Sharing In The Field

In today's world of so many voices, and so many of them seeming to claim they are pronouncing on the factuality of various specific things - I personally lean towards resisting publicly explaining some things too categorically... 

Wikipedia is one of the worst examples of a meta-compendium: it gives explanations of things, often quite correctly, but then it follows a stylistic convention of insisting that there are or can be opposing views. Well there cannot, in the case of some matters.

The pics you have seen widely in the
media are all lies.
Front-line Russian combat soldiers
wear either all black with pull-down 
balaclavas, or, pure white and also
white with blue/gray.
There are zero front-line combatants in 
green or khaki. So what have you been
watching?

I don't really want to get into it but there is one strand of thinking that is very prevalent today, which has no conception or conscious acceptance of the fact of differentiation. 

Differentiation is an idea that is real. The human mind understands what differentiation is, and it does so because the sensory equipment that it has discriminates between various signals and orders those signals into semiotics in the brain. That is a functional existential reality of what the human brain does. So one cannot then assert 'all is one' when the brain does not itself recognize such a thing in practice. 

We live, in practice.

We do not live 'in theory' or in hypothetical realities.

And so I wish to alert the thinkers out there to the common misconception that since one particular person in the past might have observed something and then wrote about it or spoken about it, it doesn't necessarily imply that person suddenly radically disavowed all the previous frameworks - used in practice - of reality.

A good example of that is David R. Hawkins and his view that there is a field or fields, out of which phenomena emerge. He is not saying that the human senses are not real.

He did say that we had lived in a paradigm that concentrated only on 'cause and effect.'

And that is completely true.

Like this.
And also, they move very characteristically,
either they are completely still like statues,
and then move suddenly but in every case
there is one person facing to the 'outside' 
of the front-moving line of direction.
 

And yet he is still also correct in pointing to the phenomenon of fields rather than simple 'cause-and-effect' frameworks of experienced reality.

Absolutely our senses are elements of and participants in 'cause-and-effect' realities.

But underlying all of them are fields - frequencies, waves, repetitions, patterns aka fields.

We can differentiate between the various boundary condition states that we associate with our senses giving signals to the brain processing, and then some effects in our body consciousness caused literally directly from those signals. That is Muller's Law in operation. It is a well-known fact of psychiatry or at least neural psychology in the clinical arena.

Soon, there will be another one of these texts posted up on various platforms, and when you read it, things will creep up on you along the way in reading it and at some point it will be simply staggering what you will have learned in there and that is of a 'practical-application' nature. They will be like a platoon of idea Spetsnaz moving through your consciousness.

 

And you will be able to apply certain things and they will result in various effects.

But then you will also be saddened, maybe even filled with a low-level kind of grief because you will see one of the outstanding problems with human beings and especially with modern human society, and how widespread it is.

You see - and this is the object of this particular post here - people present a false extension, a projection outside of their true inner selves, and then they pretend they are going to share (recall the Vesica Piscis!) part of themselves with you...

Of course people 'idealize' the past
and make make it then some static
thing. ...Like a statue.

They do that really intending to gain something from you that they want.

They are not sharing anything of themselves at all. It's deceit. Maybe sometimes by accident they do, but only by accident and it is a tiny little bit.

But then a consequence of this kind of behavior is that their actual sentience itself merges with their own false projections and they literally lose themselves - who they really were, or once were - to a false and terminal, an ephemeral, image reality.

This is a very clear-cut and certain kind of death.

You see major celebrities do it all the time, especially at the ends of their careers, where they give interviews discussing what 'the truth was' of their experience/s with various movies or with boyfriends/husbands and producers. Well the person doing the talking is not the person who did the original performance. It is the celebrity identity, merged with the celebrity image projection.

Jesus Christ explicitly quotes a Platonic idea in The Lord's Prayer but I am not going to go into what He said and the mysterious aspect about it that is unstated in any of the texts all that openly - although it is there.

These are real ideas
tied together: they are blatantly
forceful.

The reason I'm not going to say what it is, is that Wikipedia and others, misrepresent about one of these massively important ideas of the ancient Greek philosophers - and they do this kind of thing often too - however let me just say that it is to do with reality. 

And if you remember what was just now said here at the start, people in the world today are not accepting that there are boundary state conditions that apply in reality.

A real idea is not an alone thing, it is not a simple thing, it is not a unitary thing - because all real ideas are tied together by the fact of their reality. A real idea is extremely complex! Wikipedia says 'collected together,' but that is a weak and deceptive way of saying what happens: they are not collected but come together by force and by attraction and are tied utterly.

They exist in a supreme field. 

Well -, the Supreme Field.

When you stop presenting a false projection, a mere image and constructed version of 'yourself,' two things will happen: firstly you will be resented by some, and secondly you will move into the self-attracting Universal Supreme Field.

When you read the new upcoming text, you will see in there what you can do with the real self.

And how powerful that it is.

It is powerful and it is not ephemeral. And you are not then either, ephemeral; not an ephemeral being.