Might As Well Explain...

Okay, so I was hoping that, yes sure, we can make some money, no problem...

But I wanted to do it slowly and steadily and not shake anything around or make any waves at all.

I'm going to try and stick to that plan as much as possible but it really does look at this stage that we will be making a whole lot of money and maybe sooner than I had originally expected.

Really what I wanted to do was fly so far under the radar that not too much in the way of government-scrutinized anything would be required, at all.

That is probably not going to be so desirable in any case now.

To cut a long story short, and you all know this side of it anyway - there is far greater funding available when you have government-registered official status as some venture that can be a deductible expense to others.

So. Enough said on that already. Won't talk about it any more until something completely concrete actually happens. Will it...?

At this stage the option for it is on the table with strong government arena support in the mix.

So that's all good as far as it goes. I guess.

And to be fair, in the end it's all about the kids who benefit.

Can I keep - will I be able to keep the mainspring of everything completely hidden, and well-hidden?

Yep.

Silver Digital Dirhams will not feature anywhere and no one needs to know that anyone around this place has ever been doing anything other than just commenting - making commentary - about the stuff that the US Congress is talking about anyway.

LOL

But I've made no secret about spelling out clearly where and what and who, actual real ET Aliens are - if, someone ever came up with say, a million bucks so that I could go hide quickly afterwards!

We have plenty of natural pink salt 
down here in Australia.
And it's pinker than Himalayan pink salt!

Well, looks like those kinds of numbers are gathering and if they ever become a hard reality in a directly-controlled account somewhere that I can personally move around nimbly, then I will try and give out the information anyway, although my concept always was to hand it on to much younger people so that they would not be pushed around by the ruthless and the malicious when it comes to the ordinary human 'man-in-the-street' who gets manipulated and exploited viciously.

And to be able to get the attention of the junior set, you have to market the truth - you cannot just hand it to them; they've never seen it, and won't be able to assess or understand it and appreciate what it is and how to use it.

There we were, just happily skipping along, doing as we pleased, talking nonsense and some not so nonsensical things now and then, very occasionally...

Humans are half way between Life and Death.

I am by no means any kind of standard human you have ever encountered.

The smart thing to do is to move toward Life, and steer away from Death. Death is a real thing. 

People all think they know what Life is. They have no clue.

What is this - some kind of
Italian ice cream thing going on here?

They imagine that 'saving someone's life on the battlefield' or in the hospital or somewhere is something to do with Life.

Humans are living creatures but they are not fully Alive.

You can't 'save' the life of someone who is not even yet fully Alive. A consciousness is subsisting within a material and dynamic moving frame with biological processes in train and electro-chemical systems powered-up and neurology making cause-and-effect memories to be stored in cells. That is the status of a human being.

All that you are doing is -, and what you are being intent on 'saving' is - simply the maintaining of a certain status quo of an object not a person in truth and in the full dimensions of that being's potential complete reality.

In other words yes you can maintain a state of effective robotic activity and even then only up to point, beyond that point of course, is what you term 'death.'

And even that is mis-describing things: what you are describing is the break-down of some materially connected processes in a self-contained 'sarca.'

The tuning and the harmonics of the electro-neurological circuitry is what is truly intelligibly  'Alive.'

The future is the future...

Richard Dawkins and deGrasse Tyson are continuously intent on saying that there is no evidence for either 'God' or para-natural things like ET Aliens and so on.

But for people who claim to be scientists, and who must at least subscribe to mathematics more than just in name only, you would have thought - for such people they are indulging in extreme wild walks in probability and gambling when they then next 'conclude,' for instance, that they will not go to Hell when they 'die.' Because, as they assume -  'Hell does not exist' and so on in the long list of their presumptions.

It is an intellectual mistake to simply and rashly assume that they will not go to a literal Hell - when all the religious teachings say that they will.

Because they certainly will do.

And they are taking extreme gambler's odds against it in stubbornly insisting on not facing the essential moral intelligibility of the problem:

It's intelligibly sensible to make an investigation first, before merely assuming such things when the consequences are so great in the negative.

You'll be driving this, Bill.

These are the same people, by the way, who would jump at the notion that with the aid of a neural implant, one will be able to transfer one's consciousness out of a dying body...

See the problem is not really if or whether or not one is able to do that - the real problem is where do you wish to send your 'consciousness' if that even were a thing, and a real thing...

I am going to teach you all - and this is from literally advanced, super-advanced ET Alien knowledge and understandings - what this key, in fact essential quality of desirable environment, is and is all about.

It's about the desirability of the environment; not the putative practicability from some strained contemporary woke-y 'science' perspective of it, is.

If you promise to actually go and read this thing I will name in while here - it's not something written recently; it's from something written in the late-Nineteenth century.

Do you promise?

Because I will certainly ask questions afterwards.

And if absolutely no one reflects back the 'harmonics' then -, why it will be pointless going on too much further about that subject.