Not Growing Weary

There are so many mechanisms at work with the human being - the human's existential nature and underlying life - that in the normal mindset that most people are used to, it is nigh on impossible to quickly and easily explain what is going on, and what they ought to be thinking about and doing.

By 'existential' here I mean as it really is in every material aspect - not just the ones people presume are the things happening as well as the way they happen.

This is from Yesteryear of course but it is in
one of the shades of the palette that 
Pantone's Color Of The Year for
2024 contains:
the main color them is called
'Fuzzy Peach.' BTW, in case
you did not already know.
'Everything old is new again...'

Let me give you just one practical example:

We all think (well, mostly people think like this) that each and every human being is unique, but by far the greater delusion (or illusion created by the disordered thinking of the untrained human mind within standard ordinary society), is that people roughly all have more or less the same basic capacities and potential opportunities in terms of how their brains work and how their bodies function - for instance typically people think that if so-and-so had the same economic and material opportunities and resources, then they could achieve whatever heights anyone else could attain...

Rather than me simply gainsaying that belief, let me frame things differently (from the standard belief system and viewpoint) and then you see how it all looks afterwards.

There are many many individuals, individual examples of human beings, specific unique iterations of the human subject - who are similar in size and shape and looks; and they have shared mental/intelligence aspects, that is to say they think quite similarly in certain things. They also think very differently in certain other things.

More significantly still - not all of them have the same complex of consciousness; not the same depth, not the same potential intensity of feelings, not the same powers of memory. In short they are not at all the same despite that they might superficially look fairly similar and in fact have many similar traits and intellectual processes and favored mind tendencies.

Consciousness is a complex. 

It is not one thing alone.

And some things are just
new.

It is more like fluid dynamics - a continuous connected flow of liquid, but which flows through certain very specific channels and gates, as it were.

So imagine then, that what we have is a set of similar 'people,' that is to say, individual animated dynamical objects with some amount of consciousness but that all look if not identical then unnervingly similar.

But across the whole globe, one will speak Chinese and not any English, one will speak Romanian and not much English and no Chinese, one will speak Spanish and so on and so forth.

They don't know each other and have no internal suspicion that their doppelgangers exist.

This 'field' that I have been talking about on more than one occasion goes around, moves around very efficiently, and although when encountered in ordinary people's lives (like for example, when someone of a religious bent experiences some miracle or miraculous happening or construes things that way at some point when they are 'on a pilgrimage' or doing some austerities intended for them to 'get in touch with the Divine' and so on) it will seem to those individuals either quite random or the direct result of their intense 'prayer' or meditation, let's say...

...In fact this is just a usual phenomenon associated to the intelligent field as it naturally relates to these doppelgangers or close-to doppelgangers.

One of the 'Q's' from Star Trek,
of course.

The process is constantly testing material facts about the human specific examples that are template individuals - psychologists have traditionally called them human archetypes, but they are a creative act of the Cosmos, of the Universe - the whole of it inclusive of its never-ending linear intelligence that is very much self-aware.

Like a wave-front, this creative process is continually making new individuals.

But they are not just 'individuals' as people think about this concept (namely about the word 'individual' as it is standardly used) - they are a sine curve of greater and lesser complexes composite in the human package, and when the Cosmos thinks they are 'good enough' it assigns a 'top example,' one replete with all the elements that are considered in the Universal Maths and Scheme-Of-Things to be appropriate and useful to fill out the complex that becomes the peak individual example, the apex of its autologous (in the abstract) kind.

And here is the problem when it comes to perceiving what is going on out there - you might see one well-known personality a hundred times and on another occasion, you think you are looking at the obvious person everyone else knows... ...and that is not that person at all.

And then that person will do something and everyone will acclaim it and the actual person that is the one really constantly known by the public (say), will take the worldly benefit but they will never ever actually be able to themselves replicate what happened because it was not them who 'did it.'

The world looks on and only sees some-one aging and then dying and they see the seamless-ness of that linear life (and death) and that is all just plain standard obvious life and death stuff to them.

The number of times you have heard celebrities outright say 'I do not recall those moments when Kubrick or Vadim was filming we got that scene...'

Of course they do not recall it; it was not them.

If you think Roger Vadim and Stanley Kubrick were virtual recluses (less so with Vadim because he was using his personal fame as a marketing instrument), and that Lutens and Howard Hughes are (were) recluses because they did not like the crush - of the press and of the public - then you are mistaken.

Being 'down-to-Earth...'

They know things that most of you don't (yet) fully know and appreciate as facts.

'I tell you, for those with ears to hear, John who you call the Baptizer was Elijah and also Elijah who is to come. This is a difficult saying but it is true.' That is a Biblical Scriptural reference, as you know.

Thus Spake The Lord God Himself and you should take note of its hidden, or at least underlying meaning.

See yourself as you look at the world and all of its people, all the individuals in it, that it is as I say: there are numerous similar ones; but it is not in their sheer superficial similarity that the secret lies, but in the complexion of each one of them as to their individual internal make-up - the complex of attributes and mannerisms and styles and comforts and sensitivities, and the fact that these ascend in 'complex' values/how many - how integrated/sophisticated.

Until you get to a peak iteration, or example if you will.

That peak example is permanently in the field. 

The others are not but they can ascend into it, and they have the 'spiritual' opportunity to do that. Sometimes the field touches them and it changes them, sometimes it does not change them - if anything they regress.

The whole thing (for the human consciousness) is like something on the tops of waves - tossed about, trying to stay above the water and getting 'heady' in the froth... ...sometimes being taken under and nearly drowning, sometimes completely drowning. 

Learn how to rise to the top, and stay at the top, and completely enter the field and permanently stay there. 

You will never ever worry again about 'getting weary waiting.'