Oh-kay... Here We Go.

So. Human awake-state, alert, consciousness is a function of eumelanin carrying charged ions around in neural networks. Just because someone is anesthetized it doesn't mean their breathing stops - the same way that their surface consciousness has stopped. Which implies, scientifically, that the breathing nerve systems run on a different format even though they also use charged ions to transfer information and act on afferent bio-electrical impulses. I'm just repeating scientific views that are held by reputable people in the neuroscience field.

Ancient Sanskrit Vedas (Tulsi Gabbard may be familiar with the subject here - lol) make a link between 'breathing' or at least yogic breathing, and some kind of 'supernatural' but otherwise intelligible reality. And this is consistent with current ideas from modern science up until the point of 'supernatural intelligible reality.' There is certainly a categorical difference between the charged ion flows of surface consciousness, and the ions flowing in the nervous system accounting for 'breathing.' 

I'm not aware that there is any standard acknowledged 'particular' sections of the human brain that accommodate 'memories' of any 'supernatural' experiences had when in any state such as that following say heroin ingestion or drugging and so on - or, by the same token, any state developed by some kind of transcendental yogic practice, either.

People have though, and they report, emotional feelings, or 'hallucinations' or 'visions' during those altered consciousness states.

'Breathing' neurology is a bridge between the surface conscious format of the brain's memory circuits, and the 'unconscious' or 'preternatural' consciousness intelligible 'memory circuits' elsewhere. That is a proposition I make here (it isn't really mine, but I am unable to say whose it is right now; except I think it is a correct proposition).

Which means - if we take it a step further - that an individual needs to 'connect' their ordinary normal physical brain memory systems to the 'other' external or maybe sub-particle system one, in order to have any substantial recollection of any data or information or experience they had when in some kind of unconscious state. Otherwise, you'll just have been asleep for a while and wake up later with no 'memory' of anything.

It is a scientifically researched fact, that the flight/fright physiological response can easily be induced via sound, and via electromagnetic radiation - the US military currently uses such concepts in the field. UK military research via the Tavistock Institute and certain WWII UK Army Intelligence 'Departments' are notoriously recorded as being the original source of this area of psychological subversion and whatever else you choose to call it.

So it's just plain not scientific truth or fact that there is no such thing as an external intelligible potential source of 'information' - be it false information, or true (information).

There is such a thing; we use it now to inspire fear in opponents on a battlefield.

The question here is, is there such a thing - as a complex higher-order intelligible information 'thing' somewhere out there outside of our physical human brains?

The one thing you will tend to note with a lot of 'transcendent' type 'music' or tone poems, is that people who listen to them widely say they get a feeling of 'sadness,' or maybe 'bitter happiness.' Well, this is because, as people 'go unconscious' from the normal material charged ion pathways, they experience the expected sense of loss.

And - because nobody makes the 'connection' (as I have posited, above, that they must do, or they should do) to the outside para-neural intelligible structures, the loss, is replaced by nothing they remembered or gained in the experience; it's like they were on the edge of something they 'knew' was real, ahead of them somewhere, but they did not see into the 'there.' And so all they have is the feeling of sadness. Mostly. Some people maybe accidentally move further.

Just another small point - the sum of inside angles of polyhedral shapes, does not exactly equate to musical notes ipso facto, because for one thing, any range of notes arranged by discrete frequency numbers, is dependent on the reference note - which we humans always call 'C.' Whatever we started off saying was going to be 'C' then determines what frequencies all the other notes then are. But you can, more or less decode as a language, any piece of - let's call it 'music' - as shapes and as possibly, alphabets too. I know various 'groups' have done this but I personally don't go into all these dry details and I just like music for the sake well, of just music!  

Tavistock typically spent a lot of time 'connecting' subjects with fearful feelings and ideas, and some other pretty negative states. They wasted a lot of time, in my view. So, you can hurt people with noise. So? You can damage their mental condition with sounds. Yeah, great. You can keep unwanted characters away from shop-windows with looped classical music. Great.

You can 'listen to the emotions of whales' if you are from California and you do a lot of drugs. All right.

How many people even remember Dr John C. Lilly? LOL

Trust me though, rust never sleeps.

We are up the road from all of that.

Now the following is just STEP TWO, of THREE steps - it's a rough 'brush-up.'

The five notes are: G, A, F, F lower Octave, and C.