see, and that most people deny even exists and that far and way most people really think is only myth and story and ancient religious fairy tale.
Hmm interesting. I will have to watch the whole thing but in that segment you posted I got 3 ad breaks of 2 ads each, and that turns me off YouTube. I think if the next ad started “Helen Hadsell” I would’ve lost my sh!t
ReplyDeleteWhat motivates Chase to share his behavioural knowledge with the public? I mean he as his own channel even. Thx
So I watched the whole thing and enjoyed that thank you OMSF, I enjoyed this (50 million ads later because I copied the transcript)…
Delete“Hughes is making the telling point that what we are in our non-public lives, leaks out subtly and gives alert people the exact description of who we really are at any given time when we are trying to relate to the other person, to 'put the best face on' for them, as it were.”
It’s interesting because he goes on to say that our integrity should be intact both in private and in public. How we are on camera should not depart from who we are off camera. Our discipline and confidence is able to be read as authentic or fake by our behaviour, our behaviour is disciplined through conscious habit and repetition. That depending on “how much not enough I am” is whether you are able to be composed and comfortable in social situations or swing to either side of the pendulum towards postering or collapsing.
At 47:48
‘The one in the middle the difference is how much not enough am I and that's the first thing I see in other people as a Behavior profiler how much do they feel like they're not enough based on what they're doing, how they're acting, what they're wearing - all of this stuff. They feel like they're not enough and I never view that as judgment I just view that as that's going to be an obstacle to our our communication”
I think we should aim for this way of being regardless. Anyway thanks again
The McChrystal doctrine - that is retired General Stanley A. McChrystal - is that intelligence for people in the field is the same as logistics: 'to be there soonest with the mostest.' And the implications of this in today's net-connected world, is that the most important operatives and your best agents, will know what to do with the best information as long as it is also timely; aka virtually immediate. Sometimes, those agents and supporters and operatives are plainly just civilians albeit in key roles somewhere in society, or else even serving officers but they are down some other chain-of-command if you will, or on different strata to what would have been the strategic group/s on some given plan and objective. Those things being abundantly true in our modern world, it makes no sense at all to prevent good information from going to your best people, or potentially your best people but that will necessarily mean that it is widely-shared information, just that not everyone will fully comprehend it in its proper, complete context. Believe me the proper context here is that you are about to get 'invaded.' And without doubt there will also be false invasions mounted by those trying to leverage their existing control over the mind of the common broader public. The crucial thing is to be able to recognize real and genuine 'advanced people,' an advanced species as such, from the high-tech frauds that will be fashioned from the banal material currently available to the same old crowd of typical 'human overlords.'
DeleteAnd besides, although I say this with a slight touch of irony bearing in mind what Chase has to say about 'identity,' and a sense of humor that I encourage you to buy into - you are not 'the public.' lol Not anymore anyway.
DeleteI was going to make a joke along the lines of “I’ll be on the lookout” (for real genuine advanced people) but then I realised Im more like this…
Deletehow you gain composure -
@1:50:57 same video
“slow down… if I'm in that mindset I'm living behind my eyes so if I'm in true composure my experience is out here in front of my eyes but when you talk to somebody who's like insecure they have some negative self talk going on they're living back here they're living behind their eyes does that make sense… so getting your awareness out just like forcing it out in front of yourself in front of your eyes is so critically important”
Thank you. It really is all about the Z, isn't it? There is a term, I do not know if I am the first to use it or not: direct motion. Direct motion is what a conscious being with a brain does, when they cause that brain's voltage gated sodium channels to create brain waves. The action causing the emf to increase above action potential is so small, it leaves the conventional laws of causality behind. You use direct motion to manipulate a very small voltage whoch opens and closes these gates in the neurons in your brain. By using direct motion, you are literally exercising de facto will over physical material. The Z in Azazel represents direct motion. Direct motion is the most powerful force in the material world.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, the stories tell of Azazel having an altered DNA structure. This echoes the terms "stone the builder refused," and "scapegoat." Consider the 90+% of human DNA that is not used in genetic computation. Who is to say that one could not use direct motion to take control of the RNA that replicates and alters the genetic codes? You could make yourself into anything. Even a giant...
You can (alter internal organic things by using the brain) - and you regularly do; it is via the cAMP process: cyclic adenosine monophosphate, which is known as the 'secondary messenger' in the human organic system.
DeleteAs one who values "z" over "s", I have to say I found your post fascinating.
ReplyDeleteWhen the Russians started painting a "Z" on their armored vehicles, Euro-types went ape, banning the display of it. Just thought I'd mention that as a trivia item.
Engineers use "Z" to represent "impedance." More trivia!
ReplyDeleteZ-rod of the Picts
ReplyDelete